Tarvet makes it two!
Day one at the 2025 Wimbledon Championships saw late controversy as Taylor Fritz's match was suspended due to the SW19 curfew, with Alexander Zverev (3) vs. Arthur Rinderknech also paused.
American Fritz (5) fought back from two sets down to level vs. Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard but play was called off, denying fans who stayed late a final-set decider, with Zverev one set all with Rinderknech.
Earlier, two-time champion Carlos Alcaraz progressed in five sets against Fabio Fognini, 38, on a day when several seeds were shocked, including Rune (8), Medvedev (9), Cerúndolo (16), and Tsitsipas (24).
In the women's singles, world No. 1 Aryna Sabalenka was among those to win on a scorching first day with temperatures reaching 90F (32C). Watch: BBC (UK), ESPN (U.S.); Get involved: live@theathletic.com
GO FURTHER
Taylor Fritz frustrated as Wimbledon comeback is interrupted by curfew
Tarvet 6-4, 6-4, *2-3 Riedi
It's getting even better for the British qualifier and world No. 733 Oliver Tarvet, who added the second set to his stunning first against Leandro Reidi.
Court 4 is being served a real treat here. Caoimhe O'Neill
Live scenes from the queue in Wimbledon Park. You have to be a tennis ultra fan to want to queue up in these horrendously hot conditions.
My watch says 28C (82F) but I can tell you it feels a lot hotter and the only shade people can find is under umbrellas, which are usually used around these parts to keep people dry.
There is a lot of sun cream being applied and people seem relatively calm, even though they are all currently baking in the Wimbledon sunshine.
There's also no guarantee these tennis fans will make it in today — especially those at the back — and still they brave the conditions for a chance to see the world's tennis stars. That's support.
Also making progress today is Cristina Bucşa, who beat Anca Todoni 6-4, 6-4 on Court 7.
Meanwhile, both Frances Tiafoe and Learner Tien are now two sets to the good in their first-round matches — against Elmer Møller and Nishesh Basavareddy respectively.
Two out of three U.S. players progressing there is obviously as good as it will get, so fingers crossed for Frances…
Hard not to feel sympathy for Ons Jabeur, the two-time former finalist who has just had to retire hurt against Viktoriya Tomova trailing 7-6, 2-0.
Jabeur has been such a fan favourite here, and it felt for a while as though she was destined to be a Wimbledon champion.
But injuries have really taken their toll since the second of those final defeats, a devastating loss to Markéta Vondroušová in 2023, when she was the heavy favourite.
Now aged 30 and ranked No. 59 it's hard to imagine she will scale those heights again.
GO FURTHER
Ons Jabeur retires from first-round Wimbledon match against Viktoriya Tomova Getty Images
FINAL: Vekić 6-0, 6-4 Birrell
Not that Donna Vekić was far behind. Court 15 saw 16 games and 80 minutes of action as the No. 22 seed from Croatia proved far too strong for Australia's Kimberly Birrell.
The opening bagel was at least followed by a more competitive second set.
FINAL: Svitolina 6-3, 6-1 Bondar
Elina Svitolina wins the race! She grabs the first singles win of these Wimbledon championships (ignoring qualifying, of course).
It's a straightforward win for the Ukrainian 14th seed on Court 18 against Hungary's Anna Bondar.
Møller 3-6, *2-4 Tiafoe
Things are ticking over like a dream for Frances Tiafoe, with the American dominating the first set on Court 12 — and now also a break up in the second set.
The 12th seed is only serving at 52 percent on his first serve but he is winning 84 percent of those points.
Elmer Møller's Wimbledon debut has been hard work so far, as he might have expected. Getty Images
Bonzi 7-6(2), *0-1 Medvedev
Worries for the ninth seed on No. 2 Court, as Daniil Medvedev loses the opening set tiebreak to Benjamin Bonzi.
The Frenchman deserved it too, with Medvedev pretty erratic in places so far.
The Russian has at least held his opening game of the second set. Getty Images
Elsewhere for the Brits, what a story this would be if qualifier and world No. 733 Oliver Tarvet can convert his set and a break lead over Leandro Reidi, and reach the second round.
Tarvet, the first British male qualifier since 2017, leads Reidi 6-4, 3-1 on Court 4. Getty Images
Sonay Kartal is one set from causing a mighty upset on No. 3 Court.
She was 5-2 and 5-4 down to No. 20 seed Jelena Ostapenko, who held three set points — but the Brit has come storming back to take the first set 7-5.
Ostapenko, who twisted her ankle in a warm-up event but recovered in time to make the main draw, is as animated as ever.
She'll need to find her devastating power and accurate, flat hitting to recover in this one.
The media center at Wimbledon also affords a fine view over to Court 14, where it has been a difficult start for Ons Jabeur in that match against Viktoriya Tomova.
After the flurry of early breaks, Jabeur won a 22-point game to break Tomova's serve again — but she was in tears come the end of it, and had a trainer check her vital signs before going off court for medical treatment.
It was then all breaks thereafter as the temperature continues to climb. She was locked in another long service game but managed to hold. Getty Images
Ons Jabeur has been involved in three major finals, losing all three. Two of those came here at Wimbledon, in 2022 and 2023.
The Tunisian's form has not been at that level for some time now, but she is first on Court 14 this year — up against Bulgaria's Viktoriya Tomova.
This one is currently on serve, with Jabeur about to serve at 4-5 to stay in the first set.
I say on serve. There have only been three service games that have been held in this one so far. So, six breaks in nine games. Getty Images
The other high seed in early action this morning is Elina Svitolina, with the Ukrainian 14th seed on Court 18 against Hungary's Anna Bondar.
And it's all going swimmingly so far for Svitolina, who was a semifinalist and quarterfinalist here in the last two years.
She has already won the first set 6-3, and has broken Bondar in the opening game of the second.
Maybe this will be our first singles result. The race is on… Getty Images
We've got a good bit of U.S. interest right from the start at Wimbledon here.
In fact, on Court 6 it is an all-American affair with world No. 62 Learner Tien playing the neatly ranked world No. 100, Nishesh Basavareddy.
And it's Basavareddy who has the early break of serve to lead 4-2 in the opening set.
More high profile is the sight of Frances Tiafoe getting underway on Court 12, with the 12th seed facing Elmer Møller.
The Dane made his Grand Slam debut at the French Open last month, and is now trying to win his first match at a major.
But it's Tiafoe who leads with an early break, 3-1 up as he serves in the fifth game of the first set. Getty Images
Where will we get our first win of the 2025 Wimbledon singles? My money right now is on Court 15.
That is where Donna Vekić is playing Australia's Kimberly Birrell, and the Croatian is already 4-0 up and serving to make it five in the first set, after just 20 minutes.
Good start from the 25th seed. Getty Images
Given how hot it is set to be at SW19 today, I'm already curious to know how long these wigs are going to survive.
I mean, I assume they're wigs…
Yeah, first day at any slam is always special, but especially at Wimbledon on a day like today.
It is sweltering and the outside courts are very exposed here, so the heat is going to be a big talking point on day one.
I remember that 2001 opening day — Tim Henman won 6-1, 6-1, 6-1, which was I think the first time I'd seen that scoreline. James Hansen
The view over the outside courts and across to No. 1 Court never gets old.
Perfect weather at Wimbledon this morning, ahead of what is set to be the hottest opening day of the championships on record.
It was 84 degrees Fahrenheit (29C) in 2001, but today it is set to get to at least 91F (33C).
That's hot enough to invoke the plainly named heat rule, which allows players a 10-minute break after the second set in best-of-three matches and after the third in best-of-five matches.
Players may leave the court during the break, but they may not receive coaching or medical treatment.
Clearly we should get tucking into the tennis too — because the action is underway!
Daniil Medvedev is among the first to get going, as the ninth seed prepares to tackle Benjamin Bonzi on Court 2.
He has a lot of questions for the umpire at the net too, mostly revolving around towels, balls, whether he will need a water bottle and is there still water available.
Makes you think how disorientating it must be when you begin at a tournament.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Associated Press
29 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Why is Wimbledon blaming human error for a mistake by its new electronic line-calling system?
LONDON (AP) — The All England Club, somewhat ironically, is blaming 'human error' for a glaring mistake by the electronic system that replaced human line judges this year at Wimbledon. The CEO of the club, Sally Bolton, said Monday that the ball-tracking technology was 'inadvertently deactivated' by someone for three points at Centre Court during Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova's three-set victory over Sonay Kartal a day earlier in the fourth round. On one point, a shot by Kartal clearly landed past the baseline but wasn't called out by the automated setup — called Hawk-Eye — because it had been shut off. Bolton declined to say who made the mistake or how, exactly, it occurred or whether that person would face any consequences or be re-trained. She did note that there were other people at fault: the chair umpire, Nico Helwerth, and two who should have let him know the system was temporarily down — the review official and the Hawk-Eye official. 'We didn't need to put line judges back on the court again,' Bolton said. 'We needed the system to be active.' Is Wimbledon using AI for line calls this year? Not really. But like most big tennis tournaments nowadays — the French Open is one notable exception — Wimbledon has replaced its line judges with cameras that are supposed to follow the balls on every shot to determine whether they land in or out. There are those, particularly in the British media, who keep referring to this as part of the ever-increasing creep of AI into day-to-day life, but Bolton objected to the use of that term in this case. 'The point I would want to emphasize — and perhaps contrary to some of the reporting we've seen — is it's not an artificial intelligence system. And it is electronic in the sense that the camera-tracking technology is set up to call the lines automatically, but it requires a human element to ensure that the system is functional,' Bolton said. 'So it is not AI. There are some humans involved. And in this instance, it was a human error.' What happened on the missed call at Wimbledon? Russia's Pavlyuchenkova was one point from winning a game for a 5-4 lead in the first set against Britain's Kartal on Sunday when a shot by Kartal landed long. But there was no ruling from Hawk-Eye. After a delay, Helwerth decided the point should be replayed, which Pavlyuchenkova thought showed bias toward an opponent competing in her home country. With Hawk-Eye back up and running after a delay, Kartal won that game, but Pavlyuchenkova took that set and the match. The All England Club looked into what happened and found that the line-calling system actually was off for three points before anyone noticed. The system itself worked 'optimally,' Bolton said repeatedly. 'In this instance, sadly,' she said, 'it was the human part of the operation that made a mistake.' Why was the Hawk-Eye system accidentally turned off during a match? Bolton said the system is shut down between matches — 'and the humans are the people that need to do the activating and deactivating' — and someone accidentally did so during Pavlyuchenkova vs. Kartal. Asked why, Bolton responded: 'Well, I don't know. It was a mistake, obviously. ... I wasn't sat there, so I don't know what happened.' She said Helwerth could have made a ruling himself on the controversial non-call, the way he did on the prior pair of points, but instead just decided to pause the match. 'I'm assuming,' Bolton said, 'he felt he had not seen it properly.' Pavlyuchenkova said after the match the official told her he thought the ball was out. What do players think about the use of technology at Wimbledon? Players are divided on whether there even should be electronic rulings during matches — unless it is fool-proof — or whether there should be a return to Wimbledon's old way of doing things. Since 2007 through last year, there was a combination of the human touch and technology: There were line judges on court to make calls, but players were allowed to challenge and ask for a video reply of a point if they thought there was a mistake. 'It's such a big match, big event,' Pavlyuchenkova said. 'Since we have already automatic line-calling and so much invested into this, we should probably look into something else to have better decisions.' ___ Associated Press writer Mattias Karén contributed to this report. ___ Howard Fendrich has been the AP's tennis writer since 2002. Find his stories here: More AP tennis:
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
UEFA Sanctions Force Chelsea into Crucial Summer Sales
Chelsea's Champions League Gamble: Pressure Mounts as UEFA Tightens Grip Financial Firepower Collides with UEFA Reality Chelsea's windfall from the Club World Cup — nearing £60 million after victory over Palmeiras — may glisten on the balance sheet, but it is unlikely to ease their growing financial anxiety. UEFA's recent clampdown has seen the West London club hit with a record fine of £27 million, alongside a further £51.8 million suspended, for breaching the body's financial rules. But money alone is not the most punishing blow. As The Times reported, it's the accompanying sporting sanctions that will likely dictate Chelsea's direction this summer. Advertisement The spotlight now falls on UEFA's 'List A transfer balance' rule. Unless Chelsea's balance is positive, they will be barred from adding players to their Champions League squad for the upcoming season. It's a daunting requirement that prioritises sales over spending and puts pressure on the club's already congested roster. Photo IMAGO Sales Must Fund Signings The rule is clear: any new registration to UEFA's List A — the squad eligible for European competition — must be financially offset by outgoing transfers. Bonuses from the Club World Cup do not count. For Chelsea, who have already signed Liam Delap, João Pedro and Jamie Gittens, and who may need to register Estêvão Willian, Dario Essugo, Andrey Santos, Mamadou Sarr and Mike Penders if they are not loaned out, this spells trouble. Advertisement Delap's £30 million fee alone will be amortised over a five-year contract, meaning £6 million needs to be accounted for this season under UEFA's revised accounting rules. These rules, introduced in 2023, restrict amortisation to a five-year span. That, coupled with additional salaries and amortised fees for players such as Wesley Fofana and Romeo Lavia, who are yet to be registered with UEFA, makes the £60 million requirement a stark reality. As one source close to the club acknowledged, 'It is only if Chelsea's overall transfer balance is negative after the list is submitted that new players could be prevented from registering.' Time Ticking and Names Circulating The September 2 registration deadline looms, and while Chelsea remain confident they can work within the framework, the challenge is evident. Players who were left out of the Club World Cup squad — including João Félix, Raheem Sterling, Ben Chilwell, Renato Veiga and Axel Disasi — are all likely to be counted towards any positive transfer balance if sold in time. Advertisement It's not an ideal situation. Moving on high earners like Sterling and Félix, who come with substantial wage burdens and mixed recent form, will be far from straightforward. Chelsea's difficulty in offloading such players in previous windows suggests this summer may be no different. There is also the unsettling prospect of selling key contributors. Christopher Nkunku, despite fitness struggles last season, is attracting interest and could be sacrificed. Noni Madueke, who helped drive Chelsea to Champions League qualification, is drawing attention from Arsenal. 'Noni has been very important for us during this season,' admitted head coach Enzo Maresca. 'But my message to the players and to the club is that I want just players that are happy to be with us. The ones that are not happy, they are free to go.' Trevoh Chalobah is another name who may be reluctantly moved despite Maresca's praise. 'We made the Champions League and that's also because of Trevoh. He helped us a lot. We are happy with him. Unfortunately, when the window is open, anything can happen.' Advertisement Kudus in the Wings, but Conditions Apply The irony is Chelsea are still being linked with additions. West Ham's Mohamed Kudus remains a key target and a possible replacement should Madueke leave. But once again, UEFA's rule insists that any new arrival will only be possible if funded through sales. 'He is not our player, so I cannot say anything,' Maresca said of Kudus. 'The only thing is I have known about Kudus since he was in Ajax.' Such statements are revealing. Chelsea are not restrained in ambition, but they are restricted in execution. Their strategy must be more calculated, more surgical. They cannot simply accumulate talent. Every acquisition now demands a corresponding exit. Advertisement And despite the calm front projected by Stamford Bridge insiders, the reality is anything but relaxed. The summer window is not just a chance to reinforce, it is a fiscal puzzle that must be solved to avoid competitive setbacks. Long-Term Impact of UEFA's Settlement Chelsea are not alone. Aston Villa too have agreed to similar sanctions, underlining a new era of UEFA enforcement. But Chelsea's sheer squad size, the cost of recent investments and the scale of their operations make them arguably the most exposed. It's not just about meeting a fine, it's about navigating a future of conditional squad building. UEFA's decision to reject contracts longer than five years for amortisation was intended to prevent financial distortion, and Chelsea — who pioneered the long-contract trend — now face the brunt of that correction. Advertisement What is clear is that even the riches of a Club World Cup campaign are not enough to navigate UEFA's tighter framework. Chelsea must now sell smart, balance shrewdly and avoid sentimentality if they are to comply without damaging their European ambitions. Our View – EPL Index Analysis This report from The Times paints a troubling picture. As a Chelsea fan, it's hard not to feel uneasy. It's not the fine itself that worries me, it's what it symbolises — a club operating at the edge of what is sustainable, now forced into a corner. The idea that we might not be able to register our new signings unless we sell first is staggering. We're not talking fringe players either. Noni Madueke and Trevoh Chalobah were excellent last season, but now even they could be sacrificed just to stay compliant. The fact that Enzo Maresca said he hadn't paid attention to UEFA's squad registration rules is hardly reassuring. How can you plan pre-season properly when you don't even know who will be eligible come September? That's basic. Advertisement It all feels avoidable. The transfer strategy since the Clearlake takeover has felt more like fantasy football than a coherent plan. Now it's catching up to us. Selling players is fine — every club does it — but we're not in a position of strength. Everyone knows we have to sell, and that means we're not going to get top dollar. If this is the cost of chasing short-term glory, then maybe it's time we found a new balance — one that respects UEFA's rules and the traditions of smart football governance.
UPI
38 minutes ago
- UPI
Wimbledon: Weathered Carlos Alcaraz anticipates 'nightmare' Cameron Norrie QF
Spain's Carlos Alcaraz beat Russian Andrey Rublev in four sets in a Wimbledon 2025 Round of 16 match Sunday in London. File Photo by Hugo Philpott/UPI | License Photo July 7 (UPI) -- Carlos Alcaraz is once again singeing the Wimbledon grass and coming off what he called his "best match" at this year's tournament, but says he expects a "nightmare" quarterfinal matchup with Cameron Norrie. Alcaraz made the comments when he met with reporters moments after a 6-7(5), 6-3, 6-4, 6-4 win over No. 14 Andrey Rublev of Russia on Sunday in London. "I played my best match so far in the tournament," the Spaniard said. "I'm just feeling great. Obviously, in the French Open it was different because I was playing more matches on clay before [the tournament]. "Right now, I'm just trying to get that feeling [on grass]. I got it much better than the previous matches. Hopefully, I can keep it going and feeling more comfortable." The No. 2 player in the world held advantages of 22-6 in aces and 41-29 in winners in the 2-hour, 44-minute meeting. He also broke the Russian's serve four times. Alcaraz will face Norrie (No. 61) on Tuesday at the All-England Lawn Tennis Club. Norrie ousted No. 143 Nicolas Jarry of Chile 6-3, 7-6(4), 6-7(7), 6-7(5), 6-3 in his fourth-round match. Alcaraz owns a 4-2 head-to-head record against Norrie, but the Brit beat the Spaniard in two of their last three meetings. None of their six previous matchups were played on grass. "Facing Cam is always really, really difficult," Alcaraz said. "We have really difficult battles already. For me, facing him is almost a nightmare to be honest. "I'm not surprised he is in the quarterfinals playing great tennis, because I've seen him practicing. ... It's going to be really difficult. He is playing at home as well, so he's going to use the crowd. I have to be really strong mentally and focused to play good tennis if I want to beat him." The winner of the Alcaraz-Norrie quarterfinal will meet No. 5 Taylor Fritz of the United States or No. 20 Karen Khachanov of Russia in the semifinals. Fritz advanced after No. 44 Jordan Thompson of Australia retired due to injury during the second set of their fourth-round meeting Sunday in London. Khachanov swept No. 109 Kamil Majchrzak of Poland 6-4, 6-2, 6-3. No. 1 Aryna Sabalenka of Belarus, No. 12 Amanda Anisimova of the United States, No. 50 Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova of Russia and No. 104 Laura Siegmund of Germany were the top women to advance on Day 7 of the Grand Slam. Sabalenka swept No. 23 Elise Mertens of Belgium 6-4, 7-6(4) to advance to a quarterfinal meeting with Siegmund, who beat No. 101 Solana Sierra in straight sets. Anisimova eliminated No. 27 Linda Noskova of the Czech Republic. Pavlyuchenkova ousted No. 51 Sonay Kartal of Great Britain. The winner of the Anisimova-Pavlyuchenkova quarterfinal will face Sabalenka or Siegmund in a women's singles semifinal. No. 1 Jannik Sinner of Italy, No. 6 Novak Djokovic of Serbia and No. 10 Ben Shelton of the United States are the top men set to compete on Day 8. No. 4 Iga Swiatek of Poland and No. 7 Mirra Andreeva of Russia are the top women with Monday matches. Andreeva will battle No. 10 Emma Navarro of the United States. The winner of that match will face No. 17 Ekaterina Alexandrova of Russia or No. 35 Belinda Bencic of Switzerland in the quarterfinals. Swiatek will take on No. 22 Clara Tauson of Denmark. The winner of that match will battle No. 19 Liudmila Samsonova of Russia or No. 62 Jessia Bouzas Maneiro of Spain in another quarterfinal. Monday's Round of 16 coverage will air through 4 p.m. EDT on ESPN, ESPN2, ESPN Deportes and ESPN+. Quarterfinal coverage will air from 8 a.m. to 3 p.m. Tuesday on ESPN, ESPN2 and ESPN+. Wimbledon 2025: Championship moments on the court Spain's Carlos Alcaraz celebrates victory in his third round match against Germany's Jan-Lennard Struff on Day 5 of the 2025 Wimbledon Championships in London on July 4, 2025. Photo by Hugo Philpott/UPI | License Photo
