
Abandoning a multimillion-pound stealth jumpjet in India isn't a good look
Even the US Navy, masters of all things carrier aviation, can still learn the hard way. A US carrier recently made a hard turn under missile attack in the Red Sea. An F-18 was being towed by tractor on deck, with sailors driving both the tractor and the jet: as the ship heeled, both began skidding unstoppably towards the deck edge. The sailors managed to jump out, but the fighter and the tractor both went into the sea. This stuff is hard.
My feeling of being glad the aircrew get paid more didn't last. In too many cases it isn't true over time: aviators and mine clearance divers in the Royal Navy, both of which groups receive extra pay, both have the same joke.
'We don't get paid more, we just get paid faster.'
If the weather is really bad, even at a normal air base or airport ashore, things get worse. If you're trying to land that helicopter or fixed wing jet in bad weather at sea, they get hugely worse as the thing you are trying to land on is rocking and rolling and the deck is wet and slippery. It's much worse still at night.
This was the situation now more than two weeks ago, when a pilot from 809 Naval Air Squadron was attempting to get an F-35B fifth generation stealth fighter back aboard the carrier HMS Prince of Wales. The weather was simply too bad, and – as is not unheard of in peacetime naval aviation – the decision was taken for the jet to divert to an airfield ashore. Ships may send out their aircraft without any diversion option – often there is simply no friendly place to land, for instance during pretty much the whole of the Falklands campaign – but especially in peacetime we try to have a backup plan.
The F-35B got on the ground safely at Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala on the southwestern tip of India. But it then developed a fault which is yet to be fixed, and the jet is still sitting there, cutting an increasingly forlorn figure. It's now been long enough for the 'you can't park there mate' quips to have been and gone, replaced with memes from the local tourism industry about why 'Kerala is such an amazing place, I don't want to leave'.
This situation doesn't really surprise me. Two things always got my particular attention in my old life during the rigorous pre-flight briefings. As captain of the ship, I was the man who decided go or no-go.
The first thing I didn't like was if there was no diversion-to-shore option. The second second was if the aircraft was going to have to shut down once feet-dry (ashore). There isn't a huge amount you can do about the first other than keep a beady eye on the weather forecast and make sure the deck remains clear throughout, but the second one always made me nervous. In my mid-career we had a Lynx helicopter, a small and usually reliable aircraft. But it didn't like starting up on someone else's patch. Wherever possible the pilot would keep the engine running, perhaps for a long time, so as not to take the risk of winding up stuck ashore.
Planning and executing sorties from sea is therefore something that needs to be practiced until you are blue in the face, then practiced some more. It's one of the reasons that HMS Prince of Wales, her escorts and some 4,500 people are far away doing what they do. You can only simulate, wargame and train so much; eventually you have to get to sea and pressure test all the moving parts for real. Doing it at distance from the UK teaches lessons too. It's the only way you can learn and then build in resilience for combat operations.
Hopefully all this paints a picture as to why this F-35 is now stuck in Kerala. Jets are not cars – they are complex and they break down. Sometimes they can't be fixed with what you have on the ship, or what you can fly ashore in a helicopter.
In this case, it sounds like the jet developed a hydraulic issue of some sort. I'm not a pilot but I have been around maritime aviation long enough to know this is a defect that rarely ends well. We will need the investigation to know for sure why that jet went 'feet dry' and why it is still not returned either to the ship or the UK. The safety of the aircraft and pilot would have trumped potential embarrassment or politics. And with Kerala within range, they took the decision to land there.
On landing and since then, the Indian authorities have been providing first class support where needed and perimeter security. Conspiracy theories that they could reverse engineer the technology are incorrect and the jet is safe. Having said all that, our international relations with India are complicated just now. There is always a political element to these things.
Personally, I would have moved heaven and earth to get that plane fixed and either back to the ship or back to the UK, for three reasons. First, it minimises embarrassment which is there, no matter how we wish it wasn't. Second, it reduces our dependence on India, which will always come with a political price-tag. Third, and most importantly, because we should train as we mean to fight. We should have simulated needing that jet for combat tasking right away and pressure tested every system, including the Treasury, to make it so. I would have also communicated loud and clear what the plan was to minimise both doubt and further embarrassment. Instead there has been silence from the British government.
For me it feels as though we have not been aggressive enough in the rectification of the jet or at least its removal from India.
On the plus side, none of this is new.
In 1983, a Sea Harrier pilot operating off Portugal found himself unable to locate HMS Illustrious and then got so low on fuel that landing ashore was no longer an option. Rather than eject and lose the aircraft, the pilot decided to land on the container ship Alraigo, with or without their permission. The landing was good, though the Harrier did slide backwards off the container it was on, suffering some damage. Red faces and salvage claims swiftly followed, though it should be noted that the jet returned to service and was later converted to the FA2 standard.
Aviation emergencies at sea are not new and they are always complex, expensive and occasionally embarrassing. This one in India is no different.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
21 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Urgent warning as Northeast choked by smoke from wildfires
An urgent air quality warning is in place for New York and parts of New England as smoke from the Canadian wildfires continues to choke the US. Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Vermont, Rhode Island, parts of Eastern New York, and Southern Maine are under air quality alerts through Saturday. Areas like Boston, Providence, and Burlington will face 'unhealthy' levels, with the capital of Massachusetts reaching as high as 155, according to Fox Weather. 'Good' air quality is from zero to 50, while moderate is 51 to 100. Over 150 means some of the general public will experience health effects and sensitive members have a higher risk of serious reactions. Short-term health effects include irritation to the eyes, nose, and throat, and could cause sneezing, coughing, and shortness of breath. Residents in some areas are being urged to limit the amount of time they spend outdoors. The majority of the Northeast will fall in the moderate and unhealthy for sensitive people - including pregnant women and young children - but that doesn't mean residents won't see the side effects. New York City, which falls in the moderate category, has already begun to see hazy skies through the middle of the day on Saturday. Air quality is expected to be between 101 and 150 on Sunday in the Big Apple, NYC's Emergency Management advised. The smoke came in behind a cold front on Friday, according to Fox Weather. Northerly winds and high pressure trapped the smoke, leading to air quality issues across the region. The smoke will move toward the ocean as rain from the Great Lakes and the Ohio Valley move toward the area late Saturday. The haze should fully clear out by Sunday, according to Fox Weather. However, it might not leave for long as it could return early next week. There are currently 550 wildfires burning in Canada, scorching 15million acres. The blazes have left Montreal with the worst air quality in the world on Saturday morning, according to Town and Country Today. By the afternoon, it dropped to second place, behind Kinshasa, Congo. Environment Canada has urged Canadians in Montreal to reschedule outdoor events and to stay indoors. 'During heavy smoke conditions, everyone's health is at risk regardless of their age or health status,' the agency said. Quebec is also expected to return to normal air quality levels by Sunday.


BBC News
a day ago
- BBC News
Canadian wildfires prompt New York air quality alert
An air quality health advisory has been issued for New York City and its surrounding areas because of smoke from wildfires in Canada. In a post on X, New York state's Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) and Department of Health (DOH) issued the advisory for Long Island, New York City Metro, Lower Hudson Valley, Upper Hudson Valley, and the Adirondacks on Saturday. Authorities are warning air quality in those regions is "unhealthy for sensitive groups".Wildfires in Canada have forced tens of thousands of people to leave their homes, and the smoke drifting over the border has sparked air quality concerns across the northern United States. The air quality index (AQI) is predicted to be above 100 in much of New York state on Saturday, and could reach 135. Alerts are also in place for parts of New AQI measures the severity of pollution in the air and categorises health risks. The higher the number, the more unsafe the air is to breathe. This is not the first time US authorities have issued air quality alerts because of smoke from the Canadian mid-July, a similar alert was issued for Chicago, with additional precautions advised for babies and the political implications of the wildfire smoke have also reached in July, six members of Congress wrote to the Canadian ambassador complaining that smoke from wildfires was making it difficult for Americans to enjoy their are currently more than 550 active fires in Canada, with the most concentrated in the province of Manitoba, according to authorities. 6.1 million hectares (15 million acres) of land has been burnt across the country in the past and June were particularly destructive months in western Canada, with roughly 30,000 people forced to evacuate in the provinces of Saskatchewan and Manitoba, where local administrations declared a state of have consistently linked the intensifying wildfire seasons to climate is believed to be warming at twice the global average rate, and its Arctic regions are heating up at nearly three times the global rate, scientists have warned.


Daily Mail
a day ago
- Daily Mail
Surprise state tops list of best places to retire in the US
New England has emerged as the best region to spend your twilight years with four of its states ranked among the top ten places to retire. Taking the crown for the best state to put down roots in retirement has been awarded to often overlooked New Hampshire. The state, known for its luscious green wilderness and quaint towns, is also a great bet for those looking to retire due to its low taxes, excellent healthcare and safe neighborhoods. The state triumphed in an analysis run by Bankrate which analyzed factors including a state's affordability, weather, safety, healthcare, taxes and how many people there would be of a similar age. New Hampshire ranked as the best of all fifty states for neighborhood safety, fifth for healthcare and sixth for taxes. It was joined by its New England neighbors Maine, Rhode Island and Vermont in the top ten. Three western states also scored highly and made the top ten, Idaho, Utah and Wyoming. 'Surprising to many, including me, is that there are four states from New England in the top 10,' Bankrate analyst Stephen Kates said of the survey's findings. 'Health care, both access and cost, as well as safety, recreation, and walkability play a major role in our rankings, and these states excel in these categories.' Intriguingly states that have often been viewed as retirement hotspots scored below the bottom of the table. Florida was ranked 41st, and was joined by seven other sun belt states in the bottom ten. 'Unlike more common retirement rankings by state, Florida didn't land very high on our list,' Kates explained 'Coming in at number 41, Florida ranks strongly on taxes and abundance of other retirees. 'However, it ranks poorly for health care, home insurance costs and natural disasters, which create significant cost disadvantages for retirees.' Louisiana earned the unenviable bottom place, scoring poorly in every category. The sunny southern state even ranked 39th in the weather category due to the number of tornadoes and hurricanes it experiences. New Hampshire has some of the most celebrated beaches on the East Coast Bankrate analyst Stephen Kates said it was surprising how well New England states scored Texas also scored badly, following Louisiana in 49th overall place. The Lone Star state scored last for healthcare and second last in having people of a similar age. Kates urged retirees and those looking to retire in the coming years to take note of the new rankings that go beyond the traditional draws such as a sunny, warm climate and low taxes. He believes that factors such as access to recreational activities and public safety can actually have a greater bearing on a retirees quality of life.