HPQ Silicon Reinstated for Trading
HPQ Silicon Inc.
('HPQ' or the 'Company') (TSX-V:
HPQ
, OTCQB:
HPQFF
, FRA:
O08
), a technology company developing next-generation processes for advanced material manufacturing, announces that on May 15, 2025, the TSX Venture Exchange issued Bulletin V2025-1424, confirming that trading in the Company's securities will be reinstated at market open on Tuesday, May 20, 2025.
Timeline of the events.
On April 30th, 2025, HPQ issued a press release stating that its new auditors needed a few more days to complete its audited annual financial statements for the financial year ended December 31, 2024.
Subsequently, the Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF) issued a Cease Trade Order (CTO) on May 1, 2025.
On May 2, 2025, HPQ filed its audited annual financial statements, management's discussion and analysis and related CEO and CFO certifications for the financial year ended December 31, 2024 (the 'Required Filings').
Furthermore, on May 5, 2025, HPQ filed a formal response to the clarification requested by the AMF.
After reviewing the 2024 audited annual financial statements, the formal reply and after in person interviews, the AMF issued via SEDAR+ on May 9, 2025, a filing rescinding the CTO, thereby affirming that it had found no material discrepancies in the Corporation's Financial documentations.
Once the CTO was lifted, the TSX Venture started a review to confirm that HPQ continued to meet the TSX Venture Exchange listing requirements.
Upon completion of their review, the TSX Venture confirmed that the Corporation meets the listing requirements of a Tier 2 technology issuer.
As a result, BULLETIN V2025-1424 also indicated that, in accordance with Policy 2.5, effective at the opening, Tuesday, May 20, 2025, the Company's Tier classification will change from Tier 1 to Tier 2.
'We're pleased to see trading reinstated and to have confirmation that we continue to meet the TSX Venture Exchange's listing requirements,'
said Bernard Tourillon, President and CEO of HPQ Silicon Inc. '
We acted swiftly and transparently to resolve the matter, and we remain focused on executing our strategic vision and delivering value to our shareholders.'
About HPQ Silicon
HPQ Silicon Inc.
(
TSX-V: HPQ
) is a Quebec-based TSX Venture Exchange Tier 1 Industrial Issuer.
HPQ is developing, with the support of world-class technology partners
PyroGenesis Canada Inc.
and
NOVACIUM SAS
, new green processes crucial to make the critical materials needed to reach net zero emissions.
HPQ activities are centred around the following five (5) pillars:
For more information, please visit
HPQ Silicon web site
.
Disclaimers:
This press release contains certain forward-looking statements, including, without limitation, statements containing the words 'may', 'plan', 'will', 'estimate', 'continue', 'anticipate', 'intend', 'expect', 'in the process' and other similar expressions which constitute 'forward-looking information' within the meaning of applicable securities laws. Forward-looking statements reflect the Company's current expectation and assumptions and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties including, but not limited to, our expectations regarding the acceptance of our products by the market, our strategy to develop new products and enhance the capabilities of existing products, our strategy with respect to research and development, the impact of competitive products and pricing, new product development, and uncertainties related to the regulatory approval process. Such statements reflect the current views of the Company with respect to future events and are subject to certain risks and uncertainties and other risks detailed from time-to-time in the Company's ongoing filings with the security's regulatory authorities, which filings can be found at
www.sedar.com
. Actual results, events, and performance may differ materially. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements either as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by applicable securities laws.
Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.
This News Release is available on the company's
CEO Verified Discussion Forum
, a moderated social media platform that enables civilized discussion and Q&A between Management and Shareholders.
Source: HPQ Silicon Inc.
For further information contact:
Bernard J. Tourillon, Chairman, President, and CEO
Tel +1 (514) 846-3271
Email:
Info@hpqsilicon.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
an hour ago
- Business Insider
Cryptoprivacy on trial: jury to decide if Tornado Cash's Roman Storm is a $1B money launderer or a free speech hero
A federal jury in Manhattan is about to get an education in cryptocurrency mixing, the future of "DeFi," and how North Korean dictator Kim Jong Un pays for his nukes. Jury selection begins Monday, and cyberprivacy advocates say the verdict will shape the very future of decentralized finance, or DeFi. That's the blockchain-based system where users can lend, borrow, and earn interest on cryptocurrencies person to person, bypassing banks, exchanges, or the stock market. According to an online resource for currency traders, the DeFi market has a market value of about $121 billion. Opening statements may begin as early as Tuesday. "If I lose my case, DeFi dies with me," the trial's lone defendant, Seattle-based software developer Roman Storm, rather dramatically pronounced in a podcast a week ago. Storm is one of the creators of Tornado Cash, a software tool that digitally "mixes" cryptocurrency, scrambling transactions to make them even more anonymous. It lets users deposit and withdraw crypto from a shared pool, obscuring their identities. Federal prosecutors say that between 2019 and 2022, the 35-year-old Russian expat knowingly let hackers and fraudsters use Tornado Cash to scramble and launder more than $1 billion — and made millions himself in the process. "The Tornado Cash service was used to launder large volumes of criminal proceeds with the knowledge and participation of the defendant," Assistant US Attorney Thane Rehn told the judge in 2023, when Storm pleaded not guilty at his first Manhattan court appearance. Prosecutors are particularly concerned over the hundreds of millions of dollars in crypto they say Storm laundered for the Lazarus Group, the notorious North Korea-sponsored cybercrime organization credited with the 2014 Sony Pictures hack, an $81 million Bangladeshi bank heist in 2016, and the 2017 WannaCry ransomware attacks. Federal and UN officials say Kim uses the Lazarus Group to fund his nuclear missile program. In 2022, the Biden Treasury Department barred US citizens from using Tornado Cash, saying that Lazarus Group and other cybercrooks used it to launder more than $7 billion in criminal proceeds. The Trump Treasury Department lifted these sanctions without explanation in March. A DeFi cause célèbre Storm is now a cause célèbre among DeFi and blockchain privacy advocates. Amicus briefs on his behalf have been filed by the Blockchain Association, Coin Center, the DeFi Education Fund, Paradigm, and the Electronic Frontier Foundation. He has received significant financial support as well. According to more than $2.5 million in the Ethereum network-backed cryptocurrency Ether has been donated for Storm's and fellow Tornado Cash developer Alexey Pertsev's legal defense, thanks to fundraising by the Ethereum Foundation, Paradigm, and others. Pertsev was convicted of money laundering in a Dutch court last year. A third Tornado Cash cofounder, Roman Semenov, was charged with Storm but remains a fugitive. The defense contends in court filings that Storm never had control over or custody of the money that passed through his cryptocurrency mixing tool and never knowingly helped cybercriminals. "I did not have any contact whatsoever with any criminals, any criminal organizations, any illicit actors, any North Koreans," Storm said on the podcast Crypto in America. Prosecutors say communications show otherwise, including one in which Storm told his cofounders, "Guys, we're fucked" as the bits, so to speak, hit the fan. Privacy advocates and Storm himself complain that his prosecution persists despite a DOJ memo in April announcing the office "will no longer target virtual currency exchanges, mixing and tumbling services, and offline wallets for the acts of their end uses." "The Department of Justice is not a digital assets regulator," said the memo. Signed by Trump lawyer-turned-Deputy US Attorney General Todd Blanche, it criticized the Biden administration for "pursuing a reckless strategy of regulation by prosecution." Attorneys for Storm did not respond to requests for comment on Friday. A spokesperson for the US Attorney's Office in Manhattan declined to comment on the ongoing case. Tornado Cash keeps spinning Tornado Cash, meanwhile, keeps spinning along. Storm told the Crypto in America podcast last week that all he did was write code. "I did not feel I'm responsible for managing how somebody's using the software," he said. And once the code for Tornado Cash was let loose into the DeFi world, it basically ran automatically, he told the podcast. He couldn't flip the off switch if he tried, he said, because no such switch exists. "Correct," Storm answered when the podcasters asked if Tornado Cash is still up and running. "It's always been running. Just like the Ethereum network, or the bitcoin network, or the internet," he said. "It's immutable and decentralized," he said. "It's unstoppable." Storm remains free on $2 million bail and faces up to 40 years in prison if convicted. "I don't have a 100% answer right now," he said when the podcasters asked if he intends to take the stand. "I may, or may not." The trial is expected to last at least three weeks.
Business Insider
3 hours ago
- Business Insider
I've been on Amazon for 5 months and haven't sold anything. After talking to experts, I'm planning to make 2 changes.
February 18 was a noteworthy Tuesday for me and my business partner. We were officially up and running on Amazon. In a Google doc I update regularly with notes and reflections on our e-commerce experiment, page 32 emphatically marks the occasion: "The paddles have arrived at Amazon, and the listing is live!!" It was exciting, deserving of two exclamation points. We'd spent nearly two years brainstorming product ideas — we settled on pickleball paddles — and bringing the product to life. Many steps happened between the ideation phase and our first inventory order, which ran us a little more than $11,000 for 500 paddles. Half of them were sent to Amazon warehouses. The other 250, divided between five large boxes, are stacked to the ceiling of my studio apartment. If the product development process felt long, tedious, and exhausting, like getting over the finish line of a marathon, moving product is an Ironman. We've sold paddles through our Shopify site and at in-person events, but Amazon? It's been the Sahara Desert. Nearly five months after proudly listing our paddle, we've sold exactly four units. Take a look at our sales dashboard. Amazon Seller Central likes to remind us on a daily basis how little money we have coming in. It even provides overall business insights. The most recent one read: "Your store shows a declining trend in both sales and traffic since launch, despite maintaining excellent feature offer percentages." We get it. We haven't figured out Amazon yet. We're new, overwhelmed, and treating this very much as a side project. That said, we're paying Amazon to store and list our product — and paying rent for our paddles to sit untouched isn't exactly the growth strategy we had in mind. Shaking things up by purchasing ads and exploring TikTok Shop If I've learned anything from talking to and writing about successful entrepreneurs, it's to surround yourself with people who are smarter than you or have already achieved what you want to achieve. Ask them questions, be curious, and learn from their mistakes. Luckily, as a reporter, that's part of my job description. Based on conversations with people who know a lot more than me about e-commerce, here are two strategic shifts we can implement that could help get our product moving on Amazon. 1. Buy ads Tyler Walter is the cofounder of 330 Trading Co., a product-sourcing company. He works closely with US-based e-commerce businesses, advising them on everything from initial product development to creating diverse supply chains. Walter told me, point blank, we have to spend money on ads. "Ads are going to give you the best fighting chance of selling through all of your inventory profitably," he said. "If you're doing it right, a dollar into advertising should come back as $2 to $3 of revenue." Ideally, before we start throwing money at ads, we want more product reviews. In the Amazon world, reviews are rocket fuel — without them, our product will go nowhere. With ads, "you're paying to get eyeballs on your listing," Walter explained. "And if you have zero reviews, every time someone looks at your listing, the chances of them purchasing are much less than if there were a bunch of reviews." So far, we have three Amazon reviews. Walter said a good short-term goal for us is to get to double-digits. Then, we can look at our competitors and adjust our review goal accordingly. "Take the first five pickleball paddles that pop up when you search 'pickleball paddle.' How many reviews do they have? Can you get to a 10th of that?" he said. He encouraged us to think like a consumer: If we're comparing products and see one with 500 reviews, one with 200, and one with two, we're likely not going to buy the one with two. "But if you see 20, it makes you think, 'This might be trustworthy. They have a better price. Let me give them a shot.'" He told us that we may run into a bit of a chicken-and-egg dilemma: We want reviews before spending on ads, but might need ads to actually get reviews. As far as how much money we need to spend on ads, he explained that Amazon ads are more affordable compared to Google, Meta, and TikTok ads since Amazon already has so much traffic, "so you can test it out with a very small budget." That said, we want to spend enough to make an impact, and, generally speaking, spending more will lead to better results. It'll take some trial-and-error, and if we have the budget to hire a professional on a site like Fiverr or Upwork to manage our ad campaigns, we should. As with most things in life, there are no guarantees. "There's a possibility that you put $700 in over the course of a week, and you don't get a single sale. That is a possibility," he said. "But very quickly, you'll start to see data of how many people are seeing your ads, how many people are clicking in your ads, how many purchases you're getting, what the conversions are — and if you're working with a good professional, they can take that data and and tweak things and you should be able to get a pretty good idea of: Hey, if I put $500 into ads this month, I'm going to get an extra $1,500 in sales that I other otherwise wouldn't have got." 2. Think beyond Amazon and explore TikTok Shop I learned from Eugene Khayman, who built his own seven-figure Amazon business and now leads a community of 700 top e-commerce entrepreneurs called Million Dollar Sellers, that we should be thinking beyond Amazon. It's harder than ever to build a profitable Amazon business. Compared to when he started selling on the platform in the early 2010s, the fees are higher, the competition is stiffer, and the strategies are constantly evolving. Not to mention, tariffs, which added an entirely new level of complexity for Amazon sellers at the start of 2025. "If people are treating Amazon as their whole business, they're definitely more at risk," he said, and "there are so many different verticals of e-commerce to serve." He pointed to TikTok Shop, where he sees "a lot of opportunity," and compared it to Amazon in the early years before it became overrun with sellers. A smart strategy would be to couple Amazon with TikTok or other marketplaces. He also emphasized that "complacency kills," a hard truth that even the most established sellers in his community need to be reminded of. "E-commerce was really so easy the past few years, and we have to be more critical of ourselves and overall." The best way to avoid complacency and stay ahead of the curve is to keep talking to people who know what they're doing. "It's all about putting yourself in a room with people that are smarter than you, so that you're growing faster and you're not making silly mistakes," he said. I started an e-commerce business with $5,000 up front after writing about financially independent Amazon sellers. Here's how I doubled my budget. My friend and I pooled $10,000 to start an e-commerce company. After months of brainstorming products, we chose pickleball paddles. Months into launching a pickleball eCommerce company with $10,000, I'm already over budget. Here are all of my startup costs, including a surprise $2,095 expense.
Newsweek
3 hours ago
- Newsweek
Texas Housing Market To Change in September: What To Know
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Texas lawmakers trying to solve the state's housing affordability crisis passed a bill during the last legislative session that experts say will be a "game-changer" for the development of multifamily homes. Senate Bill 840 or SB 840, which was introduced by Republican state Senator Bryan Hughes and signed into law by Governor Greg Abbott in June, would streamline the process of turning non-residential commercial buildings in the state into mixed-use and multi-family residential ones. Under the new legislation, any land that is already classified as a zone for office, commercial, retail, warehouse or existing mixed uses could be turned into mixed-use residential housing without the need for a zone change. Essentially, the legislation does away with a process that some have complained can be time-consuming and expensive—at least in some cases. The mixed-use housing and office property The Republic is seen undergoing construction downtown on October 9, 2023, in Austin, Texas. The mixed-use housing and office property The Republic is seen undergoing construction downtown on October 9, 2023, in Austin, To Know About The Bill "SB 840 aims to tackle the state's widening housing shortage by allowing underused commercial land and buildings to be repurposed for multifamily development 'by right,'" Fawaz Bham, real estate law expert and partner at Dallas-based law firm Hunton Andrews Kurth, told Newsweek. "More pointedly, it rebalances the power dynamic between developers who are eager to create new mixed-use projects or convert existing commercial properties against the desire of municipalities to closely negotiate, guide, and shape build sites in their cities," he said. The bill applies only to cities with more than 150,000 residents that are in a county with more than 300,000 residents. That means that the legislation will impact less than 20 cities, including the Texas capital, Austin, where proposals to add thousands of units to two sites—almost 900 residential units 200 East Riverside Drive and up to 2,400 in Anderson Square—have already been approved. But SB 840 does more than reforming zoning regulation. It also prohibits certain restrictions on density, building height and parking for multifamily and mixed-use developments. Under the bill, municipalities cannot require more than one parking space per dwelling unit or a multilevel parking structure. They must allow the multifamily density to be the highest allowed in the municipality or 36 units per acre, whichever is greater; and the heights limits must allow the greater of the highest height allowed on the side by the zoning code or 45 feet. "By removing these barriers for the repurposing of these vacant and underutilized properties, the legislature has opened the door to a significant opportunity for developers to meet the ever-growing housing needs in Texas," Clay B. Pulliam, partner at Dallas-based law firm Troutman Pepper Locke, wrote in a recent report assessing the bill. The bill is expected to go into effect on September 1, 2025. Newsweek contacted Hughes for comment by email on July 4 for comment. How The Bill Could Change Texas Real estate experts believe that the bill will spark a "revolution" in the Lone Star State's multifamily market, where it is being hailed as a likely "game-changer." The most significant impact of the new legislation would be to allow developers in the state to utilize vacant or underutilized office buildings—which became a problem for some cities in the state, like Houston, during the pandemic years—retail centers and warehouses for multifamily housing. "There are suburban and infill areas with empty big boxes or underutilized retail and office buildings which have become acquisition targets as developers realize the potential upside of SB 840 and other companion bills that have recently passed," Bham said. Julia Parenteau, Director of Public Policy at Texas Realtors, told Newsweek: "While commercial conversions are a more niche issue, I'd anticipate the allowance of mixed-use and multi-family by right in certain zoning areas will have a positive impact by way of more multi-family housing developments going onto the market in the coming years. "Additionally, zoning by right shaves approximately 18 months off the time frame for development, allowing the conversation to focus on what amenities and designs the municipality wants or needs in the development, not whether the project is feasible." This infusion of new inventory could, in turn, help first-time and lower-income homebuyers in the state, as multi-family homes tend to be more affordable than single-family housing. "SB 840 is part of a broader suite of bills that the legislature passed, all designed to infuse the market with additional supply so that affordability improves for Texans," Emily Brizzolara-Dove, a policy adviser at Texas 2036, a nonprofit, nonpartisan public policy organization dedicated to improving lives and opportunities for all Texans through 2036, told Newsweek. "Home prices in Texas have gone up 35 percent, 40 percent since the beginning of the pandemic, and that is simply unsustainable," she said. "Housing affordability is really one of our biggest competitive advantages in the state, but that is a very tenuous advantage. Ohio has cheap houses, too. "So, if our housing supply gets to the point where families are really cost burdened by their rent and by their mortgage, we are at risk of losing that competitive advantage." SB 840 helps Texas build more housing where people want to live, Brizzolara-Dove said, by essentially reducing red tape. The big impact of the new legislation, she said, is going to be allowing residential in commercial, retail and warehouse zones—areas that are already developed and which would become more livable, more walkable, and more-resident friendly once more homes are introduced at little to no additional cost, as key infrastructure is already in place. "When you can do something that will make a really significant impact on housing prices for Texas families, and you can do it with no fiscal note, then you're in a good spot," Brizzolara-Dove said. 'The Devil Is In The Details' Bham, however, said that whether the legislation would work to fix the Lone Star State's shortage of affordable homes would still depend on how the market reacts to it. By cutting red tape and slashing costs, SB 840 should be able to attract developers willing to pursue new housing projects, but they will still need to ensure that any project is "still economically fruitful, financially viable, and sustainable in the long-run to secure investors, financing, and—ultimately—paying renters," Bham said. Real estate experts also worry that the bill could also have a negative impact on the Texas housing market. While Pulliam says that the bill does "an admirable job of addressing the bottlenecks and administrative burden of converting properties to residential uses," he warned that the legislation might have some unintended consequences. "Zoning ordinances are often cumbersome and sometimes antiquated, but the framework that these ordinances provide gives some degree of certainty to property owners, residents and the municipalities themselves," he said. "For example, no consideration has been given to the impact on public schools when these additional projects result in an influx of students. Will dispensing with the need for traffic studies or traffic mitigation measures create more congestion? Developers who have invested heavily in entitling their multifamily projects must now compete with developers who can skip that entire process. Will owners of existing multifamily or mixed-use projects be at a disadvantage to those who can now bypass barriers to entry quickly and without cost?" he asked. Weston B. Rockers and Benjamin W. McKay of Polsinelli, on the other hand, are concerned about the potential for a sudden surge in converted multifamily to devalue existing multifamily properties and/or saturate the multifamily housing market in some municipalities. "As multifamily supply increases, developers relying on exclusive and/or isolated multifamily zoning classifications will experience less demand," the two wrote in a June report. At the same time, the single-family market could also suffer, they say, as reclassifying commercial sites to multifamily "has the potential to devalue single-family homes, which were planned or developed in close proximity to commercial developments." Brizzolara-Dove remains optimistic about the impact of the bill, even as she admits that "the devil is in the details when it comes to implementing these bills, and there is no state agency oversight of them." It will be "all down" to the municipalities, she said: "We will be able to see in a year from now how the cities have implemented [the legislation], if they are fully embracing the law and if changes would need to be made—and they likely will."
