
Ready for a summer road trip? Here's why a visit to the gas pump could cost you more in July
Gas prices at the pump in California will likely jump in July, the result of a state sales tax hike and stricter rules on refineries to encourage them to create lower-carbon fuels. The combined increases could boost gas prices by nearly 70 cents, although industry experts said they can't estimate the exact price of a gallon of gas for next month.
Californians and drivers nationwide typically see a spike in fuel prices during the month of June but the oil supply market is currently outweighing demand, leading to slightly cheaper prices compared to 2024, according to the American Automobile Assn.
As of Wednesday, the current average for the state is $4.64 per gallon compared to $4.81 on the same day last year, a 17-cent decrease.
Even though forecasters predict global oil inventories will increase over the next five months, relieving pressure on oil prices, California consumers won't feel the expected continued reprieve next month.
On July 1, California's gas and diesel excise tax will increase to 61.2 cents per gallon, from the current rate of 59.6 cents per gallon, according to the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration. Diesel fuel will also increase from 45.4 to 46.6 cents per gallon.
The state adjusts its fuel tax rates based on data from the Department of Finance annually and the new rate goes into effect on July 1 of each year.
This isn't the only factor that will drive up gas prices this summer.
In 2024, California Air Resources Board approved amendments to the state's Low Carbon Fuel Standard program that was established in 2011 with two goals in mind: shifting the state's fuel dependence toward lower-carbon fuels and helping the state reach the goal of cutting fuel use by 49% by 2045.
The approved amendments are meant to incentivize the value of lower-carbon fuel and impose stricter limits on carbon intensity fuels so gasoline producers are encouraged to create less-polluting fuels.
But that extra cost to comply with the new regulations will be passed onto motorists at the pump.
Last year, CARB estimated the amendments could raise gasoline prices by 47 cents a gallon, or $6.4 billion a year. Months later the agency walked back its estimate and said it would not provide the public with a revised one.
The agency previously told The Times that no new numbers will be forthcoming because 'what we are not equipped to do is analyze what the effect would be on retail gasoline prices,' it instead analyzes economic growth, job creation and public health.
Danny Cullenward, vice chair of the California's Independent Emissions Market Advisory Committee, estimated that near-term affects from the program amendments on gas prices could be an additional 65 cents a gallon this year, $0.85 per gallon by 2030, and nearly $1.50 per gallon by 2035.
AAA said it doesn't have an estimate yet on how the amendments to the Low Carbon Fuel Standard program will affect gas prices next month, 'especially with the recent drop in oil prices.'
'If those stay low, the impact could be smaller,' said Gianella Ghiglino, spokesperson for AAA of Southern California.
Drivers won't be able to avoid the price hike at the pump in California but there are ways to locate gasoline stations with the cheapest prices.
There are several apps and websites that can help you find lower prices near your traveling route.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Epoch Times
2 hours ago
- Epoch Times
Only 18 Percent of Californians Can Afford to Buy a Home
In California, the housing market appears stable, but the income needed to afford a typical home is well over $200,000 a year. Most households make less than half that. Only 18 percent of Californians can afford to purchase a median-priced home. In this episode, economist Oscar Wei explains how interest rates, limited supply, an...


Bloomberg
a day ago
- Bloomberg
Retaliatory Tariffs Padding Canada's Finances as Expenses Rise
Canada's retaliatory tariffs on US goods are partially offsetting weaker revenue from corporate and sales taxes as federal government expenditures continue to rise. Revenue from customs import duties rose to C$2.4 billion ($1.8 billion) in April and May, according to data released Friday by Canada's Department of Finance. That's up from C$842 million in the same period a year earlier, capturing revenue from retaliatory tariffs that Prime Minister Mark Carney has levied on imports of some US goods.


Fox News
a day ago
- Fox News
High-speed rail isn't California's only expensive boondoggle
Print Close By Michael Feuz Published July 25, 2025 California Gov. Gavin Newsom is suing the Trump administration for pulling back $4 billion in federal funding for high-speed rail. But President Donald Trump hasn't actually derailed any trains. And all the lawsuit has really done is expose the trainwreck that is California's fiscal situation. For months, Newsom has bragged about California having the world's fourth-largest economy and sending back more money to Washington than it takes in. He's right, but he's also conveniently ignoring that California also boasts the nation's highest real poverty rate and a projected budget deficit as high as $20 billion. That just scratches the surface of the fiscal mess Californians deal with every day – not just in Sacramento, but at every level of government. Let's start with the high-speed rail project. Voters approved it in 2008 to run from San Francisco to Los Angeles at an approximate cost of $40 billion with a completion date of 2033. As of June of this year, the projected cost was as high as $128 billion with no track laid. CALIFORNIA'S GREEN NEW SCAM COULD COST YOU $20,000 Los Angeles residents know this kind of bureaucratic ineptitude all too well. Complex and sometimes conflicting county and state environmental regulations played an important role in the closure of the county's second-largest landfill, Chiquita Canyon, at the end of 2024. Residents now have to fund the added expense of hauling trash to a landfill farther away while local politicians obsess over "price-gouging" by those who haul and handle residents' garbage. Taxpayers are burdened enough with the political junk Sacramento sends their way; local officials would be a lot more useful if they reduced, instead of added, to the heap. Los Angeles, meanwhile, can't seem to provide essential services at any price, gouged or otherwise. Check out all of the fire hydrants that didn't work during the recent fires and the empty city-run reservoir nearby. Anyone who oversaw those failures and still has a job is gouging taxpayers with every paycheck. Paying for incompetence is bad enough, but what about corruption? That's what taxpayers across the state have funded for years as officials in state, county and city governments have colluded in a Medicaid reimbursement scheme by allowing government-owned providers to charge as much as 13 times more for certain services than the private sector is allowed to charge. CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION Not only has this practice squeezed private providers, thereby limiting care options for non-Medicaid patients, but it has allowed California to paper over its unfunded pension obligations for government employees by pocketing the difference. And those obligations will come due faster than policymakers prefer as the nation's highest cost-of-living and top marginal tax rates continue to drive taxpayers and businesses out of the state. "Businesses that want to grow and parents who want to provide for their families have been moving out of California for a decade, especially to states like Texas and Florida that have no or minimal income taxes," said Vance Ginn, Ph.D., chief economist for the Office of Management and Budget during the first Trump administration. "And that trend isn't likely to reverse itself because lawmakers and regulators up and down the state keep spending more and regulating and taxing themselves out of residents." CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP Cleaning up California's fiscal mess will take a lot more than creative accounting tricks, piecemealing federal funding grants and soaking the taxpayers – like the one-time windfall of capital gains taxes that created the temporary surplus in 2022. It requires reining in out-of-control spending while also reducing the regulatory burden on residents and businesses. That's why Newsom's lawsuit over the train funds isn't about infrastructure. It's about image. His flip on gender identity issues and sudden support for reducing California's atrocious housing regulations were sops to "the middle," but he also wants to make the Left happy by showing he can stand up to Trump. At federal taxpayer expense, of course, all the while claiming that he's keeping California "innovative" while basic governance collapses underneath. CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM MICHAEL FEUZ Print Close URL