The key to solving your relationship problems might come down to your emojis, new study reveals
Using the digital representations of emotions and ideas in text and social media messages boosts closeness and relationship satisfaction by complementing face-to-face interactions, say American scientists.
Although emojis are highly prevalent in texting and social media, no previous studies had looked at their potential as a tool for fostering interpersonal connection.
Advertisement
Using the digital representations of emotions and ideas in text and social media messages boosts closeness and relationship satisfaction by complementing face-to-face interactions, say American scientists.
ifeelstock – stock.adobe.com
Researchers from The University of Texas at Austin investigated how emojis influence relationship perceptions in an era dominated by online interactions.
The participants included 260 adults ranging in age from 23 to 67 who were randomly assigned to read 15 text message exchanges that varied only in the presence or absence of emojis in the text.
Advertisement
They were instructed to imagine themselves as the sender of each message and to focus on their partner's replies.
Participants rated partners who used emojis as more responsive than partners who communicated through text alone.
Study author Sally Huh said: 'This perceived partner responsiveness through emoji use was positively associated with closeness and relationship satisfaction.
'Surprisingly, there were no significant differences between face and non-face emojis, suggesting that the type of emoji may be less critical than previously assumed.
Advertisement
'Rather, it may be the presence of emojis that drives perceptions of greater partner responsiveness and better relationships.'
The design of the study, published in the journal PLOS One, focused only on one partner in an inherently two-way relationship.
Participants rated partners who used emojis as more responsive than partners who communicated through text alone.
ifeelstock – stock.adobe.com
The researchers say the design helped to isolate the effects of emoji use on friendship dynamics, moving beyond the correlational approaches that dominate much of the existing literature.
Advertisement
They believe the findings show that emojis may serve not only as expressive devices but also as signals of attentiveness and emotional engagement.
Ms Huh added: 'The study revealed that emojis can boost relationship satisfaction by signalling emotional attentiveness.
'Interestingly, it's not the type of emoji but simply their presence that makes people feel closer to their partner.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
13 hours ago
- Newsweek
New Study Says Skip the Hot Dogs This Fourth of July
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. As Americans fire up their grills for the Fourth of July, a new study published in Nature Medicine says that there is no safe amount of hot dogs—or any processed meat—to consume. The study, led by Dr. Demewoz Haile of the University of Washington's Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, found that even small daily servings of processed meat significantly increase the risk of type 2 diabetes, colorectal cancer, and heart disease. The findings arrive just as Americans are expected to consume over 150 million hot dogs during the holiday weekend. Health experts are urging moderation, if not outright avoidance, of processed meats, sugary drinks, and trans fats. The study analyzed data from over 60 prior studies and employed a burden-of-proof methodology to evaluate the strength of the evidence. Hot dogs are ready for the 2025 Nathan's Famous Fourth of July hot dog eating competition at Coney Island in the Brooklyn borough of New York on July 4, 2025. Hot dogs are ready for the 2025 Nathan's Famous Fourth of July hot dog eating competition at Coney Island in the Brooklyn borough of New York on July 4, It Matters Hot dogs are a staple of July 4 celebrations, but this research contributes to a growing body of evidence linking processed meats to an increased risk of chronic disease. With diet-related illnesses already among the leading causes of death in the U.S., the study speaks to the need for more transparent communication about the risks of everyday foods that are deeply embedded in American culture. What To Know Eating just 50 grams of processed meat daily—the weight of a typical hot dog—is associated with an 11 percent higher risk of type 2 diabetes and a 7 percent higher risk of colorectal cancer. The study also found links between sugary drinks and ischemic heart disease and between trans fats and elevated cholesterol. Researchers concluded that there is no safe level of habitual consumption of processed meats, sugary drinks, or trans fats. The strongest associations were observed even at low levels of intake, suggesting that regular consumption—regardless of the amount—poses measurable health risks. The research pooled data from over 60 studies and applied a burden-of-proof risk function to assess the strength and consistency of the evidence. While observational, the study's scale and statistical rigor make its findings difficult to ignore. Dr. Nita Forouhi of the University of Cambridge, who was not involved in the study, said the findings support existing dietary guidelines to limit processed meat, per CNN. Other experts emphasized that occasional indulgence is unlikely to cause harm, but regular consumption should be avoided. The study's release coincides with the annual Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Contest and a weekend when Americans traditionally consume millions of hot dogs. Health officials are using the moment to encourage healthier grilling choices and raise awareness about long-term dietary risks. What People Are Saying Authors of Health effects associated with consumption of processed meat, sugar-sweetened beverages and transfatty acids: a Burden of Proof study: "We observed a statistically in type 2 diabetes risk associated with higher processed meat consumption; that is, disease risk increased with increased intake." Dr. Demewoz Haile, the study's lead author, told CNN.: "Habitual consumption of even small amounts of processed meat, sugary drinks and trans fatty acids is linked to increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes, ischemic heart disease and colorectal cancer. What Happens Next While the study is unlikely to stop Americans from enjoying hot dogs this weekend, it may influence future dietary guidelines and public health campaigns.
Atlantic
17 hours ago
- Atlantic
America Is Killing Its Chance to Find Alien Life
In April, scientists announced that they had used NASA's James Webb Space Telescope to find a potential signature of alien life in the glow of a distant planet. Other scientists were quick to challenge the details of the claim and offered more mundane explanations; most likely, these data do not reveal a new and distant biology. But the affair was still a watershed moment. It demonstrated that humans have finally built tools powerful enough to see across interstellar space and detect evidence of biospheres on distant worlds—in other words, tools truly capable of discovering alien life. Given the telescope technologies we astronomers have now and the ones we'll build soon, within a few decades, humans might finally gather some hard data that can answer its most profound, existential question: Is there life beyond Earth? What's arguably even more remarkable is that unless something changes very soon, the humans making that epochal discovery might not be NASA and the American space scientists who power it. The U.S. space agency is facing a funding and personnel crisis that the Planetary Society has called ' an extinction-level event.' The Trump administration's proposed 2026 budget—a version of which passed Congress and now awaits the president's signature—slashes NASA's funding by almost a quarter. That means, adjusted for inflation, NASA would get the same level of funding it had in 1961, before John F. Kennedy called for the United States to put a man on the moon. The modern version of NASA has far more on its plate: maintaining the International Space Station, hunting for Earth-killing asteroids, and using its Earth-observing satellites to help farmers monitor soil conditions. The president's budget also calls for an aggressive push to land humans on both the moon and Mars. It's hard to see how the agency can safely and accurately fulfill its current responsibilities—let alone develop advanced (and expensive) scientific equipment that would advance the search for alien life—with such reduced funding. ('President Trump's FY26 NASA Budget commits to strengthening America's leadership in space exploration while exercising fiscal responsibility,' a NASA spokesperson wrote in an email to The Atlantic. 'We remain fully committed to our long-term goals and continue to make progress toward the next frontier in space exploration, even as funding priorities are adjusted.' The White House did not respond to a request for comment.) Almost all of NASA's divisions face dramatic cuts, but the proposed nearly 50 percent slash to its Science Mission Directorate poses the greatest threat to hopes of future grand discoveries, including finding life on other worlds. SMD's engineers and scientists built the rovers that helped scientists show that Mars, now a freezing desert, was once warm and covered in rushing water. The researchers it funds developed probes that revealed vast subsurface oceans on some of Jupiter's moons. SMD is also where you'll find the folks who built the Hubble Space Telescope, the James Webb Space Telescope, and a flotilla of other instruments. These extraordinary machines have provided views of colliding galaxies 300 million light-years away, captured the death throes of stars like the Sun, and recorded portraits of interstellar clouds that birth new generations of stars and planets. In 2023, the scientists and engineers of the SMD were tasked with building the all-important Habitable Worlds Observatory, designed specifically to find alien life on planets light-years away. Slated to launch sometime in the 2040s, the HWO is planned to be about the same size as the JWST, with a similar orbit beyond the moon. Unlike the JWST, the HWO's sophisticated detectors must be able to tease out the light of an exoplanet against the billions-of-times-brighter glare of its host star, a signal as faint as the dim glow of a firefly flitting around a powerful field light at the San Francisco Giants' Oracle Park, but detected from all the way across the country in New York City. But now, many astronomers fear, NASA might never get the chance to build HWO—or carry out a slew of other missions that maintain the U.S.'s strong advantage in space science, as well as keep it ahead in the hunt for alien life. Under Donald Trump's plan, NASA would be forced to abandon 19 'active' missions. These include Juno—which is revolutionizing astronomers' understanding of Jupiter and could help them understand similarly monstrous worlds in other solar systems with other Earth-like planets—and New Horizons, a mission that took nearly 10 years to reach Pluto and is now flying into uncharted space at the edge of the solar system. The budget also decimates the future of space-science exploration. Scientists have been desperate to get back to Venus, for example, after a chemical compound associated with life was potentially detected high in its atmosphere in 2020; the two missions that would get us there are axed out of the administration's budget. The plan for the Nancy Roman Telescope, which would test key technologies necessary for the HWO, is so withered that many astronomers worry the telescope might never leave Earth. Worst, the development for the HWO takes an 80 percent cut in the president's proposed budget, going from $17 million in 2024 to just $3 million in 2026, before rebounding in 2028. The HWO represents one the most ambitious projects ever attempted, and the technological innovation needed to build it, or probes that might land on Jupiter's ocean moons, get measured across decades. In order for such missions to succeed, investments have to remain steady and focused—the opposite of what the Trump administration has proposed. Amid all the difficulties the country faces, the losses in space science might seem trivial. But American science, including space science, has paid enormous dividends in keeping the nation strong, prosperous, and worthy of the world's respect. If the original budget passes, one in every three of NASA's highly skilled workers will lose their job. The agency, in turn, will lose decades of hard-core technical experience: Not many people know how to blast a robot science rover from Earth, have it cross hundreds of millions of miles of deep space, and then land it—intact—on the surface of another planet. As the cuts take hold, plenty of NASA scientists might be forced to take jobs in other countries or early retirements they didn't want, or simply be let go. And the agency will be set back decades more into the future by choking off funding to young researchers at every level. Just as the U.S. is stumbling and falling back in its efforts to find alien life, astronomers around the world are preparing for the steep climb. The European Space Agency has a list of missions aimed at studying exoplanets. China has announced a 2028 launch date for Earth 2.0, a space telescope designed to find Earth-size exoplanets in the habitable zones of their stars. If it succeeds, that mission would put China on a path to building its own version of the Habitable Worlds Observatory. In my work as an astrophysicist, studying the possibilities of life on exoplanets, I travel around the world representing American science. In those travels, I consistently find people in other countries wearing two icons of American culture: the Yankee cap and the NASA logo. That a kid in Florence or a middle-aged guy in Bangkok would wear a NASA T-shirt is testimony to the power of its legacy. NASA—with its can-do spirit and its willingness to dream like no other organization in the history of the world—is America. If protected and nurtured, it would almost certainly lead the charge to answer that most existential question of life beyond Earth. But if this administration's shortsighted budget passes, it might be some other nation that discovers we are not alone in the universe.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
So, Your Dog Definitely Knows When You're Stressed–Here's How
So, Your Dog Definitely Knows When You're Stressed–Here's How originally appeared on PetHelpful. Understanding dog behavior will never not be totally interesting. From having their own love languages to specific barks having unique meanings, dogs are truly complex and amazing creatures with their own rich inner worlds. As it turns out, the bond between dog and owner goes even deeper than you might have ever imagined, so much so that a dog can even detect when their person is stressed out. 🐾 SIGN UP to get "pawsitivity" delivered right to your inbox with inspiring & entertaining stories about our furry & feathered friends along with expert advice from veterinarians and pet trainers 🐾 In an interview with American Kennel Club (AKC), Dr. Zoe Parr-Cortes, veterinarian and PhD graduate from the University of Bristol, explained how dogs can pick up on their owner's mental state through various cues."As one of our closest companions, dogs have co-evolved alongside humans for thousands of years. Because of this, both humans and dogs have learned to recognize cues in each other that signal how the other is feeling. Several studies have demonstrated that dogs respond to the sights and sounds of various human emotions, including crying, vocal tones, and facial expressions," Dr. Parr-Cortes explained to AKC. In addition, dogs also can sense stress through scent. According to research published in PLOS One, dogs can actually detect stress from sweat and breath samples through their sense of smell. In this study, baseline sweat and breath samples were taken from human participants. After that, the researchers administered math tests with the goal of causing the participants stress (side note: that would absolutely work to make me panic) and then collected a second round of samples. When the researchers presented the dogs with the samples, the canine participants could distinguish the baseline from the stress samples with over 90% accuracy thanks to a shift in the breath and sweat samples' volatile organic compounds, which is detectable to dogs' noses. More recent research conducted by Dr. Parr-Cortes and other members of the Animal Welfare and Behaviour Group at Bristol Vet School sought to understand exactly what it is the dogs are smelling that allow them to detect stress in those samples. While it was unclear whether the dogs in this particular study were responding to the humans' cortisol, adrenaline or other stress markers, this study opened up more avenues to further test what the dogs are sensing that makes them detect stress. Either way, pretty interesting stuff!So, Your Dog Definitely Knows When You're Stressed–Here's How first appeared on PetHelpful on Jun 23, 2025 This story was originally reported by PetHelpful on Jun 23, 2025, where it first appeared.
