Venture capital's extreme new 'fame game'
In a July 4 post, the California-based Maguire wrote that the NYC candidate "comes from a culture that lies about everything" and now seeks to advance "his Islamist agenda." It racked up more than 5 million views, became national news, and prompted two full-throated open letters: one demanding that Sequoia make a public apology, signed by self-identified employees of Microsoft, Google, and Apple, the other offering support, signed by the likes of tech iconoclasts Josh Wolfe and David Marcus. In the investing world, Maguire may have just claimed the crown as its reigning edgelord.
And yet: no apology. No deleted tweet. To the contrary, Maguire has only doubled and tripled down on his "Islamist" comments with several follow-up posts and a 29-minute video defending his remarks, while dismissing the open letter as an example of "cancel culture." He also clarified that he thinks only a small portion of Muslims are Islamists.
"You only embolden me," he wrote on X. Another post thanks the "haters and losers" among his 10,000 new followers. In another, he wrote, "Just so my enemies understand. I've reverse engineered your entire command structure. I'm going to play nice for now, but am ready to embarrass any of you should you escalate." Maguire and Sequoia did not respond to requests for comment on this story.
Here's the thing: As both tech and politics have become more polarized, incendiary behavior may no longer carry consequences for elite venture capitalists. If anything, it may be good for business.
From an outsider's perspective, Maguire's broadside may seem beyond the pale of content marketing. But it may just be the next turn of the dial in a post-pandemic tech ecosystem where elites have grown ever more brash and unapologetic. Top investors especially have learned they can be loud, bold, and polarizing, and it won't impact their ability to secure deals. In a market where the demand for capital outweighs the supply, VCs can afford to ruffle feathers.
Venture capital is largely "a fame game," says a venture capitalist at a multistage firm with several notable exits. "We all sell the same money. So brand awareness matters a lot, both in seeing and in winning deals."
While that's always been true, in today's attention-based economy, where a viral post has the half-life of a mayfly, some VCs are pushing beyond bland thought leadership into outright provocation. See: Paul Graham's moral screeds about woke culture and "founder mode," David Sacks' grievance-saturated podcasting, Marc Andreessen's manifesto drops. Keith Rabois, the managing director of Khosla Ventures, regularly takes aim at what he sees as liberal overreach in tech companies, slams remote work as lazy, and frames elite universities as indoctrination mills. Garry Tan, who sits at the helm of Y Combinator, posted last year that San Francisco politicians should "die slow" in a profanity-laced rant. Tan deleted the post and apologized, saying it was a reference to a Tupac Shakur diss track.
Maguire's viral tirade may have boosted his profile well beyond the technosphere — and the blowback could end up being a net positive.
Beyond VCs, a broader constellation of "free-speech absolutists" have emerged across tech, chief among them Elon Musk. The X owner's no-holds-barred posting style has given other tech figures implicit permission to say what they really think. And the broader rise of the independent, chest-thumpingly pro-tech media (Pirate Wires, All-In, TBPN) has further emboldened them to launch rhetorical grenades.
In that light, Maguire is a particularly potent case study in what happens when an investor decides to go full agitator. In the past year, he's posted conspiratorial claims that "antifa" was behind the attempted assassination of Donald Trump, accused Hunter Biden of stiffing him on rent for a Venice, California, property, and likened DEI policies to "structural racism."
Controversy isn't just tolerated in the upper ranks of business and politics. It's increasingly rewarded. Trump posted all the way back to the White House. Public company CEOs are getting bolder, too: Palantir's Alex Karp has openly derided higher education, while Meta's Mark Zuckerberg says big companies need more "masculine energy."
But venture capitalists like Maguire operate with even more insulation. They don't need votes or mass-market approval. They need access to deals, institutional capital, and portfolio wins. And so far, none of those seem particularly threatened at Sequoia — social media blow-ups be damned.
In fact, recent financings suggest the opposite: Sequoia remains a top-tier draw for startups like Harvey, Decart, and Mercury, and Maguire still writes big checks. He also serves as the firm's stand-in in the Muskverse, supporting its investments in SpaceX, xAI, The Boring Company, and Neuralink. Just through SpaceX, he's generated oodles of paper wealth for Sequoia's limited partners; Bloomberg reported this week that the company is in talks to raise new funding at a $400 billion valuation.
There are founders and investors who won't want to work with Maguire because of his ideology, said a principal at an early-stage fund. But many are reluctant to say so publicly, for the same reason he asked not to be named. Speaking out risks severing a critical relationship with Sequoia. For early-stage VCs, that relationship can mean the difference between a modest outcome and a breakout win, especially when Sequoia leads a later round and drives up the valuation.
Maguire's viral tirade may have boosted his profile well beyond the technosphere — and the blowback could end up being a net positive. "It might help more than it hurts," said another early-stage investor close to Maguire. "Everybody's talking about him" and "his good investments."
The multistage venture capitalist speculated that Maguire's comments might even bolster his standing in certain circles, particularly among Israeli founders, where he recently closed a defense tech investment. As for the entrepreneurs who just want to steer clear of controversy, they can slide into another Sequoia partner's DMs.
While there may be a hard line in VC, it appears that Maguire has not crossed it. The Sequoia partner can alienate some people without jeopardizing the machine. And the machine is humming along just fine.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time Business News
a minute ago
- Time Business News
EXCLUSIVE: Elon Musk Reportedly Set to Rebrand Vine as 'VIX,' an AI-Powered Creative Platform
Sources claim Musk is preparing to relaunch Vine under the name 'VIX,' blending nostalgia with cutting-edge AI through xAI. July 24, 2025 — Multiple sources close to the matter suggest that Elon Musk is planning a full rebrand of the iconic short-form video app Vine. The new name? VIX — a compact, futuristic title said to represent a fusion of Vine, Intelligence, and Musk's overarching X ecosystem. According to individuals familiar with early-stage development, VIX will not simply be a Vine reboot, but a radical reinvention of the platform using AI infrastructure developed by xAI, Musk's artificial intelligence company. 'This isn't Vine 2.0. It's something far more ambitious — a smart content engine that understands trends, tone, and timing before the user even hits publish,' one source with knowledge of the internal roadmap claimed. What is VIX? VIX is reportedly being positioned as a neural-enhanced short video platform, optimized for both creation and consumption. Key elements in early internal prototypes include: AI-assisted editing : Videos are automatically trimmed, looped, and enhanced using generative models. : Videos are automatically trimmed, looped, and enhanced using generative models. Real-time content suggestion : Users receive live creative prompts based on trending formats, keywords, or user behavior. : Users receive live creative prompts based on trending formats, keywords, or user behavior. Emotionally adaptive feeds : For users who opt in, content curation may eventually respond to facial microexpressions or sentiment indicators. : For users who opt in, content curation may eventually respond to facial microexpressions or sentiment indicators. Prompt-based clip generation: Early experiments allow users to describe a video idea via text, and have AI assist in generating or remixing visual content. One internal engineer described VIX as a combination of 'TikTok's immediacy with the intelligence of a neural co-pilot.' Strategic Branding: VIX in the X Ecosystem The name VIX is rumored to stand for Vine + Intelligence + X, aligning with Musk's growing suite of unified brands, including X (formerly Twitter), xAI, and Insiders point to the simplicity and symmetry of the name as intentional. Unlike the nostalgia-heavy 'Vine 2.0' brand floated in past years, VIX aims to signal evolution — from manual meme-making to smart, self-aware media. Recent activity around domain names like and as well as trademark applications tied to 'visual intelligence networks,' further support the speculation. A Shift Toward Neural Entertainment While Musk has made only vague comments when asked about reviving Vine, he has alluded in public remarks and posts on X to a future where content becomes 'real-time intelligent, not just reactive.' This aligns with xAI's stated mission to build artificial general intelligence that can be integrated across entertainment, education, and communications — areas where short-form video sits at the center. A confidential internal presentation, tentatively titled 'Project Loopback,' reportedly outlines a vision for intelligent content loops: short videos that learn, evolve, and adapt through feedback, prompts, and collective behavior. What Comes Next There is no official timeline for a public announcement, but several X engineers have hinted at a potential limited-access preview in late 2025, with a full rollout targeted for 2026. As with most Elon Musk projects, confirmation may come suddenly — or not at all. But if these early signals are accurate, VIX could represent the most significant evolution of short-form media since Vine's original debut in 2013. Developing story. Further updates will follow as more information emerges. TIME BUSINESS NEWS

Business Insider
a minute ago
- Business Insider
'A long, slow bleed': Quant hedge funds are getting slammed and scrambling for answers
Quant hedge fund managers are experiencing one of the most prolonged droughts in recent memory. The bigger concern: They don't know why. Systematic hedge funds have suffered a steady decline since June that managers are struggling to wrap their heads around. Quant executives, portfolio managers, and headhunters working in the space told Business Insider that the turmoil has hit most of the industry, generating concern and intrigue about the source of the pain. "It kinda crept up on everyone as there weren't many disastrous days, but it's been small loss after small loss," said one executive at a quant trading firm, who wasn't authorized to speak publicly. "No one seems to know why this is happening." Qube Research & Technologies, the $28 billion quant firm started by former Credit Suisse traders, has lost 5% in July in its flagship fund through last Friday, a person close to the manager said. The manager's larger Torus fund is down 7% in July, but both strategies are still up double-digits on the year. Point72's Cubist unit has experienced one of its worst stretches since the pandemic slammed global markets in March 2020, two people familiar with the firm said. Two Sigma's Spectrum fund is down roughly 2% this month through the end of last week, a person close to the manager said. At Man Group, the firm's AHL Dimension fund — a multi-asset systematic strategy — was down 2.5% in July through Tuesday, according to the London-based manager's website. Renaissance Technologies' largest external fund was down close to 6% in June, according to HSBC's Hedge Weekly report. These firms declined to comment or did not immediately respond to requests for comment. From the start of June through this Tuesday, equity quant managers lost 4.2%, according to a report from Goldman Sachs' prime services unit. The losses, driven by US equities, are the worst run of performance for systematic long-short strategies since a sharp drop at the end of 2023. Quant distress doesn't necessarily signal broader market trouble, but severe losses can spill over — especially if a large firm dumps positions and sparks contagion. The S&P 500 is up nearly 8% since June, and the VIX — a measure of volatility — is at its lowest point since February. Other prominent hedge fund strategies, including fundamental equity and multi-strategy, have steadily gained over the same period, the report said. Luckily for the quant space, it had been a strong year performance-wise until summer began, so the sector's annual returns are still, on average, outpacing their human rivals. A hallmark of statistical arbitrage, a classic quant trade that wields mathematical models to exploit short-term pricing inefficiencies across large baskets of stocks, istaking positions poised to pay off regardless of broader market swings. It has periodic slumps like any other trade, but they tend to be sharp and quick. Major drawdowns often last just a couple of days and stem from a large player liquidating a portfolio or reducing market exposure. Overcrowding can exacerbate losses, as it did during the so-called Quant Quake, in which systematic hedge funds such as Goldman Sachs' famed quantitative division suffered heavy, sudden losses in August 2007 while the rest of the market rallied. What's unusual this summer, industry sources say, is the accumulation of small losses over weeks. "Everyone says it's different this time — different because of duration," said a hedge fund consultant who works with large quant funds. "This has been a long, slow bleed across the complex." That pattern isn't consistent with a large liquidation and its aftershocks, though losses so far this week have been more intense, including a 0.6% decline on Tuesday, according to Goldman Sachs. The Goldman report said drivers included the sell-off of momentum strategies that bet rising stocks will keep rising; the rally in speculative, high volatility stocks; and "some unwinding of crowded trades." Intense losses could quickly pile up if sizable funds start cutting their exposure. "It's survival of the fittest, basically," said one quant trader at a multi-billion-dollar manager. "Who is going to have the stomach to ride this out and stick to their bets?"


Bloomberg
a minute ago
- Bloomberg
C3.ai CEO Tom Siebel to Seek Successor Due to Health Concerns
Software company Inc. is looking for a new chief executive officer after Tom Siebel said he intends to step aside due to health concerns. 'After being diagnosed with an autoimmune disease in early 2025, I have experienced significant visual impairment,' Siebel said in a statement Thursday. He will remain executive chairman once the company's board appoints a successor, he added.