Manitoba says no to some U.S. bidders, but Tories say U.S. firms still getting work
The government promised in March to implement a buy-Canadian policy which would prioritize Canadian firms, in response to tariffs on Canadian goods imposed by U.S. President Donald Trump.
In some recent requests for proposals, the government has explicitly banned bids from south of the border.
A request for proposals issued Tuesday for a 'comfort camping village' — a term that can include amenities such as cabins or yurts — in St. Malo Provincial Park is limited to Canadian suppliers. In addition, 'submissions which propose the use of subcontractors based in the United States will be automatically disqualified,' the government's online proposal said.
Similar wording was used for the planned redevelopment of a washroom and shower building in Whiteshell Provincial Park.
The work involved is of a low enough dollar value to be exempt from Canada-U.S. free-trade obligations, a government spokesperson said.
But the Progressive Conservatives said Tuesday there have been glaring exemptions to the buy-Canadian policy.
The Tories tabled government documents in the legislature that showed two technology contracts, worth more than $1.8 million each, were awarded to firms headquartered in Texas and California in March after U.S. tariffs took effect.
One — a deal with software company Actian, based in Round Rock, Texas — was awarded directly, meaning other companies were not given an opportunity to bid.
'This NDP government gave multimillion-dollar ... contracts to American firms in the middle of a trade war,' Tory legislature member Josh Guenter said.
The government said it is in the middle of reviewing its purchasing and aiming to favour Canadian firms.
'Our government is reviewing all the contract and procurement policies to make sure we are getting the most benefit for Manitobans,' said Mintu Sandhu, the provincial minister for public service delivery.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published May 20, 2025.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Atlantic
15 minutes ago
- Atlantic
Censorship for Citizenship
This is an edition of The Atlantic Daily, a newsletter that guides you through the biggest stories of the day, helps you discover new ideas, and recommends the best in culture. Sign up for it here. Not that long ago, believe it or not, Donald Trump ran for president as the candidate who would defend the First Amendment. He warned that a 'sinister group of Deep State bureaucrats, Silicon Valley tyrants, left-wing activists, and depraved corporate news media' was 'conspiring to manipulate and silence the American people,' and promised that 'by restoring free speech, we will begin to reclaim our democracy, and save our nation.' On his first day back in office, Trump signed an executive order affirming the 'right of the American people to engage in constitutionally protected speech.' If anyone believed him at the time, they should be disabused by now. One of his most brazen attacks on freedom of speech thus far came this past weekend, when the president said that he was thinking about stripping a comedian of her citizenship—for no apparent reason other than that she regularly criticizes him. 'Because of the fact that Rosie O'Donnell is not in the best interests of our Great Country, I am giving serious consideration to taking away her Citizenship. She is a Threat to Humanity, and should remain in the wonderful Country of Ireland, if they want her,' he posted on Truth Social. This must have been exhilarating to O'Donnell, who received a brief new grant of relevance and told the Irish broadcaster RTE, 'I am very proud to be opposed to every single thing he says and does and represents.' But once the exhilaration subsides, the fundamental idea is very disturbing: Trump appears to view both free speech and U.S. citizenship as conditional, things he can revoke based on his own whims. Writing off the threat to O'Donnell as just another instance of Trumpian trolling—or an attempt to distract from fatal flooding in Texas, dozens of incomplete trade deals, or intramural MAGA battles over Jeffrey Epstein —is tempting. And the odds that Trump would actually successfully strip O'Donnell of her passport seem slim. But that doesn't mean the threat is irrelevant. What in particular set Trump off here is unclear—he and O'Donnell have been feuding for years—but by all indications, the answer is simply that she has exercised her freedom of speech to jab him. Perhaps this should go without saying, but native-born American citizens like O'Donnell generally cannot be stripped of their citizenship. (Citizens can, however, choose to relinquish their citizenship—something that has become a somewhat popular option for people wishing to avoid U.S. taxes, including former U.K. Prime Minister Boris Johnson, a New York native.) A president can't just decide that he wants to take it away. In other recent cases where the Trump administration has attempted to suppress speech, officials have at least claimed that they have evidence of criminality (though that's not to say even that was a legitimate standard; such accusations are also dangerous, and judges have dismissed them). With O'Donnell, Trump isn't even pretending she has crossed some sort of criminal line. He's also not (yet) taking action, but Trump often uses initially brash and outlandish threats as a way to acclimate the populace to his overreaching, as I wrote in the January 2024 issue of The Atlantic: 'When a second-term President Trump directs the Justice Department to lock up Democratic politicians or generals or reporters or activists on flimsy or no grounds at all, people will wring their hands, but they'll also shrug and wonder why he didn't do it sooner. After all, he's been promising to do it forever, right?' I wish this argument had aged worse. Trump has begun talking more frequently about revoking citizenship as a means of punishing political speech. He has mused about using the tool against political opponents, including the New York mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani, alleging potential fraud, and his former buddy Elon Musk, who had the temerity to insult him. Both of these men are naturalized, which makes their citizenship marginally easier to remove—though, again, not for simple speech. The administration has also been pursuing denaturalizations of citizens whom it believes it can prove lied on their application, which is an established legal basis for stripping their legal status. Even if Trump doesn't normalize taking away citizenship, he is continuing to entrench the idea that the government—or, really, just the president on his own—can punish citizens who criticize it, or him. That's been one of the most prominent themes of his term so far: He has banished the Associated Press from some White House spaces simply for refusing to adopt his preferred terminology, extorted law firms that employed lawyers involved in the criminal cases against him, and demanded huge payouts from news organizations. He'll continue as long as he's successful. 'If we don't have free speech, then we just don't have a free country,' Trump said in a campaign video posted in 2022. 'It's as simple as that. If this most fundamental right is allowed to perish, then the rest of our rights and liberties will topple just like dominos one by one. They'll go down.' Here are three new stories from The Atlantic: Today's News President Donald Trump announced a new weapons-transfer plan for Ukraine and threatened to impose high tariffs on Russia if a peace deal is not reached in 50 days. The Supreme Court allowed the Trump administration to move forward with dismantling the Education Department and firing nearly 1,400 workers. Twenty-four states and the District of Columbia sued the Trump administration for withholding more than $6.8 billion in education funding, which helps pay for free or low-cost after-school programs and assistance for students learning English. Dispatches Evening Read The AI Mirage By Ian Bogost 'I'm not going to respond to that,' Siri responded. I had just cursed at it, and this was my passive-aggressive chastisement. The cursing was, in my view, warranted. I was in my car, running errands, and had found myself in an unfamiliar part of town. I requested 'directions to Lowe's,' hoping to get routed to the big-box hardware store without taking my eyes off the road. But apparently Siri didn't understand. 'Which Lowe?' it asked, before displaying a list of people with the surname Lowe in my address book … The latest version of Siri has 'better conversational context'—the sort of thing that should help the software know when I'm asking to be guided to the home-improvement store rather than to a guy called Lowe. But my iPhone apparently isn't new enough for this update. I would need cutting-edge artificial intelligence to get directions to Lowe's. More From The Atlantic Read. Alert the incels! The rest of us love Pamela Anderson, and we will always love her, Caitlin Flanagan writes. Let go. And let your kid climb that tree, Henry Abbott writes. It could actually make them safer. Play our daily crossword.
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump says US will send Patriot missiles to Ukraine: 'They desperately need' them
WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump said the United States will send Patriot air defense missiles to Ukraine that will be reimbursed for by the European Union, offering critical help to Kyiv as it battles an onslaught of Russian drone attacks. Trump did not specify how many weapons systems the United States would provide and told reporters it had not been agreed upon yet. The United States, Trump stressed, would not pay for them. He then heaped fresh criticism on Russian President Vladimir Putin, whom he's soured against in recent weeks. "We will send them Patriots, which they desperately need," Trump said of Ukraine while speaking with reporters at Joint Base Andrews on July 13. "Putin really surprised a lot of people. He talks nice and then he bombs everybody in the evening. There's a little bit of a problem there. I don't like it." Ukraine latest: Trump escalates criticism of Putin, rearms Ukraine, as Russia's war plows on Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has been pressing Trump to allow his country to purchase Patriot missile air defense systems from the United States as Russia intensifies its missile and drone attacks. Shipments of the missile systems that were previously approved were paused by a Pentagon review of U.S. military stockpiles and then resumed last week by Trump. "Ukraine is ready to buy this equipment and support American weapons manufacturers. Europe can help," Zelenskyy said after a June 25 meeting with Trump. While speaking to reporters after returning from the FIFA Club World Cup match in New Jersey, Trump said the United States would be sending Ukraine "sophisticated military" equipment. The plan was expected to be part of an Oval Office discussion at the White House with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte. Trump said in an interview with NBC News last week that the United States would be sending weapons to NATO that the military alliance would be paying for. 'We are not paying for any more weapons,' Trump told NBC at the time. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: US will send Patriot air defense missiles to Ukraine: Donald Trump
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Top Telecom Pick: Should You Choose Telus or BCE?
Written by Adam Othman at The Motley Fool Canada Successful dividend investing in the stock market is all about making high-quality picks from the right sectors that can distribute payouts comfortably, supported by solid underlying businesses. Looking into stock from the top companies in industries that can align with your passive income goals is a good way to go about this. The Canadian telecom sector is highly consolidated and well-established, and has a few recession-resistant names that many investors like to own in their portfolios. Most of the top telecom stocks offer shareholders an attractive dividend yield supported by solid fundamentals. Two Canadian telcos are the top considerations for many investors. Each has its own strategic approach to respond to changing market conditions. Dividend-centric investors should consider these carefully to make a well-informed decision before investing in Canadian telecom stocks. Today, we'll take a good look at Telus Corp. (TSX:T) and BCE Inc. (TSX:BCE) to help you determine which might be the better pick for your self-directed portfolio. Telus is one of the Big Three telcos in the country. Boasting a $34.3 billion market cap, it has over 9 million mobile customers across the country, accounting for roughly a third of the market. The company provides internet, TV, and landline services. It has also recently started upgrading from its legacy copper network to fibre optic cables to offer better value for money to customers. Besides this, Telus has several subsidiaries operating across different sectors, including agriculture, healthcare, security, and international business services. As of this writing, Telus stock trades for $22.65 per share and boasts a 7.4% dividend yield. Despite high-yielding dividends, its payout ratio is in the reliable 60–75% of free cash flow range. The company's diversified revenue streams, increased earnings, and sustainable payout ratio make it an attractive investment to consider. BCE is another one of the Big Three, boasting a $29.7 billion market capitalization. It offers wireless and internet services, broadband, landline services, and has a considerable media segment that holds digital media, TV, and radio assets. BCE recently announced a 56% dividend cut, effectively slashing the payouts to relieve itself from double-digit yields that we are seeing of late. The dividend cut did not go well with plenty of investors, but it might be a good decision. Slashing payouts to more sustainable levels means that the company has better financial flexibility to fuel future growth. The more the company can grow, the better returns it can offer to investors in the long run. Being the biggest driving force behind 5G technology in Canada, BCE could benefit from having better financials. As of this writing, it trades for $32.60 per share and boasts a 5.4% dividend yield. Dividend-focused investors seeking immediate returns might not appreciate the dividend cut announced by BCE. However, those with a long-term investment horizon might appreciate the change because it lets the telco improve its financials over time at the cost of lower dividends for the time being. Telus offers the promise of growth through dividends that it does not plan to cut. It also has the backing of several diversified revenue streams that might make payouts more sustainable for the company. Between the two, it is difficult to make the wrong decision for your self-directed portfolio. If you're seeking higher-yielding immediate returns through dividends, Telus wins. If you're willing to invest with plenty of patience for potentially better long-term returns, BCE might be a better pick. The post Top Telecom Pick: Should You Choose Telus or BCE? appeared first on The Motley Fool Canada. Before you buy stock in BCE, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor Canada analyst team just identified what they believe are the Top Stocks for 2025 and Beyond for investors to buy now… and BCE wasn't one of them. The Top Stocks that made the cut could potentially produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider MercadoLibre, which we first recommended on January 8, 2014 ... if you invested $1,000 in the 'eBay of Latin America' at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $24,927.94!* Stock Advisor Canada provides investors with an easy-to-follow blueprint for success, including guidance on building a portfolio, regular updates from analysts, and two new stock picks each month – one from Canada and one from the U.S. The Stock Advisor Canada service has outperformed the return of S&P/TSX Composite Index by 30 percentage points since 2013*. See the Top Stocks * Returns as of 6/23/25 More reading 10 Stocks Every Canadian Should Own in 2025 [PREMIUM PICKS] Market Volatility Toolkit A Commonsense Cash Back Credit Card We Love Fool contributor Adam Othman has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends TELUS. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. 2025
