Scope Markets Appoints Mohanad Yakout as Senior Market Analyst for the MENA region
With certifications from CISI, IFTA (CFTe), and CMT Level 2, and a degree in Finance & Investment, Mohanad's deep knowledge of global and regional markets spans both macroeconomic and technical analysis as well as strategic client engagement. In this role, Mohanad will deliver high-quality insights to support clients within the MENA region and beyond.
Joshua Mahony, Chief Market Analyst at Scope Markets, commented:
'Mohanad brings a rare combination of analytical depth and real-world client impact. His ability to deliver timely, multilingual insights across multiple channels reinforces our commitment to providing best-in-class support for traders and partners.'
Mohanad is known for producing market reports, technical outlooks, and live updates in both English and Arabic, making him an important voice in regional and international financial media. He has served as a market spokesperson on platforms such as CNBC, Bloomberg Asharq, and Al Arabiya, where he delivers real-time commentary and strategic analysis on key global events.
Mohanad Yakout, Senior Market Analyst at Scope Markets, added:
'Joining Scope Markets is an exciting next step. 'The firm's focus on transparency, research, and client empowerment matches my own approach to helping traders and partners navigate markets with clarity and confidence.'
Scope Markets continues to broaden its appeal to clients in the MENA region, strengthening its existing offering, which includes access to regional index pricing on UAE equity exchanges, pricing on gold and silver CFDs in non-USD denominated contracts, local language customer service facilities and funding in local payment options.
By expanding its research capabilities in the native language of the region, Scope Markets reinforces its dedication to serving the unique needs of MENA investors and deepening its presence in one of the world's most dynamic financial markets. As part of these efforts, Mohanad will contribute to regional event and media appearances, market publications, and platform-integrated commentary—delivering insight that helps clients act decisively across asset classes in both Arabic and English.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arabian Post
an hour ago
- Arabian Post
Trump's Tariff War Creates De Facto Counter-Axis Driven By Common Cause
By K Raveendran Donald Trump's aggressive tariff regime, launched under the guise of bolstering American strength and reclaiming lost economic ground, has triggered a worldwide response that may ultimately defeat the very goal it seeks to achieve. Framed as a nationalist project to assert America's economic primacy, the tariff war has turned out to be a catalyst for an accelerating global shift away from unipolar US dominance toward a truly multipolar world order. What was once largely speculative—the idea of a global economic architecture not centred on Washington—is now becoming tangible as Trump's trade brinkmanship compels other nations to rethink, regroup, and realign. The essential flaw in Trump's strategy lies in its assumption that the rest of the world would blink first, caving in to American demands under the weight of economic pressure. But the world hasn't blinked. Instead, countries are finding common cause in resisting what they perceive as economic coercion masquerading as negotiation. The result is a fluid yet increasingly coherent realignment of powers—chief among them China, Russia, and India—that is beginning to operate as a de facto counter-axis to the United States. Driven by shared grievances and the common objective of shielding their strategic autonomy, these nations are cooperating more closely in trade, investment, and energy. The irony is that Trump's pursuit of economic supremacy is hastening the erosion of the very system that enabled US dominance for decades. Beijing, long a prime target of Trump's tariffs, has responded with both retaliation and redirection. Rather than capitulating to Washington's demands, China has expanded its outreach to other major economies, particularly in Asia and Africa, while deepening its engagement with Russia and India. The Belt and Road Initiative, initially conceived as a means of global infrastructure connectivity, is now also a tool for economic realignment. As Trump builds tariff walls, China builds roads, ports, and financial networks that bypass the United States. Moscow, for its part, has welcomed this pivot. Isolated by US and European sanctions, Russia sees opportunity in closer ties with China and India, both of which have shown increasing willingness to defy Western pressure. India, though traditionally more aligned with the West and an enthusiastic participant in global liberal markets, has found itself inching toward the emerging non-Western axis. Trump's tariffs on Indian goods, coupled with his administration's threats of secondary sanctions on countries trading with Russia or buying Iranian oil, have forced New Delhi to draw red lines. India's stance on Russian oil, for instance, has been unambiguous: it is a matter of national interest and energy security. Any effort by Washington to curtail these purchases is seen not just as economic interference but as a direct challenge to sovereign decision-making. In retaliation, India has dangled the cancellation of key defence deals, including the proposed purchase of the F-35 fighter jets—a symbolic snub that indicates a broader reassessment of strategic alignment. What makes this realignment especially potent is the breadth of its scope. It is not merely a matter of retaliatory tariffs or diplomatic rhetoric; it includes infrastructure cooperation, technological integration, and long-term investment planning. China and India, despite historic differences, have increased dialogue in recent months on trade facilitation and regional connectivity. Russia's role as a common energy partner and military supplier to both nations gives it leverage in the triangle. And with US credibility as a dependable trade partner being questioned, many smaller nations are also hedging their bets, diversifying their economic relations away from a US-centric model. Even traditional US allies in Europe are uneasy. Germany and France have voiced concerns about the destabilizing effects of Trump's tariffs on global trade norms. The EU is pursuing its own trade treaties with countries like Japan and Vietnam, carving out autonomous space in global commerce that doesn't necessarily involve Washington. At the heart of this geopolitical churn is a growing skepticism toward the idea that the United States can or should dictate the terms of global trade. The Trump administration's belief that economic might translates automatically into negotiating power has ignored the subtle but critical fact that globalisation has made nations more interconnected and interdependent. Trying to weaponise trade may yield short-term leverage, but it also creates lasting rifts and compels partners to seek alternatives. The economic structures of the 21st century no longer afford any single nation the luxury of acting as an economic autocrat without consequences. Furthermore, the economic impact within the United States is more complex and less flattering than the populist rhetoric suggests. While certain domestic industries may benefit from tariff protections, others are suffering from rising input costs and retaliatory measures. American farmers have been hit particularly hard by Chinese tariffs on agricultural imports, prompting the Trump administration to introduce multi-billion dollar bailout packages that, in effect, cancel out the supposed gains of the trade war. Manufacturing, far from being resurgent, is experiencing uncertainty and disruption due to volatility in global supply chains. The idea that tariff wars are 'easy to win' has proven to be one of the most misguided statements of Trump's presidency. Even American multinationals, once eager advocates of 'America First' policies, are quietly relocating parts of their supply chains to countries not caught in the tariff crossfire. This shift not only diminishes the US's leverage but also accelerates the decentralization of economic power. No longer is the American market an irresistible magnet for global commerce; it is increasingly seen as a zone of instability and risk. For many countries, the trade war has been a wake-up call—an impetus to invest in regional blocs, alternative trade corridors, and new financial instruments insulated from US influence. In the broader scheme, what Trump has unwittingly triggered is a reimagination of how global power is structured. The post-Cold War illusion of US-led globalisation is being replaced by a more pluralistic, competitive, and fragmented order. Emerging powers are no longer content to play by rules written in Washington. They are building parallel systems: China's digital yuan aims to reduce dependency on the dollar; India and Russia have revived rupee-rouble trade mechanisms; and regional trade agreements like RCEP are functioning without US participation. What's being born is a new kind of globalization—less hierarchical, more balanced, and far less dependent on any single country. (IPA Service)
Arabian Post
12 hours ago
- Arabian Post
India maintains oil trade with Russia amid growing pressures
Despite mounting international tensions and growing calls for sanctions, India has confirmed its commitment to continuing oil purchases from Russia. The decision, which has drawn both support and criticism, comes in the face of strong opposition from Western powers, particularly the United States. India's robust relationship with Russia, especially in energy sectors, remains central to its strategy to ensure energy security amid global market volatility. While the United States has intensified its warnings against increasing trade with Russia, citing geopolitical risks and the ongoing war in Ukraine, Indian officials assert that the decision aligns with the country's broader economic interests and long-term energy goals. The timing of the announcement comes as global oil prices continue to fluctuate, driven by factors ranging from OPEC+ production cuts to the ripple effects of the Russia-Ukraine conflict. With Russia now facing significant sanctions from the West, including oil price caps and restrictions on exports, India has emerged as one of the largest buyers of Russian crude oil, navigating complex international pressures while keeping its energy needs in focus. ADVERTISEMENT India's oil imports from Russia soared in the wake of the war in Ukraine, particularly after Western nations moved to isolate Moscow from the global market. The country, which historically sourced much of its oil from the Middle East, found Russian oil a lucrative alternative as Western sanctions created discounts, allowing India to tap into a relatively cheap energy supply. Russia, in turn, welcomed the partnership, as it opened new markets and ensured continued demand for its oil. According to official sources, Russia's increased sales to India, and other non-Western nations, helped offset some of the lost revenue due to sanctions. India's government, however, has been careful to position its stance within a framework of neutrality. Public statements highlight that the nation's energy decisions are based on its own national interest, focusing primarily on economic stability and the welfare of its people. Officials have also pointed out that India is among the world's most energy-hungry nations and needs to secure a steady and affordable supply of oil to support its growing population and economic expansion. Internationally, this trade has sparked debates over the moral and strategic implications of engaging with Russia. Critics argue that by maintaining ties with Russia, India risks undermining global efforts to isolate Moscow, particularly as Western governments seek to enforce stricter sanctions. They point out the tensions between India's non-alignment policy and its deepening economic relationship with a nation under international scrutiny. On the other hand, some argue that India's approach reflects a pragmatic understanding of its own strategic priorities, particularly the need to balance international relationships with domestic requirements. With rising fuel costs and inflation becoming pressing issues for many nations, securing affordable energy resources has become a matter of national security. India's oil trade with Russia, however, is not without its challenges. Western nations have long pressured India to reduce its dependence on Russian energy. The Biden administration, particularly, has warned that India's continued imports could strain relations, especially as the US seeks to maintain solidarity with its European allies in pressuring Russia. Washington's position on the matter is clear: nations that continue to do business with Russia will face consequences, with potential impacts on trade and geopolitical ties. Yet, India's economic and geopolitical imperatives make it unlikely to back down. As part of the BRICS group, which also includes Brazil, Russia, China, and South Africa, India has voiced its commitment to a multipolar world order where nations can pursue their own economic paths, free from external coercion. India has also consistently argued for the need for dialogue and peaceful resolution in the Russia-Ukraine conflict, advocating for diplomacy over military escalation. The ongoing conflict has undeniably reshaped global energy dynamics, forcing countries to reassess their energy strategies and alignments. While India's stance has garnered significant attention, its broader approach is seen as part of an evolving foreign policy that seeks to advance national interests without being swayed by external pressures.
Gulf Today
17 hours ago
- Gulf Today
Newcastle reject Liverpool opening bid to sign striker Isak, say reports
Newcastle have rejected Liverpool's opening bid to sign unsettled Sweden striker Alexander Isak, according to reports on Friday. Isak has been training at his old club Real Sociedad this week after reportedly telling Newcastle he wants to leave St James' Park. The 25-year-old has been linked with Liverpool since the end of last season and the Premier League champions are now believed to have formalised their interest with an offer of around £110 million ($159 million) plus potential add-ons. But Newcastle, who reportedly value Isak at £150 million, remain keen to hold onto their prize asset and have rebuffed Liverpool's initial bid. Isak, who joined Newcastle in a £60 million move from Real Sociedad in 2022, scored 23 Premier League goals last season to help Newcastle qualify for the Champions League. He has three years left on his Newcastle contract, but did not travel to Asia for the Magpies' ongoing pre-season tour, with the club saying he had a minor thigh injury. On Thursday, Real Sociedad confirmed he was at their Zubieta facility with his own trainers. It was reported on Friday that Newcastle had told Isak he could agree a new deal containing a get-out clause for next year, but he responded by insisting he wants to move now. Liverpool manager Arne Slot has already bolstered his attacking options by signing Eintracht Frankfurt striker Hugo Ekitike and Bayer Leverkusen playmaker Florian Wirtz during the current transfer window. But the Reds are keen to make their forward line even more formidable by adding Isak as they look to win back to back English titles for the first time since the 1980s. Newcastle boss Eddie Howe struck a defiant note earlier this week when he said: 'He is still our player. He's contracted to us. 'We, to a degree, control what is next for him. I would love to believe all possibilities are still available to us. 'My wish is that he stays, but that's not in my full control.' Liverpool have spent over £250 million so far in the summer window, with Milos Kerkez, Jeremie Frimpong and Giorgi Mamardashvili joining Wirtz and Ekitike at Anfield. Meanwhile, Premier League side Chelsea loaned teenage defender Mamadou Sarr back to sister club Strasbourg on Friday for the upcoming Ligue 1 season. The French club confirmed the loan move on its website, having sold the highly rated Sarr to Chelsea in June. Strasbourg is owned by the consortium led by Todd Boehly and Clearlake Capital that bought Chelsea in 2022. The 19-year-old Sarr is a France under-20 international. He was a regular last season, playing 27 league games as Alsace-based Strasbourg finished in seventh place to seal a place in the Conference League playoffs. He previously played briefly for Lyon. Chelsea won the Conference League last season and will play in the Champions League after finishing in fourth place in the Premier League. Strasbourg was bought by Chelsea's ownership group, BlueCo, in 2023. Chelsea said Sarr had signed a contract until 2033 but didn't disclose the transfer fee. Strasbourg opens their league campaign at Metz on Aug. 17. Elsewhere, West Ham midfielder Lucas Paqueta has been cleared of spot-fixing charges by an independent regulatory commission, the club announced on Thursday. Agencies
