Former Orland Park cops sue village over discrimination claim, alleged unlawful arrest
William Sanchez, a sergeant and 19-year veteran of the force, alleges he was fired in March 2024 after complaining to supervisors and the village's Human Resources Department that he was denied a promotion to lieutenant 'because of his racial identity as a Hispanic Latino.'
Apart from the village, the lawsuit names police Chief Eric Rossi and Brian West, previously deputy chief and now interim village manager, among the defendants.
Sanchez said he also filed charges of discrimination with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and the Illinois Department of Human Rights.
Kenneth Kovac, a retired sergeant, alleges in his lawsuit that there was a conspiracy to violate his constitutional rights, including his First Amendment right to freedom of speech.
The Orland Park resident says he was unlawfully arrested and charged with false personation and disorderly conduct, which he said stemmed from a parody Facebook profile he created aimed at West, at the time deputy police chief. The charges were later dismissed in Cook County court, according to the lawsuit.
The village said it has been made aware of the lawsuits and that the village 'stands by its actions and those of its employees and remains confident that they were appropriate and fully compliant with the law.'
'The Village is committed to maintaining a fair and inclusive workplace, upholding the highest professional standards in our employment and law enforcement practices, and ensuring that all employees are treated with respect and in accordance with the law,' according to the statement. 'We will address these claims through the legal process and remain confident that the village has acted lawfully and appropriately in these matters.'
The law firm Hughes Socol Piers Resnick, & Dym, Ltd. represents both Sanchez and Kovac. The lawsuits were filed March 14.
'Sergeant Sanchez deserves to get his job back, and for Orland Park to take meaningful steps to make sure no one else has to fear for their jobs just because they voice their concerns about potential race discrimination within the police department,' Justin Tresnowski, an attorney with the firm, said in a news release.
Sanchez said he was initially notified in February 2024 he was being suspended without pay for alleged misconduct, then later fired. He said his union, the Orland Park Police Supervisors Association, filed a grievance challenging the firing and demanding arbitration.
An arbitrator ruled in January that Sanchez was not fired for just cause and ordered the village to reinstate him to his former position and 'make him whole for all losses suffered.' The village is appealing the decision.
Sanchez sought reinstatement along with back pay.
At the time of his firing, Sanchez was president of the Orland Park Police Supervisors Association, a bargaining unit separate from patrol officers that represents police sergeants and lieutenants in the department.
Sanchez was hired in 2004 as a patrol officer. He was promoted to sergeant in 2021 and that August was assigned as supervisor of the department's traffic safety unit.
He alleged harassment and racial discrimination on the part of Rossi and West, while Sanchez was alleged to have contributed to creating a hostile work environment for West.
In his lawsuit, Kovac said he created a parody Facebook page, under the profile 'Bryan East,' after he became concerned about 'abuses of power' within the Police Department.
West is a defendant in his lawsuit along with the village and Rossi. It seeks attorney fees, court costs and other unspecified damages.
In his lawsuit, Kovac said that, using the Bryan East name, he posted what he described as innocuous comments on the village's Facebook page. He said he created his Facebook page in January 2024, and deleted it within about a week.
Kovac said he was subjected to an investigation, including search warrants used to examine his personal communications and other data.
During the investigation, he said, his attorney contacted the village and warned that Kovac's Facebook activities were constitutionally protected, and that Orland Park could open itself up to liability.
Kovac said in the lawsuit that two criminal complaints were filed against him in late March 2024, and that he turned himself in April 7 of last year. The charges against him were dismissed in court this past January, according to his lawsuit.
'Sergeant Sanchez's retaliatory termination for complaining about discrimination and Mr. Kovac's arrest and prosecution for non-threatening parody posts online were patently illegal abuses of power,' Tresnowski said in the news release. 'Mr. Kovac and Sergeant Sanchez deserve justice, and the Village must be held accountable.'
Originally Published: March 21, 2025 at 3:10 PM CDT
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
8 hours ago
- CBS News
Scammers tap into Coloradan's Facebook page; authorities say it's an ongoing problem that's nearly impossible to investigate
"We're conducting a sale of personal items due to my uncle's move to a care facility," the posting on Facebook begins. Along with it are over 60 photos of items allegedly for sale. Pickups and SUVs, tractor trailers, 4-wheelers, generators and appliances. All at desperation-looking prices. It appears Jeanellil Taylor's uncle had quite an accumulation of possessions. But they need to be sold. On the page the posting says, "To manage this transition smoothly, items are being sold on a first-come, first-serve basis! I'll be out of town assisting with this move and won't be back till next weekend. To reserve an item a deposit is necessary." Except one problem. Jeanellil Taylor of Evergreen had her Facebook page hijacked by scammers. It's fraud. Her uncle is not going into a care facility. There are no items for sale. Taylor, who was on vacation out of state when someone tapped into her Facebook page and took it over, was initially unaware. It was only after friends who were tagged in the Facebook post began contacting her directly when she found out. But she couldn't even look at the posting on her own page. She was unable to get onto her Facebook account. "It's absolutely insane. People are absolutely insane," said Taylor. "People are coming out of the woodwork and they're like, 'Are you selling this? I'll buy this.' And I'm like, what are you talking about.?" A cousin in Arizona contacted her about the item she was buying. She had already sent money via an online digital wallet service as a deposit. It was too late. Taylor tried contacting Facebook to get control of her page again and get the posting taken down. "I tried to reach out to Facebook, tried to change my password, and it's just like nope, nope, nope, nope, shutdown, shutdown, shutdown shutdown. No matter how I tried. Phone numbers, email address nothing," said Taylor describing the process as a vicious circle. People were baited by the photos, which were not always consistent in their backdrop. A Ford F-150 was going for $10,000. A Toyota Rav4, $7,000. A Kubota tractor, $3,000. The posting asks people to contact the seller via Instant Message. Comments have been turned off, so those who do catch on, cannot post a warning. It's a variation on similar scams they see often says Jefferson County Sheriff's Office spokesman Mark Techmeyer. "It's really unfortunate. And in situations like this, you know, every one of these investigations have different nuances and parts of it that can be different. But for the most case when you see where someone's Facebook page is hacked, the IP address, where the information is coming from, or is often fake and untraceable." They are nearly impossible to investigate. The perpetrators are often overseas. The jurisdiction for investigating is a tangled mess. "In this particular case, our victim in in Evergreen is a victim of fraud. But then everyone who sent money to make a deposit on these items is a victim of theft. And where they were when they sent that wire, that money, is the jurisdiction that has the responsibility for investigating the theft," said Techmeyer. CBS Colorado sent an email to Facebook's listed media contact Friday. There has been no reply. The posting and Taylor's page appeared still in the hands of the scammers late Monday and had not been taken down. "It is not often that we will work with Facebook in a situation like this, because it nothing really comes to fruition out of it," said Techmeyer. The best way to stop it is buyer beware. "So you just got to stop and think about that and be suspicious of postings where people are asking for money up front," said Techmeyer. Look out for unusually cheap prices and when pictures of multiple items are in different locations, that too is a red flag. Taylor is upset with someone using her good name. "I've always been an honest person and it just drives me crazy that people would do something like this." Her uncle? There were several. But, "They're all up in heaven."
Forbes
11 hours ago
- Forbes
Cop Who Tried To Run Over Protestor Faces First Amendment Lawsuit
A protester has filed a First Amendment lawsuit against police officers in Allentown, Pennsylvania, after they repeatedly attempted to intimidate him, including driving a car down a public sidewalk. To vindicate his right to film police officers, Phil Rishel has partnered with the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE) and sued the officers in federal court last week. 'The retaliation over my speech confirms that there is a huge issue with the culture of the Allentown Police Department,' Phil said in a press release. 'These officers have a disdain for the rights of the people they're sworn to protect — and I hope my lawsuit changes things for the better.' Phil Rishel has filed a First Amendment lawsuit against police officers in Allentown, Pennsylvania. On March 26, 2024, Phil was filming outside of a police parking garage in Allentown on a public sidewalk. Noticing Phil, Officer Dean Flyte pointed towards a 'No Trespassing' sign, before heading back inside. 'Yeah, that's a nice sign. Too bad it doesn't apply to the public sidewalk,' Phil quipped. Moments later, Flyte reappeared, this time in his police cruiser, and tried to exit the garage. But the officer botched the turn and instead hit the garage's sidewall. Phil laughed and mocked Flyte for his driving. Undeterred, Flyte activated his lights and siren and started to slowly drive down the sidewalk towards Phil. Phil fled. He found cover behind a concrete planter on the sidewalk. Flyte left the car and once again went back inside the garage, before re-emerging with a supervisor, Sgt. Christopher Stephenson. Sgt. Stephenson ordered Phil and threatened to arrest him if he walked down a public sidewalk. So Phil decided to leave for the day. The very next day, Phil returned to the same police parking garage to continue filming outside. This time, according to FIRE's lawsuit, Sgt. Joseph Iannetta 'berated and tried to intimidate' Phil and outright told him, 'You need to be institutionalized.' Soon after Phil's interaction with Iannetta, Sgt. Stephenson appeared and threatened to cite Phil because he was filming police officers. Phil also filmed the sergeant who claimed, on camera, that 'one person is not a protest' and 'filming is not a First Amendment right.' (He's wrong on both counts.) Stephenson charged Phil with both loitering and disorderly conduct for 'verbally abusing, harassing, and screaming obscenities on the public street.' But in June 2024, the Lehigh County Magisterial District Court dismissed the charges of disorderly conduct, correctly noting that swearing or giving the middle finger are constitutionally protected under the First Amendment. The court did find Phil was guilty of loitering, but even this charge was later overturned on appeal. Prior to filing his lawsuit with FIRE, Phil shared his footage documenting his experience with the Allentown officers with Lackluster Media. The video went viral in February, earning more than 1 million views. What happened to Phil is part of a much larger pattern. In its complaint, FIRE details multiple cases where Allentown police officers were caught on film 'violating citizens' constitutional rights,' with cell phone cameras 'providing an important check against police brutality and misconduct.' Over the past decade, the city has paid out more than $2 million to victims of police misconduct. Accordingly, Phil and FIRE are also suing the City of Allentown for its alleged 'deliberate indifference' in failing to properly train and educate its police officers about respecting the First Amendment. 'Citizens trying to hold police officers accountable should not be punished,' said FIRE Attorney Zach Silver. 'Public officials, including police officers, must uphold the law and respect citizens' right to record police and to use harsh language, not bully them into silence.'
CBS News
11 hours ago
- CBS News
Trump administration says federal employees can encourage co-workers to "re-think" their religious beliefs
The Trump administration on Monday told federal workers they can talk about religion at work, including by trying to "persuade others of the correctness of their own religious views." In a memo to the heads of federal agencies, the Office of Personnel Management — the government's human resources arm — said public employees have the right to religious expression in the workplace, citing civil rights law and the First Amendment. That includes the right to discuss religion, engage in "communal religious expressions" and display items such as bibles, crucifixes and mezuzahs on their desks, the memo states. "During a break, an employee may engage another in polite discussion of why his faith is correct and why the non-adherent should re-think his religious beliefs," it states. "However, if the non-adherent requests such attempts to stop, the employee should honor the request." The five-page memo listed out other examples of religious expression that federal workers shouldn't be punished for. OPM said in its memo that employees can invite co-workers who belong to other religions to their church or put up invitations to Easter services on communal bulletin boards; staff can display religious posters, Veterans Affairs doctors can pray over their patients, and park rangers for the National Park Service can join their tour groups in prayer. According to the memo, agencies can still broadly limit staffers' speech — for example, they can "require that employees perform official work while on duty," and they can ban employees from putting up posters of any kind, both religious and non-religious. It also said attempts to persuade co-workers about religion can't be "harassing in nature." Still, staff "must be allowed to engage in private religious expression in work areas to the same extent that they may engage in nonreligious private expression," the office said. The policy isn't entirely new. In 1997, the Clinton administration said federal employees can "discuss their religious views with one another" and "may even attempt to persuade fellow employees of the correctness of their religious views" — but they "must refrain from such expression when a fellow employee asks that it stop." For years, the Department of Labor's online religious discrimination guidelines have said staffers "who seek to proselytize in the workplace should cease doing so with respect to any individual who indicates that the communications are unwelcome." "Federal employees should never have to choose between their faith and their career," OPM Director Scott Kupor said Monday in a statement. "This guidance ensures the federal workplace is not just compliant with the law but welcoming to Americans of all faiths." Monday's memo comes amid a broader push by the Trump administration to let federal workers express religious beliefs. Earlier this month, OPM said federal agencies should "adopt a generous approach" when staffers ask for permission to work from home or change their schedules for religious reasons, citing a 2023 Supreme Court case in which a mail carrier requested Sundays off for religious reasons. In early February, shortly after returning to office, President Trump signed an executive order accusing the Biden administration of pervasive "anti-Christian weaponization of government." The order set up a task force to look into alleged anti-Christian bias. Months later, the State Department encouraged staff to report any allegations of bias. The moves have drawn pushback. The Freedom From Religion Foundation called Monday's memo "outrageous and unconstitutional," arguing the guidance "purports to protect religious expression in the federal workplace but encourages outright proselytizing." "These shocking changes essentially permit workplace evangelizing, but worse still, allow supervisors to evangelize underlings and federal workers to proselytize the public they serve," the group's co-president, Annie Laurie Gaylor, said in a statement.
