Hundreds of trans activists descend on Parliament to oppose 'bathroom ban'
Hundreds of trans activists and their allies have descended on Parliament for a mass lobby of MPs, in a bid to have what they call a "bathroom ban" blocked before it can become law.
They are furious about plans for legislation, proposed by the (Equality and Human Rights Commission), which would say trans people can only use gendered facilities which correspond to their biologic sex at birth.
The EHRC began reconsidering guidance for single sex facilities after a landmark ruling in the Supreme Court which decided the term "woman", as referred to in the Equality Act 2010, is defined by a person's biologic sex.
Labour had said it would refrain from issuing guidance about which facilities trans people should use until the EHRC had completed its consultation, which will close next week.
But interim guidance issued by the commission said "trans women (biological men) should not be permitted to use the women's facilities".
Prime Minister Keir Starmer, in response to the Supreme Court ruling, appeared to have changed his mind about trans people.
In 2022 he'd said "transwomen are women" but when asked if he still believed that after the ruling, his spokesperson said: "No, the Supreme Court judgment has made clear that when looking at the Equality Act, a woman is a biological woman."
Some women's activists including JK Rowling said the ruling was vindication for their campaign to protect single sex spaces but rather than settle the long running debate, it appears to have just marked the start of another chapter in the story.
Trans activists, who've met dozens of MPs in Parliament, are desperate to convince politicians to block any new guidance introduced to parliament after the consultation closes.
Jude Guaitamacchi, founder of the Trans+ Solidarity Alliance, said the bathroom ban - if it goes ahead - "will have a devastating impact" on trans people.
They added: 'The EHRC's proposals would force workers in shops and pubs to become 'gender police' - told to demand birth certificates from anybody that they think doesn't fit gender stereotypes - and require major facilities changes at great expense for businesses across the country."
'Politicians must act to prevent trans people like me from becoming second class citizens and this is our chance to call for meaningful action to resolve the current human rights crisis. There is no dignity and respect in a bathroom ban, we now need real political leadership.'
A former legal director at the EHRC said the commission's draft guidance is a "cynical attempt to undermine the will of Parliament and remove trans people's rights".
Grey Collier added: "In practical terms it would be entirely unenforceable which makes it bad law. Most importantly, its impact will be absolutely devastating on the participation of trans and non binary people in all aspects of public life."
Among those attending protest were singer Kate Nash and several MPs including former Green Party leader Sian Berry as well as Labour's Olivia Blake.
"These proposals would be devastating to trans lives, and it's time for all of us to stand up in the UK and across the world against anti-trans hate and division. Transphobia is not feminism. Trans inclusive feminism is the only path forward & we mustn't let these fringe views become the mainstream," Nash said.
"Trans people need protection, rights and healthcare from the UK government. Trans people are not a threat, but are people living their lives like you and me."
The exact number of attendees outside Parliament is not yet clear but 1,400 signed up online and over 100 MPs had agreed to meet constituents.
Trans+ Solidarity Alliance said the event was expected to be the largest mass lobby on LGBT+ rights since the 1980s.
A mass lobby is where activists, all campaigning on the same issue, organise meetings with their local MP in Parliament to impress upon them a strength of feeling around the country, aimed at getting them onside.
MPs who spoke to ITV News about the rally said they were hopeful the prime minister would listen, but it is unlikely Starmer would choose to ignore advice issued by the EHRC.
A government Spokesperson said: 'We have always supported the protection of single-sex spaces based on biological sex.'This ruling brings clarity for women and service providers such as hospitals, refuges, and sports clubs.'Single-sex spaces are protected in law and will always be protected by this government.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
I think Keir Starmer's ineptitude here takes some beating
Sir Keir Starmer pays for that first challenge through reputational damage. We will all pay for the second challenge through other spending curbs and possible tax hikes. I have covered politics for the odd decade. I have witnessed missteps aplenty by leaders from each and every political party. However, the ineptitude displayed here takes some beating. Read More: Consider the PM's demeanour. There he was at the NATO summit, promising a substantial increase in defence spending. Which, in itself, leaves some Labour MPs disquieted. Asked about the growing insurrection over cuts to disability payments, he dismissed the complaints as 'noises off'. Cue yet more anger from discontented backbenchers, furious that their genuine concerns for the disadvantaged were downplayed in such a fashion. Then, inevitably changing tack, he conceded on Thursday that there would be talks with the dissidents, aimed at achieving a settlement in line with 'Labour values of fairness.' The rebels duly entered those talks. But many were privately asking themselves what happened to those 'Labour values' when Ministers proposed a package of reforms which their own official advisers said would push a quarter of a million people into poverty, including 50,000 children. For pity's sake, what did Sir Keir and his Cabinet think the reaction would be to such a forecast? Meek acquiescence? In viewing this spectacle, I could not help thinking of Neil Kinnock's 1985 conference speech, condemning Militant, when he summoned up 'the grotesque chaos of a Labour council – a Labour council – hiring taxis to scuttle round a city handing out redundancy notices to its own workers.' Change the accent, excise the oratory and you have Keir Starmer heading a Labour government – a Labour government – driving people into poverty with cuts in disability support. Sir Keir has now performed a hat-trick of U-turns. On winter fuel payments, on a statutory inquiry into grooming gangs – and on welfare. This is by far the most substantive. Can he come back from this? He can – although there is a much shorter electoral timetable in Scotland. But, still, it makes us revisit basic questions about his leadership. Firstly, last July's big Labour win is not solely or even chiefly down to him. He entered Downing Street because folk were heartily sick of the Tories – and sought a conduit to kick them out. As things stand, Reform seem to be offering an alternative for those who have broadened their disgust – and are utterly sick of established politics, full stop. Secondly, with some exceptions, the team around him have failed to shine. Including the Chancellor. Was there really nobody to suggest gently that the emperor was somewhat short of bodily cover on the benefits issue? Were they, perhaps understandably to some degree, so engrossed in global crisis that they failed to notice – or, rather, sufficiently address – the concerns of their backbenchers over the most distressed and disadvantaged of our citizens? Thirdly, and ironically, the very weakness of the Conservatives adds to Sir Keir's problems. To be blunt, he has nothing to beat. Relatively little is required of him in the Commons or in public discourse. Finally, those Labour values. When you contemplate Sir Keir, do you really summon up principles such as egalitarianism and fairness? Yes, you will know of his upbringing, His mum, the nurse. His father, the toolmaker. He told us often enough. But do values of commonality and collective endeavour shine through from him? I get the concept. He took over from Jeremy Corbyn and felt obliged to stress that Labour had moved from the Left, had changed – and would, consequently, change the country. On assuming office, Rachel Reeves felt the need to assuage the markets with a balanced budget. Hence the stress she placed upon curbing winter fuel payments. For a Labour Chancellor, it was deliberately counter-intuitive. Again, I get it. In due course, they backed down on winter fuel. And the cuts to disability benefits went too far for their party. Way too far. And for the voters. By chance, I chaired a conference on the issue in Glasgow this month. Two things stood out. Deep, genuine apprehension over the benefit cuts. And entrenched distrust over the package of support for getting jobs. Labour know they got this badly wrong. The emphasis on job creation needed to come first. The cuts needed to be moderated. Both will now happen. Sir Keir will insist that reform is still on track. However, this has been a fundamentally damaging episode for the PM. I understand the motivation. The desire to be fiscally cautious, to generate funds for spending in other quarters. But this was the wrong target, introduced in the wrong way. No doubt temporarily, Sir Keir seemed to forget which party he was leading – and in which legislature. He is Prime Minister, primus inter pares, completely dependent upon Commons votes. Not a dismissive, stand-alone President. Those were not 'noises off'. They were concerns voiced by his backbenchers, his supporters, the bulwark of his power. Then there is Scotland. Where former Labour Minister Brian Wilson, writing in The Herald, urged a rethink to avoid 'a deep and lasting split'. Where former MSP Neil Findlay questioned the sanity of Labour MPs – while warning that their chances of re-election would be reduced, not enhanced. Where the Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar was left stranded. Backing the principle of reform – while urging 'fairness'. In practice, as his MP colleagues made up their minds, his influence appeared minimal. He was duly lampooned by John Swinney at Holyrood – as the SNP cited figures indicating that child poverty is down in Scotland, by contrast with England and Wales. There is a way back for the PM. There is almost always a way back. But this has been deeply, deeply damaging. For Sir Keir Starmer, never glad confident morning again. Brian Taylor is a former political editor for BBC Scotland and a columnist for The Herald. He cherishes his family, the theatre – and Dundee United FC
Belfast Telegraph
an hour ago
- Belfast Telegraph
Ireland's media watchdog defends €500,000 funding of ‘Kneecap' film as Belfast rappers prepare for Glastonbury gig
Irish media regulator boss has defended his decision to give nearly half a million euro (£427k) in funding to Kneecap's film. The Belfast rap trio will take to the stage at Glastonbury this afternoon, despite opposition from UK prime minister Keir Starmer who said he did not feel it was 'appropriate' given the current court case against band member Liam Óg Ó hAnnaidh.
BBC News
2 hours ago
- BBC News
Sir Keir Starmer says Eluned Morgan right to raise concerns
The prime minister has played down divisions within his party after weeks of public criticism of him from Welsh Labour leader Eluned Keir Starmer told BBC Wales the Welsh first minister was "right to raise concerns" and promised to "deliver on those as far as we can".He spoke ahead of his Welsh Labour conference speech in Llandudno, where he will allege Plaid Cymru would be willing to form a "backroom stitch-up" with Reform and the Tories after the next which has strongly ruled out working with Reform in any form, accused Sir Keir of "peddling fiction". In her conference speech First Minister Eluned Morgan will say Reform would "rip" up the May, Morgan used an event in Cardiff Bay's Norwegian Church to set out a series of criticisms and demands of the UK her "Red Welsh Way", Morgan said she would "not stay silent" if Sir Keir's government took decisions "we think will harm Welsh communities".She complained about the UK government's plans for benefits and winter fuel payments, and demanded Wales benefit from wind power via the Crown Estate. The UK government has since U-turned on both winter fuel payments and disability benefits - the latter after a huge rebellion threatened Sir Keir's government. Speaking at a visit to RAF Valley on Anglesey, Sir Keir said the Westminster and Welsh governments "work very well together".He said the UK government had given Welsh ministers their largest financial settlement since devolution Keir said there was a "good relationship" and argued the spending review - which saw £445m for rail including new stations and £118m for coal tip safety - showed there was "a lot of really important delivery for Wales"."She quite rightly raises the issues of concern and I'd expect her to do so. And I work with her to deliver on those as far as we can." In a conference speech on Saturday, Sir Keir will make the case that having two Labour governments in London and Cardiff is delivering for Wales."This is the party that has got wages rising faster in the first 10 months than the Tories managed in 10 is the government that is cutting bills and creating jobs," he will will warn abandoning Labour could risk a "return to the chaos and division of the last decade" with a "backroom stitch-up between the Tories, Reform and Plaid".Plaid Cymru has firmly ruled out working with Nigel Farage's Reform UK, with leader Rhun ap Iorwerth saying in March there was "no way to see any co-operation at all between two parties who are so fundamentally different".He also told PA Media in May he could not see a "formal relationship" with the Conservatives "after 14 years of destruction".But he said "co-operation can take many, many forms. It can be informal. It can be issue by issue". The next Senedd election will see the partial-first past the post and proportional voting system used since 1999 replaced with elections that aim to better reflect how people will make it very hard for any party to win a majority or govern alone, and parties will face questions about who they may be prepared to work response, a Plaid Cymru spokesperson said: "If this is Labour's big pitch to the people of Wales, then frankly, they're scraping the barrel. Instead of offering hope, they're peddling fiction about imaginary coalitions involving parties that agree on virtually nothing."Welsh Conservative Senedd leader Darren Millar has said he would work with "anybody" to unseat the Welsh Labour government in Cardiff said: "It is in the national interest to kick Labour out of office so we can get to grips with these challenges and fix Wales. The Welsh Conservatives will do everything we can to secure that outcome." 'Moment of reckoning' In her conference speech, First Minister Morgan will say the next Senedd election will be a "moment of reckoning".In a bid to mobile the party's membership, Morgan will say: "Reform are rising. Plaid are mobilising."This is not a moment to look away. This is the moment to look forward - a moment of maximum opportunity and, yes, also of serious threat."She will say Reform want to "dismantle" the NHS and "rip it up" for a "privatised, profit-driven" system.A Reform UK Wales spokesperson said: "Wales now has the worst health service and health outcomes in the entire UK. Baroness Morgan is a former health minister herself – her record speaks for itself." Jo Stevens, Welsh Secretary, will announce a £11m fund for businesses in Port includes £6.78m from the UK government and £5m from Tata Steel and will support firms that offer skilled, well-paid employment will say: "This new fund is a powerful example of what can be achieved when Labour governments, trade unions and business work together to deliver for communities."
