Plans for mayor of Cumbria move a step closer as consultation ends
The consultation was launched to gather the views of Cumbrians over the plans to have a directly elected mayor of the county.
Cumbria could be set for a combined authority mayoral election in May 2026 under the plans unveiled by the deputy prime minister.
Cumbria, Cheshire and Warrington, Greater Essex, Hampshire and Solent, Norfolk and Suffolk, and Sussex and Brighton are all six new potential devolution areas throughout England with 'a view to mayoral elections in May 2026", according to Angela Rayner MP.
Cumbrian councils were invited to join the government's devolution priority programme after earlier expressing interest in exploring what greater devolution of powers could mean in Cumbria.
Metro mayors have proved successful in places like Greater Manchester and Teesside in driving local economic growth and the deputy prime minister has said she would like to see other directly elected, combined authority mayors across the country.
Devolution provides regions with more powers and decision-making over matters including transport, employment support, planning, and housing.
Senior Labour and Conservative politicians in Cumbria have previously called for a mayor in Cumbria which could bring more powers for local transport links, planning and housing.
The proposal to have a mayor in Cumbria has been supported by both the leaders of Cumberland Council and Westmorland and Furness council.
Leader of Cumberland Council, Cllr Mark Fryer, said: "This is good news for Cumberland and Cumbria as a whole.
"Being included in this priority programme is a vote of confidence in our ability to drive investment and deliver for local communities.
"Devolution will unlock more funding and more powers for our area, with decisions being made in Cumbria rather than in London."
Critics of devolution say that it adds another layer of bureaucracy and does not offer value for money for taxpayers.
Speculation has previously run rife over candidates for a potential mayoral contest, but nobody has officially put their hat into the ring.
Carlisle MP, Julie Minns has also backed the plans for a regional mayor.
'Greater devolution is key to unlocking regional growth in Cumbria, delivering on the government's plan and putting more money into working people's pockets, while also empowering them to direct change in their communities,' said Ms Minns.
'It will see Cumbria given sweeping new powers, putting our community on the fast-track to deliver growth, opportunities, transport and housing for local communities."
Westmorland and Furness Council has stressed the importance of 'sufficient' funding if devolution in Cumbria is to go-ahead to address a 'legacy of underinvestment'.
In response to the government's proposals for a mayoral combined authority (MCA) the Liberal Democrat-led authority said the funding must be sufficient to address 'historic underinvestment' in the area.
The response from the council reads: 'We await the outcome of the Spending Review later in the year to provide clarity on the future funding for devolution in Cumbria, this understanding will be essential for any decisions to provide our consent.
'Historically, the area has been funded, via 'per head' funding models that have left the area substantially disadvantaged compared to areas with higher population density.
'Devolution has been shown to work in some larger urban and metropolitan areas, but it is not clear how the funding model will work in rural areas where there is a higher cost of service delivery for a dispersed population over a large land area.
'For Cumbria to be a sustainable devolved geography, the funding our area would receive through devolution must be sufficient to make a meaningful difference and address this legacy of underinvestment.'
This comes after the local government finance settlement scrapped the rural services delivery grant which resulted in the council losing £6.44 million this financial year.
Deputy leader of Westmorland and Furness Council councillor Andrew Jarvis previously described the 'political shift' in funding from rural areas to urban areas as 'deeply disappointing'.
The report from the council adds: 'Acknowledging systematic underfunding of some key services in Cumbria and the vital importance of adequate future resourcing, there are potentially significant opportunities for a MCA [mayoral combined authority] to deliver benefits to the local community.
'Many of the devolved powers are essential building blocks for improving social outcomes, such as improving health, housing, transport, employment and the environment.
'The MCA has the opportunity to lead by example, acting as an anchor institution and taking long term decisions that impact on not only its workforce and the local population, but also the outcomes of generations to follow.'
MP for Westmorland and Lonsdale, Tim Farron previously said Cumbria should be able to get devolution without a mayor.
Mr Farron previously said: 'We desperately need our local council to be given more funding and powers if we are to properly deliver for our local communities.
'So therefore, I support the council wanting to engage with the Government on devolution.
'However, I am concerned that there is still a lack of detail from the government about what is on offer, and I still remain of the view we should be able to get devolution without us needing to have a mayor.
'What is most important is that the government keeps its promise of running a proper consultation for local residents. And if, once all the details are made clear, the public decide that they don't wish to have a mayor, then the Labour government must not impose one on us.'
Now that the Government-led public consultation exercise has concluded, both unitary councils will then be required to make a final decision later in the year.
If approved, Cumbrians could be set to visit the polls for the new combined authority mayor as early as 2026 ahead of planned local council elections in 2027.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
'Everyone will be financially worse off after October'
Climbdown. Not so much a U-turn, more of a double somersault. Sir Keir Starmer's reversal of Labour's much-maligned welfare policy, particularly P.I.P., was an accident waiting to happen. Restoring the winter fuel allowance and excluding current claimants from the ravages of bureaucratic changes to the personal independence payment system was the right decision. I applaud the dissenting MPs for forcing the administration to change course. It is hard to believe that a Labour government would attempt to balance the books on the backs of the most vulnerable sections of society, rather than from those who can best afford to contribute. It would be comforting to believe that these decisions were made in the light of a sudden surge of altruism, but the reality is that Starmers' leadership and that of his heartless chancellor, Rachel Reeves, were under threat. The bad news is that everyone will be financially worse off after October, when the government seeks to recover the lost revenue from the population by raising taxes. Austerity is back on the menu. Malcolm Richards, Newport
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Poilievre says he lost Ottawa riding for being 'honest' about plan to cut public sector jobs
Conservative Party Leader Pierre Poilievre says he lost his riding of Carleton in the federal election due to an "aggressive" campaign by public sector unions after he was honest about wanting to cut federal worker jobs. Poilievre had held the Ottawa riding of Carleton for two decades until the April 28 election, when he was defeated by Liberal candidate Bruce Fanjoy by 4,500 votes. The loss was a major setback for the leader, who before the new year had been favoured to become prime minister. Poilievre no longer has a seat in the House of Commons, but he's hoping to regain one in the rural Alberta riding of Battle River–Crowfoot on Aug. 18 — after former Conservative MP Damien Kurek offered up his spot in what is one of the safest Conservative seats in the country. In an interview with CBC's The House that airs on Saturday, Poilievre said his campaign was transparent about his intention to cut public service jobs if his party won the election. "And it's an Ottawa riding with a lot of federal public servants who disagreed with that approach," Poilievre said. "They ran a very aggressive campaign, particularly the public sector unions did, to defeat me on that basis." The leader said his voice as a representative for Canadians across the country took precedence over pleasing the 124,000 or so people in the riding — which happens to border Prime Minister Mark Carney's riding of Nepean. But Poilievre continues to want to highlight his party's successes in the election under his leadership, including the two and a half million more votes it garnered than in the 2021 federal election, as well as adding 25 seats in Parliament. He will be undergoing a mandatory leadership review in January, which the Conservative Party's constitution calls for if a leader does not resign following an election loss. "Some people might say, 'Well, it wasn't the best idea to run on a smaller federal public service when you're an Ottawa MP,' but I had an entire country to represent," Poilievre said. "I had to be honest with people." He said the Liberals didn't do the same. "I guess I could've done what the Liberals did, which is hide their plans," Poilievre said. WATCH | Why Pierre Poilievre thinks he lost his riding of 2 decades: Last week, Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne asked fellow cabinet ministers to come up with "ambitious savings proposals" to get a handle on public sector spending. During the election campaign, Carney did share his intention to rein in federal operational spending, saying he would "spend less, so Canada can invest more." At the time, he said he would cap the size of the public service and try to make government operations more efficient by "leveraging AI and machine learning." "The voice that I bring represents those eight million-plus people who believed in my message of fighting inflation, of getting affordable homes built, of locking up criminals, defeating drugs, unleashing our resources," Poilievre told Catherine Cullen, host of The House. When it comes to cutting the federal public service, he said, "that's the only way you bring down taxes and deficits, and I was honest about that, and the people in that particular constituency voted accordingly."Poilievre is running against Liberal candidate Darcy Spady in Battle River–Crowfoot. Kurek first won the riding's seat in 2019 and was re-elected in April with almost 82 per cent of the vote. The young Conservative has said he plans to run in the riding again in the next federal election. The Conservative leader said he wants to continue challenging the government in the House of Commons, as he's well known for doing during question period. "If you look at how the debate has changed in Canada as a result of the arguments and the causes that I've taken on, that voice has been very important to countless people, and it's a voice I want to amplify," he said.
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump officials cutting $1bn in NIH grants is ‘void and illegal', judge rules
A federal judge ruled on Monday that the Trump administration's termination of more than $1bn in research grants at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) was 'void and illegal'. US district judge William Young added that the cuts, which targeted research with a perceived connection to diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) programs, represented unlawful 'racial discrimination and discrimination against America's LGBTQ community', Reuters reported. Young, who was appointed to the bench by then president Ronald Reagan, added that he had 'never seen a record where racial discrimination was so palpable'. Young ordered that grants previously awarded to the organizations and 16 Democratic-led states that filed the lawsuit against the Trump administration be reinstated. In a statement, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) director of communications, Andrew Nixon, said that the agency 'stands by its decision to end funding for research that prioritized ideological agendas over scientific rigor and meaningful outcomes for the American people. 'Under the leadership of Secretary Kennedy and the Trump administration, HHS is committed to ensuring that taxpayer dollars support programs rooted in evidence-based practices and gold standard science – not driven by divisive DEI mandates or gender ideology. HHS is exploring all legal options, including filing an appeal and moving to stay the order.' Related: NIH scientists go public to denounce Trump's deep cuts in health research In February, the Trump administration slashed billions of dollars in NIH funding, in an attempt to shrink the federal government and national debt led by then presidential adviser Elon Musk and his so-called 'department of government efficiency'. The move came amid efforts to cut 10,000 jobs from federal health agencies. In April, the American Public Health Association; the United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America; and other health experts filed suit, saying the cuts had targeted research with any connection to race, gender identity, vaccines or equity. The legal complaint claimed that the NIH broke from its science-based review process in preference of 'vague' new priorities. According to a letter signed by dozens of NIH employees, the NIH has cut 2,100 research grants valued at more than $12bn since Donald Trump took office. During a Senate committee hearing last week, the NIH director, Jay Bhattacharya, said he 'didn't take this job to terminate grants', and was evaluating ways to restore some funding. Young's ruling on Monday only applies to some of the grants mentioned in the lawsuit. The federal judge will rule on further claims after both sides present additional evidence.
