Over 140 guests, crew sick due to a gastrointestinal outbreak on this popular cruise line
Among the 3,914 guests aboard its Navigator of the Seas ship, 134 reported being ill during a cruise that ended July 11, along with seven crew members, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Their main symptoms were vomiting, abdominal cramps and diarrhea.
The health agency listed the causative agent as unknown. The ship was sailing a week-long cruise to Mexico round-trip from Los Angeles, according to CruiseMapper.
The cruise line implemented heightened disinfection and cleaning measures and isolated sick guests and crew, among other steps, the CDC said.
'The health and safety of our guests, crew, and the communities we visit are our top priority,' a spokesperson for Royal Caribbean Group, the line's parent company, told USA TODAY in an emailed statement. 'To maintain an environment that supports the highest levels of health and safety onboard our ships, we implement rigorous cleaning procedures, many of which far exceed public health guidelines.'
There have been 18 outbreaks of gastrointestinal illness on cruises that met the CDC's threshold for public notification in 2025, most of which were caused by norovirus. There were 18 outbreaks total last year, and 14 in 2023.
The CDC told USA TODAY in April that while 'the number of recent cruise ship outbreaks has been higher than in years prior to the pandemic, we do not yet know if this represents a new trend.'
'However, CDC data show a newly dominant strain is currently associated with reported norovirus outbreaks on land,' the agency said in an emailed statement. 'Ships typically follow the pattern of land-based outbreaks, which are higher this norovirus season.'
The illness is often associated with cruise ships, but those represent only 1% of all outbreaks reported.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
WebMD
4 minutes ago
- WebMD
Fans Can Help in High Heat — but Only If You Use Them Right
Aug. 1, 2025 – In extreme heat, a fan can be your friend — or not. New research finds that electric fans might help cool you down even at higher temperatures than previously thought, if you use them the right way. The finding is the latest in a long quest to pinpoint exactly when it's too hot to use an electric fan. Since the 1990s, the CDC has cautioned against fan use above 90 degrees Fahrenheit. The new study, published this week in JAMA Network Open, suggests that in certain conditions – particularly when fans are combined with skin wetting – they may help reduce heat strain and improve comfort, even in 100-degree heat. (The World Health Organization caps the threshold at 104 degrees, and other recent research is also in line with the higher limit.) 'When the air temperature becomes greater than our skin temperature, then we actually gain heat from the environment,' said Daniel Gagnon, PhD, an expert in thermal physiology and co-author of the new study. That's why fans can sometimes increase your body temperature, despite feeling cool. With climate change fueling longer, more dangerous heat waves, especially in urban areas, figuring out safe and effective ways to cool down is crucial, particularly for older adults and people with heart conditions, who are more susceptible to heat-related illness. Here's what the new research found. 1. There is a tipping point when it comes to using fans to stay cool. Why it matters: In the study, when people used fans for cooling in conditions of 100 degrees Fahrenheit and 60% humidity, the fans 'reduced the amount of work that the heart was doing and reduced internal body temperature a little bit,' said Gagnon, an associate professor of kinesiology at Université de Montréal in Canada. 'People felt better, and they had better sensations of comfort.' The study included people ages 65 and older — including some with heart disease — but its results can apply to people of all ages, Gagnon said. The takeaway: When people used fans in 104 degrees, the researchers saw signs that their bodies were heating up, putting them at risk for heat-related illnesses. If you're concerned, use air-conditioning or seek out air-conditioned public spaces. Dialing 211 can help you find one. 2. Fan use only works if you stay hydrated. Why it matters: Sweat cools the body by letting internal heat escape through evaporation. A fan speeds that process by boosting convective heat transfer — the same way a convection oven moves heat to a food's surface, helping it cook faster. But it only works if you're sweating enough to keep the cycle going. That's why you need to drink plenty of water. The takeaway: Aim for about 8 ounces of water per hour — that's how much people in the study drank. Don't wait until you're thirsty; carry water with you and sip constantly. 3. Skin wetting can help a fan cool you more effectively. Why it matters: Using multiple cooling techniques is a great approach to hot days, Gagnon said. If you have air conditioning and want to save energy, use it to cool the room slightly. Then turn on a fan and mist your skin. And when temperatures do rise to extremes, combining the fan with skin wetting may still help keep you cool. During experiments in 104-degree rooms, 'it reduced the amount of work that the heart does, it reduced sweating, and people felt a little bit better,' Gagnon said. The takeaway: For this strategy to work, you need to keep your skin constantly wet. In the experiments, people used a spray bottle, but it's OK to use other options like wet cloths. Make sure you're paying attention to the temperature of where you are — indoor air temperatures can be hotter than outdoors, especially in spaces with poor ventilation or no air conditioning. If you notice signs of heat exhaustion — like dizziness, nausea, headache, or blurred vision — get out of the heat right away, rest, and drink plenty of fluids. Someone with heat exhaustion should seek medical care if symptoms don't improve within an hour or immediately if they become confused or distressed, pass out, or can't keep fluids down.
CNN
5 minutes ago
- CNN
HHS further constrains certain vaccine advisers to the CDC, limiting their input in evidence reviews
Vaccines Federal agenciesFacebookTweetLink Follow In a further jolt to the process of reviewing and recommending vaccines at the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, another group of outside advisers to the agency was abruptly sidelined this week. In an email sent late Thursday evening, which was obtained by CNN, members of roughly 30 medical and public health organizations who serve as liaison members of the CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, or ACIP, were told they could no longer participate in the committee's crucial workgroups. Liaison members don't vote at ACIP's public meetings on vaccine recommendations, but they can participate by asking questions and commenting on presentations. Behind the scenes, they have also historically done important work undertaking detailed evidence reviews of the safety and effectiveness of vaccines that helps to inform the group's votes. Those reviews happen in subcommittees called workgroups. As of late last year, ACIP had 11 active workgroups. In addition to studying scientific research, workgroups consider issues of public health importance like what age groups might get the most benefit from a vaccine, what an immunization costs and whether it will be accessible to people who should get it. Workgroups also help craft the language of the recommendations that are voted on by the full committee. Votes are typically held during ACIP's three public meetings each year. If ACIP approves a recommendation, it's forwarded to the CDC director for consideration. The director isn't bound by the committee's recommendation but usually follows it. Liaisons include groups like the American Medical Association, the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Pharmacists Association. Members also represent nurses and public health officials, typically groups that play a significant role in delivering vaccinations. The latest move comes more than a month after US Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. removed all 17 voting members of ACIP, replacing them days later with eight of his own picks, many of whom have cast doubt on the safety of vaccines and public policy around vaccination. One member later dropped out during the required financial review. The email sent Thursday called the liaison members 'special interest groups' that are 'expected to have a 'bias' based on their constituency and/or population they represent.' 'It is important that the ACIP workgroup activities remain free of any influence from any special interest groups so ACIP workgroups will no longer include Liaison organizations,' the email said. Andrew Nixon, director of communications for HHS, said in a statement Friday that 'Under the old ACIP, outside pressure to align with vaccine orthodoxy limited asking the hard questions. The old ACIP members were plagued by conflicts of interest, influence and bias. We are fulfilling our promise to the American people to never again allow those conflicts to taint vaccine recommendations.' Dr. William Schaffner, an infectious disease expert at Vanderbilt University who has been participating in ACIP for 40 years as both a voting member and a liaison member, said the move to exclude professional organizations from the process of making vaccine recommendations was shortsighted. 'The organizations have a certain ownership in the recommendations because they participate,' Schaffner said. That participation increases buy-in from different stakeholder groups, which helps ACIP recommendations become the accepted standards of medical practice. Without that participation, Schaffner said, there's a risk that groups will make their own vaccine recommendations, which could lead to conflicting and confusing advice. In fact, some outside organizations, including the Vaccine Integrity Project, have already started the process of making independent vaccination recommendations. Shaffner said he also takes issue with the idea that liaison representatives are biased, which he says implies a conflict of interest. 'Every work group member, no matter who they are, is vetted for a conflict of interest,' he said, and that vetting process has only become more stringent over time as society has become more attuned to the problem. 'I have to turn down opportunities because they would interfere with my being on a work group, and that's something I do, or did,' he said. ACIP's charter spells out that some 30 specific groups should hold non-voting seats on the committee. It also allows the HHS secretary to appoint other liaison members as necessary to carry out the functions of the committee. On Friday, eight organizations that are liaisons to the committee said in a joint statement that they were 'deeply disappointed' and 'alarmed' to be barred from reviewing scientific data and informing the development of vaccine recommendations. 'To remove our deep medical expertise from this vital and once transparent process is irresponsible, dangerous to our nation's health, and will further undermine public and clinician trust in vaccines,' said the statement, which was sent by the American Medical Association. New outside experts may be invited to participate in the workgroups as needed based on their expertise, according to an HHS official who spoke on the condition that they not be named because they had not been authorized to share the information, but such inclusion will no longer be based on organizational affiliation. 'Many of these groups don't like us,' the official said. 'They've publicly attacked us.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Another Royal Caribbean cruise outbreak hits 140+ passengers. Are outbreaks getting worse?
2025 has already seen as many cruise ship outbreaks as all of last year. Is this the new normal? More than 140 passengers and crew members aboard Royal Caribbean's Navigator of the Seas fell ill with gastrointestinal symptoms during a week-long cruise that ended July 11, marking yet another outbreak in what's shaping up to be a particularly challenging year for the cruise industry. The outbreak affected 134 of the ship's 3,914 passengers — roughly 3.4% of those aboard — along with seven crew members out of 1,266 total crew. Passengers experienced the familiar trio of cruise ship illness symptoms: vomiting, diarrhea, and abdominal cramps. The Navigator of the Seas had departed Los Angeles on July 4 for a round-trip voyage to Mexico, making three stops before returning to port, where the outbreak was officially reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. What makes this outbreak particularly concerning isn't just the numbers — it's the broader trend. We're only halfway through 2025, and this incident brings the year's total cruise ship gastrointestinal outbreaks to 18, already matching the entire total for 2024. That's a significant jump from the 14 outbreaks recorded in 2023. Is this the future of cruising? A troubling pattern in the U.S. The CDC tracks these incidents carefully, but only reports outbreaks that meet specific criteria: the ship must be under Vessel Sanitation Program jurisdiction (operating voyages that include both U.S. and foreign ports) and at least 3% of passengers or crew must report gastrointestinal symptoms to the ship's medical staff. This means the Navigator of the Seas outbreak, at 3.4% of passengers affected, just barely crossed the threshold for public notification. Most of these outbreaks stem from norovirus, the highly contagious stomach bug that spreads rapidly in enclosed environments. The CDC noted in April that "a newly dominant strain is currently associated with reported norovirus outbreaks on land," and ships typically mirror land-based outbreak patterns. This suggests the current surge may reflect broader public health trends rather than cruise-specific problems. But that's not great news, either. For the record, Royal Caribbean implemented enhanced sanitation protocols and isolated sick passengers and crew members during the voyage. The company emphasized that "the health and safety of our guests, crew, and the communities we visit are our top priority," noting their cleaning procedures exceed public health guidelines. However, the CDC has yet to identify the causative agent behind this latest outbreak. The streak continues — across all cruise lines This isn't Royal Caribbean's first outbreak rodeo this year. The cruise line has been dealing with multiple outbreaks across its fleet, joining other major operators like Holland America Line, Princess Cruises, and Cunard in facing similar challenges. Earlier this year, a Cunard luxury liner experienced an outbreak affecting more than 240 passengers and crew during a monthlong international voyage, while Princess Cruises saw over 80 people fall ill during a 16-night cruise in February. The timing of these outbreaks raises questions about whether cruise lines are adequately prepared for what appears to be a particularly virulent norovirus season. While companies have implemented enhanced cleaning protocols and isolation procedures, the close quarters and shared facilities aboard cruise ships create ideal conditions for rapid transmission of gastrointestinal illnesses. Are cruises... actually safe? Despite the alarming headlines, perspective matters. The Navigator of the Seas carried nearly 4,000 passengers, and while 134 falling ill sounds significant, it represents a relatively small percentage of the total. For comparison, norovirus outbreaks occur regularly on land — in schools, nursing homes, and restaurants — but cruise ships draw more attention because they're self-contained environments where outbreaks can be easily tracked and reported. The CDC emphasizes that cruise ship outbreaks represent only 1% of all reported gastrointestinal outbreaks. However, the concentrated nature of cruise ship populations means that when outbreaks do occur, they can affect a substantial number of people in a short timeframe. For prospective cruisers, the key is understanding that while these outbreaks are concerning, they remain relatively rare events. The cruise industry serves millions of passengers annually, and the vast majority complete their voyages without incident. That said, the uptick in reported outbreaks suggests passengers should be particularly vigilant about hand hygiene and other preventive measures, especially during peak norovirus seasons. The real question isn't whether cruises are safe — they generally are, all things considered. Instead, we should be asking whether the industry is doing enough to adapt to evolving public health challenges (never mind sustainability) and whether current protocols are sufficient to handle increasingly virulent strains of common illnesses. Because in 2025, there's work to be done. Solve the daily Crossword
