
‘Trip of a lifetime': Usha Vance's India visit turns into a family affair, says her kids were enchanted
In a captivating account at the US-India Strategic Partnership Forum in Washington, DC, US Second Lady Usha Vance recounted the unforgettable details of her family's April visit to India, a journey filled with wonder, personal connection, and vibrant cultural experiences.
A first-time journey filled with discovery
Usha Vance described the trip as 'the trip of a lifetime' for her children, who had never set foot in India before. 'They'd grown up hearing the stories about our family, the food, and the rich traditions, but to finally see it all in person was simply mind-blowing,' she recalled during a fireside chat at the eighth edition of the USISPF Leadership Summit. From savoring authentic Indian cuisine to marveling at iconic landmarks, every moment of the journey added a new layer to their understanding of the country's heritage.
A heartwarming encounter with Prime Minister Modi
One of the most memorable highlights of the trip was meeting
Prime Minister Narendra Modi
, an encounter that forged a remarkably personal connection. The Vance children, still sleep-deprived from earlier travels in Paris, instantly took a liking to Modi when they saw 'an Indian man with a white beard and white hair,' as Usha described.
'From the moment we met him, our kids embraced him as their 'grandfather' figure,' she said.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Thị trường có dấu hiệu suy thoái không?
IC Markets
Đăng ký
Undo
Their adoration was further cemented when, during a prior encounter in Paris, PM Modi presented a birthday gift to their five-year-old son. Later, at his residence in New Delhi, the children's affection overflowed; they ran up to him and hugged him, a gesture that spoke volumes about his kindness and generosity.
Usha emphasized that the productive conversations between Prime Minister Modi and her husband, Vice President JD Vance, not only reinforced diplomatic ties but also deepened personal bonds, something that she believes will bolster the future of US-India relations.
Cultural extravaganza: Exploring India's heritage
The visit was more than just political or diplomatic; it was a deep cultural immersion. The Vance family explored some of North India's most treasured sites:
Iconic landmarks:
The family marveled at the Taj Mahal in Agra early in the morning, basking in the soft glow of dawn against cool, blue skies. They also toured Amber Fort in Jaipur and the awe-inspiring Swaminarayan Akshardham Temple in New Delhi.
Local experiences:
Usha recounted the thrill of riding in an auto-rickshaw, a particular highlight for her daughter, Mirabel. The Secret Service even allowed a brief enclosed drive, adding to the excitement for the little one.
Puppet shows and craftsmanship:
Attending a puppet show featuring segments from the Ramayana and comedic animal performances was a standout experience. The performance, which boasted puppeteering talents from across the country, including Andhra Pradesh (Usha's ancestral home), left her children so inspired that they've been trying to recreate similar shows using construction paper.
Moments of childlike wonder
Beyond the historical and political significance of the trip, it was the small, personal moments that resonated most deeply with the Vance children.
Ewan, the eldest, was captivated by the intricate temple sculptures, describing them as a revelation of ancient craftsmanship that he had only previously encountered through stories.
Vivek, the middle child, found joy in every interaction with India's wildlife, from elephants and peacocks to the charming camel encounters. Perhaps the most humorous moment came when a cart full of mangoes caught their son's eye; so enchanted was he by the treat, he jokingly told Prime Minister Modi that he might just live there, planning his future among the fruit-laden displays.
Strengthening the US-India bond
For Usha Vance, the significance of the visit extended well beyond sightseeing.
With deep personal roots bridging India and the United States, she sees the relationship between the two nations as both political and profoundly personal. 'I have family in India, and I grew up with visits that forged lasting bonds,' she explained. 'This isn't just about diplomacy, it's about families, memories, and mutual respect.
'
Her reflections at the forum reiterated the potential for future cooperation, especially as both nations navigate challenges and opportunities on the global stage.
With the upcoming Global Leadership Awards at the summit highlighting key figures from the QUAD nations, the event underscored that strong bilateral relationships are built not only on economic and strategic ties but also on deeply human connections.
A lasting legacy of warmth and connection
As the Vance family's stories continue to inspire, Usha Vance's heartfelt narrative serves as a testament to the power of cultural exchange and personal diplomacy. With memories of warm embraces, captivating landmarks, and little adventures like auto-rickshaw rides and mango indulgences, the trip stands as a lasting reminder that the strongest ties often begin with a shared smile and an open heart.
For the Vances and for many who cherish the bridge between the United States and India, this journey will be remembered as a pivotal moment, one that transformed political visits into personal stories of connection and wonder.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India.com
24 minutes ago
- India.com
The Milk India Refuses To Drink: Why ‘Non-Veg Dairy' Is A Red Line In Trade Deal With US
New Delhi/Washington: In the backrooms of New Delhi's diplomatic zone, trade officials kept circling one issue that simply would not move. It was not fighter jets, data servers or farm subsidies. It was milk. Yes, milk. One of the biggest stumbling blocks in the India-U.S. trade pact is white, creamy and sacred to millions. And the problem lies not in how it is consumed, but how it is produced. Washington wants access to India's $16.8 billion dairy market, the largest in the world. It wants to sell its butter, cheese and milk powder to a country that churns out over 239 million metric tonnes of milk a year. But New Delhi is not opening that door. At the centre of India's resistance lies one demand – an assurance that the milk entering Indian homes comes from cows that were never fed meat, blood or animal remains. No exceptions. No compromises. Indian officials are calling it a red line. The idea of 'non-veg milk' does not sit well with millions of Indian households, especially vegetarians who see dairy as nutrition as well as ritual. Ghee is poured into sacred flames during prayer. Milk is bathed over deities. The concept of cows being fed pig fat or chicken remains crosses dietary boundaries and lines of faith. Trade experts struggled to explain this to Washington. 'Imagine eating butter made from the milk of a cow that was fed meat and blood from another cow. India may never allow that,' said Ajay Srivastava from the Global Trade Research Initiative in New Delhi. Despite U.S. claims that the concern is exaggerated, several American reports confirm the reality. A Seattle Times investigation documented how American cattle feed can legally include ground-up remains of pigs, horses and poultry. Even chicken droppings, known as poultry litter, sometimes make their way into the mix. The logic is economic – feed animals cheap and grow them fast. For Indian regulators, it is simply unacceptable. India's Department of Animal Husbandry mandates certification on all imported food items, including milk, to ensure no animal-derived feed is involved. This has long been criticised by the United States at the World Trade Organisation (WTO) as a 'non-scientific barrier'. But for India, it is not about science but belief. In 2006, the Indian government formalised this belief in trade rules. It resulted into high tariffs – 30% on cheese, 40% on butter and a whopping 60% on milk powder. For countries like New Zealand or Australia, breaking into India's dairy space is nearly impossible. For the United States, it is a billion-dollar hurdle. India's dairy sector feeds over 1.4 billion people. It employs more than 80 million, many of them smallholder farmers. Cheap American imports, experts say, could collapse local markets. A report from the State Bank of India estimates an annual loss of Rs 1.03 lakh crore if U.S. dairy is allowed to flood in. That is nearly 2.5-3% of the country's entire Gross Value Added. And the risk is not theoretical. 'If American butter comes in cheap, our milk prices drop. What happens to the village woman who sells five litres of milk a day?' asks Mahesh Sakunde, a dairy farmer from Maharashtra. Meanwhile, Washington sees India's refusal to open up as 'protectionist'. But India's negotiators stood firm. 'There is no question of conceding on dairy. That is a red line,' said a senior Indian official. The United States exported over $8.2 billion worth of dairy last year. Gaining access to India's vast market could supercharge those numbers. But Indian officials are unwilling to allow milk from cows that ate meat to be offered at temple altars or poured into toddler cups. And so, while the two countries hammer out trade terms with hopes of reaching $500 billion in bilateral commerce by 2030, the dairy debate remains unresolved. It may seem like a small detail in a massive negotiation, but in India, this is sacred, culture and a line that will not be crossed.
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
25 minutes ago
- First Post
Iran situation tense, India asks citizens to consider available exit options
Amid rising tensions in the Middle East, the Indian Embassy in Iran has advised Indian citizens to avoid non-essential travel to Tehran and urged those already in the country to stay alert and consider leaving if needed. read more (File) The S-300 missile system is displayed during Iranian defence week, in a street in Tehran on September 24, 2024. Reuters The Indian Embassy in Iran on Wednesday issued a new advisory urging Indian citizens to think carefully before making any non-essential trips to Tehran, given the growing tensions in the region. In a statement shared on X, the embassy also advised Indians in Iran to stay alert to the latest developments in the Middle East and consider using commercial flights or ferry services if they wish to leave the country. 'In view of the security-related developments over the past several weeks, Indian nationals are advised to carefully consider the evolving situation before undertaking non-essential travel to Iran,' the advisory said. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD More from World Deepening China-Iran ties pose a new challenge for India 'They are also advised to monitor regional news closely and follow updated advisories issued by Indian authorities. Indian nationals already in Iran who wish to leave may use commercial flight and ferry options currently available,' it added. This advisory comes amid heightened tensions in the Middle East, following recent clashes between Iran, Israel, and the United States. Last month, Israel carried out strikes on Iranian nuclear and military facilities under 'Operation Rising Lion,' aiming to disrupt Iran's nuclear program and prevent it from building atomic weapons. In response, Iran launched missile and drone attacks against Israel. The United States supported Israel in the conflict. On June 22, the US conducted its own strikes against Iranian nuclear sites, including facilities in Natanz, Fordow, and Isfahan, as part of 'Operation Midnight Hammer,' using B-2 stealth bombers and bunker-buster bombs.
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
35 minutes ago
- First Post
Trump backtracks on striking Moscow, says Zelenskyy 'shouldn't target' Russian capital
Trump has reversed course, saying Ukraine should not target Moscow, as he denied reports that he urged strikes on Russian cities, outlining new conditions for ending the war. read more US President Donald Trump and Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy meet in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC, on February 28. File image/AFP In a big U-turn, US President Donald Trump on Tuesday (Jul 15) said that Ukraine should not strike Moscow, dismissing reports that he had urged Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to attack the Russian capital during a call on July 4. Speaking to reporters at the White House, Trump said, 'No, he shouldn't target Moscow.' When asked if the US was considering sending long-range missiles to Ukraine, Trump replied, 'No, we're not looking to.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD His comments came just a day after he announced what he called a tougher stance against Russia, which includes new military aid for Ukraine. Earlier, the Financial Times reported that during the July 4 call, Trump allegedly asked Zelensky, 'Volodymyr, can you hit Moscow? Can you hit St Petersburg too?' According to the report, Zelensky responded, 'Absolutely. We can if you give us the weapons.' The report claimed Trump suggested striking Russian cities could 'make them [Russians] feel the pain' and push President Vladimir Putin toward negotiations. 'I am on nobody's side,' Trump told reporters on the South Lawn of the White House. 'I am on humanity's side because I want to stop the killing.' A spokesperson clarified that 'President Trump was merely asking a question, not encouraging further violence,' and added, 'He's working tirelessly to stop the killing and end this war.' Trump also expressed disappointment with President Putin, saying that while he has helped resolve other conflicts, the war in Ukraine remains unsolved. He called the conflict 'a Biden war, not a Trump war,' and said his goal is to find a way for the US to step back from the situation. Trump has given Russia a 50-day deadline to agree to a ceasefire or face new US sanctions and oil tariffs—a shift that signals a tougher approach but leaves questions about how negotiations might proceed. 'At the end of the 50 days, if we don't have a deal, it's going to be too bad,' Trump said, without offering details on what an agreement would look like. He defended the timeline, saying, 'I don't think 50 days is very long—and it could be sooner than that.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD He also threatened 'severe' tariffs if Russia doesn't end the war within the next 50 days, warning, 'If there's no deal in 50 days, we'll impose secondary tariffs—100 percent. That's how it's going to be.' Trump's remarks come just weeks after the Pentagon halted arms deliveries to Ukraine. Speaking from the Oval Office alongside NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte, Trump confirmed that billions of dollars' worth of US-made weapons would soon be sent to NATO allies. 'We are going to produce top-of-the-line weapons, and they will go to NATO,' he told reporters.