logo
Texas students worry ‘no one is going to be home for me' amid deportation push

Texas students worry ‘no one is going to be home for me' amid deportation push

Yahoo12-05-2025
Under President Donald Trump's renewed administration, Texas has emerged as a key frontline in the push for aggressive immigration enforcement and widespread deportations. Texas residents – regardless of immigration status – feel the ripple effects in the economy, schools, healthcare systems, courts and public safety services. To better understand these challenges, KXAN spent the first 100 days of Trump's second term producing 'Undocumented,' a comprehensive project diving into the real-life consequences of related policies and proposals.
KYLE, Texas (KXAN) – Two days after President Donald Trump took office for his second term, staff at Lehman High School were fielding calls from panicked parents.
The new head of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security had just rescinded a 2011 policy that ensured immigration enforcement actions did not occur in or near sensitive locations, such as schools and churches, unless necessary. The shift, according to DHS, was to 'not tie the hands' of law enforcement.
EN ESPAÑOL: A los estudiantes de Texas les preocupa que 'nadie vaya a estar en casa para mí' en medio de la ofensiva de deportación
More than 80% of Lehman's student body is Hispanic. Data show that on the first day of school following the inauguration and the policy change, attendance across the entire school district — Hays CISD — dropped.
It's unclear whether the lack of attendance was solely caused by fear of a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement raid on schools, but longtime teacher Carla Perez said faces were missing from her classroom, and parents were scared.
'We had a lot of teachers having conversations with parents, saying we don't know if we want to send our kids,' Perez said.
An hour away in San Antonio, Viridiana Carrizales was getting similar calls and texts. Carrizales leads a nonprofit organization that supports immigrant students – including those who are undocumented – navigating the public education system.
I want to take her out of school, one text read.
Another parent said her kids asked if ICE was coming to the school.
Is this true?
'I started hearing from teachers, and from some of our district partners, who we have been working with for the past several years, who said, 'We can't locate some of our students,' Carrizales said.
KXAN analyzed attendance data at several school districts in Central Texas to try to understand the impact of the policy change. We requested the daily attendance rates for districts with the highest and lowest Hispanic student populations in the days leading up to and after Trump's inauguration.
In districts with the highest Hispanic student populations, attendance dipped the day after the policy change was announced. In Del Valle ISD, where Hispanic and Latino students make up about 83% of the student population, attendance dipped from around 90% the week before the inauguration to 85% on Jan. 22. Other districts with high Hispanic populations, like Lockhart ISD, Elgin ISD, Bastrop ISD and Hays CISD, saw similar drops.
This chart shows the daily attendance rate at school districts between Jan. 13 and Jan. 24, 2025. Districts with a high Hispanic student population saw a short-lived drop in attendance after President Trump's policy change, while those with low Hispanic populations did not. Source: PEIMS attendance data obtained via public information request to each district (KXAN Interactive/Christopher Adams)
It's unclear if fears over ICE raiding schools were the cause of the attendance dip. Other factors may have played a role, like high instances of the flu and other seasonal illnesses. Schools were closed on the day of Trump's inauguration because of Martin Luther King Jr. Day, and a winter storm on Jan. 21 — the day of the policy change — forced most schools in the KXAN viewing area to close, except a few in the Hill Country.
But while other factors may have played a part, it's also true that attendance dropped in districts with high Hispanic student rates but not in those with low Hispanic populations. In Dripping Springs ISD, Eanes ISD and Lake Travis ISD, attendance stayed flat — or increased — the day after the policy change. In each of those districts, Hispanics make up less than a quarter of all students. In Eanes ISD, they make up only about 15% of the student population.
'Are you a US Citizen?' TX hospital patients questioned, state says millions spent on undocumented
The drop in attendance seen in some districts was short-lived, and rates rebounded somewhat on Jan. 23. In Del Valle ISD, for example, attendance was back up to 90% that day, then about 88% on Jan. 24.
'The kids were like, 'Oh, I am afraid when I come to school that I am going to try to go home, and no one is going to be home for me,' Perez said, referring to concerns that family members could be deported while the students are away. 'Usually, school is a safe space for them, and now they are hearing it might not be – it throws off the entire academic success that they are having.'
Months after DHS rescinded the policy – and even as college campuses around them began to feel the impact of ramped-up immigration efforts – districts across Central Texas reported ICE made no attempts to come onto campuses.
In February, leaders from Alice Independent School District in South Texas stated they had received information indicating that border patrol agents might attempt to board school buses at highway checkpoints, but later retracted the warning.
On an episode of Fox & Friends, U.S. Border Patrol Chief Mike Bank called the idea of agents targeting school buses 'absurd.' ICE told Nexstar Border Report correspondent Sandra Sanchez, 'ICE enforcement resources are based on intelligence-driven leads and ICE officers do not target persons indiscriminately.'
School districts across Central Texas told KXAN they have not received any requests for student information or any attempts to access school campuses from immigration enforcement officials since the policy change on Jan. 21.
After Trump immigration order, ICE 'force multiplier' agreements with Texas police surge
The more present concern for staff at Lehman High School is what will happen to students' families while they are at school, as immigration officials work to deport more people living in the U.S. illegally – and in some cases, those who are in the country legally.
'I have a student. His mom was deported. He was at school, got home, and she was gone,' Lehman High School Mental Health Counselor Jessica Salcido said.
Carrizalez said she's aware of Texas parents who have been detained by immigration authorities while dropping off their kids at school.
'People are vanishing. They are scared. They are hiding, and as a result, they are not taking their children to school,' Carrizalez said.
After a traffic stop over expired tags near Dobie Middle School in Austin late last month, ICE sent a family of five to Mexico. The parents and oldest child were undocumented, and officials with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security said the mother chose to take her two younger children – both of whom the family's legal team said are U.S. citizens – with her when she deported. Texas Department of Public Safety troopers initiated the traffic stop. The state agency told KXAN they were part of a 'regional tactical strike team' collaborating with federal authorities on immigration enforcement at the direction of Gov. Greg Abbott. Abbott's office has not responded to KXAN's request for comment on the matter. According to AISD, 80% of the campus's students are Hispanic, though officials had no further information since the incident was not on school grounds.
SOURCES: ICE sends family of five to Mexico, including US-born kids, after DPS detainment near Austin school
Salcido and Carrizalez both said they are encouraging families to update their children's emergency contacts at their schools in case immigration authorities detain their parents. They are also trying to encourage parents to bring their children to school, despite concerns about separation.
'In many ways, our children are more protected at school than they are at home. If immigration comes to the school, there's a protocol, and they are going to be speaking with attorneys in the school district. When they come to the home, they are going to be speaking with us,' Carrizalez said. 'That also instilled a sense of urgency to make sure schools, in fact, had those protocols in place.'
School districts in Central Texas like Austin Independent School District and Hays Consolidated Independent School District, have published policies or resolutions explaining how they will handle immigration authorities if they were to come onto campuses.
In the publicly posted policy, Austin ISD instructs district staff to contact a school resource officer and to request law enforcement identification or a badge along with documentation explaining why they are on campus. Staff are then instructed to call the district's legal team to review the identification and other documentation.
The guidance states if the district's legal team 'deems the paperwork valid, the school shall permit the law enforcement officer to perform the action authorized in the paperwork.' An Austin ISD official later added that the district would not interfere with any law enforcement action, including if an agency comes with a valid warrant.
But not all school districts in the state have taken a public or proactive approach in the event ICE decides to enter their schools.
In January 2025, when DHS rescinded the federal policy around sensitive locations, the Mexican American Legislative Caucus wrote a letter to the Texas Education Commissioner asking that his agency release guidance for every school district on how to respond to any federal immigration authorities that might try to collect data on students or come onto campus.
How South Texas border communities have changed after Trump immigration policies enacted
'Please, Commissioner Morath, respond to our letter, and tell us how you, too, are working to protect our Texas kids,' MALC President State Rep. Ramon Romero, D-Fort Worth, said in a video published on X.
In response, Texas Education Commissioner Mike Morath wrote back, saying the state expects school districts to 'follow the law' – including maintaining secure facilities and not allowing visitors without a legitimate reason to be on campus. Morath also wrote, 'Campus personnel must not impede federal officials.'
'Well, with what component? If they have a warrant? Or just comply with whatever their actions are,' Romero said in an interview with KXAN. 'It was the most vague, simple response.'
The Texas Education Agency declined KXAN's request for an interview but stated that it had also sent the same guidance to any school district that requested it.
'It is important that schools know, one, students have rights and legal protections,' Carrizales said. 'The only way that a law enforcement official, including immigration, can have access to a student's record is if they present a judicial warrant.'
Higher education has already felt the impact of ramped-up federal immigration enforcement. Since March, college campuses across Texas confirmed to KXAN the federal government has revoked visas or terminated the legal status of more than 100 foreign students, leaving them vulnerable to deportation or detention. Our reporting partner, the Texas Tribune, reports the number is at least 252 statewide.
This map shows the number of students affected by visa revocations or Student and Exchange Visitor Information System record terminations at universities across Texas. Source: University spokespeople (KXAN Interactive/Christopher Adams)
Court records show the federal government has restored the legal status for hundreds of students after several federal lawsuits were filed challenging the decision. The federal government announced in multiple court hearings in April that it intends, at least for now, to restore the legal status of students it had terminated from the Student and Exchange Visitor Information System, or SEVIS, earlier this year.
The statement, which was read aloud in court by a government attorney, stated, 'ICE is developing a policy that will provide a framework for SEVIS record terminations. Until such a policy is issued, the SEVIS records for plaintiff(s) in this case (and other similarly situated plaintiffs) will remain Active or shall be reactivated if not currently active, and ICE will not modify the record solely based on the NCIC finding that resulted in the recent SEVIS record termination.'
University of Texas at Austin spokesperson Mike Rosen confirmed multiple visa reactivations in the SEVIS database, but clarified that not all students who were terminated since March had their legal status restored.
Rice University confirmed all five of its affected students had their visas reinstated.
The federal government has not specified how it determines which students' statuses should change. However, DHS said in a press release that it would 'consider aliens' antisemitic activity on social media and the physical harassment of Jewish individuals as grounds for denying immigration benefit requests.'
Court records show that in one case, a man from India, who had recently completed his master's degree at the University of Texas-Arlington and was granted authorization to work as a full-time data engineer, was notified that his immigration status had been terminated in SEVIS.
The termination reason was listed as 'otherwise failing to maintain status,' and it further stated that the individual was identified through a criminal records check. According to the lawsuit, he was previously arrested for misdemeanor driving while intoxicated and had already completed the terms of his probation.
According to the lawsuit, the former student received no warning of the termination or opportunity to respond to the allegations.
There are several federal laws protecting student records, including the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act. Federal law also prevents schools from collecting or requesting immigration status information from students upon enrollment.
The Plyler v. Doe Supreme Court ruling in 1982 established that undocumented students have a right to a free public education, and states cannot deny them access to education.
But some Texas lawmakers have sought to pass legislation requiring school districts to collect information on undocumented students.
Texas State Sen. Bob Hall, R-Rockwall, proposed Senate Bill 1205, which would require school districts to document students' immigration status and report that information to the state. The bill would also prohibit school districts from receiving state funds for the education of students who are not lawful permanent residents of the United States.
KXAN emailed and called Hall's office repeatedly, but they declined our requests to set up an interview.
'They're scoring political points. They're saying, 'Me, too! I can do it. I can show how tough I am on these undocumented families!' Unfortunately, they're not thinking about the trauma that's occurring,' Rep. Romero said.
Employing undocumented workers in Texas is illegal, but rarely enforced
Perez has spent decades teaching in Texas. Before this latest administration, she had already seen the impact of a child being separated from a parent due to deportation.
She recounts that several years ago, a third grader's father was deported. Perez describes how he went missing from school for several days and how, upon his return to class, he told her about his mother's efforts to keep the family together and make ends meet in the United States.
'It is really, really difficult to have to deal with policies that affect our kids directly,' Perez said with tears in her eyes. 'I just don't know what is going to happen in the next few years.'
KXAN Investigative Photojournalist Richie Bowes, Graphic Artist Wendy Gonzalez, Director of Investigations & Innovation Josh Hinkle, Investigative Photojournalist Chris Nelson, Digital Special Projects Developer Robert Sims, Digital Director Kate Winkle and WFLA Bilingual Digital Producer José Acevedo Negrón contributed to this report.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

This 'Then And Now' Picture Of The Oval Office Is Going Viral And Says So, So Much About The Trump Administration
This 'Then And Now' Picture Of The Oval Office Is Going Viral And Says So, So Much About The Trump Administration

Yahoo

time16 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

This 'Then And Now' Picture Of The Oval Office Is Going Viral And Says So, So Much About The Trump Administration

Anna Moneymaker / Getty Images Donald Trump has completely transformed the Oval Office into his own gaudy, gold fantasy land. Kevin Dietsch / Getty Images It's A LOT. Andrew Harnik / Getty Images You've got the gold crown molding. Bloomberg / Bloomberg via Getty Images The fireplace is cluttered with gold statues. Chip Somodevilla / Getty Images He's got gold coasters. SAUL LOEB / AFP via Getty Images And then there's a TON of these gold squiggly things all over the picture from the White House really shows how many gold accents have been added to the Oval Office. This is how it looked last year: michellelprice/Twitter: @michellelprice From this: To this: Look at all that gold!!! Well, since then, Trump has SOMEHOW managed to add even more gold. @JoeMyGod posted this "then and now" picture that is going super viral: From this: To this: "It's like the Dollar Tree version of Versailles," one person joked. "Which one seems more fiscally responsible...." another person asked. And this person said, "I hope that lovely fireplace can be restored with no damage." Thoughts on the renovations?! Solve the daily Crossword

A postmortem on the dismantling of USAID
A postmortem on the dismantling of USAID

The Hill

time17 minutes ago

  • The Hill

A postmortem on the dismantling of USAID

On the first day of his second term, President Trump issued an executive order suspending all foreign aid expenditures, except for those providing emergency and military assistance. On March 10, the administration cancelled 83 percent of the programs run by the U.S. Agency for International Development. USAID, Trump declared, had been 'run by a bunch of radical lunatics.' Elon Musk opined that the agency was 'a criminal organization.' Social media outlets spread false allegations that USAID had spent $60 million on condoms for South Africa. On May 21, Secretary of State Marco Rubio told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, 'No one has died because of USAID.' Lawmakers presented him with credible evidence that he was wrong. By the middle of the year, 94 percent of USAID's 4,500 employees, many of them living overseas, had been laid off. As of July 1, Rubio announced, 'USAID will officially cease to implement foreign assistance.' The State Department would only implement existing and new foreign aid programs if they advanced the administration's 'America First' agenda by privileging 'trade over aid, opportunity over dependency, investment over assistance.' The dismantling of USAID has already had a negative impact on the lives of tens of millions of poor and vulnerable people in some 130 countries. And the evisceration of USAID is undermining our national interest. Established in 1961, USAID became the world's leading donor of humanitarian, economic development and democracy-promoting programs. The organization has had considerable success in alleviating poverty and malnutrition, decreasing the spread of infectious diseases and increasing access to safer drinking water and sanitation. Its programs helped mitigate the effect of natural disasters and achieve substantial reductions in mortality rates across all ages and causes, death rates from HIV/AIDS, malaria and tropical diseases. Working with non-government organizations, USAID provided educational opportunities for women in Afghanistan and supported independent media committed to correcting disinformation campaigns by state-controlled outlets in Eastern Europe. Although MAGA Republicans have denounced USAID as 'woke,' the agency's largest implementing partner in 2024 was Catholic Charities. In the last four years, Samantha's Purse, founded by Franklin Graham, the son of evangelical minister Billy Graham, received $90 million in USAID funds. A study recently published in The Lancet, the respected scientific and medical journal, estimates that the implications of dismantling USAID could 'reverberate for decades,' with an impact 'similar in scale to a global pandemic or a major armed conflict.' By 2030, an additional 14 million people, 4 million of them children under five years old, could die. 630,000 of those deaths would be associated with dramatic reductions in staff, medications and treatment through PEPFAR, President George W. Bush's signature foreign aid initiative. USAID is a paradigmatic example of the exercise of 'soft power,' a difficult to quantify strategy of exerting national influence through trade, economic assistance, educational exchanges, public-private partnerships and relationships with business and political leaders. China had already strengthened its global ties by investing $679 billion — more than nine times the foreign aid expenditures of the U.S. — between 2013 and 2021 to construct or repair roads, railways, airports and energy and digital infrastructure. It began filling the soft power void created by the dismantling of USAID almost immediately in Nepal and Colombia. U.S. foreign aid, moreover, is relatively inexpensive. In 2023, total expenditures for non-military foreign aid were $71.9 billion, 1.2 percent of the $6.1 trillion federal budget. USAID was responsible for $43.5 billion of the $71.9 billion. The U.S., it's worth noting, gives a relatively low percentage of its GDP in aid compared to most other wealthy nations. As Trump and Rubio surely know, a substantial majority of Americans do not understand the aims and achievements of foreign aid or know how much the U.S. spends on it. On average, Americans believe that foreign aid constitutes 31 percent of the federal budget. About 70 percent of Americans (and 9 out of 10 Republicans) think Washington spends too much money assisting other countries. Trump and Rubio are not attempting to enlighten them. The dismantling of USAID provides a teachable moment. Referring to PEPFAR, former President Bush recently asked and answered a rhetorical question: 'Is it in our national interest that 25 million people who would have died now live? I think it is.' Providing humanitarian assistance is the right thing for the wealthiest country in the world to do, whether or not there's an immediate payoff. But it is also one of many ways, in our increasingly interconnected and interdependent planet, in which a robust USAID served — and might again serve — America's national interest.

"He's a madman": Trump's team frets about Netanyahu after Syria strikes
"He's a madman": Trump's team frets about Netanyahu after Syria strikes

Axios

time17 minutes ago

  • Axios

"He's a madman": Trump's team frets about Netanyahu after Syria strikes

As smoke and debris swirled over the Syrian presidential palace, the chatter in the West Wing grew louder: Benjamin Netanyahu is out of control. What they're saying:"Bibi acted like a madman. He bombs everything all the time," one White House official told Axios, referring to Netanyahu by his nickname. "This could undermine what Trump is trying to do." A second senior U.S. official also pointed to the shelling of a church in Gaza this week, which led President Trump to call Netanyahu and demand an explanation. "The feeling is that every day there is something new. What the f***?" A third U.S. official said there's growing skepticism inside the Trump administration about Netanyahu — a sense that his trigger finger is too itchy and he's too disruptive. "Netanyahu is sometimes like a child who just won't behave." Netanyahu's spokesperson Ziv Agmon did not respond to a request for comment. Why it matters: Six U.S. officials tell Axios that despite a U.S.-brokered ceasefire that halted this week's escalation in Syria on Friday, this week ended with the White House significantly more alarmed about Netanyahu and his regional policies. However, Trump has so far refrained from public criticism and it's unclear if he shares his advisers' frustrations. It is not totally clear whether he shares his advisers' recent concerns about Israel's actions in Syria. Driving the news: On Tuesday, Israel bombed a convoy of Syrian army tanks en route to the city of Suwayda to respond to violent clashes between a Druze militia and armed Bedouin tribesmen, which had killed over 700 people as of Saturday according to the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights. Israel claimed the convoy crossed into a zone of southern Syria it demands be demilitarized, and that the Syrian military was participating in attacks on the Druze minority, which Syria denies. U.S. envoy Tom Barrack asked his Israeli counterparts on Tuesday to stand down to allow for a diplomatic resolution, and the Israelis committed to do so, according to a U.S. official. Instead, after a pause, Israel escalated the strikes. On Wednesday, Israel dropped bombs on Syria's military headquarters and near the presidential palace. Friction point:"The bombing in Syria caught the president and the White House by surprise. The president doesn't like turning on the television and seeing bombs dropped in a country he is seeking peace in and made a monumental announcement to help rebuild," a U.S. official said. Secretary of State Marco Rubio told Netanyahu and his team to stop on Wednesday. Netanyahu agreed to do so in return for the Syrian military withdrawing from Suwayda. But by then countries including Turkey and Saudi Arabia had conveyed angry messages to the Trump administration about Israel's actions, and several senior U.S. officials had complained directly to Trump about Netanyahu. Behind the scenes: Among those officials were Barrack and White House envoy Steve Witkoff — both close friends Trump's, according to a U.S. official. The general belief in the White House was that Netanyahu bombed Syria because of domestic pressure from Israel's Druze minority and other political considerations. "Bibi's political agenda is driving his senses. It will turn out to be a big mistake for him long-term," a U.S. official said. Another U.S. official said the damage the Israelis had done to their standing at the White House over the past week didn't seem to be breaking through to them. "The Israelis need to get their head out of their asses," the official quipped. Between the lines: The tensions over Syria came just days after Netanyahu's visit to D.C., in which he met Trump twice and the two leaders seemed closer than ever in the afterglow of the war with Iran. In addition to Syria and the attack on the church in Gaza, the murder of Palestinian American Saif Mussallet by a mob of Israeli settlers last weekend also sparked pushback from the Trump administration toward Netanyahu's stridently pro-settler government. Amb. Mike Huckabee, who days earlier had visited Netanyahu's corruption trial in a show of support, released a series of statements calling the attack "terrorism" and demanding answers. On Saturday, he also visited a Christian community in the West Bank that had been targeted by settler attacks. Huckabee, long an effusive supporter of Israel, also criticized the Israeli government this week for making it harder for American evangelicals to obtain travel visas. The other side: The Israelis were surprised by the U.S. pushback over the Syria strikes. A senior Israeli official said Trump had encouraged Netanyahu to hold parts of Syria during his first weeks in office and hadn't previously expressed concerns about Israel's interventions in the country. The official stressed that Israel only intervened after its intelligence indicated the Syrian government was involved in attacks against the Druze. The official denied any domestic political considerations. "The U.S. wants to keep the new Syrian government stable and doesn't understand why we attack in Syria, because of attacks on the Druze community there. We tried to explain to them that this is our commitment to the Druze community in Israel," the senior Israeli official said. State of play: The instability in Syria is a major concern to the administration. On Saturday, Rubio posted on X that the regime in Damascus needs to help bring peace and stop the killings. But a senior U.S. official said Israel shouldn't be able to decide whether the Syrian government can exert its sovereignty over its own citizens and territory. "The current Israeli policy would lead to an unstable Syria. Both the Druze community and Israel will lose in such a scenario," the official said. The big picture: This was hardly the first time Netanyahu tested Trump's patience. His gamble that Trump would ultimately back his strikes on Iran paid off in dramatic fashion. He's pressed on in Gaza for months despite Trump's desire for an end to the war. In Syria, he bet once again that he could escalate dramatically without destabilizing the region or his relationship with Trump. And Trump aides have become more and more aware in recent months of the influence far-right Jewish supremacist elements in Netanyahu's coalition have on policy. This dynamic has also become more evident to the broader MAGA movement. The bottom line: U.S. officials who spoke to Axios cautioned that Netanyahu's luck, and Trump's goodwill, could run out.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store