Respect Indigenous Rights and Withdraw Opposition to Bill C-61, CUPE Ontario Tells Ford Conservatives
After the federal Liberals signalled plans to re-introduce Bill C-61 – legislation meant to guarantee First Nations communities' access to clean drinking water – both McCarthy and the environment minister for Alberta wrote to the federal environment minister, asking her to refrain from going ahead with the bill. Bill C-61 died when Parliament was prorogued earlier this year.
'Minister McCarthy can call it 'confusion,' but he put his request in writing to the federal environment minister and he has yet to withdraw it,' said CUPE Ontario President Fred Hahn. 'Indigenous leaders have called for the minister to resign, and our union supports their demand.
'But Premier Ford must also intervene to rescind the letter officially, as part of the government's effort to correct this deeply troubling misstep.'
Hahn pointed out that, time and time again, 'the Ford Conservatives deny the human rights of Indigenous people and communities, and this attitude is born out of nothing more than ingrained environmental racism.'
'CUPE members are among those who work to provide clean drinking water in cities and towns across Ontario,' he continued. 'Would Minister McCarthy threaten the drinking water of residents of Bowmanville or Burlington, or any other town or city, in the name of competitiveness? No. Apologies notwithstanding, the minister has undermined decades of advocacy by Indigenous people to secure safe reliable drinking water for their families and communities.'
As CUPE's Water Is Life campaign asserts, access to clean water is not a privilege, but a right that should be afforded equally to everyone in Canada.
'We've already seen the Ford Conservatives impose legislation that is harmful to Indigenous communities,' said Dawn Bellerose, past leader of CUPE's National Indigenous Council and a vice-president on CUPE Ontario's executive board. 'This time, they are attempting to block legislation that would benefit Indigenous communities. The ongoing lack of respect is insulting and hurtful. This government needs to do better, and I support the call of Anishinabek Nation Grand Counsil Chief Linda Debassige for the minister's resignation.'
Jennifer Smith, chair of the CUPE Ontario Indigenous Council, said: 'Too many First Nations communities in Ontario have boil-water advisories that are decades old. Indigenous communities continue to live with the impacts on the health, well being and futures of their people. Bill C-61 would help end this particular brand of environmental racism, but the Ford Conservatives are hoping to see it flourish. It's immoral, and we add our voice to those demanding respect, equity and true recognition of Indigenous sovereignty.'
cj/cope491
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hamilton Spectator
an hour ago
- Hamilton Spectator
First Nations launch legal challenge against Ontario, federal bills 5 and C-5
TORONTO - Nine First Nations in Ontario are asking a court to declare a pair of federal and provincial laws meant to fast-track infrastructure projects unconstitutional and are seeking an injunction that would prevent the governments from using some of the most contentious aspects. The Indigenous communities say in the legal challenge filed in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice that the federal law known as Bill C-5 and the Ontario law known as Bill 5 both represent a 'clear and present danger' to the First Nations' self-determination rights to ways of life on their territories. 'While the laws do leave open or commit that there will be some First Nation consultation at the very first in that decision alone is a smoke and mirrors trick, deflecting attention from all the other ways the laws necessarily diminish the ability of First Nations to engage on the regimes' broader consequences,' they write in the court challenge. Bill C-5 allows cabinet to quickly grant federal approvals for big projects deemed to be in the national interest such as mines, ports and pipelines by sidestepping existing laws, while Ontario's bill allows its cabinet to suspend provincial and municipal laws through the creation of so-called 'special economic zones.' The First Nations are asking the court for an injunction prohibiting the federal government from naming national interest projects and prohibiting Ontario from implementing special economic zones. Both the federal and Ontario governments have said their laws are tools to counteract the effects of U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs by allowing Canadian development, such as natural resource development, to proceed more quickly. But this is not a battle of development versus no development, the First Nations argue. Rather, they advocate for 'doing it right' by ensuring that necessary information is gathered before proceeding and rights and protections are respected 'so the real costs of development do not end up far exceeding their asserted benefit.' 'Fragmentation and delay results from Crown choices and unwieldy bureaucracies, not from First Nations,' they write in the court document. 'Making changes now in some effort to 'streamline' (or ram through) projects, cannot be at the cost of First Nations, their rights, the Constitution and reconciliation.' The First Nations argue the laws are unconstitutional because they violate charter right to life, liberty and security of the person, as well as equality rights. Representatives of both governments have said they will respect the duty to consult Indigenous people, but the nine First Nations argue that rings 'hollow' because the laws authorize the opposite. Ontario has already started some consultations with First Nations who 'share our vision of unlocking economic opportunity and critical infrastructure in their community and will continue these consultations throughout the summer,' the premier's office wrote in a statement. 'We will continue to build consensus with First Nations on shared priorities including legacy infrastructure, all-season roads, and resource development, that support long-term prosperity.' One of the First Nations challenging the laws is Aroland First Nation. Premier Doug Ford used Chief Sonny Gagnon's name several times this spring in defence of Bill 5, saying some chiefs will always be anti-development but others are progressive thinkers like Chief Sonny. While Aroland has signed a shared-prosperity agreement with the province for major upgrades to roads that lead to the mineral-rich Ring of Fire in northern Ontario, Gagnon has come out against Bill 5. Aroland has never consented to mining the Ring of Fire, he said. The region is of particular importance in this case, the legal challenge says, since Ontario has said that it both wants the Ring of Fire to be a special economic zone and has asked the federal government to designate it as a nation-building project. Aroland sits outside the Ring of Fire region with access to the provincial highway system that ends near its territory. Prime Minister Mark Carney has promised to meet with First Nations this week after chiefs said their rights were not respected by a rush to push the bill through Parliament. Chief Sylvia Koostachin-Metatawabin of Attawapiskat First Nation said in a press release announcing the court challenge that their way of life is not 'a pawn in some political game.' 'Rushing headlong into major projects without knowing the costs, means the governments are playing a dangerous game with our lands and futures,' she wrote. This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 15, 2025.
Hamilton Spectator
2 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Young calls Sask ‘energy superpower' during event in Belle Plaine, government, industry call for increased rail capacity
In the mining world, Saskatchewan has a lot to brag about, and the provincial government is saying the province is poised to make Canada an energy and mining superpower. Fresh off an Energy and Mines Ministers Conference in Prince Edward Island, Colleen Young realized exactly how Saskatchewan is leading the way for growth across Canada. 'I was proud to discuss how innovative Saskatchewan is in our energy and resource sectors,' said the provincial Energy and Resources Minister. 'Ministers from across the country explored how addressing the challenges in the resource sectors can serve as opportunities for growth nationwide. The largest takeaway for me was that it is clear that Saskatchewan is leading the charge in many of these areas. A major focus of this meeting was on the need to build a strong, secure and competitive resource sector across Canada, and from a Saskatchewan perspective, we are in a great position to help manage that change.' Front and centre for Young was seeking federal support for transportation. 'I advocated for substantial federal investment in building national energy infrastructure and corridors to transport reserves resource products to tide water,' she said. 'I also emphasized the need for streamlined and predictable approval of large resource projects to attract investment from development countries and to ensure Canada's supply chains remain secure and reliable.' Of the talks in PEI, Young noted they paved the way to find ways to not only promote Saskatchewan on a greater scale, but 'how we can make Canada an energy and minerals superpower.' 'It was refreshing to feel the unity in those discussions, which I'm hopeful will lead to more access for Canadians to reliable, affordable energy and wealth generated by our vast resources,' Young said. 'With Saskatchewan's robust and expanding resource sectors, we are and have been positioning the province to contribute significantly to Canada's emergence as a global energy superpower.' Highlighting the importance of mining in the province, Pam Schwann, President of the Saskatchewan Mining Association, broke down some interesting numbers. 'The mining sector continues to be one of Saskatchewan's pivotal economic drivers, directly employing over 11,000 people with an annual payroll of over $1.7 billion, consistently ranking among the province's top contributors to GDP and direct government revenues,' she said. 'In 2024, Saskatchewan's mining industry purchased over $3 billion in goods and services from Saskatchewan businesses, including over $900 million from Indigenous-owned businesses. In 2025, Saskatchewan mining companies will make over $7 billion in capital investments with our exploration members contributing over $425 million annually to discover new deposits.' A tour of Belle Plaine Young and Schwann were among a group of dignitaries invited to a quick tour of the Mosaic Belle Plaine potash solution mine last week, giving industry leaders the opportunity to highlight some of the triumphs and challenges facing the energy sector in Saskatchewan. 'Potash is one of Saskatchewan's 27 critical minerals, and we at Mosaic would say it's the most critical as it is essential to helping the world grow the food it needs,' said Marnel Jones, Director of Government and Public Affairs for The Mosaic Company. 'Our facility here at Belle Plaine has been producing potash for over 60 years. Mosaic's approximately 500 employees at this site and 2,000 province wide are foundational to the Saskatchewan mining story.' The first and largest solution mine in the world, the Belle Plaine facility produces nearly three million tonnes of finished potash products annually. Is mining immune to tariffs? When pressed for her opinion on what the uncertainty of U.S. tariffs might have in store for the mining industry, Young noted those discussions are best left to the federal government. 'The meetings that we had last week in PEI, we did discuss tariffs a little bit, but for the most part, we were focused on energy and making Canada a superpower,' she said. 'I will leave the counter tariffs under discussion to our prime minister and his cabinet as to what they would want moving forward.' According to Jones, it's more of a 'wait and see' process right now. 'We've been advocating for our potash industry on both sides of the border,' she said. 'As you know, we have operations both in the U.S. and Canada. With our potash operations here in Canada, we have been watching the trade negotiations closely—as have has everyone—and it's continuing to be a dynamic situation. So we're watching to see what happens next. Right now, we're fortunate that our product is all CUSMA compliant, so we are not experiencing any tariffs, and we're going to continue to advocate for that to be the case. We don't believe that any fertilizer product should be tariffed as it's meant for humanitarian services to grow food, and we're going to continue to be pushing for that.' Jones noted that potash prices are stable right now, despite what may be happening at a global level. 'That's where we like them to be,' she said. 'It's in a stable place, not what we saw back in the period when Ukraine was invaded by Russia. We saw sky high potash prices, and that's not actually very conducive to the market or to producers in the long term. So the market we have right now, it's stable. We're making lots of tonnes, and our customers want it. So we're in a pretty good spot today.' Increased costs are one area Schwann is keen to keep her eyes on as tariff threats continue to run hot and cold. 'You have some products that cross over like automobiles, but steel products that might go into the States and come back and can get increased costs from that,' she said. 'So if you've got large capital projects that are happening, you're going to see some price escalation, and that may actually stop those projects moving forward. We're watching it very closely, obviously it's a concern. We like to see free trade, especially amongst our allies.' Rail lines wanted Getting Saskatchewan potash out of the ground and around the world is another major focus. 'We haven't had any new pipelines introduced in the last 10 years due to the federal regulatory environment that was in place and layered on impositions for most of our industries, but it also means rail capacity,' Young said when asked about what type of future projects she would like to see. 'We need to get our products to global markets, and looking at the expansion of our ports—particularly on the West Coast. I think that's something that needs to be considered at this point in time so that those industries that are producing—such as Mosaic here—have that rail capacity available when they need it in order to get into those ports.' In order to fast-track projects, Young says the answer is a one-approval process. 'The provinces have the authority to approve many of the things that happen within our province, but I think we need to partner with the federal government to ensure that they aren't being held up at a second level when they get to that licensing portion under the federal government,' she said. 'We've already had applications that have been sitting on the books for the last 10 years and just need to be approved to get them moving forward.' Jones seconded that need for enhanced routes, noting that the first quarter of the fiscal year was especially difficult in terms of transportation. 'We're here today to talk about the challenges we face with getting our products to market, and that includes rail service and just the fact that Saskatchewan is here and we have a long way to get to tide water,' she said. 'What we saw in the first quarter of the year was a really cold winter with a lot of snow and wind, and those are not great things to have for us to be loading rail cars and getting them to Vancouver or other parts of Canada. We're in the process of recovering, but Q1 was really tough getting our products to market, which is why we continue to advocate for increased funding towards our infrastructure in Canada, because we operate 365 days of the year, and we have to get our products to market.' The transport issue will only be magnified as potash operations continue to build—a good problem to have seeing more investment in the province, but the SMA also points toward more rail capacity as the answer. 'We're looking at a new potash mine coming, and that's 4.5 million tons, potentially going to 8 million tons,' she said. 'We need more rail capacity. If we can get oil onto pipelines, that will free up some capacity there, but we also have to address some of the labour disruptions that we have, climate resiliency on some rail lines as well, and also some of the regulatory elements in the rail lines and the port that caused congestion on the rail infrastructure.' For people like Jones, even seeing conversation taking place between provincial and federal levels of government is a positive sign. 'Our facilities produce millions of tons of potash each year, but our limiting factor is how much product we can get to market,' she said. 'To that point, Canadian port and rail infrastructure is crucial for resource companies like ours to reach our customers around the globe. We are pleased and encouraged to hear so much conversation by the federal and provincial governments in support of trade, enabling infrastructure so we can unlock our full potential as an economic critical minerals powerhouse right here in Saskatchewan. 'In Saskatchewan, we're not lacking ambition, know-how, or the demand for our products, but as a nation we haven't invested or collectively planned how we can competitively deliver our essential products to the world 365 days a year for international exports. That means getting products from right here in Belle Plaine to our largest, most efficient port in Vancouver to access some of our fastest growing markets. Our provincial government understands what needs to be done for us to earn our place within the country and the world as a mining superpower.' Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
Hamilton Spectator
2 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Ford wants to override towns and cities. They're saying no — by the dozens
When Councillor Tammy Hwang attended a recent meeting of the Association of Municipalities of Ontario (AMO), she expected concern about the Ford government's controversial Bill 5. What she didn't expect was how unanimous — and intense — the reaction would be. 'It was a heated and very raucous conversation among political leaders,' said Hwang, who represents the City of Hamilton and sits on the association's board. The board has 41 members representing Ontario municipalities big and small. 'Every single one of us was very concerned and had significant misgivings about Bill 5.' Speaking to her colleagues at last week's Hamilton planning committee meeting, Hwang said the association's policy team 'heard us loud and clear' and discussions will likely continue at its annual conference in August . 'This is not just a Hamilton thing,' she said. 'The other 444 municipalities share in Hamilton's concerns and misgivings about a lot of these policy changes.' That concern is now boiling over into formal opposition. According to an analysis of municipal meeting minutes from across the province by Canada's National Observer, more than 30 municipalities are passing motions, sending letters and urging federal intervention on Bill 5. From urban centres like Hamilton, Guelph and Kingston, to commuter towns, such as Caledon, Orangeville and Shelburne, to rural and cottage-country communities like Wawa, Trent Lakes, and The Archipelago — and inspired by First Nations opposition — resistance to Bill 5 has become a province-wide movement. Hamilton has been one of the most vocal opponents. The city council passed a motion opposing the legislation and sent letters to five provincial ministers. At the centre of their concerns is the creation of 'Special Economic Zones,' which allow the province to override local planning rules, weaken environmental oversight and undermine Indigenous consultation. The criteria for these exemptions remain vague. 'Hamilton is interested in investment and economic growth,' Hwang told Canada's National Observer. 'But we also have some of the most fertile farmland in the province, and we're trying to build a sustainable city. We just want to make sure growth happens in the right places with respect for the land and community needs.' Hwang said the impact of Special Economic Zones will differ in each municipality and expects more pushback from municipalities as people see how Bill 5 affects their communities. Coun. Craig Cassar, who brought forward the motion in Hamilton, described the bill as 'fundamentally undemocratic.' He warned it could disrupt local efforts to protect biodiversity and conservation, pose risks to endangered species and highlighted the lack of meaningful consultation with First Nations. 'This bill is titled Protect Ontario by Unleashing Our Economy Act, and to me, it evokes the image of a wild beast being unleashed — attacking Indigenous rights, endangered species, ecosystems as a whole, and municipal local democratic rights,' Cassar said. 'So, for once, it's actually an appropriately named bill, but for all the wrong reasons.' Hamilton's concern is also shaped by recent history. The Ford government previously attempted to remove protected Greenbelt land within the city as part of what became the $8.3 billion Greenbelt scandal — an effort to open thousands of acres of conservation land to developers. The decision was later reversed following public outcry and a damning Auditor General's report. Cassar said Hamilton's $1.3 billion agri-business sector could be directly affected by development in Special Economic Zones. 'Once you pave over farmland, it's gone forever.' At a recent rally outside Hamilton City Hall — dubbed 'Kill Bill 5' — hundreds gathered to demand the province reverse course. Similar alarm bells are ringing in Dresden, a small town in Chatham-Kent where residents are fighting a proposed landfill near their community. What pushed them over the edge was the discovery that the project was exempt from environmental assessment under Bill 5. 'We've passed motions, sent letters, attended committee hearings,' reads an email response from the Chatham-Kent mayor's office. But Chatham-Kent isn't stopping there. The city is calling on the federal governmen t to intervene — an escalation that underscores just how powerless municipalities feel under the new law. In a letter, the Association of Municipalities of Ontario also voiced its concerns about Bill 5 and urged the province to consult municipalities before enforcing Special Economic Zones. 'Without limits on how SEZs [Special Economic Zones] are identified, and which bylaws would be exempt, municipalities are concerned that the use of SEZs to bypass local deliberation on proposed projects may not deliver on the promise of supporting economic growth,' the letter reads . 'Instead, SEZs may hinder or prevent these projects from moving forward.' Association president and Westport Mayor Robin Jones said while the organization supports economic development, the process must respect local decision-making. 'We understand the need for the government to support economic projects that are going to move forward provincial priorities,' Jones told Canada's National Observer. 'Our concern is using a special economic zone contrary to municipal bylaws without the support of the municipality.' The Ford government's push to override local planning rules in the name of economic development isn't new. Christina Bouchard, a doctoral candidate and teacher in political studies at the University of Ottawa, who worked in municipal planning for over a decade, said Bill 5 is just the latest but more aggressive in more than 30 planning reforms introduced by the Ford government since 2018. Similar to Bill 5's Special Economic Zones, the government introduced Bill 66 in 2018 with 'open-for-business by-laws,' which would have allowed municipalities to bypass environmental protections , including Greenbelt safeguards, to fast-track development. After strong public and environmental pushback, the government removed the clause . Bouchard said the province keeps using the same method: cut local rules to speed up development. But instead of simplifying the system, repeated changes have created new challenges for municipalities trying to understand and apply land use laws. Bouchard said the Ford government this approach follows a pattern she calls 'governing by crisis.' 'Since he came into office — first the economic crisis, then the real COVID crisis, then the housing crisis and now the tariff crisis — each time, the government uses it as a reason to 'cut red tape,'' Bouchard said. But she suggested this approach doesn't always address the underlying problems. Social issues are complex and relying on a single solution may not deliver the results the government wants. According to Bouchard, many of the environmental protections and planning policies now being weakened were originally introduced in response to past public concerns about sprawl, gridlock, and the loss of farmland and green space. She said cutting these policies without careful review risks undoing progress made over the past two decades. She also warned that many people may not understand Bill 5's full impact until projects start in their communities. That's when concern and opposition are likely to grow — especially in areas where development could harm drinking water, farmland or local infrastructure. But at that point, it may be too late. Bouchard said not all communities will be equally equipped to push back. Municipalities with fewer resources may struggle to defend their interests if they're bypassed by provincial decisions, raising serious equity concerns in how the bill's impacts are felt across Ontario. Canada's National Observer reached out to Premier Doug Ford's office and the provincial minister of energy for comment but did not receive a response in time for publication. By Abdul Matin Sarfraz & Rory White Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
