
Andy Shaw: Why neophyte mayors need steady hands on the wheel
That sobering reality helps explain why Brandon Johnson, a relatively unknown teacher who broke out of a large pack to win Chicago's 2023 mayor's race, has stumbled badly enough in two-plus rocky years atop the City Hall food chain to tank in recent polls.
And it's a cautionary tale that certainly can't be lost on wunderkind Zohran Mamdani, the 33-year-old New York state assemblyman who is favored to become New York City's next mayor.
Mamdani won the Democratic nomination on a wave of youthful energy, grassroots excitement, social media savvy and the same kinds of progressive promises Johnson made during his campaign.
But Mamdani has a chance to avoid many of the pitfalls that have bedeviled Johnson by choosing and co-existing comfortably with at least one veteran of NYC government to help him navigate the turbulent waters of Big Apple politics.
This is crucial because leading a movement is world's apart from running a sprawling big city government. It's one thing to rail against the system from the outside and another to manage it from the inside.
Mamdani may have idealism, charisma and social media followers, but he needs someone who understands city budgets, contracts, union negotiations, how bond markets react to fiscal instability and why slogans don't pave roads or staff homeless shelters.
Johnson, to his credit, tapped Rich Guidice, a veteran of the Richard M. Daley administration, to be his first chief of staff. But that inconvenient marriage lasted only a few months, and none of Guidice's successors or Johnson's other top aides have been able to help him avoid two-plus years of unaffordable promises unkept, divisive City Council battles waged and media relations unnecessarily made fraught.
Mamdani, apparently cognizant of the perils of inexperience, has forged a somewhat surprising political alliance and personal friendship with a former competitor-turned-ally in the mayor's race: city comptroller and former Brooklyn Councilman Brad Lander, and that could make all the difference.
If Mamdani wins the general election in November, he would be smart to ask Lander to serve as his deputy mayor, NYC's equivalent of a chief of staff, to run the city's day-to-day operations while Mamdani focuses on the big picture.
Lander has spent decades watching NYC's political theater play out from the front row. He's seen and participated in enough real-world policymaking to know that ideology needs structure — not just passion.
As comptroller, he's no fiscal hawk, but he knows how to balance ambition with arithmetic, not smoke and mirrors. If he were to become deputy mayor, he would occupy the perfect power post to help translate Mamdani's passion and energy into sustainable and actionable governance.
This is where the comparison with Johnson becomes instructive and sobering. Johnson was also a movement candidate, propelled into office by energized unions, frustrated progressives, and backlash from decades of police intemperance and economic inequality. But once he got the keys to City Hall's fifth floor, he couldn't keep a seasoned driver.
After Guidice left a few months into the new administration, Johnson surrounded himself with loyal progressives — teachers, organizers and activists — who lacked valuable management experience. Admirable idealism? Maybe. Wise politics? Absolutely not.
Chicago's finances remain wobbly. Public safety is still a top concern, the schools face a fiscal cliff, the transit system is hemorrhaging riders and credibility, and the shortage of affordable housing has reached crisis proportions.
Johnson isn't a bad guy — he's smart and articulate, and he genuinely believes in his mission — but he was, at least initially, clearly in over his head. And without a seasoned deputy like a Lander or a Guidice, or even a former campaign rival with stellar big-city management chops such as Paul Vallas, no one on Johnson's leadership team has enough experience or stature to keep him on task and message.
Competence trumps charisma. A city is not a college campus where you can endlessly debate systems of oppression. It's a living organism that needs to be fed, housed, policed, cleaned and financed. That takes pros. Not poets.
Mamdani seems to understand that. Maybe it's because he's watched other progressive leaders get swallowed up by the system or their own inexperience. Maybe it's because he listens to the quiet voices that tell him values and vision aren't enough. Or maybe he's just smart enough to know what he doesn't know. That's leadership.
It doesn't mean a Mamdani administration would avoid every pitfall. Big cities are hard to run, even for seasoned leaders. Every decision will anger someone. Every budget line item has a built-in opposition group. Every stumble would be amplified by right-wing media eager to paint him as 'another woke disaster.'
But unlike Johnson, Mamdani would be giving himself a fighting chance if he elevates and keeps someone who knows where the wires are buried. Lander isn't flashy, and he doesn't inspire rally chants. But he understands the machinery of government in a way activists rarely do.
Lander is the kind of steady hand Johnson hired but couldn't hold on to. Mamdani might be a progressive determined not to let his agenda die under a pile of rookie mistakes and fiscal naiveté.
Maybe there's a lesson here for the next wave of liberal mayors and the movements that support them: Passion helps get you elected, but experience and competence enable you to do the job well. And if you're smart, you make room for both.
Johnson has 19 months until the next Chicago election, and if he has even a slim chance of righting the ship and changing the narrative enough to be a viable candidate — something predecessor Lori Lightfoot was unable to do — he would be wise to quickly find and hire a Lander-type clone here in Chicago.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Bloomberg
23 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Voters 'Sick of the Bloodsport' of Politics, Says Texas Democrat Talarico
Texas state Representative James Talarico, a rising Democratic Party star, said voters want to see authentic moral leadership from their politicians. He said that he is considering jumping into the 2026 race for Senate, but is right now focused on the special legislative session in the Texas statehouse and combating republic redistricting efforts. (Source: Bloomberg)
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Project 2025 author Paul Dans will challenge Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham in South Carolina
WASHINGTON (AP) — A chief architect of Project 2025, Paul Dans, is launching a Republican primary challenge to Sen. Lindsey Graham in South Carolina, joining a crowded field that will test the loyalties of President Donald Trump and his MAGA movement in next year's midterm election. Dans told The Associated Press the Trump administration's federal workforce reductions and cuts to federal programs are what he had hoped for in drafting Project 2025. But he said there's 'more work to do,' particularly in the Senate. 'What we've done with Project 2025 is really change the game in terms of closing the door on the progressive era," Dans said in an AP interview. 'If you look at where the chokepoint is, it's the United States Senate. That's the headwaters of the swamp." Dans, who is set to formally announce his campaign at an event Wednesday in Charleston, said Graham has spent most of his career in Washington and 'it's time to show him the door.' Chris LaCivita, a senior adviser to Graham's campaign who co-managed President Donald Trump's 2024 bid, predicted in a statement to the AP that Dans' campaign would 'end prematurely.' 'After being unceremoniously dumped in 2024 while trying to torpedo Donald Trump's historic campaign, Paul Dans has parachuted himself into the state of South Carolina in direct opposition to President Trump's longtime friend and ally in the Senate, Lindsey Graham," LaCivita said. Challenging the long-serving Graham, who has routinely batted back contenders over the years, is something of a political long shot in what is fast becoming a crowded field ahead of the November 2026 midterm election that will determine control of Congress. Trump early on gave his endorsement of Graham, a political confidant and regular golfing partner of the president, despite their on-again-off-again relationship. Graham, in announcing he would seek a fifth term in the Senate, also secured the state's leading Republicans, Sen. Tim Scott and Gov. Henry McMaster, to chair his 2026 run. He has amassed millions of dollars in his campaign account. Other candidates, including Republican former South Carolina Lt. Gov. André Bauer, a wealthy developer, and Democratic challenger Dr. Annie Andrews, have announced their campaigns for the Senate seat in an early start to the election season, more than a year away. Graham, in an appearance Sunday on NBC's 'Meet the Press,' did not discuss his reelection campaign but fielded questions on topics including his push to release 'as much as you can' from the case files on Jeffrey Epstein, something many of Trump's supporters want the government to do. Dans, an attorney who worked in the first Trump administration as White House liaison to the office of personnel management, said he expects to have support from Project 2025 allies, as well as the ranks of Trump's supporters in the state who have publicly tired of Graham. After Trump left the White House, Dans, now a father of four, went to work at the Heritage Foundation, often commuting on weekdays to Washington as he organized Project 2025. The nearly 1,000-page policy blueprint, with chapters written by leading conservative thinkers, calls for dismantling the federal government and downsizing the federal workforce, among other right-wing proposals for the next White House. 'To be clear, I believe that there is a 'deep state' out there, and I'm the single one who stepped forward at the end of the first term of Trump and really started to drain the swamp,' Dans said, noting he compiled much of the book from his kitchen table in Charleston. Among the goals, he said, was to 'deconstruct the administrative state,' which he said is what the Trump administration has been doing, pointing in particular to former Trump adviser Elon Musk's work at the Department of Government Efficiency shuttering federal offices. Dans and Heritage parted ways in July 2024 amid blowback over Project 2025. It catapulted into political culture that summer during the presidential campaign season, as Democrats and their allies showcased the hard-right policy proposals — from mass firings to budget cuts — as a dire warning of what could come in a second Trump term. Trump distanced himself from Project 2025, and his campaign insisted it had nothing to do with his own "Agenda 47." Dans is launching his campaign with a prayer breakfast followed by a kick-off event at a historic venue in Charleston. ___ Kinnard reported from Chapin, South Carolina, and can be reached at


New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Andrew Cuomo slams Eric Adams as ‘spoiler' in NYC mayoral race: ‘It's about you and your ego'
What's good for the goose isn't good for the ex-governor. Andrew Cuomo contended that Eric Adams' longshot independent re-election campaign only makes it easier for socialist Zohran Mamdani to become mayor. Cuomo, who is mounting an independent mayoral bid of his own after Mamdani walloped him in the Democratic primary, accused Adams of consistently putting himself above the interests of New Yorkers. Advertisement 'If you're going to run, even if you're just a spoiler, then it's about you and your ego,' Cuomo told reporters at the Colombian Day Parade in Jackson Heights on Sunday. 'It's not about the people of the city of New York. And that is consistent. He puts himself above the city of New York. He always has.' 3 Former Gov. Andrew Cuomo accused Eric Adams of being a 'spoiler' candidate in the mayoral race. Kevin C Downs forThe New York Post The dismissive words by Cuomo came in response to Adams not only blasting him exclusively to The Post for stepping down as governor amid a sexual harassment scandal, but also supposedly stealing the mayor's 'playbook' by running as an independent. Advertisement Adams argued his own 'personal strife' — meaning his historic federal corruption indictment — didn't lead him to resign like Cuomo. 'During my personal strife, I stepped up. I continued to deliver for the city,' he said, breezing over the Trump administration controversially dismissing his charges. 3 Adams himself had accused Cuomo of stealing his 'playbook' by running as an independent. J.C. Rice The war of words — and arguable battle to show who's the least self-aware — between Adams and Cuomo comes as both jockey to coalesce anti-Mamdani support from business leaders, moderates and other New Yorkers wary of a socialist mayor. Advertisement Polling shows Mamdani could easily win November's election if he faces a ballot with three independents — Adams, Cuomo and lawyer Jim Walden — and Republican nominee Curtis Sliwa. Many powerbrokers, such as former Gov. David Paterson, have called for candidates to clear the lane for a strong contender against Mamdani if they're not polling well. Cuomo defiantly has tried to pitch himself as that candidate, despite his double-digit loss to Mamdani in the Democratic primary and a chorus of calls afterward for him to stop actively campaigning. His decision to stay in the race as an independent drew accusations that he was acting as a spoiler candidate. Advertisement Adams has tried to gobble up Cuomo's big business backers by arguing he's the best anti-Mamdani candidate. But his argument has been undercut by abysmal polling, with one recent survey finding him in a distant fourth. 3 Cuomo has faced numerous calls to drop out after being walloped by Zohran Mamdani in the Democratic primary. Kevin C Downs forThe New York Post Beyond attacking Adams, Cuomo again accused Mamdani of offering 'hollow promises.' 'None of it would make a difference,' he said, before launching into a takedown of Mamdani's signature policy proposals. 'One grocery store in every county. What is that gonna do for anybody? Fast, free buses. Why should I get a free bus ride? Why would you subsidize wealthy people on a bus? 'None of that makes sense. New Yorkers would say it's BS. And that has to be exposed. It is all a fraud. Slick salesman.'