Trump's Aug 1 tariff deadline is fast approaching. Here's where the world stands
Trump in April unveiled sweeping import taxes on goods coming into the US from nearly every country, including heightened 'reciprocal' rates for certain countries.
The implementation of levies has since been postponed twice. By early July, Trump began sending warning letters that higher tariffs would be imposed against dozens of countries from Aug 1.
Since then, the US has announced more trade frameworks. But key details remain sparse.
Here's what we know about the agreements so far.
SOUTH KOREA
Trump said on Wednesday the US will impose a 15 per cent tariff on imports from South Korea – a lower levy than the earlier threatened 25 per cent.
As part of the deal, Trump added that South Korea had agreed to invest US$350 billion into the US and to purchase US$100 billion of liquefied natural gas and other energy products.
The US president also said South Korea would accept American products, including cars, trucks and agriculture into its markets and impose no import duties on them.
JAPAN
Japan will similarly face a 15 per cent levy on its exports to the US – also a lower rate than the previously threatened 25 per cent.
Crucially, that reduction includes the tariffs on automobiles, an industry accounting for 30 per cent of the country's exports to the US last year.
Trump said that Japan would also invest US$550 billion into the US and 'open' its economy to American autos and rice.
CHINA
US and Chinese officials on Tuesday agreed to seek an extension of their 90-day tariff truce that is set to expire on Aug 12 – though Trump has yet to officially agree to the extension.
At its peak, Trump's new tariffs on Chinese goods totalled 145 per cent and China's counter-tariffs on American products reached 125 per cent. The levies were eventually rolled back to 30 per cent and 10 per cent on May 12 following the agreed truce.
In June, the two countries announced a trade agreement.
As part of the deal, US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said that China had agreed to make it easier for American firms to acquire Chinese magnets and rare earth minerals critical for manufacturing and microchip production. Meanwhile, the Chinese Commerce Ministry said that the US would ' lift a series of restrictive measures it had imposed on China".
Other key details of the deal remain murky — including the timing of implementation for these terms.
US trade policy expert William Reinsch said he thinks the US will extend the Aug 12 deadline by another 90 days.
He noted that Trump's rhetoric on China has gotten less dramatic and that "he's not complained about Xi Jinping in particular".
"I think he wants to have a one-on-one meeting with China's leader and does not want to do anything to rock the boat," he added.
INDIA
Trump on Wednesday said the US is still negotiating with India on trade, backtracking his announcement earlier in the day that the US would impose a 25 per cent tariff on goods imported from India starting on Friday,
The US president added that there would be an unspecific penalty on India. What the penalty would be was not clear.
Trump indicated initially, in a post on the Truth Social website, that the penalty was a response to India buying Russian arms and oil and its "obnoxious non-monetary trade barriers".
When asked about the penalty later at the White House, he said it was partly due to trade issues and partly because of India's involvement in the BRICS group of developing nations, which he described as hostile to the US.
Reinsch said of the situation in India: 'We are seeing classic Trump tactics.'
"When the negotiation is not going quickly enough for him or when he thinks it's not going to have an ending that he wants, he makes more threats," said Reinsch. "You turn up the pressure and hope they fold.'
PAKISTAN
Pakistan and Washington have struck a deal in which they will work together in developing the South Asian nation's oil reserves, Trump announced on Wednesday.
He added they were in the process of choosing the oil company that would lead the partnership. No further details were provided.
Pakistan confirmed a deal had been reached with the US, adding that the agreement would result in reduced tariffs on Pakistani exports to the US.
It also said the trade deal is expected to spur increased US investment in the country's infrastructure and development projects.
PHILIPPINES
Earlier this month, Trump announced a 19 per cent tariff rate on goods from the Philippines – one percentage point lower than the previously threatened levy.
In return, Trump said on Truth Social, the US would not pay tariffs on American goods it shipped to the Philippines. But additional details remained unclear.
In the days that followed, the ambassador of the Philippines to the US Jose Manuel Romualdez said the country hoped to renegotiate its trade deal with Washington.
INDONESIA
Similarly, Indonesian exports to the US will also be taxed 19 per cent, Trump announced on Jul 22. This compares to the previously threatened levy of 32 per cent.
According to Washington, nearly all US goods will be able to enter Indonesia tariff-free. Moreover, it said Jakarta had agreed to recognise US standards for car and pharmaceutical imports.
Indonesia had already made other concessions earlier in July, pledging to buy more US oil and agro-industrial goods.
Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto said he will continue to negotiate with Trump, in hopes of further lowering the coming US tariffs.
VIETNAM
Vietnam saw tariffs on its exports more than halve to 20 per cent from the previously threatened 46 per cent in April.
But a 40 per cent tariff will be imposed on goods manufactured in third countries that use Vietnam to circumvent steeper trade barriers.
US goods will also not face any tariffs entering Vietnam.
UNITED KINGDOM
On May 8, Trump agreed to cut tariffs on British autos, steel and aluminium, among other trade pledges — while the UK promised to reduce levies on US products like olive oil, wine and sports equipment.
Levies on UK autos dropped to 10 per cent for the first 100,000 vehicles per year, down from the earlier threatened 27.5 per cent.
British steel and aliuminium exports to the US are subject to 25 per cent levies. It is the only country spared from Trump's 50 per cent levies on the metals.
The rest of Britain's products are subject to the 10 per cent base rate.
EUROPEAN UNION
The EU and Washington announced a trade framework that includes a baseline US tariff of 15 per cent that will apply to 70 per cent of European goods brought into the US. The rate will apply to pharmaceuticals, semiconductors, and car and car parts.
The remaining 30 per cent of those imports is still open for negotiations.
That is lower than the blanket 30 per cent tariffs Trump had threatened to impose, but significantly higher than the duties in place to date.
As part of the deal, the 27-nation EU has agreed to purchase energy worth US$750 billion from the US and make US$600 billion in additional investments, according to Trump.
The two sides have agreed to bilateral tariff exemptions on a number of "strategic products", notably aircraft, certain chemicals, some agricultural products and critical raw materials.
BRAZIL
Trump on Wednesday slapped a 50 per cent tariff on most Brazilian goods to fight what he has called a "witch hunt" against former President Jair Bolsonaro, but softened the blow by excluding sectors such as aircraft, energy and orange juice from the heavier levies.
The new tariffs will go into effect on Aug 6, not Aug 1 as Trump announced originally.
SECTORAL TARIFFS
A 50 per cent tariff on copper pipes and wiring will kick in on Friday, Trump announced on Wednesday.
Details of the levy, though, fell short of the sweeping restrictions expected and left out copper input materials such as ores, concentrates and cathodes.
Steel and aluminium imports are also subject to a 50 per cent levy.
WHICH COUNTRIES HAVE NOT STRUCK DEALS?
Earlier this month, Trump sent letters to some countries warning of steeper tariffs if no deals were made with the US by Aug 1.
Some of these countries have yet to announce agreements with Washington.
In Asia, Myanmar, Laos, Brunei, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka have not struck deals with the US yet.
On Thursday, Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim said he had spoken with Trump, and that US tariff rates on Malaysia would be announced on Friday.
US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said in an interview with Fox News on Wednesday the US had made trade deals with Cambodia and Thailand. No further details were provided.
WEAPONISING TRADE
Trump is not the first person to weaponise trade for political objectives, Reinsch said, adding that "the Chinese have been doing it for years'.
'It's not a new thing,' he said. 'But it's a very worrisome thing because it's very hard to negotiate that.'
"What he's telling the Indians is you need to change your foreign policy – and that's a big ask. That's different from saying you need to lower your tariffs," Reinsch said.
Trump is also "really intervening in the sovereignty" of Brazil with his demand and it is very hard to have a negotiation about that, he added.
The US president said tariffs on Brazil were to fight what he has called a witch hunt" against former President Jair Bolsonaro. Trump's administration also unveiled sanctions on the Brazilian supreme court justice who has been overseeing Bolsonaro's trial on charges of plotting a coup.
"I'm very worried this is going to become a common tactic and I don't know how we're gonna deal with it," said Reinsch.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
17 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Gaza hunger presents Trump with moral test familiar to past presidents
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Images of malnourished Palestinians in the war-ravaged enclave have disturbed US President Donald Trump enough to take action. WASHINGTON – As the Gaza Strip tips into famine and images of starving children trigger new demands for action, US President Donald Trump faces a test all too familiar to his predecessors. Time after time, American presidents have found themselves watching suffering in faraway countries with the knowledge that they could act to save innocent lives. Images of death and misery in places such as the Balkans, Rwanda, Darfur and Syria, to name a few, haunted their consciences – sometimes moving them to act, but often leading to excuses. The desperation in Gaza has emerged as such a test for Mr Trump. By his own account, images of malnourished Palestinians in the war-ravaged enclave have disturbed him enough to take action. 'I mean, some of those kids are – that's real starvation stuff,' Mr Trump said in Scotland on July 28. 'I see it, and you can't fake it. So we're going to be even more involved.' It was unclear what Mr Trump meant by getting 'more involved'. Days earlier, he had withdrawn his special envoy, Steve Witkoff, from talks between Israel and Hamas in pursuit of a ceasefire to end the war in Gaza. Mr Witkoff travelled to Israel on July 31 to discuss Gaza , and Israeli news outlets reported that he might even visit a food distribution centre in the territory. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. World Trump modifies reciprocal tariffs ahead of deadline; rate on Singapore likely to remain at 10% Singapore 'For one last time, let's go home': Tears, laughs as last scheduled Jetstar Asia flight touches down Singapore Over half of job applications by retrenched Jetstar Asia staff led to offers or interviews: CEO Singapore No entry: ICA to bar high-risk, undesirable travellers from boarding S'pore-bound ships, flights Business More new homes are coming up in northern Singapore Business OCBC Q2 profit drops 7% to $1.82b as interest rates fall, to pay lower interim dividend Asia Thailand seeks neutral venue for border talks with Cambodia Singapore 'Switching careers just as I became a dad was risky, but I had to do it for my family' Mr Witkoff's change of plans comes as aid groups say hunger in Gaza is reaching crisis levels. One UN-affiliated group said in a report this week that a worst-case famine scenario is unfolding, and Gaza health officials say that dozens of Palestinians, including children, have died of starvation in recent weeks. Those grim facts have been driven home by gut-wrenching images of skeletal toddlers and people fighting for food. Israeli officials reject responsibility for food shortages in Gaza, which they say are exaggerated and caused by Hamas. 'There is no policy of starvation in Gaza, and there is no starvation in Gaza,' Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said. Hamas 'robs, steals this humanitarian aid and then accuses Israel of not supplying it', he added. But Hamas denies that, and Israeli military officials privately say they have found no evidence that Hamas systematically steals aid. Such protests have not defused global anger. France announced this week that it would recognise an independent Palestinian state at the United Nations in September , and Britain said it would follow suit if Israel did not agree to a ceasefire with Hamas . And in Washington this week, one of Mr Trump's fiercest Republican allies in Congress, Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia, condemned Israel's actions in Gaza as 'genocide'. Mr Trump has few good options. The United States supplies Israel, its close partner, with billions in annual military aid. Even if Hamas is the main obstacle to aid delivery, Mr Trump lacks influence over the militant group. His only real hope is to insist that Israel, which controls Gaza's borders, does more to clear roads and protect aid convoys. A long-term solution may require leveraging American aid to force Mr Netanyahu to accept a ceasefire on terms short of his long-time demands. Dr Stephen Wertheim, a senior fellow in the American Statecraft Programme at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, said the quandary is a familiar one for US presidents. 'President Trump's excuse-making over Gaza resonates with a long line of presidents who were pressured to address humanitarian catastrophes,' Dr Wertheim said. That pressure comes from a sense of moral duty in the country's DNA, dating as far back as John Winthrop's 1630 'City on a Hill' sermon, in which he told Puritan Massachusetts colonists that 'the eyes of all people are upon us'. As the United States grew in power and wealth, so did its sense of obligation to people in need everywhere. Before he became a free-market Republican president, Herbert Hoover ran a federal foreign aid programme that sent food to famine-stricken Soviet Russia in 1921. 'Whatever their politics, they shall be fed!' he declared. Cold War competition for global influence with the Soviet Union reinforced the instinct, on strategic grounds. Many conservatives argue that America is not a charity, and should help people abroad only when it advances the national interest. Mr Trump has made that argument explicit in his America-first foreign policy, his deep cuts to foreign aid spending and his dismantling of the US Agency for International Development. Displaced Palestinians waiting for food at a charity kitchen in Gaza City on July 23. PHOTO: SAHER ALGHORRA/NYTIMES Mr Stephen Pomper, the chief of policy at the International Crisis Group, noted that a president who preaches an America-first foreign policy has undermined an international system built over decades to prevent foreign atrocities. The United States 'looks increasingly like it rejects or is indifferent to the founding principles of the order that it helped create', he said. Still, the crisis in Gaza has echoes of past humanitarian crises that left presidents wringing their hands over how to respond. President Bill Clinton took office in 1993 as a champion of human rights and international institutions. But when machete-wielding Hutu militias started to slaughter ethnic Tutsi in Rwanda in 1994, he rejected calls for US action. Scarred by the deaths of 18 American soldiers on a peacekeeping mission in Somalia, Mr Clinton feared that even modest steps could escalate dangerously. Unchecked, Hutu killers carried out the genocide of an estimated 800,000 Tutsi. Mr Clinton later said he regretted not doing more to stop it. Mr Clinton also hesitated as Serbian forces slaughtered civilians in Bosnia-Herzegovina in the mid-1990s, rebuffing direct pleas from the likes of Elie Wiesel by saying the problem did not warrant risking American lives. The 1995 massacre of 8,000 men and boys at a UN-declared 'safe area' in the Bosnian town of Srebrenica finally moved Mr Clinton to act. A US-led bombing campaign against Serbian forces led to a peace deal credited with stabilising the region. Stopping mass killings in the Darfur region of Sudan in the early 2000s became a campaign for activists and celebrities, including Angelina Jolie and George Clooney. But even after the US State Department formally declared the atrocities there a 'genocide' in 2004, president George W. Bush refused calls to deploy US troops to stop it. He cited, among other things, concern about intervening 'in another Muslim country' at the time of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. By the time Mr Barack Obama became president, activists and scholars – fuelled by the American failure in Rwanda – had developed new legal theories to support cross-border intervention to protect victims of atrocities. Among them was Ms Samantha Power, an influential national security aide to Mr Obama, who helped engineer a 2011 presidential directive on the subject. 'Preventing mass atrocities and genocide is a core national security interest and a core moral responsibility of the United States,' it declared. Palestinians carry aid supplies which entered Gaza through Israel in Beit Lahia, northern Gaza, on July 27. PHOTO: BLOOMBERG Mr Obama put that idea into practice in 2011, when he ordered airstrikes in Libya against government forces preparing to crush a rebellion in the city of Benghazi. Mr Obama said he acted to avert 'a massacre that would have reverberated across the region and stained the conscience of the world'. But that supposedly limited intervention expanded into a months-long Nato bombing campaign, and Libya collapsed into violent anarchy, leaving Mr Obama regretting the experience. So when he was pressured again to intervene in Syria's civil war against the country's brutal regime, he rejected pleas for airstrikes from top officials, including US Secretary of State John Kerry. Mr Obama did, however, order limited airstrikes in Syria in 2014 against Islamic State group fighters, in part to save thousands of Yazidi people trapped on a mountain in Iraq and at risk of genocidal massacre. 'Earlier this week, one Iraqi cried that there is no one coming to help,' Mr Obama said in an address to the nation. 'Well, today America is coming to help.' Gaza presents Mr Trump with an especially difficult case, as it did for former president Joe Biden. Mr Biden faced withering questions about his support for Israel's military campaign, and was shouted down at public events by protesters accusing him of complicity in genocide. But while Mr Biden often harangued Mr Netanyahu to allow more aid into Gaza – usually with limited and temporary results – he never risked a full break with the Israeli prime minister over the matter. One reason, Mr Biden's officials say, was intelligence showing that Hamas responded to signs of a potential split between the United States and Israel by hardening its negotiation position in ceasefire talks. Mr Biden felt enough of a responsibility – and also perhaps political vulnerability – that he resorted to dramatic displays of support for hungry Palestinians, sending military planes to airdrop supplies and ordering the construction of a US$230 million (S$299 million) pier to allow aid delivery by sea. Critics dismissed both measures as made-for-TV substitutes for putting decisive pressure on Mr Netanyahu. Ultimately, Dr Wertheim said, America's real problem in Gaza is itself. 'It's not that other parties are engaged in atrocities and the question is whether the United States will use its righteous power to stop,' he said. 'In this case, the issue is that the United States is complicit in Israel's conduct.' NYTIMES
Straits Times
17 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Asia manufacturing outlook at lowest since pandemic on Trump tariffs
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Manufacturers across South-east Asia turned the least optimistic about future growth since the depths of the pandemic amid Trump's long tariff rollout. Hong Kong – Manufacturers across South-east Asia turned the least optimistic about future growth since the depths of the pandemic amid Trump's long tariff rollout, even as activity improved last month. Confidence in future output across the region fell to the lowest since July 2020, according to S&P Global purchasing managers' index (PMI) data published on Aug 1. The pessimism comes even as overall output improved in July, as the headline index of activity rose for the first time since March to 50.1, just above the 50-line demarcating growth or contraction. That's after contracting in June the most in nearly four years Manufacturers across the region, which the world relies on for goods, have been whipsawed since early this year by White House trade policy. After unveiling in April some of the highest tariff rates in Asia, US President Donald Trump has since set tariff rates of 10 per cent to 40 per cent for the region. Economies in the region are highly reliant on industrial production and exports, particularly to the United States, and serve as a barometer for global trade activity and demand. There were other slight improvements in external demand, as new export orders contracted at a softer pace and output prices rose at a faster pace, indicating increased demand from abroad. 'Despite these emerging positive trends, the latest data also indicated a further erosion of confidence,' said Maryam Baluch, economist at S&P Global Market Intelligence. 'While an increase in output is anticipated, the growth rate is expected to remain subdued.' Meanwhile, overall activity in Japan and South Korea contracted for another month. The new orders, output and employment measures together account for three-quarters of the PMI index, and surveys are conducted in the second half of each month. BLOOMBERG
Business Times
17 minutes ago
- Business Times
Thailand welcomes 19% US tariff as ‘major success'
[BANGKOK] Thailand welcomed on Friday the 19 per cent trade tariff imposed by US President Donald Trump as a 'major success', a government spokesman said, averting a threatened levy of 36 per cent. Trump ordered stiff tariffs on dozens of trading partners in an effort to reshape global trade in favour of the US economy. Thailand has been negotiating with Washington for weeks, seeking a reduction in the 36 per cent levy on key exports threatened under Trump's 'Liberation Day' measures. 'This finalised deal, setting US import tariffs at 19 per cent, marks a major success for Thailand,' Thai government spokesman Jirayu Huangsab said in a statement. 'It represents a win-win approach aimed at preserving Thailand's export base and long-term economic stability.' The United States' goods trade deficit with Thailand hit US$45.6 billion in 2024, up 11.7 per cent from the year before, according to US Trade Representative data. A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU Friday, 8.30 am Asean Business Business insights centering on South-east Asia's fast-growing economies. Sign Up Sign Up Thailand has struggled to reignite its economy since the Covid-19 pandemic, when travel restrictions hammered the key tourism sector. The Thai government in May cut its 2025 economic growth forecast to 2.3-3.3 per cent, from 3.2-4.2 per cent, citing uncertainty over tariffs. Growth in 2024 was 2.5 per cent. The tariff announcement on Thursday in Washington came days after Trump intervened to help broker a ceasefire between Thailand and Cambodia. Five days of heavy border clashes between the two neighbours - their deadliest in decades - left more than 40 people dead and 300,000 evacuated from their homes. AFP
