logo
Has the stock market's epic rebound come too far, too fast? What investors chasing the rally should keep in mind.

Has the stock market's epic rebound come too far, too fast? What investors chasing the rally should keep in mind.

Yahoo16-05-2025
Any investor who was bold enough to buy the dip in stocks last month has been quickly rewarded. But has the stock market's comeback been too much, too fast?
Some on Wall Street think so.
I have $50,000 in credit-card debt after my divorce, but received $30,000 after a car wreck. Do I buy a used Lexus?
My second wife says her 2 kids should inherit our estate, but I also have 2 kids. Is that fair?
My husband and I spend more money on our daughter and her family than on my single son. Do we compensate him?
These $5,000 bonds can help you fix a stock-heavy portfolio
'I am scared to death that I'll run out of money': My wife and I are in our 50s and have $4.4 million. Can we retire early?
'I think what we're seeing now is emotion and people chasing the rally, and this fear of missing out,' said Michael O'Rourke, chief market strategist at Jones Trading, during an interview with MarketWatch.
Since its closing low on April 8, the S&P 500 SPX has risen by more than 17% through Tuesday's close, a pace rarely seen over the past 75 years. Analysts at Birinyi Associates have found six examples since 1950 where short-term returns for the S&P 500 were on par with what investors have seen over the past six weeks.
Following each example, returns 12 months later were almost universally strong. The strongest example followed the COVID-19-inspired meltdown in early 2020: Following the market's initial comeback, the S&P 500 continued to climb, ultimately tacking on a 46% return 12 months later.
But a lot can happen in a year, and there are still plenty of investors out there who expect stocks could head lower once again in the interim. Even Wall Street luminaries like Paul Tudor Jones have said that they expect the market will revisit its April lows later this year as the economic damage from Trump's tariffs is finally felt.
See: Paul Tudor Jones says U.S. stocks will fall to new lows — even if Trump dramatically dials back China tariffs
Mark Hackett, chief market strategist at Nationwide, pointed out that U.S. stocks are still expensive compared with companies' expected earnings over the next 12 months.
'The market has raced from oversold to overbought in record time, with the S&P 500 now trading at 21x forward earnings,' Hackett said in emailed commentary.
The relative strength index for the S&P 500, a popular stock-market momentum gauge, was sitting north of 70 on Wednesday, putting the index squarely in overbought territory. It had fallen below 30 as recently as April 4, before Trump announced his initial 90-day pause on global tariffs.
To be sure, investors inclined to keep on buying have plenty of grist to support their thesis. Trump has walked back many of his most economically damaging tariffs, and few expect the administration will bring them back — at least not at the levels announced on April 2.
At the same time, many hedge funds and other institutional investors who either sold stocks in April or sat things out are likely facing pressure to chase the rally.
Trade deals with the U.K. and China have shown that the White House is serious about finding an off-ramp. After unveiling the 90-day pause followed by a dramatic de-escalation of its China tariffs this week, the U.S. effective tariff rate has fallen to 14.4%, compared with nearly 24% just before, according to data from J.P. Morgan. To be sure, even 14.4% is higher than where tariffs stood at the beginning of 2025.
Adding to the sense of optimism, much of the hard economic data released so far have shown little indication that the tariffs, and the attendant surge in policy uncertainty caused by their chaotic rollout, have caused any deeper damage to the American labor market or consumers' willingness to spend.
But plenty of data from April has yet to be released, and some expect the full extent of the economic blowback could take longer to play out.
'There has likely been damage done, especially to smaller businesses, that it will be difficult to recover from, at least in the short term,' said Melissa Brown, managing director of investment-decision research at SimCorp.
There are still plenty of unanswered questions surrounding the White House's tariff agenda that could upend stocks. After rampant speculation about whether the 'Trump put' was still in play, the administration has shown once again that it is responsive to pressure from the financial markets, be it stocks or bonds.
See: Stock-market recovery suggests equities must fall this far to spark a 'Trump put' or pivot
Trump's plans for national-security tariffs on semiconductors and pharmaceuticals remain a key unanswered question for investors. The administration has been largely quiet regarding its plans lately, although the Commerce Department was asked to begin a formal investigation at the beginning of April, Jones Trading's O'Rourke noted. If the White House follows through with substantial levies intended to encourage the reshoring of production related to sensitive goods, it could send stocks reeling once again.
The confusion here helps underscore a key risk for stocks: The fact that with one Truth Social post, Trump could send investors scrambling out of equities once again.
O'Rourke, however, said he is beginning to suspect that last month's market chaos may have caused the president to lose his nerve on his tariff agenda.
'Did the president get so spooked on the reaction to his China tariffs that he doesn't follow through here?' O'Rourke wondered.
Then there's the question of the bond market. The yield on the 10-year Treasury note BX:TMUBMUSD10Y quietly crept back above 4.50% on Wednesday, returning to levels seen last month that spooked fears of a bond-market meltdown and helped encourage Trump to announce the 90-day pause on many of his 'liberation day' levies. Bond prices move inversely to bond yields, falling as yields rise.
'Yields on the long end are rising, that's going to be our ultimate battle now,' said George Cipolloni, a portfolio manager at Penn Mutual Asset Management.
U.S. stocks traded mostly higher on Wednesday, with the S&P 500 up marginally while the Nasdaq Composite COMP ended on solid gains. The Dow Jones Industrial Average DJIA and the Russell 2000 RUT both closed lower.
Wall Street's biggest bull held his nerve throughout this year's selloff. What he's saying now.
'I'm flabbergasted': My friend wants to borrow $5,800 to save his home from foreclosure. What should I do?
Has the stock market's epic rebound come too far, too fast? What investors chasing the rally should keep in mind.
'We live modestly': My wife and I have $900K in stocks and $380K in savings and CDs. Are we holding too much cash?
Wall Street's fear gauge just dropped with striking speed. What historically comes next for stocks?
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

£529 to invest? This FTSE 100 ‘cheat code' share could make investors a million
£529 to invest? This FTSE 100 ‘cheat code' share could make investors a million

Yahoo

time21 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

£529 to invest? This FTSE 100 ‘cheat code' share could make investors a million

The UK's most active investors — those aged between 25 and 34 — save £529 on average per month. That's according to investments provider Shepherds Friendly. With this sort of sum, I think it's realistic to target a million-pound portfolio with FTSE 100 shares. Since 2015, the Footsie's delivered an average annual return of 7%. And, in recent days, it's touched new record highs. But I believe buying individual blue-chip stocks is the most effective way to build long-term wealth. There's no such thing as a 'sure thing' in investing. However, this FTSE 100 growth share has proved to be a terrific 'cheat code' for long-term investors looking to supercharge their portfolios. And I think it will remain an exceptional wealth creator. If its performance since 2015 continues, a £529 monthly investment each month will create a portfolio worth £1,022,797 just over 10 years from now. I wouldn't just hold one share in my portfolio, given the high risk that comes with a lack of diversification. But here's why I think buying this company as part of a balanced portfolio demands consideraton. Jaw-dropping return Games Workshop's (LSE:GAW) delivered a stunning annual return of 42.9% over the past decade. The products might not be to everyone's tastes. But the exceptional capital gains it's produced make it hard to ignore. In a nutshell, the company designs, manufactures, and sells miniatures and tabletop games systems, chiefly under the Warhammer brand. Other products include paints, dice, and books that bring its products and the associated lore to life. This is clearly a niche industry. But it's a vast one — today Games Workshop has hundreds of stores and a distribution network spanning the globe — and it's still growing rapidly as the fantasy gaming genre enters new markets. The FTSE company had revenues of £119.1m a decade ago. That's since ballooned to £617.5m today. There are two other reasons why I like Games Workshop shares. It is the market leader, and enjoys spectacular margins as a result (core gross margin was 69.5%, latest financials show). And the business is stepping up licencing of its highly popular intellectual property (IP) to help drive future growth, including a blockbuster TV and film deal with Amazon. Growth powerhouse Like any UK share, Games Workshop faces obstacles it'll need to overcome in the years ahead to keep delivering delicious returns. One is the problem of mounting competition as other games companies try to steal in on its markets. Adding to this, there's also been substantial growth in the counterfeit market, fuelled by the rapid rise of 3D printing. But so far, the premium quality of Games Workshop's product — and aggressive moves to protect its IP — have helped it stay ahead of the curve. These twin factors explain why City analysts remain confident in the company's long-term profits outlook. Okay, they predict it will follow a 19% rise in annual earnings for the last financial year (to May 2025) with a 5% fall in the current period. However, this reflects the likelihood of fewer major new product releases this year compared to the financial 2025 year. Brokers are tipping earnings to rebound 9% next year, as fresh new games are released and broader consumer spending recovers. As part of a balanced portfolio, Games Workshop is a top growth stock to consider. The post £529 to invest? This FTSE 100 'cheat code' share could make investors a million appeared first on The Motley Fool UK. More reading 5 Stocks For Trying To Build Wealth After 50 One Top Growth Stock from the Motley Fool Royston Wild has positions in Games Workshop Group Plc. The Motley Fool UK has recommended Amazon and Games Workshop Group Plc. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. Motley Fool UK 2025 Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Summer Reading for Your Portfolio—and Sanity
Summer Reading for Your Portfolio—and Sanity

Bloomberg

time23 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

Summer Reading for Your Portfolio—and Sanity

By Every week on the Merryn Talks Money podcast we ask our guests what they are reading. A theme has emerged over the last six months or so: It is a cry for help. This makes sense. There's a lot going on. The various cries can be divided into three categories: take me back to basics (investing classics); show me how this worked out last time around (history); and give me some tips on how to think (actual self-help books).

Trump fires a senior official over jobs numbers
Trump fires a senior official over jobs numbers

CNN

time27 minutes ago

  • CNN

Trump fires a senior official over jobs numbers

Donald Trump Job market EconomyFacebookTweetLink Follow President Donald Trump has fired Dr. Erika McEntarfer, the commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, whom he accused, without evidence, of manipulating the monthly jobs reports for 'political purposes.' The BLS' monthly labor report Friday showed that the US economy added only 73,000 jobs in July, far below expectations. It also sharply revised down the employment growth that had been previously reported in May and June – by a combined 258,000 jobs. After the revisions, the jobs report showed the weakest pace of hiring for any three-month period since the pandemic recession in 2020. 'In my opinion, today's Jobs Numbers were RIGGED in order to make the Republicans, and ME, look bad,' Trump said in a Truth Social post. Although the May and June jobs numbers were worse than initially believed, revisions are normal in this process. The BLS' initial monthly jobs estimates are often based on incomplete data, so they are revised twice after the initial report — followed by an annual revision every February. Additionally, BLS economists use a formula to smooth out jobs numbers for seasonal variations and that can exacerbate revisions when they fall outside economists' expectations. Trump on Friday incorrectly called the revisions a 'mistake.' 'McEntarfer said there were only 73,000 Jobs added (a shock!) but, more importantly, that a major mistake was made by them, 258,000 Jobs downward, in the prior two months,' Trump said on Truth Social. 'Similar things happened in the first part of the year, always to the negative. The Economy is BOOMING under 'TRUMP.'' Trump said McEntarfer 'faked' the jobs numbers before the election to try to boost former Vice President Kamala Harris' chances in the 2024 presidential election. 'We're doing so well. I believe the numbers were phony, just like they were before the election, and there were other times. So, you know what I did? I fired her, and you know what? I did the right thing,' Trump told reporters Friday on the South Lawn. McEntarfer was confirmed by the Senate 86-8 in January 2024 for a term of four years. CNN has reached out to McEntarfer for comment. Until Trump replaces McEntarfer, Deputy Commissioner William Wiatrowski will serve as Acting Commissioner, the administration said. Trump has previously criticized the BLS for its jobs data and revisions, and he told reporters Friday evening he's 'always had a problem with these numbers.' In 2016, during his first presidential campaign, Trump claimed that the unemployment rate was significantly higher than the BLS let on. In 2024, he accused former President Joe Biden's administration of orchestrating a cover-up, after the BLS reported that it had overcounted jobs by 818,000 over the previous 12 months. 'I was thinking about it this morning, before the numbers that came out. I said, 'Who is the person that does these numbers?' And then they gave me stats about before the election,' Trump said Friday. 'We need people that we can trust,' he added. But Trump and his administration have also praised the BLS data when it has been favorable to them. During Trump's first term, former White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer said in March 2017 that the jobs data was no longer 'phony' after the BLS issued a strong jobs report. And a month ago, current White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt posted on social media that the economy had beat expectations for jobs in four straight BLS labor reports. The BLS is nonpartisan, and businesses and government officials rely on the accuracy of its data to make determinations about investment, hiring, spending and all sorts of key decisions. 'It's outrageous for anyone in government to question the integrity of the BLS,' said Jason Furman, a Harvard professor and former Obama economic adviser. 'Accurate statistics are essential to the economy.' Furman doubted that replacing McEntarfer would compromise the BLS, but he said even the possibility or appearance of that notion 'would be bad.' 'Countries that have tried to fake those statistics have often ended up with economic crises as a result,' Furman said. Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody's Analytics, said the BLS' data is at the 'highest standard,' and 'as accurate as it can be.' 'Anything that undermines that or even the perception of that high standard is deeply worrisome,' Zandi said. 'I've never seen anything even close to this.' At Moody's, Zandi said he has hired a number of former BLS economists whom he called 'fantastic.' 'They do great work,' Zandi said. 'They are critical to a well-functioning economy.' Democratic Virginia Senator Mark Warner accused Trump of working the referees. 'Firing the ump doesn't change the score,' Warner said in a statement. 'Americans deserve to know the truth about the state of the Trump economy.' But Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer said in a post on social media that she supports replacing McEntarfer. 'A recent string of major revisions have come to light and raised concerns about decisions being made by the Biden-appointed Labor Commissioner,' Chavez-DeRemer said on X. 'I support the President's decision to replace Biden's Commissioner and ensure the American People can trust the important and influential data coming from BLS.' The BLS jobs survey is widely considered by economists to be robust. It samples more than 100,000 businesses and government agencies each month, representing roughly 629,000 individual worksites. But, as part of larger cost-cutting taking place around practically every part of Trump's government, the BLS is laying off staff — and, as a result, reducing the scope of its work. For example, the BLS posted a notice in June stating it stopped collecting data for its Consumer Price Index in three cities (Lincoln, Nebraska; Buffalo, New York; and Provo, Utah) and increased 'imputations' for certain items (a statistical technique that, when boiled down to very rough terms, essentially means more educated guesses). That worried Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell. In testimony before Congress in June, Powell said he believed the BLS data to be accurate, but he was upset about what could become a trend. 'I wouldn't say that I'm concerned about the data today, although there has been a very mild degradation of the scope of the surveys,' Powell said at the time, in response to a question about survey data quality. 'But I would say the direction of travel is something I'm concerned about.' This story has been updated with additional developments and context.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store