Steam To Silicon: Comparing The Industrial Revolution And The AI Age
Some periods in our history are so transformative that they create a clear divide between the world before and after. We attribute the 18th and 19th centuries to such a period. Named the Industrial Revolution, this period ushered in an era of machines, mass production and urban expansion, forever altering how we live and work.
Today, as artificial intelligence (AI) begins to shape everything from how we communicate to how we create and make decisions, we find ourselves at a similar inflection point. Make no mistake: The AI Revolution has already begun.
Looking back at the sweeping changes of the industrial era, can we anticipate challenges and opportunities created by this new age of AI? History may not repeat itself exactly, but it often leaves us clues. Let's study our history in preparation for what is to come.
Impact Of The Industrial Revolution
There were a number of major changes introduced by the Industrial Revolution. The harnessing of steam and later electricity enabled labor automation, scaled production and reduced costs. This led to a migration from rural farms to industrial cities, creating the urban centers that still anchor our economies today. Transformative innovations in engineering, metallurgy, chemistry and transportation were developed, leading to a growth in national wealth and the emergence of a consumer culture as goods became more affordable and accessible.
Yet these gains also came with consequences: child labor, exploitative working conditions, environmental degradation and social dislocation. For example, one of the most difficult challenges of the Industrial Revolution was the widespread displacement of traditional labor. Skilled artisans saw their trades replaced by machines. Farmers lost their livelihoods as machines took over agricultural tasks. In the short term, resistance was fierce. Famously, the Luddites destroyed machinery in protest.
However, over time, societies responded by combining policy and progress. Public education expanded to prepare future workers for industrial jobs. Labor unions emerged to protect workers' rights and push for fair wages and safer conditions. Governments began to regulate factory practices and, eventually, invested in infrastructure projects that created new employment opportunities. The shift wasn't smooth or universally fair, but it laid the groundwork for a modern economy where adaptability became a survival trait.
Parallels With The AI Revolution
As we get deeper into the AI Revolution, I've noticed a number of similar traits. One is that when new industries emerge, old crafts often fade. Machines replaced muscle, and now AI is being used to replace decision-making and analysis, from chatbots and recommendation engines to autonomous vehicles and predictive modeling. Clerical jobs, coding, design and even art face disruption.
Yet AI also creates new demands, such as prompt engineering, AI ethics and human-in-the-loop systems. Cloud computing, 5G, edge computing and massive data centers could be considered the new railroads and factories. In both revolutions, labor laws, environmental protections and workplace standards have needed to evolve, often following public outcry that forced change.
However, while innovation can drive progress, it doesn't guarantee equity. In the Industrial Revolution, wealth became concentrated in the hands of industrial barons before eventually trickling down through reforms and systemic change. In a similar fashion, a number of today's tech giants wield disproportionate influence. These "data barons" may soon rival the steel magnates of yore.
Ultimately, economic growth and prosperity benefited most, but not all. With AI, efficiency gains and improved robotics will likely replace a number of tasks traditionally requiring human dexterity, and some products may become very cheap, resulting in an era of abundance. But it's important that we balance this by ensuring there is prosperity for the masses in order to ensure demand.
Where The Revolutions Differ
There are several notable differences between these two eras. Where the Industrial Revolution played out over decades and spread unevenly, AI is evolving at digital speed and has proliferated nearly instantly across many borders, enabled by a globally connected digital infrastructure and the new race for dominance. According to 2024 research by Epoch AI, the amount of compute used to train notable machine learning models has been growing at a rate of approximately 4.6 times per year since 2010.
And where industrialization redefined how we built and challenged social roles, AI challenges how we think. Some believe its trajectory could even eclipse human intelligence and border on consciousness, raising deeper philosophical and ethical questions about intelligence, creativity and what it means to be human.
Predictions: Where We Are Headed In The AI Era
I believe history suggests that revolutions come in four phases: disruption, adaptation, integration and, finally, normalization. Based on what we've seen in the past, here is what I believe we can anticipate in the future:
1. Massive Reskilling: Just as agrarian workers learned factory work, much of today's workforce will need AI fluency, for both using these tools and coexisting with them.
2. New Social Contracts: Debates about universal basic income, data ownership and algorithmic fairness may force new political and economic paradigms.
3. Rise Of Hybrid Work: I believe more and more humans will work in tandem with AI, using it to amplify human abilities rather than simply replacing them.
4. Digital Ethics As A New Frontier: Where labor laws once reined in factory abuse, tomorrow's rules should center on algorithmic transparency, surveillance boundaries and bias mitigation.
5. Cultural Renaissance Or Crisis: AI-generated content challenges originality, copyright and artistic identity. Will it usher in a new golden age or dilute human expression?
Conclusion: Stewarding This Revolution
The steam engine changed the world, but not without disruption. As we build the capabilities of the AI age, we should reflect on the balance between progress and purpose, innovation and humanity. The future is not only what we invent; it's also what we accept, resist and reform.
The past doesn't repeat itself, but it rhymes. If we heed the lessons of the Industrial Revolution, I believe we can not only navigate the age of AI but also guide it wisely.
Forbes Business Council is the foremost growth and networking organization for business owners and leaders. Do I qualify?
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fast Company
a day ago
- Fast Company
Show leadership, not fear, with AI
It was telling that the new pope would use his first major address to talk about the challenges of artificial intelligence (AI). He chose the name Leo because the last pope to use it, Pope Leo XIII, wrestled with the changes spurred by the Industrial Revolution. In a similar way, the recently elected pontiff is preparing for the AI revolution. Business leaders, take note. You need to prepare, too. A global PwC CEO survey found that more than half of chief executives say generative AI 'has resulted in efficiencies in how employees use their time, while a third reported increased revenue (32%) and profitability (34%).' 'AI is reshaping our business in ways that were once unimaginable,' Ramon Laguarta, Chairman and CEO of beverage and snack food giant PepsiCo, said in a press announcement about the company's AI ambitions. The question for reluctant CEOs who are still on the fence about using AI in their organizations is: What are you waiting for? In the age of intelligent machines, leaders who ignore AI are not being cautious; they are being reckless. The rise of agentic AI (applied AI that autonomously learns and acts) is reshaping markets at a blistering pace. These autonomous agents are a super-charged version of chatbots, empowering organizations to contact potential sales leads and create marketing content with almost no human intervention. 'At least 15% of day-to-day work decisions will be made autonomously through agentic AI by 2028, up from 0% in 2024,' according to Gartner. 'In addition, 33% of enterprise software applications will include agentic AI by 2028, up from less than 1% in 2024.' Executives across a broad swath of industries now face a stark choice: Actively engage with AI's risks and potential, or risk irrelevance. The duty of leadership today is to embrace AI's strategic implications head-on. Anything less is an abdication of responsibility. This is not some illusion of choice, as if this innovation can be treated the same as others. It cannot. You don't have a choice in adoption or not, but you do have a choice in where you start and how you phase the scaling of AI. THE TRILLION-DOLLAR OPPORTUNITY AI's business impact is no longer hypothetical; it's here, and it's enormous. Global GDP is projected to be 14% higher by 2030 thanks to AI—an uplift of $15.7 trillion and more than China and India's combined output. This value comes from AI-driven gains in productivity, efficiency, and new products. In fact, studies find that AI adoption boosts productivity significantly. Early experiments with GenAI tools show employee output jumping by 66% after automating tedious tasks. According to McKinsey, GenAI had the potential to save businesses $1.2 trillion in annual labor costs by 2025. Projected savings have only increased since that study was released in 2023. Across sectors, from manufacturing to health care to finance, AI is driving unprecedented growth and innovation. In fact, 78% of organizations worldwide reported using AI in 2024 (up from 55% in 2023). The evidence is overwhelming: Firms that harness AI are reaping outsized rewards, from faster product development to personalized customer experiences, while those that hesitate leave massive value on the table. Executives must also reckon with the risks of inaction. In survey after survey, business leaders voice the same alarm: 75% of CEOs believe AI will disrupt their industry within five years. They're likely right. AI is a general-purpose technology poised to upend business models much like the internet did. History shows that innovation and early adoption consistently correlate with long-term growth and market leadership. Companies that embraced the internet early dominated the next era; AI presents a similar inflection point. 'Companies without an AI strategy are already behind,' warned a World Economic Forum report. According to McKinsey, 92% of companies plan to increase AI investments in the next three years, yet only 1% feel their organizations are truly 'AI mature' with AI fully integrated into operations. This gap between ambition and execution is a ticking time bomb. Leaders who fail to embed AI at scale risk seeing more agile competitors seize their market share. In contrast, organizations that invested early in AI (the 'AI high performers') attribute 20% or more of their earnings to AI and outpace others in new AI capabilities. The message is clear: Standing still invites disruption, while proactive innovation fuels resilience. Ignoring AI's strategic implications—whether it's transformative upside or the competitive risk it poses—is nothing short of negligent. LEADING BOLDLY IN THE AI ERA Responsible leadership in 2025 demands urgent, informed action on AI. This means going beyond lip service and small pilot projects. As one McKinsey study concludes, the biggest barrier to scaling AI isn't technology or employees, it's leaders not moving fast enough. My advice? Leaders must act now to educate themselves and their teams about AI's capabilities and limitations. Craft a clear AI strategy and invest in the talent and infrastructure to implement it. Start by assessing organizational AI readiness by evaluating skills, data assets, and processes—and then embed AI capability-building into your core business strategy. Include upskilling the workforce and instituting governance for ethical AI use. Executives need to make AI adoption and innovation a top strategic priority. Put it on par with finance or operations. Bold action today will separate tomorrow's winners from losers. The history of technological revolutions shows that moments like this define the rise and fall of companies. The AI revolution is no different.
Fast Company
a day ago
- Fast Company
Leaders change, but leadership doesn't
We've gone from typewriter-wielding secretaries to word processors. From mailroom clerks to e-mail. From landlines to do-it-all devices in our pockets. Technology has reshaped what it means to be a business owner, and often, there's no choice but to keep up. Now comes the AI revolution—a transformation of how work gets done, how workplaces are structured, and how they're managed. The treadmill is speeding up. What leaders must understand and manage keeps expanding. Separating signal from noise is a challenge. So how do we keep up? Simple: Don't chase the noise. Focus on what stays constant—the foundation that got you and your business here. That foundation is leadership, the core pillars of which are building the right team, nurturing meaningful communities, and fostering resilience both mental and organizational. You can't plan for everything. But with the right people, the right causes, and the right support, you can get through a whole lot. BUILDING A COMMUNITY My company, Yocale, was born out of community. We set out to create a platform that gave small and medium-sized businesses the tools and reach of much larger organizations. Our goal wasn't just product-market fit; it was about creating equity for entrepreneurs who were often left behind. Even if community isn't the core of your product, it should still be part of your ethos. That's why we've supported causes beyond our core business through education, partnerships, and corporate social responsibility initiatives. As a leader, you set the tone. Identify where your business can contribute and follow through. No matter your scale, there are opportunities. Local groups, charities, or events—pick one and contribute. Become part of the glue that holds your community together. It pays dividends you can't always measure. BUILDING THE RIGHT TEAM Hiring is one of a leader's most consequential decisions. In a startup, every hire shapes the culture and trajectory of the company. I've always prioritized character as much as skill, because in a world where AI can teach and replicate many technical skills, character, alignment, and cultural fit matter more than ever. The people you hire should reflect the internal community you want to build. When I started Yocale, I surrounded myself with people who had deep expertise in areas I lacked. I trusted them to make decisions and gave them the space to lead. That wasn't always easy. Letting go requires confidence in yourself and your team. But here's the nuance: Empowerment doesn't mean blind trust. Misplaced trust is costly. I learned early that 'you don't know what you don't know,' and that can lead to trusting the wrong people. Before delegating, make sure the right people are in the right seats. Empowerment only works when those you trust are aligned, competent, and share your values. It also means creating an environment where people feel safe being vulnerable. As Patrick Lencioni outlines in his book, The Five Dysfunctions of a Team, teams break down when vulnerability-based trust is missing. If people don't feel safe admitting mistakes or asking for help, true collaboration can't happen. That kind of openness is what strong leadership cultivates. Money doesn't build teams—people do. Your job is to bring in those with the skills to do that. BALANCING STAKEHOLDERS In any business, stakeholders—whether employees, customers, investors, or partners—have competing priorities. The challenge is to respect each group without losing sight of the bigger picture. It's trite to say, but it's still true: You can't please everyone. You can ensure everyone feels heard. When those priorities clash—and they will—your job is to maintain trust through clear, consistent communication. Help people understand the 'why' behind your decisions, especially when the short-term impact may cause discomfort. And when plans change (as they always do), updating stakeholders must be your top priority. You can't lead in silence. At Yocale, our mission to support local entrepreneurs became a unifying thread. It gave every team—product, marketing, customer success—a shared sense of purpose. Purpose helps ease stakeholder tension. Let's talk about pressure. Being a founder, CEO, or business owner can feel like the weight of the world is on your shoulders. You can delegate, you can build community, but at the end of the day, it's on you. It's why we do it, right? Your resilience isn't optional—it's your greatest asset. And that mindset must extend to your people, too. Everyone in your company must learn to bend, not break. In tech, we pride ourselves on being disruptive. But that requires risk, and with risk comes failure. Failure is universal. The way you handle it? That's the pinnacle of leadership. I recently spoke with a former NHL franchise owner about mental health and resilience. Hockey is a sport that defines itself by toughness: the ability to take a knock and carry on, and not say a word about it. The challenges of turning that into a culture where 'real resilience' was valued—the ability to be open with one's struggles—were enormous. Detaching from your business and its flaws can feel impossible. My talk with the NHL franchise owner gave me perspective. If it can be done in the uber-macho world of hockey, we can bring that culture into the world of tech, and to work culture in general. It demands vulnerability, but lets you take a clear-eyed view of your business. You find what needs to be fixed, changed, or thrown out, and lead that process. Resilience doesn't mean perfection. It means enduring, adapting, and growing stronger with each setback. FINAL THOUGHTS Leadership—whether in tech, sports, or small business—comes down to a few enduring truths: Hire intentionally Lead with purpose Build culture through trust and clarity Invest in resilience—your own and your team's Markets evolve. Tech changes daily. But leadership? That's what lasts. The measure of a leader isn't just in the company they build—that's the end result. Getting there means recognizing that businesses are made of people, and people thrive when they're valued, trusted, and supported. The legacy of a great leader isn't just a company—it's a culture that outlasts them.
Business Insider
2 days ago
- Business Insider
Here's what Tim Cook thinks about AI replacing the iPhone
Apple CEO Tim Cook appears unfazed by concerns that advancements in AI could topple the iPhone's dominance. During Thursday's earnings call, Wamsi Moen, an analyst with Bank of America, asked Cook directly how Apple is preparing for a world where dependence on screen-based devices "significantly diminishes," thanks to advances in AI. Cook didn't seem to see an imminent threat to Apple's hero product. "When you when you think about all the things an iPhone can do, from connecting people to bringing app and game experiences to life, to taking photos and videos, to helping users explore the world and conduct their financial lives and pay for things and so much more, you know, it's difficult to see a world where iPhone's not living in it," Cook said. "And that doesn't mean that we are not thinking about other things as well," Cook added, "but I think that the devices are likely to be complementary devices, not substitution." While Cook didn't appear worried about advances in AI disrupting the tech giant's business, Apple has been slow to release new Apple Intelligence features, leaving analysts with mixed opinions about its competitive edge. EMARKETER analyst Jacob Bourne told Business Insider that, "while the AI arms race may pressure Apple toward bolder moves, including potential acquisitions, its disciplined approach to product quality over speed should help it maintain a competitive advantage in the premium market over the long haul, provided it makes the necessary R&D investments in AI." Wedbush analyst Dan Ives said in a research note after the call that the company's revenue beat was "a major step in the right direction," adding that "now it's time to address the elephant in the AI strategy, which remains absent while the rest of the tech world is laser focused on the AI Revolution at warp speed."
