New advisory cautions against use of electronic shock collars and prong collars on dogs
SINGAPORE – Dog owners are being discouraged from using electronic shock collars and prong collars to train their pets as such devices can cause serious harm to canines, according to a new advisory released by Animal & Veterinary Service (AVS) on July 26.
Electronic collars are designed to deliver stimulus such as an electric shock, vibration or spray at the dog's neck. Prong collars comprise a series of links with teeth or blunted ends, designed to pinch the skin around a dog's neck when it's tightened.
Both fall under a category of tools called aversive training devices, which inflict discomfort or pain to deter unwanted behaviour in dogs. Such devices are easily available online, and can cost between $15 to over $250.
The advisory, which aims to help dog owners understand the downsides of such devices, was launched by Minister of State for National Development and Trade and Industry Alvin Tan during the Pet's Day Out event held at Tampines Boulevard Park. The event saw pet lovers gathering for workshops and a pet marketplace.
AVS, a cluster within the National Parks Board (NParks), will also be reviewing the need to license the use of animal training devices, as part of the review of Animals and Birds Act. The review will take into consideration the outcomes and feedback for the advisory.
Said Mr Tan: '(The advisory) provides clear, science-based guidance to help dog trainers and pet owners make informed and responsible decisions about training methods.'
The advisory also strongly encourages positive, rewards-based training methods.
Top stories
Swipe. Select. Stay informed.
Singapore Students hide vapes in underwear, toilet roll holders: S'pore schools grapple with vaping scourge
Singapore 'I've tried everything': Mum helpless as son's Kpod addiction spirals out of control
Singapore Almost half of planned 30,000 HDB flats in Tengah to be completed by end-2025: Chee Hong Tat
Singapore Black belt in taekwondo, Grade 8 in piano: S'pore teen excels despite condition that limits movements
Singapore As Asean looks to nuclear energy, public education efforts are needed: UN nuclear watchdog chief
Asia Thousands rally in downtown Kuala Lumpur for resignation of PM Anwar
Asia Death toll climbs as Thai-Cambodia clashes continue despite calls for ceasefire
Asia Shunsaku Tamiya, who brought perfection to plastic race car models, dies at 90
'These are methods that help build trust with our dogs, making them feel safe and confident, while training and teaching them to better adapt to life in our urban environment,' said Mr Tan. 'The use of aversive dog training devices should only be chosen as a last resort and only by trained professionals or under the supervision of one.'
The 34-page document was developed by the Dog Training Workgroup, which comprises dog trainers, veterinarians, animal welfare groups and representatives from working dog units. Formed in Aug 2024, the workgroup is co-chaired by the AVS and Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals.
A prong collar (left) and electronic shock collar on display.
ST PHOTO: KELVIN CHNG
The advisory details the different types of electronic and prong collars, and the negative impact it can have on a dog's welfare. Other than causing direct distress such as pain, fear and anxiety, aversive tools may also exacerbate and worsen existing behaviour problems.
Dog trainers and vets alike laud the launch of the advisory.
Mrs Anna Koo, founder of dog training company Mutt Matters, said she usually handles cases of dogs who display reactive or aggressive behaviours. More often than not, the cases are linked to use of aversive devices.
Mrs Koo explained that aversive devices will typically suppress problematic behaviour such as growling, lunging or barking. However, these are ways that a dog expresses fear or discomfort.
'Over time, the dog will learn that it is not safe for it to communicate. So then you may start to get a silent, biting dog, which is far more dangerous,' said Mrs Koo, 48.
Singapore Veterinary Association president Teo Boon Han said the advisory was a good first step.
ST PHOTO: KELVIN CHNG
President of the Singapore Veterinary Association Teo Boon Han said that the advisory is a good first step in outreach and education, and he hopes there is no need to take further measures.
'Hopefully, with these collective efforts, we can work together, and we don't need to take that next step (towards more measures.) As a society, if there is internal motivation to change the way we treat animals, that's the best outcome,' said Dr Teo.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Independent Singapore
8 hours ago
- Independent Singapore
Singaporean questions pet shop practices after spotting caged rabbit for two months
Photo: Canva Free Image Library SINGAPORE: On the r/askSingapore subreddit, a post about a caged rabbit sparked an outpouring of emotion and introspection. The user shared discomfort about a rabbit they'd seen at a Pet Lovers Centre, sitting alone in a small enclosure for what they observed had been two months and questioned whether it was harassment. 'It's almost akin to leashing a dog without any freedom,' the user wrote. 'It looks healthy and is well-fed, but I was told it will stay in that cage until someone buys it — and at S$330, that might take a while.' The post wasn't just about one rabbit but about the uncomfortable reality of how animals — particularly those for sale — are treated not as living beings with needs, instincts, and emotions, but as merchandise waiting for a transaction. When normal becomes numb The rabbit in question was reportedly AVS-approved (Agri-Food & Veterinary Authority of Singapore), and from the outside, it met all basic welfare standards — clean fur, access to food and water, and a visibly healthy appearance. However, the deeper question the post posed was more difficult: Is this enough? For animals like rabbits — naturally curious, social, and energetic — life in a confined glass enclosure, with minimal stimulation or space to move, isn't a life but more like a waiting room. In Singapore's tightly regulated pet trade, this practice is technically compliant, but compliance doesn't always equal compassion, and when we become used to seeing animals in cages, we risk becoming desensitised to their quiet suffering. Numerous commenters chimed in, sharing stories of similar discomfort, of rabbits and hamsters and birds kept in enclosures either barely large enough for the animals to turn around or overcrowded. Some netizens mentioned that animals can develop depression, anxiety, or physical problems due to prolonged confinement. As many animals sold in pet shops are prey animals, they also often mask their distress, making it easy for their suffering to be overlooked by the untrained eye. See also Home sought for poor doggo imprisoned in cage for 5 years While AVS regulations require pet shops to meet certain health and hygiene standards, animal-rights activists have said ethical animal care is more than just a checklist. It's about understanding the natural behaviours of the animals being sold and ensuring they have the space, stimulation, and care they deserve. A small hope What began as a quiet observation in a pet shop evolved into a conversation of shared concern that behind every glass enclosure is a living creature with instincts and needs, and that, sometimes, change starts not with grand legislation — but with someone pausing in front of a cage and asking a simple, human question: 'Is this okay?' () => { const trigger = if ('IntersectionObserver' in window && trigger) { const observer = new IntersectionObserver((entries, observer) => { => { if ( { lazyLoader(); // You should define lazyLoader() elsewhere or inline here // Run once } }); }, { rootMargin: '800px', threshold: 0.1 }); } else { // Fallback setTimeout(lazyLoader, 3000); } });
Vogue Singapore
a day ago
- Vogue Singapore
Multilingualism in Singapore—and what we lose if it declines
From a fishing village to a global powerhouse in under half a century, Singapore's meteoric rise is certainly one for the books. Multiracial, multiethnic and multicultural, the demographic make-up of this little red dot is about as diverse as it gets. So, when it came to deciding not only how the nation would communicate with the rest of the world, but also how to facilitate communication within the country, there wasn't a clear-cut solution. English, Mandarin, Malay and Tamil—four official languages course through the nation of Singapore. But among the four, there is a clear hierarchy. 'To move things forward after independence, we needed a language that would connect with the rest of the world. Hence, English was chosen,' says Tan Ying Ying, associate professor of linguistics and multilingual studies at Nanyang Technological University. Simply put, English was the language that provided the most linguistic capital. It allowed us to be a competitive force on the global stage. As a nation built on the pursuit of efficiency and progress, we embraced it with open arms. But what was the cost of doing this? While English took on the role of the nation's lingua franca, to anchor ourselves in Asian values and retain a connection to our heritage, the bilingual policy was introduced. All students had to learn another language—be it Mandarin, Malay or Tamil—also known as their 'mother tongue'. But the assignment of one's mother tongue proved more arbitrary than expected. In Singapore, instead of learning your actual mother's tongue, you are told what your mother tongue is In Singapore, students are assigned their mother tongues based on ethnicity, which often does not reflect the language they had been speaking from early childhood. 'It's a strange label to be using because it defies the linguistic definition of what a mother tongue implicates,' Tan points out. 'In Singapore, instead of learning your actual mother's tongue, you are told what your mother tongue is.' Inadvertently, a paradox was born. While Mandarin was chosen to represent the Chinese population, a large majority of the community did not speak it at the time. Instead, Hokkien, Teochew and Cantonese dominated households. Similarly, for the Indian population, while more than 50 percent spoke the Tamil, there were others who communicated in other languages, such as Malayalam, Punjabi or Hindi. The election of representative languages stemmed from a place of pragmatism instead of a natural evolution. And as Tan aptly remarks: 'When it comes to social engineering, any kind of controlled planning tends to have strange outcomes.' Being the primary instructional medium in schools and in the workplace, English has become the language most Singaporeans feel comfortable conversing in. 'Are we still multilingual? Yes. Are we functionally multilingual? Maybe not quite so,' Tan puts succinctly. We may sprinkle a few foreign words when ordering food or brandish our Singlish proudly in conversation, but to be functionally multilingual is a whole other playing field. Are we still multilingual? Yes. Are we functionally multilingual? Maybe not quite so Languages shape the way we view and interact with the world; it broadens perspectives and fosters connection. 'If you learn a language just to pass exams, even if you pass them with flying colours, you still won't be using it in your daily lives,' Tan notes. Instead of sharing an affinity for a language meant to foster connection to one's cultural heritage, many in turn begin to resent the language as well as the culture. It's not unlike how a humanities student may resent biology or calculus, although for the average person, knowing another language surely will come in handier than photosynthesis. For digital creator Sharlyn Seet, speaking Chinese poorly was the norm growing up. 'Back in school, I remember being proud to be what we call 'bananas'—yellow on the outside, white on the inside. For some reason, it was seen as cool not to speak Chinese properly,' she reflects. Similar to many of her peers, Seet didn't grow up speaking Mandarin at home. 'Mandarin felt like just another subject to pass. It didn't feel like something useful or relevant, and most of us treated it like a hurdle,' the 23-year-old adds. As she found herself traversing the world for business and leisure in recent years, she quickly realised how the Chinese language, which she once deemed boring, was not only an asset, but one containing a million folds of culture and history. When Seet first visited Shanghai in 2024, she felt a growing frustration due to her handicap with the language. 'I could understand what the locals were saying, but I couldn't express myself back. It felt stifling,' she recalls. 'As someone who's ethnically Chinese, I started to feel a quiet shame.' Instead of retreating further, she took it upon herself to change what she had once accepted as the status quo. The second time around, Seet discovered that learning the language did not have to be as gruelling as she once thought. 'In school, learning Chinese was results-based. Everything revolved around tests, memorising model essays and regurgitating phrases. It wasn't about developing a relationship with the language,' she explains. 'Relearning Chinese, I felt like I was reclaiming something that I had unknowingly dismissed for years. I started appreciating not just the people but the traditions, stories and values that shape our community.' Language acts as a window; it allows you to better connect with the people and its culture, modern or historic. 'Right now, we observe people picking up Korean simply because of K-pop's influence,' Tan observes. Often, the sole driving force behind learning languages is personal interest and motivation. There's no denying the boom of Korean and Japanese in the younger generation, largely due to the rising popularity of their respective cultures. And there's no doubt this includes those who may have shuddered at the thought of a language exam when they were in school. As I relearnt Chinese, I started appreciating not just the people but the traditions, stories and values that shape our community Beyond an increased appreciation for her culture and heritage, Seet recognises the pragmatic value in having another language at her disposal. 'I see a clear return on investment, both in business and in everyday life.' If cultural capital is the end goal, having more is always better than having less, is it not? But as a working adult, Seet recognises the difficulties in carving out the time to sustain a consistent learning journey. 'As an adult, it really is about how much time you're willing to invest. Watch Chinese dramas, listen to music, travel or just try reading signs on the MRT,' she suggests. 'Small everyday moments can spark curiosity and build confidence over time.' Seet acknowledges the irony of her situation. 'My mother often pokes fun at me for paying money to relearn something I could've acquired growing up,' she shares. However, Seet knows that it was a journey she had to embark on to reach where she is now. 'She's not wrong, but I'm finally doing it on my own terms,' she proclaims contently. Besides being able to converse fluently without trepidation, Seet also cites the less conspicuous benefits she has come to reap. Understanding Chinese memes, unlocking a new arena of inside jokes, and catching subtle meanings in song lyrics—she has only just begun to tap into the wealth of riches that lies beneath the surface. Order your copy of the July/August 'Home' issue of Vogue Singapore online or pick it up on newsstands now.
AsiaOne
2 days ago
- AsiaOne
As Singapore marks its 60th birthday, can we turn 'complain culture' around?, Singapore News
As SG60 celebrations kick into high gear, you've probably seen some reflections on social media on how far we've come - and where we're headed next. Perhaps, it's also time to move past some of the lingering stereotypes that hold us back, like the idea that Singaporeans love to complain. So what happens when everyday Singaporeans try to do the opposite? Instead of reacting negatively and pointing fingers when they spot an issue, some are devising solutions and rolling up their sleeves as they follow through on plans with dedication. Take for instance 39-year-old Johny Tan, a healthcare administrator and grassroots leader. He started the Boon Lay Clean-Up Project - an initiative that invites everyone, including those residing outside Boon Lay - to contribute towards a cleaner estate. Tan, whose work revolves around the study of population health, was inspired by research showing that clean environments improve well-being and reduce stress. He kickstarted this community effort to collectively uplift the welfare of fellow residents. A cleaner 'hood for the greater good But creating a clean estate is just the icing on the cake - real impact lies in livening up the community to make it a brighter, warmer and more welcoming place to call home. "I think the town council has done a very good job [with maintaining cleanliness]. But the project is also about finding opportunities to galvanise my community and get them to do something together," said Tan. The ground-up initiative has since attracted volunteers across generations and diverse backgrounds. At the last session, around 50 volunteers, including students, working adults, seniors and even young children, showed up to contribute their time and effort. "Residents who come together to bond and clean-up have a stronger sense of community pride," said Tan. He noted that many who participated in this initiative have returned for volunteer opportunities with a renewed sense of shared responsibility and "community ownership". Collaboration between citizens and government for lasting solutions Tan believes that strengthening the community ought to be a "collective effort" between citizens and the government. Where citizens can offer ground-up insights, the government can provide structure and support to enhance community initiatives. "When both government and citizens work together, we have a sense of co-ownership which is essential for lasting and meaningful improvements," said Tan. Well-run projects with the necessary resources and backing would also ensure longevity and sustainability. Tan's project has since gained enough momentum among regular volunteers for them to run it without him taking the reins. "I'm actually handing off to the youth network to run the bimonthly litter pickups," he shared, underlining the keen effort from young adults in the community to continuously champion this endeavour. When more Singaporeans like Tan step forward with constructive solutions for the country, positive change can happen. These ground-up efforts ripple as ideators are equipped with the resources and know-how to shape our communities, co-create policies and improve our public spaces and services. A platform that connects Singaporeans to resources As a grassroots leader, Tan noted that he was attuned to the various resources he could tap on, such as the Municipal Services Office (MSO)'s Love Our 'Hood fund, the Residents' Network, as well as the National Environment Agency (NEA) to enable and fund his project. However, he recognised that getting in touch with the relevant agencies and constituency officers could prove challenging to people who may be interested but are new to participating in community efforts. To that end, the Singapore Government Partnerships Office (SGPO) was established to facilitate and catalyse such initiatives. It serves as a first stop for citizens and ground-ups that need the necessary backing and resources to start or scale up their community initiatives. With the establishment of SGPO, Tan hopes it will invite "great ideas take shape to benefit more residents and citizens in Singapore". Check out SGPO's website to explore existing initiatives and find ways to contribute to building the Singapore you would be proud of. This article is brought to you in partnership with the Singapore Government Partnerships Office (SGPO).
