
From Tesla to Thebes: How Elon Musk channels Epaminondas to challenge Trump's modern-day Sparta
wants the old rules gone. Early this morning, he posted: 'By a factor of 2 to 1, you want a new
political party
and you shall have it! Today, the
America Party
is formed to give you back your freedom.'
The catalyst? Donald
Trump
's so-called 'big, beautiful' tax-cut and spending plan, which Musk brands a fiscal nightmare. They were once allies Musk even ran Trump's Department of Government Efficiency, trimming spending and staff. That bromance is dead.
Independence Day poll
Musk's breakaway move wasn't exactly subtle. On Independence Day, he asked his followers on X: 'Independence Day is the perfect time to ask if you want independence from the two-party (some would say uniparty) system!' The answer came back clear. His new party was born by popular vote at least online.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
2 Kapseln pro Tag! Am 3. Tag passt die Hose nicht mehr!
Apotheke Regional
Undo
'When it comes to bankrupting our country with waste and graft, we live in a one-party system, not a democracy,' Musk wrote. To him, America's two parties merge into one when it comes to reckless spending.
Also Read:
Elon Musk can't run for US Presidency, so who will? Inside the mystery of the America Party's future leader
Live Events
How Greece comes in
This is where
Epaminondas
enters. The Theban general turned Greek politics upside down in 371 BC when he smashed the Spartans at Leuctra. Sparta was Europe's boogeyman then disciplined, ruthless, unbeatable. Until it wasn't.
Epaminondas used a radical formation, hammering the Spartan right wing with concentrated force at one point instead of spreading his troops thin. The mighty
Spartan shield wall
cracked.
Musk thinks US politics can crack the same way. 'The way we're going to crack the uniparty system is by using a variant of how Epaminondas shattered the myth of Spartan invincibility at Leuctra: Extremely concentrated force at a precise location on the battlefield,' he wrote.
What this really means
Forget sweeping presidential campaigns for now. Musk's strategy is small, sharp, surgical. He wants to target 6–8 House seats and 4 Senate seats in the
2026 midterms
, mostly in tight swing districts. Flip those and you hold the balance of power. This is the Theban wedge modern edition.
He's not pretending this will be easy. The Republican-Democrat grip on US politics has survived for 160 years. But Musk clearly thinks enough people want a real alternative.
Also Read:
Elon Musk announces he is launching new political party, the America Party, 'to give you back your freedom'
The rift and the risks
Trump is furious. He's threatened to pull billions in federal subsidies from
Tesla and SpaceX
. Investors are uneasy too Azoria Partners just froze a planned
Tesla
ETF, worried Musk's new hobby will distract him from cars and rockets. Azoria's CEO James Fishback demanded Tesla's board clarify whether their star CEO is now a full-time politician.
Meanwhile, Republicans are sweating. They relied on Musk's donations. Now he's threatening to bankroll primary challenges against their loyalists.
Asked what made him flip from Trump's biggest fan to open rival, Musk didn't mince words: 'Increasing the deficit from an already insane $2T under Biden to $2.5T. This will bankrupt the country.'
When's the fight?
He's aiming for November 2026. No presidential bid, no grand stage (yet). 'Next year,' Musk told an X user when asked about his election timeline. 'We'll start small, contesting key seats in 2026 to flip the balance, not 2028.'
He added: 'The future strategy should certainly evolve, but it is worth noting that Thebes did actually dominate Greece for a decade following Leuctra.' A neat reminder that the underdog can take over if the first strike lands.
The uniparty won't vanish overnight. Musk knows that. But by learning from a Greek general long dead, he thinks he can find the system's soft spots and drive a wedge right through them.
There was no immediate comment from Trump or the White House on Musk's announcement. The feud with Trump, often described as one between the world's richest man and the world's most powerful, has led to several precipitous falls in Tesla's share price.
The stock soared after Trump's November reelection and hit a high of more than $488 in December, before losing more than half of its value in April and closing last week out at $315.35. Despite Musk's deep pockets, breaking the Republican-Democratic duopoly will be a tall order, given that it has dominated American political life for more than 160 years, while Trump's approval ratings in polls in his second term have generally held firm above 40%, despite often divisive policies.
If he pulls it off, America's next political map may look very different Spartan shield wall cracked open, with Thebes marching through the gap.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
25 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Trump calls Musk's America Party 'ridiculous', says doomed to fail
US President Donald Trump on Sunday dismissed Elon Musk's newly launched 'America Party' as 'ridiculous' and reiterated his support for the traditional two-party system, according to a report by Bloomberg. Responding to questions about Musk's announcement, Trump said, 'We've had tremendous success with the Republican Party. The Democrats have lost their way, but it's always been a two-party system." "Starting a third party just adds to the confusion." He added, "Third parties have never worked. He can have fun with it." 'Off the rails': Trump calls Musk a political 'train wreck' Trump expanded on his remarks in a post on his social media platform Truth Social, calling Musk's recent political moves a 'train wreck'. 'I am saddened to watch Elon Musk go completely 'off the rails,' essentially becoming a train wreck over the past five weeks,' Trump wrote. 'He even wants to start a third political party, despite the fact that they have never succeeded in the United States ,the system seems not designed for them. The one thing third parties are good for is the creation of complete and total disruption & chaos." Trump hails EV rollback, says Musk on the wrong side of policy He contrasted Musk's efforts with what he called a 'smooth-running machine' in the Republican Party, which he said had just passed a historic bill eliminating the electric vehicle (EV) mandate. 'It is a great Bill but, unfortunately for Elon, it eliminates the ridiculous EV mandate, which would have forced everyone to buy an electric car in a short period of time,' Trump said. 'I have been strongly opposed to that from the beginning. People are now allowed to buy whatever they want – gasoline-powered, hybrids (which are doing very well), or new technologies as they come about – no more EV mandate.' Musk endorsed me despite knowing EV rollback plan: Trump Trump also claimed that Musk had endorsed him fully, despite being aware of his opposition to EV mandates. 'I have campaigned on this for two years and, quite honestly, when Elon gave me his total and unquestioned endorsement, I asked him whether or not he knew that I was going to terminate the EV mandate. It was in every speech I made. He said he had no problems with that – I was very surprised!' Trump accuses Musk of seeking influence over Nasa picks In a further swipe, Trump alleged that Musk had tried to influence appointments at Nasa. 'Elon asked that one of his close friends run Nasa and, while I thought his friend was very good, I was surprised to learn that he was a blue-blooded Democrat who had never contributed to a Republican before. Elon probably was, also. I also thought it inappropriate that a very close friend of Elon, who was in the space business, run Nasa, when Nasa is such a big part of Elon's corporate life." Last month, Trump withdrew the nomination of Jared Isaacman, a close associate of Elon Musk as Nasa administrator, following Musk's exit from his role in the Trump administration. Musk launches 'America Party' amid deepening rift Trump's remarks came a day after tech billionaire Elon Musk officially launched the America Party, a political platform he said was aimed at challenging what he called a 'one-party system' in the United States. Musk's announcement came shortly after Trump signed the 'One Big, Beautiful Bill,' a major legislative move that eliminated the federal electric vehicle mandate and marked a key milestone early in his second term. Once one of Trump's top donors during the 2024 election, Musk fell out with the President after leading cost-cutting measures as head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE).


Mint
35 minutes ago
- Mint
How healthcare cuts in the ‘big, beautiful bill' will affect Americans
After the House narrowly passed President Trump's tax-and-spending-cuts bill, he signed it into law on Friday. The passage of President Trump's 'one big, beautiful bill" has left some hospitals, doctors and patient-advocacy groups reeling. Millions of people will lose health-insurance coverage, and struggling hospitals across the country may have to close, lay off staff or shut down some services, they say. States will also face difficult budget choices as federal funds are reduced. 'The magnitude of these reductions—and the number of individuals who will lose health coverage—cannot be simply dismissed as waste, fraud, and abuse," Rick Pollack, president of the American Hospital Association, said after the House narrowly passed the bill. Trump signed the bill into law on Friday, Independence Day. The act slashes over $1 trillion in healthcare spending over the next decade, mostly from Medicaid, the joint federal and state program that provides health insurance to poor Americans. It is the biggest cut to federal healthcare spending—and to Medicaid—in history. The legislation's health provisions, including work requirements for Medicaid recipients, represent a fundamental shift in the federal government's approach to healthcare for its poorest citizens, both Republicans and Democrats have said. 'This is a much more conservative approach to healthcare," said David Mansdoerfer, a former health official in the first Trump administration. 'The big beautiful bill would represent a significant mindset change for federal safety-net programs." There will be nearly 8.7 million fewer people covered by Medicaid over the next decade because of the bill, according to an analysis by Manatt Health, a consulting firm that advises states and healthcare providers on Medicaid policy. Other provisions in the bill, including more-stringent requirements for people to enroll and retain health-insurance plans under the Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare, are projected to drive up the number of uninsured, healthcare experts said. Many who study healthcare policy say that people who lose insurance, or people who live in rural areas where doctors and hospitals are closing up shop, often delay preventive care, sometimes costing the system more later. Many of the Medicaid policy changes target the 40 states that expanded eligibility for Medicaid to low-income able-bodied adults. Those enrollees will now have to prove their incomes are below a certain threshold every six months to remain on Medicaid, instead of annually, as well as show that they have spent 80 hours a month working, volunteering or attending school. People in the lowest 10% of income distribution in the U.S. stand to lose noncash government benefits such as Medicaid coverage and food stamps worth nearly $1,600 annually on average, according to an analysis of an earlier version of the bill by the Congressional Budget Office. Hospitals say they are big losers under the new legislation. More uninsured people will mean more uncompensated healthcare costs, they say. And many hospitals now face reductions in some supplemental payments that most states have come to rely on to augment low Medicaid payment rates. Over the next decade, Medicaid payments to hospitals will be reduced by nearly $665 billion, an 18.2% reduction, according to analysis by Manatt. Meanwhile, hospitals' uncompensated care costs are projected to increase by upward of $84 billion in 2034, according to an analysis of the bill by America's Essential Hospitals, which represents some 350 hospitals nationwide. That number takes into account lower Medicaid payments and Medicaid payment shortfalls, as well as costs from caring for the uninsured. 'It is a double-whammy. We're going to have many millions more uninsured individuals showing up needing care," said Beth Feldpush, the group's senior vice president of advocacy and policy. 'But at the same time, hospitals won't be able to backfill financial holes." Medicaid payment rates are notoriously low compared with other types of insurance. States have increasingly boosted these rates in recent years through so-called state-directed payments, which can raise Medicaid payment rates to levels comparable with Medicare or even average commercial insurance rates. The bill clamps down on these payments. States that have expanded their Medicaid programs under Obamacare to include more low-income adults would have state-directed payment rates capped at 100% of Medicare rates; states that haven't adopted expansion would be capped at 110% of Medicare rates. The change will reduce federal spending by $149.4 billion over a decade, according to a CBO analysis. Hospitals in about 30 states will likely see reductions in the state-directed payments they receive once cuts go into effect, according to an analysis by KFF, a health-policy nonprofit. State hospital associations said these payments are lifelines for hospitals, many of which operate at or near a loss. Even before the bill's passage, several hospitals across the country laid off employees, froze hiring and tightened spending, citing the impending cuts to Medicaid as a factor. Providence, one of the country's largest health systems, said last month that it had implemented a restructuring plan that would lead to 600 employees losing their jobs. Other hospitals say they are bracing for the changes to come. Our Lady of the Angels Hospital, a safety-net hospital in Bogalusa, La., said it would have to consider closing its doors, and the University of Kentucky said it might have to pause construction on a new building dedicated to caring for cancer patients if state-directed payment cuts go into effect. The cuts may also eat into the earnings of for-profit hospitals like HCA Healthcare and Tenet Healthcare that have enjoyed lucrative boosts to their bottom lines from state-directed payments. The National Rural Health Association said it was worried that the bill's provisions would significantly hamper healthcare access in rural areas. Senate Republicans added a $50 billion relief fund to the bill at the last minute for rural hospitals, but Sen. Susan Collins (R., Maine), who voted against the bill, said it wouldn't be enough to offset the other changes. For insurers, the biggest impact of the legislation is clear: fewer customers. Though Medicaid is a government program, most enrollees get their benefits through insurers that are paid with state and federal money. 'From a health insurer's perspective, that's a lot of business to lose," says Cynthia Cox, a vice president at KFF, a health-research nonprofit. The industry impact will be heaviest among companies with a focus on Medicaid. Among the largest are Centene, which has nearly 13 million Medicaid enrollees, Elevance Health, UnitedHealth Group, Molina Healthcare and CVS Health's Aetna. 'Revenue and profits will be pressured," said Sarah James, an analyst with Cantor Fitzgerald. A Wellcare location in New York City, part of Centene Corp., one of the largest Medicaid insurers. The cutbacks to Medicaid will come on top of blows to another key insurance market—Obamacare marketplace plans. Federal subsidies that help people pay for Obamacare plans are set to shrink next year, and the new legislation doesn't fill the gap. Along with other Trump administration changes to the rules for Obamacare plans, the reduction in subsidies is projected to reduce the number of people with coverage by another 5.1 million if Congress doesn't extend them. In Obamacare and Medicaid, the shrinking rolls are likely to create another headache for insurers. When people drop out of insurance markets, the healthier ones are often the first to go. That leaves a sicker, more costly pool of customers for insurers, which then seek to get paid more to cover those expenses. They demand higher premiums, either from state Medicaid agencies or from Obamacare customers. Nationally, states will have roughly $1.3 trillion dollars less in federal and state funds to spend on Medicaid over the next decade, according to Manatt. Most of the reductions—93%—will be in states that have expanded Medicaid to cover able-bodied adults. One of the biggest impacts will come from the bill's crackdown on so-called provider taxes, which states levy on hospitals and other healthcare providers to trigger federal matching funds. Most hospitals receive back more than they pay in taxes through higher payment rates via state-directed payments and other mechanisms. Currently, the taxes are capped at 6% of healthcare providers' net patient revenue, but will be reduced to 3.5% in expansion states. In non-expansion states such as Florida and Texas, tax rates will be frozen in place up to the 6% maximum on the date the bill is signed into law. Healthcare workers last month protested the Medicaid cuts proposed in the bill that President Trump signed Friday. The taxes have been criticized as a gimmick that exploits federal taxpayers without requiring states to put any skin in the game. President Obama twice proposed clamping down on provider taxes, including in his 2013 budget, which would have reduced the maximum rate to 3.5%. States use provider taxes to fund state-directed payments to hospitals and other providers. Some, such as North Carolina, have also designed the taxes to fund their Medicaid expansions. On a percentage basis, red and purple expansion states will be hit hardest since many of them tend to rely heavily on provider taxes, says Avi Herring, a Manatt managing director. Montana faces a 21% reduction in state and federal funds; Arizona, Kentucky and Virginia are each looking at reductions of about 18%. The largest blue states, which tend to have more generous Medicaid programs, face far bigger dollar cuts, though they are somewhat smaller proportionally. California is expected to see a 13% reduction. New York's spending will be reduced by nearly 9%. Write to Dominique Mosbergen at Joseph Walker at Liz Essley Whyte at and Josh Ulick at


NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
"I Think It's Ridiculous": Donald Trump Mocks Elon Musk's 'America Party'
Washington: US President Donald Trump on Sunday slammed former ally Elon Musk's launching of a new political party as "ridiculous," deepening the Republican's feud with the man who was once his biggest backer. Trump also branded the SpaceX and Tesla tycoon a "TRAIN WRECK" who had gone "off the rails" after Musk said he wanted to challenge the current US political system. The world's richest man was almost inseparable from Trump as he headed the cost-cutting "Department of Government Efficiency," but they fell out hard over the president's "big beautiful" tax and spending mega-bill. "I think it's ridiculous to start a third party," Trump told reporters before he boarded Air Force One on his way back to Washington from his New Jersey golf club. "It's always been a two-party system, and I think starting a third party just adds to confusion. Third parties have never worked. So he can have fun with it, but I think it's ridiculous," he said. South African-born Musk announced on Saturday that he would create the so-called "America Party" to challenge what he called the United States' "one-party system." Musk says the president's massive domestic spending plan would explode the US debt, and has vowed to do everything in his power to defeat lawmakers who voted for it. The former DOGE boss, who led a huge drive to slash federal spending and cut jobs, equated Trump's Republicans with rival Democrats when it came to domestic spending. "When it comes to bankrupting our country with waste & graft, we live in a one-party system, not a democracy," Musk posted on X, the social media platform that he owns. Musk gave few details of his plan and it was not clear whether he had registered the party with US electoral authorities, but it could cause Republicans headaches in the 2026 midterm elections -- and beyond. - 'Saddened' - In a sign of how sensitive the issue could be for Trump, he took to his Truth Social network while still on Air Force One to double down on his assault on Musk. "I am saddened to watch Elon Musk go completely 'off the rails,' essentially becoming a TRAIN WRECK over the past five weeks," Trump posted. "The one thing Third Parties are good for is the creation of Complete and Total DISRUPTION & CHAOS, and we have enough of that with the Radical Left Democrats." In a lengthy diatribe, Trump repeated his earlier assertion that Musk's ownership of electric vehicle company Tesla had made him turn on the president due to the spending bill cutting subsidies for such automobiles. Musk has insisted that his opposition is primarily due to the bill increasing the US fiscal deficit and sovereign debt. Earlier on Sunday, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent also threw shade at Musk's attempts to enter the political fray, telling him to stick to running his companies. When asked by CNN if Musk's plan bothered the Trump administration, Bessent offered thinly veiled criticism. "I believe that the boards of directors at his various companies wanted him to come back and run those companies, which he is better at than anyone," Bessent said. "So I imagine that those board of directors did not like this announcement yesterday and will be encouraging him to focus on his business activities, not his political activities." Musk left DOGE in May to focus full-time on his corporate responsibilities, with Tesla's sales and image especially suffering from his brief venture into Trump's inner circle. Trump gave him a grand send-off in the Oval Office, during a bizarre ceremony during which Musk appeared with a black eye and received a golden key to the White House from the president. But just days later the two were exchanging bitter insults on social media after Musk criticized Trump's flagship spending bill. Trump would not comment on Sunday when asked if he would be asking Musk to return the golden key.