Dying NZers & Their Families Will Fund The Shortfall Between Pay For A Nurse In A Hospital & A Nurse In A Hospice
We want to record a cry for help for the 19,000 New Zealanders and their families we care for every year help us keep our nurses! says Mr Hospice New Zealands Chief Executive, Wayne Naylor.
Hospice New Zealand's Chief Executive, Wayne Naylor, says he extremely concerned about the effect changes to the Pay Equity legislation will have.
'Dying New Zealanders and their families will fund the difference between the pay for a nurse in a hospital and a nurse at a hospice,' says Mr Naylor.
Health New Zealand has so far declined to adjust funding so that hospice nurses and their assistants can be paid the same as if they worked at their local hospital.
The nursing rates that are paid at the local hospital are set by Health New Zealand and paid for by all New Zealand taxpayers. The pay for nurses working in hospices relies very heavily (at least 35%) on fundraising (such as the local hospice op-shop) and donations from families and communities.
'To fund the widening pay gap is simply beyond the ability of hospices to do,' says Mr Naylor. 'Some have paid their nurses more than they can afford just to keep their nurses and keep providing care. Some can't even do that and are looking to cut back services.
'If these patients were cared for by the local hospital the nurses there would be paid more, but of course the local hospital would be put under huge pressure should that happen.
'We want to record a cry for help for the 19,000 New Zealanders and their families we care for every year – help us keep our nurses!' says Mr Naylor.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
an hour ago
- Otago Daily Times
Public encouraged to share stories, raise drowning awareness
Share your story — that is the message from Water Safety New Zealand and the Accident Compensation Corporation today as they recognise World Drowning Prevention Day. In New Zealand, 74 people lost their lives by drowning in 2024; and in the first six months of this year, 38 people have drowned in incidents that could have been prevented. One of those was from Otago earlier this year. There were no preventable drownings in the region last year. The global theme for this year is "Your Story Can Save A Life", and WSNZ and ACC are encouraging people to speak openly about their experiences, in a bid to make people more mindful of the risks around water this winter. The 74 drowning fatalities in 2024 was the lowest annual toll since 2018, and was a 14% drop from the 10-year average. Water Safety New Zealand interventions lead Esther Hone said the reduction was encouraging, but the risks remained real. She said since 2014, an average of 86 New Zealanders drowned every year in incidents that could have been prevented. Fatalities involved behaviour such as not wearing a lifejacket, entering the water alone, consuming alcohol and other drugs or underestimating conditions. "We are making progress, particularly with our tamariki, but every life lost is one too many. "World Drowning Prevention Day is a chance to speak up, share our stories and help shape a culture where water safety is second nature. "We believe every child deserves the knowledge, experience and confidence to survive in the water — not just swim in it." ACC injury prevention leader James Whitaker said ACC accepted about 4500 water-related injuries every year, costing the taxpayer $13.5million to help people recover. In Otago, ACC accepted about 450 water-related injuries every year, costing $1million to help people recover. Mr Whitaker said a drowning was devastating for any family and the local community and he urged people to follow the Water Safety Code. "New Zealand's beaches, lakes and rivers provide us all with amazing opportunities to enjoy ourselves and connect with friends and families. "If we take time to assess the risks and make smart choices before we jump in, we can keep on doing the things we love." The Water Safety Code encourages people to know how to float; find the safest place to swim; if in doubt, stay out; take care of yourself and others; and know how to get help.
1News
6 hours ago
- 1News
Healthworkers want MPs to waive private healthcare while in office
A group of healthworkers — including specialists, GPs, nurses and paramedics — have signed an open letter to MPs asking them to waive private healthcare during their time in office. Politicians making critical decisions about the public health system system — to cut funding, defer maintenance, or implement restructures — should not be allowed to "insulate" themselves against the consequences, they write. Their prescription? All MPs — and the families of Cabinet ministers — should rely on the public system. The group's spokesperson, Northland cardiologist Marcus Lee, said the public deserved leaders who were so committed to public healthcare that they were willing to stake their family's wellbeing on it. ADVERTISEMENT "Essentially, we want fair and transparent leadership with integrity. We want people who have skin in the game." The test was whether politicians were "comfortable and confident" enough to rely on the public health system for their families, he said. "If it's good for them, it's good for us. If it's not good enough for them, it shouldn't be good enough for anyone." Nicola Willis and Simeon Brown in 2020 (Source: Getty) The letter asks MPs to consider questions including: Would I be comfortable with my child waiting six months for this procedure? Is this emergency department adequate for my elderly parent? Are these staffing levels sufficient for my family's safety? Prime Minister Christopher Luxon did not believe having private health insurance meant he was out of touch with the problems besetting the public system. ADVERTISEMENT "I think we're well aware of the challenges in the healthcare system, which is why we've put a record amount of investment in," he said. "We inherited again a botched merger that just created a layer of bureaucracy and we've put the money in, we're hiring more people, we've got clarity on the targets. "We're starting to see some stabilisation of those targets and in some cases improvements on those health targets. "But we now need a high performing Health NZ, and that's what we're fixated on." Labour's health spokesperson Dr Ayesha Verrall said MPs with private health insurance were "betting their own money against the public system". "Ministers of Health should place a bet on the public health system succeeding and meeting New Zealanders' needs. Having private health insurance is a sign that you're not willing to place that bet." Labour health spokesperson Ayesha Verrall. (Source: 1News) ADVERTISEMENT Labour Party leader Chris Hipkins — a former health minister — took a less hard-line approach. "I got health insurance 20 or 30 years ago as a union membership benefit and I've kept it since then, although I'm fortunate I haven't really had to use it. "I'm not going to begrudge people who have it. But I want to make sure that, if you haven't, you still get the standard of care you deserve." Health Minister Simeon Brown said he did not have private health insurance but he would not impose that choice on anyone else. "Ultimately there's a large number of New Zealanders who use health insurance, that's a fantastic part of our health system, and ultimately people make individual choices." Brown said his focus was on timely access to quality healthcare for New Zealanders, which included making better use of the private sector. "We will work with private hospitals to unlock capacity, publicly funded [patients] but in private hospitals to speed up access." ADVERTISEMENT Finance Minister Nicola Willis and Education Minister Erica Stanford both had private health insurance. Mental Health Minister Matt Doocey did not, saying he is "happy using the public health system". Other National MPs were more coy. Minister of Climate Change, Energy, Local Government and Revenue, Simon Watts: "I won't answer that, it's a personal question." Minister for the Community and Voluntary Sector, Disability Issues, Social Development and Employment, Louise Upston: "That's not a question in the public interest." Bay of Plenty MP Tom Rutherford: "I'm not interested in talking about that. It's not necessary for people to know — I don't go out into the general street and ask people about their health insurance." Green MP Ricardo Menéndez March said it was "quite rich" to see politicians not being worried about the state of the public healthcare system, when they had the means to pay for private insurance or private care. ADVERTISEMENT "That is why we are really concerned with the Government's flirtation with privatising more of our public healthcare system, which will ultimately see our poorest less able to access basic healthcare." For some Labour MPs, it was a matter of principle. Kelston MP Carmel Sepuloni: "I believe, as politicians, if we're going to be working to ensure the healthcare system works for everyone, we should be reliant on it too." Nelson MP Rachel Boyack: "My father was a public health chief executive so I've always had a strong belief in the public health system, and that the health system should be available to all New Zealanders, and that includes me as an MP." Mt Albert MP Helen White could understand why some people opted to have it, but it was not for her: "I just think that I should live by my principles. Also I probably couldn't afford it. I know I'm on a decent salary, but it's a lot of money." Mt Albert MP Helen White says she probably couldn't afford health insurance. (Source: 1News) Labour MP Ginny Andersen said health insurance was not in her budget: "By the time I pay my mortgage and my insurance and my rates and feed my children." ADVERTISEMENT ACT Party leader David Seymour, who is also the Associate Health Minister, said the healthworkers made "an interesting argument" — but, in his view, MPs should come from a broad range of backgrounds. "I don't think you should have to fit into a sort of ideological straight-jacket to do that." The healthworkers behind the letter said MPs who refused to give up their private safety net would be revealing "exactly what they really think about our healthcare system". "We'll be watching to see who has the courage to put their family where their policies are."
Scoop
14 hours ago
- Scoop
Gore 'Not Out Of The Woods Yet'- Nitrate Level Linked To Increased Risk Of Preterm Birth
Greenpeace Aotearoa has tested a sample collected from the Gore town supply, which returned a result above 5 mg/L nitrate (NO3-N), a level associated with an increased risk of preterm birth. Above this level of nitrate, the New Zealand College of Midwives recommends that pregnant people consider finding another source of water because of the increased risk of preterm birth. The sample was collected on the morning of Wednesday 23 July and tested with an optical spectrometer, which is standard equipment for testing nitrate in the field, and followed the organisation's standard testing procedures which have been externally reviewed by GNS science. While the township's do-not-drink notice has been lifted, Greenpeace freshwater campaigner Will Appelbe says there is still a risk to public health. "Gore is not out of the woods yet and we're concerned about the risk to pregnant people and babies in other rural communities. Many rural communities are experiencing nitrate contamination caused by intensive dairying. Gore was issued a do-not-drink notice last Friday after the town supply exceeded the maximum allowable value (MAV) of 11.3 mg/L for nitrate. This was set in the 1950s to avoid blue baby syndrome, but it doesn't take into account the more recent health science that has linked several health risks with long-term exposure to nitrate at levels below the current legal limits, including bowel cancer and preterm birth. "We know the source of this pollution. It's the overuse of synthetic nitrogen fertiliser in intensive dairy farming, led by Fonterra and their lobbyists at Federated Farmers. This is an industry that isn't working for anyone except for the industry itself. Dairy pollution is contaminating people's drinking water. Meanwhile, New Zealanders are paying through the nose for a block of butter at the supermarket." "But instead of taking action, Luxon's government has proposed weakening freshwater protections at the behest of Federated Farmers - which will worsen the drinking water crisis." "It's about time that Federated Farmers were accountable to the people of New Zealand. Fed Farmers are opposing every measure to protect freshwater, and they should do right by the rural communities whose drinking water that they and Fonterra have polluted."
