King and Queen brave summer downpour to honour Kirkcaldy's war dead
Charles and Camilla sheltered under umbrellas as they left a wreath at the memorial in Kirkcaldy, Fife, as hundreds of spectators watched the poignant service.
Former prime minister Gordon Brown later joined the King at a solo event, while wife Sarah Brown met the Queen when she visited a cancer centre run by Maggie's – an organisation both women officially support.
Charles's first task was to unveil a cairn commissioned to mark the 100th anniversary of the Kirkcaldy War Memorial Gardens and designed as a time capsule for future generations.
He chatted to pupils from local Viewforth High School who had helped fill the capsule with school mementos and memory sticks filled with photos, and quipped about the rain: 'I keep telling myself it's a blessing.'
Camilla said: 'It's a bit damp,' adding: 'We've been used to the heatwave.'
The royal couple, who are spending their official week in Scotland known as Holyrood Week, arrived in Fife as the heavy showers began and met dozens of well-wishers waiting behind barriers.
Holding umbrellas, they shook hands with the public but at one point a lone protester stood a few feet from the King and shouted his apparent opposition to Israel's war in the Gaza Strip, alleging 'weapons that we sell contribute to genocide'.
After the brief wreath-laying service, Camilla left to visit Maggie's Fife while Charles toured the nearby Kirkcaldy Art Gallery.
The King chatted to representatives of Fife-based charities and organisations which included Fife Multibank, an initiative founded by Mr Brown that provides essential goods to low-income families and now has five other organisations across the country.
Mr Brown said afterwards: 'The biggest problem in Britain today is the divisions caused by child poverty and we're doing something about it, in the way that we can.
'We saw that goods surplus to companies were not being repurposed into a circular economy, and we thought we could solve some of the problems of pollution and poverty at the same time.
'We've got 90 companies now and we're working with 1,000 organisations in Fife. So we work with all the schools, social workers, health visitors, foodbanks and charities – we have given out in total, around the UK in the last year or two, eight million goods worth about £80 million.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
43 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Barrister who is set to defend 'Starmer fire bomber' is fined after being caught drinking brandy in his car during a lunch break... of a trial
The barrister set to represent an alleged fire bomber of Sir Keir Starmer 's house has been fined after he was caught drinking from a bottle of brandy in his car during a lunch break - of a trial. Dominic Charles D'Souza will defend one of the men charged over suspected arson attacks on the Prime Minister's properties this year. But he has received a slight setback after being forced to cough up £3,000 by the Bar Standards Board (BSB) for 'professional misconduct' after his daydrinking caused a trial at Snaresbrook Crown Court, east London to collapse in March 2023. The judge at the criminal trial was informed about the barrister's drinking and discharged the jury, the Telegraph reports. Mr D'Souza, who describes himself as the 'exceptionally charismatic' head of crime at London's Goldsmith Chambers law firm, was filmed by a van driver tucking into a couple of sips of brandy while he sat in the driver's seat. A BSB tribunal said: 'The film shows [Mr D'Souza] to take two short drinks from a bottle of spirits.' The barrister initially denied drinking alcohol on that occasion, claiming instead that he had been swigging Kombucha from the bottle. He later admitted drinking brandy, adding he 'was ill he took drink to calm his stomach'. The tribunal report says: 'When a report of this behaviour was made to the judge, Mr D'Souza withdrew from the case, the jury was discharged, and a new date was fixed for the criminal trial.' The panel found he had 'behaved in a way which was likely to diminish the trust and confidence which the public places in him or in the profession'. It added he had 'behaved in a way which foreseeably interfered with the administration of justice' and 'wasted the time of the court'. The report concluded: 'It is difficult to conceive of a situation more likely to cause public disquiet than a barrister engaged in a trial sitting in the driver's seat of a car in the Crown Court car park drinking directly from a bottle of spirits. 'However, we bear in mind that [Mr D'Souza] believed himself to be acting unobserved in private, that he drank very little, and that he did so misguidedly in circumstances when he was unwell. 'There is no suggestion that [Mr D'Souza] was drunk before or after the event; in fact the evidence suggests he had performed effectively in Court.' Mr D'Souza admitted the three disciplinary charges brought against him was fined £3,000 and ordered to pay costs of £2,670. It comes after he posted a pictured from inside his Tesla in 2021, appearing to show him driving at 59mph. He claimed he had been 'parked in a service station' when it was taken and not driving. No action was taken against the barrister as he avoided the maxium punishment of a £200 fine and six points on his licence. The photo posted by Mr D'Souza looked as if it could only have been taken from the driver's seat with the digital dashboard of the vehicle clearly visible. Mr D'Souza posted the photo on his LinkedIn page and captioned it: 'On the way to Manchester in the most miserable weather, but thanks heavens I have an electric car otherwise I would not be getting there at all!'
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Home Office 'does not know' how many foreign workers stay in Britain to work illegally after visas expire, MPs warn
The Home Office fails to collect 'basic information' on foreign workers including whether they carry on working illegally in the UK at the end of their visas, MPs have warned. The Commons' Public Accounts Committee (PAC) found the department 'does not know' how many foreign visa holders leave the country when they are supposed to. A damning new report, published today, raised serious concerns about the operation of the skilled worker visa system which was brought in at the end of 2020. It comes after a Daily Mail investigation into a 'cash for care jobs scandal' last year found some agents charging overseas applicants fees of up to £20,000 to help them get a visa allowing them to come – and stay – here. The PAC's report said: 'We asked the Home Office whether it knows if people leave the country when their visa expires. 'The Home Office told us the only way that it can tell if people are still in the country is to match the data it holds on individuals with the passenger data it receives on people using airlines. 'The Home Office has not analysed exit checks since the route was introduced and does not know what proportion of people return to their home country after their visa has expired, and how many may be working illegally in the United Kingdom.' It added that officials had told the committee the problem 'was not solved' but there was 'scope to strengthen exit checks' under a new digital visa system currently being rolled out. The cross-party committee of MPs urged the Home Office to do far more to tackle visa overstayers. It recommended the department should 'undertake a full assessment … to identify gaps in its response', including studies of specific work sectors which should be updated every six months. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper should also make sure the Home Office can 'identify what data is needed to strengthen its response, including how to better understand what happens to people at the end of their visa', it added. PAC chairman Sir Geoffrey Clifton-Brown said: 'From when the government opened the skilled worker visa route in December 2020 up to the end of 2024, 1.18million people applied to enter the UK. 'Our report finds that this speed came at a painfully high cost – to the safety of workers from the depredations of labour market abuses, and the integrity of the system from people not following the rules. 'There has long been mounting evidence of serious issues with the system, laid bare once again in our inquiry. 'And yet basic information, such as how many people on skilled worker visas have been modern slavery victims, and whether people leave the UK after their visas expire, seems to still not have been gathered by government.' In the wake of the visa changes in 2020, net migration – the difference between those coming to live long-term in Britain and those emigrating – hit a record 906,000 in the 12 months to June 2023. It then fell to 413,000 last calendar year after the Tory government tightened the rules. A visa allowing overseas recruitment of care workers was particularly vulnerable to abuse, and saw 648,100 applications, including dependants, between 2022 and last year. Earlier this week the Home Office set out measures to phase out foreign care worker recruitment, plus a range of other new restrictions on other types of visa. Sir Geoffrey added: 'Further changes are now underway in this system, with an end to the overseas recruitment of care workers. 'Without effective cross-government working, there is a risk that these changes will exacerbate challenges for the care sector. 'Government now needs to develop a deeper understanding of the role that immigration plays in sector workforce strategies, as well as how domestic workforce plans will help address skills shortages. 'Government no longer has the excuse of the global crisis caused by the pandemic if it operates this system on the fly, and without due care.'
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Families are £1,700 worse off only one year on from Labour's loveless landslide - as critics say it is the 'worst start to a government in living memory'
Families are up to £1,700 worse off after one year of a Labour Government, according to an analysis. The Conservatives said Britons were suffering under the 'worst start to a government in living memory' – but warned there is more to come. According to the Tories' analysis, Labour has left families paying an extra £1,761 a year, adding that further tax rises are 'inevitable' – and could see the sum reach almost £3,000 by the end of the year. The Tories calculated that energy bills have risen by £152 since the election, while council tax will rise by £109 on average this year. Water bills are set to rise by an average of £123 a year, car tax and TV licences have been hiked by £5 and the average phone bill has gone up by £46. Meanwhile groceries and takeaways are up by £210, nursery fees have jumped by £756 for a child under two in a part-time nursery, and broadband has risen by an average of £36. The Tories also included an £11 'Chagos surrender tax' and the employer national insurance 'jobs tax', which the party said would cost families £308. Shadow Chancellor Mel Stride said: 'In just 12 months, Labour has taken a wrecking ball to the economy – and it's working families who are left to pick up the bill. 'This is the worst start to a government in living memory but the pain isn't over. Autumn's tax hikes are now all but inevitable. This is chaos created in Downing Street.' It comes as new polling suggests Labour has seen a double-digit drop in support. Sir Keir Starmer's party has averaged 24 per cent in polls in the last month, down ten points from 34 per cent in the weeks following the so-called loveless landslide election victory a year ago. While a slide in the polls after taking power is common, a drop of this size in unusual. A Labour spokesman said: 'Just as they didn't in Liz Truss's mini-Budget, the Tories' sums still don't add up. 'Through Labour's Plan for Change, wages are rising faster than prices, mortgage rates have come down, three million of the lowest earners have had a pay boost, and Britain has the highest economic growth in the G7.
