
Pro-Palestinian activists say they damaged planes on a UK air force base
The group Palestine Action said two members entered RAF Brize Norton on Wednesday and used electric scooters to approach the Voyager jets, which are used for air-to-air refueling.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Farage counter-protester claims at asylum hotel are ‘categorically wrong', Police say
Police say claims that officers 'bussed' counter-demonstrators to a protest outside a hotel housing asylum seekers, are 'categorically wrong'. Essex Police have denied the claims circulating on social media; claims of which Reform UK leader Nigel Farage said that the force's chief constable should resign for. A series of demonstrations took place outside the Bell Hotel in Epping since asylum seeker Hadush Gerberslasie Kebatu, 38, was charged with sexual assault after an incident earlier this month, in which he is alleged to have attempted to kiss a 14-year-old girl. The force said the protests began peacefully but 'escalated to the point of disorder and criminal damage', with eight officers injured at one demonstration outside the hotel on Thursday evening and five men charged with disorder at the protests. Alongside footage shared in a post on X, the Clacton MP said: 'This video proves @EssexPoliceUK transported left-wing protesters to the Bell Hotel in Epping. There is no way Chief Constable BJ Harrington can stay in position.' 🚨 BREAKING NEWS 🚨 This video proves @EssexPoliceUK transported left-wing protestors to The Bell hotel in is no way Chief Constable BJ Harrington can stay in position. — Nigel Farage MP (@Nigel_Farage) July 23, 2025 But in a statement released shortly afterwards, a force spokesperson said: 'There are claims on social media that Essex Police officers 'bussed' protesters to the protest outside the Bell Hotel on Thursday July 17. 'This is categorically wrong. 'Officers did provide a foot cordon around protesters on their way to the protest, where they and others were allowed to exercise their right to protest. 'Later, some people who were clearly at risk of being hurt were also escorted by vehicle away from the area for their safety. 'To reiterate, we categorically did not drive any counter-protesters to the site on any occasion.' In an update to the gathered media in Chelmsford, Chief Constable Ben-Julian Harrington said Essex Police had made 10 arrests following the protests. He said: 'I want to thank the people of Epping, I want to thank the people of Essex. 'I also want to thank all those who have turned up to protest and express their views peacefully and lawfully, because there have been many of those. 'What has been unacceptable has been the people who have come to Epping and committed violence, who have attacked people who work at the hotel, who have attacked officers, who have damaged property and who have caused fear and disruption to the people of Epping.' Mr Harrington said the force were aware of 'a couple' of protests being advertised and discussed over the coming week, and that it had a robust operation in place. 'It's abOut communities. It's about protecting communities, whoever they are,' he added. Kebatu denied the sexual assault charge when he appeared at Chelmsford Magistrates' Court on Thursday. Jonathan Glover, 47, of Springfields, Waltham Abbey, Stuart Williams, 36, of Duck Lane, Thornwood, Epping, Keith Silk, 33, of Torrington Drive, Loughton, and Dean Smith, 51, of Madells, Epping, have been charged with violent disorder in connection with the protests and are due to appear at the same court on August 18, Essex Police said on Tuesday. A fifth man, Joe McKenna, 34, of Highcliffe Road, Wickford, is charged with failing to remove a face covering when told to do so and remains on bail until a hearing at Chelmsford Magistrates' Court on September 24. Essex Police previously said the cost of policing the incidents in Epping over the last week had reached £100,000.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
UK Supreme Court quashes convictions of 2 bank traders after deciding their trials were unfair
LONDON (AP) — Britain's Supreme Court on Wednesday quashed the convictions of two financial market traders accused of manipulating benchmark interest rates in one of the biggest scandals to come out of the global financial crisis in 2008. The charges against Tom Hayes, a former Citigroup and UBS trader, and Carlo Palombo, who worked for Barclays, centered around alleged efforts to influence the London Inter-Bank Offered Rate, or Libor, and its euro currency equivalent Euribor, which were used to set the interest rates on trillions of dollars of loans and other financial products around the world. The court ruled that the convictions of Hayes and Palombo were unfair because the judges in their separate cases gave inaccurate instructions to jurors. That effectively prevented jurors from considering the key question of whether the traders had acted dishonestly. 'That misdirection undermined the fairness of the trial,' Judge George Leggatt wrote in an 82-page decision backed by all five members of the panel that heard the case. Hayes was convicted in August 2015 and sentenced to a maximum of 14 years in prison, which was later reduced to 11 years. Palombo, convicted in March 2019, was sentenced to four years in prison. Both men were released in 2021. 'It destroyed my family, I missed most of my son's childhood,' Hayes told the BBC. 'For so long I've been an international fugitive … and now I can move on with my life, or try to,' he added. The decision came after the U.S. Second Circuit Court of Appeal in 2022 overturned the convictions of two traders charged with similar crimes in the United States. Hayes and Palombo, whose appeals were repeatedly rejected by British judges, were allowed to take their case to the U.K. Supreme Court after that ruling. The U.K.'s Serious Fraud Office began investigating alleged efforts to manipulate Libor in 2012. That ultimately led to the conviction of nine bankers. 'We have considered this judgment and the full circumstances carefully and determined it would not be in the public interest for us to seek a retrial,' the SFO said in response to the Supreme Court ruling. Libor and Euribor were critical benchmarks that were once used to set the interest rates on everything from business loans to home mortgages and credit card debts. As a result, they also became central to more complex financial transactions such as those used by banks and businesses to bet on interest rate fluctuations. The benchmarks were vulnerable to manipulation because they were set by banks that could profit from swings in interest rates. Each day, major international banks were asked to submit the interest rate at which they could borrow money from other banks. An average of those submissions was then used to set the daily Libor and Euribor rates. During the financial crisis, regulators became aware that some banks were making artificially low Libor submissions to make their institutions seem more creditworthy. Some traders also sought to influence the submissions made by their banks as even small moves in the benchmark rates could boost their profits. Those risks became even more pronounced during the financial crisis, when lending dried up and bankers had to base their daily submissions on a subjective assessment of the market rather than actual loans. Libor and Euribor were phased out in recent years, in part because they were seen as worsening the financial crisis. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Where have there been asylum hotel protests and what has the government said?
A protest has gathered outside a four-star hotel in east London for the second day in a row after it emerged the government had decided to use it to house asylum seekers. The demonstration in Canary Wharf comes after several protests outside another hotel in Epping gathered national attention. Tower Hamlets Council has confirmed the hotel is being used to house the asylum seekers, the London Advertiser reported. Several people have taken to TripAdvisor to claim their bookings had been cancelled at the last minute, with some claiming they had been told the hotel had been booked for a private event. Footage on social media showed a small group of protesters outside the hotel on Tuesday night, with dozens of officers stationed in the area. The Met Police told the Standard no arrests were made. On Wednesday, a group of protesters were met by a smaller group of counter-protesters. A third protest also occurred on Monday in Diss, Norfolk, after it was revealed the government had swapped using a hotel to house families and would instead use it to house single male asylum seekers. There are fears the protests could spread and there could be a repeat of the disorder that rocked the UK last summer, with numerous violent demonstrations taking place outside of hotels people claimed were housing asylum seekers. What sparked the protests? The protests began when 38-year-old asylum seeker Hadush Gerberslasie Kebatu was charged with sexual assault eight days after arriving in the UK following an incident where he is alleged to have attempted to kiss a 14-year-old girl. He denied the charge when he appeared at Chelmsford Magistrates' Court on Thursday, 17 July. Following the charge, protesters gathered outside a hotel in Epping, Essex, which they claimed houses asylum seekers. The protesters claim Kebatu was a resident of the hotel, and days of anti-migrants protests followed. Since then, they have spread to other hotels that people believe are housing asylum seekers. The protests come amid a wider debate over the use of hotels to house asylum seekers, with growing tensions in some towns and cities. The government has pledged to end the use of hotels to house migrants, but has made little progress since coming to power. Where have the protests taken place? The largest protest has taken place in Epping, with the police saying it has now cost over £100,000 to monitor the recent unrest. Several protests have taken place, including more than 100 people gathering at the hotel on Sunday, 20 July with chants of "save our kids' and holding signs saying 'deport foreign criminals', 'we go home when they go back' and 'defend our girls'. Bottles and smoke flares were thrown towards police vans that blocked the entrance to the hotel. Five men have been charged with violent disorder as a result of the protests. The protest in Canary Wharf attracted a large police presence on Tuesday and Wednesday, although there were considerably smaller scale to what was seen in Epping. The protest in Diss saw over 100 people making speeches and waving placards outside the hotel after it emerged the government had switched the hotel to single male asylum seekers. South Norfolk Council said it opposed the change and had successfully worked with many of the asylum seekers who had previously been residents. But they said they were informed of the change with just says notice and now families who had lived in the area for two years were being forced to move somewhere else. What has the government said? Top Labour officials have so far avoided commenting directly on the protests, but on 22 July, the deputy prime minister told the Cabinet the government acknowledged people's 'real concerns' about immigration. Angela Rayner told Cabinet colleagues that immigration and increasing time spent online are having a 'profound impact on society'. Asked whether Ms Rayner sees a link between immigration and the violence seen during the disorder, No 10 said: 'I think she sees a link between concerns that people have about where the Government is acting on their behalf and acting in their interests, and a range of factors. 'High levels of immigration over the last 10 years, including illegal immigration, but also, importantly, the cost of living, economic security, the rapid pace of technological change and deindustrialisation and changes in the economy, these are all factors that have had an impact on our social fabric and social cohesion.' Other MPs have been more vocal in their opinions on the recent protests. In Poplar and Limehouse, we are clear: refugees are welcome the face of relentless demonisation and targeting, we continue to stand with migrants for their rights to safety and the far-right and their hateful ideology that are not welcome here. — Apsana Begum MP (@ApsanaBegumMP) July 22, 2025 Independent MP Apsana Begum, who represents the east London constituency where the Canary Wharf hotel is situated, said: "In Poplar and Limehouse, we are clear: refugees are welcome here. "In the face of relentless demonisation and targeting, we continue to stand with migrants for their rights to safety and dignity. "It's the far-right and their hateful ideology that are not welcome here." But Reform UK chief whip Lee Anderson said he was "absolutely furious" about the hotel being used to house asylum seekers. He said most British people could not afford to stay the weekend in the hotel and questioned if it was a good use of taxpayer money. He said: "500 rooms here. What are we playing at?"