logo
From Obama's ‘treason' to missing gold reserves, the wildest conspiracy theories consuming Trump's Washington

From Obama's ‘treason' to missing gold reserves, the wildest conspiracy theories consuming Trump's Washington

Indian Express17 hours ago
OK, so US President Donald Trump's name is in the Jeffrey Epstein files. But who put it there? Could it possibly have been Barack Obama from his prison cell? Or a tranquilized Hillary Clinton? Oh wait, maybe it was etched onto the documents by Joe Biden's magical autopen.
Or is that mixing up different scandals? It's so hard to keep up with the latest wild notions circulating in the capital and beyond. Washington is awash in conspiracy theories these days, a cascade of suspicion and intrigue promoted or denied in the Oval Office, ricocheting around Capitol Hill and cable news and propelled at warp speed across social media.
No commander in chief in his lifetime has been as consumed by conspiracy theories as Trump, and now they seem to be consuming him. They have been the rocket fuel for his political career since the days when he spread the lie that Obama was secretly born overseas and therefore not eligible to be president. More than a decade later, Trump is coming full circle by trying to divert attention from the Epstein conspiracy theory with a new-and-improved one about Obama supposedly committing treason.
The harmonic convergence of competing conspiracies has overshadowed critical policy issues facing America's leaders at the moment, whether it's new tariffs that could dramatically reshape the global economy or the collapse of ceasefire talks meant to end the war in the Gaza Strip. The Epstein matter so spooked Speaker Mike Johnson that he abruptly recessed the House for the summer rather than confront it. The allegations lodged against Obama so outraged the former president that he emerged from political hibernation to express his indignation at even having to address them.
The whispers and questions — 'this nonsense,' as Trump put it — followed the president all the way to Scotland, where he landed Friday for a visit to his golf club.
'You're making a very big thing over something that's not a big thing,' he complained to reporters, suggesting, in his latest bid at conspiracy deflection, that instead of him, the news media should be looking at Epstein's other boldface friends like former President Bill Clinton. 'Don't talk about Trump,' he said.
Conspiracy theories have a long place in American history. Many Americans still believe that someone else had a hand in killing President John F. Kennedy, that the moon landings were faked, that the 9/11 terrorist attacks were an inside job or that the government is hiding proof of extraterrestrial visitors in Roswell, New Mexico. Sixty-five percent of Americans told Gallup pollsters in 2023 that they think there was a conspiracy behind Kennedy's assassination.
Some conspiracy theories do turn out to be true, of course, or have some basis. But presidents generally have not been the ones spreading dubious stories. To the contrary, they traditionally have viewed their role as dispelling doubts and reinforcing faith in institutions. President Lyndon B. Johnson created the Warren Commission to investigate his predecessor's murder specifically to keep rumors and guesswork from proliferating. (Spoiler alert: It didn't.)
Trump, by contrast, relishes conspiracy theories, particularly those that benefit him or smear his enemies without any evident care for whether they are true or not. 'There have been other conspiratorial political movements in the country's past,' said Geoff Dancy, a University of Toronto professor who teaches about conspiracy theories. 'But they have never occupied the upper echelons of power until the last decade.'
Conspiracy theories are not the exclusive preserve of Trump and the political right. Around the time of last month's anniversary of the assassination attempt against Trump in Butler, Pennsylvania, some on the left once again advanced the notion that the whole shooting episode had been staged to make the Republican candidate into a political martyr.
Trump, however, has stirred the plot pot more than any other major political figure. In the six months since retaking office, he has remained remarkably cavalier about suggesting nefarious schemes even as he heads the government supposedly orchestrating some of them.
He suggested the nation's gold reserves at Fort Knox might be missing, resurrecting a decades-old fringe supposition, even though he would presumably be in position to know whether that was actually true, what with being president and all. 'If the gold isn't there, we're going to be very upset,' he told reporters.
It fell to Scott Bessent, the decidedly nonconspiratorial Treasury secretary, to burst the bubble and reassure Americans that, no, the nation's reserves had not been stolen. 'All the gold is present and accounted for,' he told an interviewer.
Trump has played to long-standing suspicions by ordering the release of hundreds of thousands of pages of documents related to the assassinations of Kennedy, his brother Robert F. Kennedy and the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr., an act of transparency for historians and researchers that may shed important light on those episodes.
But Trump has gone beyond simple theory floating to make his own alternate reality official government policy. Some applicants for jobs in the second Trump administration were asked whether Trump won the 2020 election that he actually lost; those who gave the wrong answer were not helping their job prospects, forcing those rooted in facts to decide whether to swallow the fabrication to gain employment.
Trump has likewise claimed that Biden was so diminished toward the end of his term that his aides signed pardons without his knowledge using an autopen. Biden was certainly showing signs of age, but the autopen story was conjecture. Asked if he had uncovered proof, Trump said, 'I uncovered, you know, the human mind. I was in a debate with the human mind and I didn't think he knew what the hell he was doing.'
The past week or so has seen a fusillade of Trumpian conspiracy theories, seemingly meant to focus attention away from the Epstein case. Tulsi Gabbard, the president's politically appointed intelligence chief, trotted out inflammatory allegations that Obama orchestrated a 'yearslong coup and treasonous conspiracy' by skewing the 2016 election interference investigation — despite the conclusions of a Republican-led Senate report signed by none other than Marco Rubio, now Trump's secretary of state. She also claimed that Hillary Clinton was 'on a daily regimen of heavy tranquilizers' during the 2016 campaign.
Relying on this, Trump accused Obama of 'treason,' suggesting he should be locked up and going so far as to post a fake video showing his predecessor being handcuffed in the Oval Office and put behind bars. The idea of a president posting such an image of another president would once have been seen as a shocking breach of etiquette and corruption of the justice system, but in the Trump era it has become simply business as usual.
For all that, the conspiracy theorist in chief has not been able to shake the Epstein case, which reflects the rise of the QAnon movement that believes America is run by a cabal of Satan-worshipping pedophiles. Most of the files, the ones that his attorney general told him include his name, remain unreleased, bringing together an unlikely alliance of MAGA conservatives and liberal Democrats.
It was well known that Trump was friends with Epstein, although they later fell out. So it's not clear what his name being in the files might actually mean. But Trump is not one to back down. Asked last week about whether he had been told his name was in the files, Trump again pointed the finger of conspiracy elsewhere.
'These files were made up by Comey,' he told reporters, referring to James Comey, the FBI director he had fired more than two years before Epstein died in prison in 2019. 'They were made up by Obama,' he went on. 'They were made up by the Biden administration.'
The theories are endless.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's AI Tool Targets Massive Federal Regulation Cuts, Sparks Legal and Ethical Debate
Trump's AI Tool Targets Massive Federal Regulation Cuts, Sparks Legal and Ethical Debate

Hans India

time14 minutes ago

  • Hans India

Trump's AI Tool Targets Massive Federal Regulation Cuts, Sparks Legal and Ethical Debate

In a bold move to reshape the federal regulatory landscape, the Trump administration has turned to artificial intelligence to fast-track its ambitious deregulation agenda. A new report from The Washington Post reveals that a government-deployed AI system, dubbed the DOGE AI Deregulation Decision Tool, is being used to identify and eliminate a sweeping number of federal rules—potentially as many as half of the current 200,000 regulations. The tool is operated under the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), a body created to modernize and streamline federal operations. So far, the AI has already reviewed and recommended removal of more than 1,000 regulations at the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) in just two weeks. It's also credited with drafting all recent deregulations at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). Government insiders told The Post that DOGE AI was developed by a team of engineers recruited during tech billionaire Elon Musk's brief involvement with the agency. According to a presentation reviewed by the publication, DOGE AI is being promoted as a cost-saving solution that could cut bureaucratic red tape, lower compliance costs for businesses, and attract new investment by simplifying the regulatory environment. Agencies across the federal government have been given a deadline of September 1 to submit their lists of regulations to be reviewed—and potentially scrapped—using the AI tool. The Trump administration hopes this initiative will deliver visible results by the first anniversary of Trump's return to office. This AI-driven approach follows Trump's earlier executive order, issued in January, directing federal agencies to eliminate ten existing rules for every new one introduced. Departments like Transportation and Labor have already announced significant rollbacks of existing regulations as part of this push. Despite the technological enthusiasm, the move has drawn mixed reactions across federal agencies. While some departments have embraced DOGE AI's rapid processing capabilities, others are voicing caution. Critics argue that relying on AI to review intricate and legally sensitive regulations could result in oversight, errors, or even violations of administrative law. Legal experts emphasize that repealing federal rules is not a simple task. Administrative law mandates rigorous processes, including public consultations, environmental impact assessments, and legal reviews. Automating this work, they argue, could undermine the integrity of the system. Adding to the uncertainty is internal tension among federal staff. Some employees fear that increased dependence on AI could lead to flawed policy decisions. Meanwhile, ongoing staffing cuts are reportedly hampering the speed at which agencies can review or respond to AI-generated suggestions, despite pressure from the White House for faster results. Still, the administration maintains confidence in the technology. 'We're exploring all options,' said White House spokesperson Harrison Fields, adding that while nothing is finalized, the DOGE team deserves credit for introducing fresh ideas into government operations. As the deadline approaches, the ultimate impact of DOGE AI remains unclear. But what's certain is that this experiment in algorithmic governance is already reshaping conversations about the future of policymaking in Washington. TAGS: Trump deregulation AI tool, DOGE AI federal rules, US regulation cuts 2025, Technology, Tech News

‘Biggest ever' US-EU trade deal: 5 takeaways
‘Biggest ever' US-EU trade deal: 5 takeaways

Indian Express

time14 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

‘Biggest ever' US-EU trade deal: 5 takeaways

After months of tense negotiations, including repeated threats by Donald Trump to increase tariffs on the European Union, the US on Sunday (July 27) announced it had reached a trade deal with the bloc. The deal announced by US President Trump and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen at his golf club in Turnberry, Scotland, sets a baseline tariff rate of 15% on all European goods, effective Friday (August 1). To recap, Trump had previously announced a 10% baseline tariff on most imports from the EU, 25% tariffs on automobiles, and 50% tariffs on steel and aluminium. Since April, the US has charged an additional 10% 'reciprocal' tariff on top of the pre-existing 4.8% average duty on imports from the EU. Earlier this month, he threatened to impose 30% tariffs if a deal was concluded by August 1. 'It's the biggest of all the deals,' Trump said on Sunday. 'I think it's going to be great for both parties,' von der Leyen concurred, describing this as 'the best we could get' and saying, 'Today's deal creates certainty in uncertain times.' Here is all you need to know. All EU goods will face a baseline tariff of 15%, half the 30% rate Trump had threatened to implement come August 1. The deal includes medicines, semiconductor chips, and cars. US exporters would now have access to European markets, and may face zero tariffs for certain products. The zero tariffs would reportedly apply to sectors including 'all aircraft and component parts, certain chemicals, certain generics, semiconductor equipment, certain agricultural products, natural resources and critical raw materials', von der Leyen said. A Reuters report quoted a US official as saying that commercial aircraft would face zero tariffs for now, while there was a 'reasonably good chance' that a new rate less than 15% could be realised later. Uncertainty still remains over the tariffs European wine and spirits producers will face in the US, but she said the matter would be resolved in the coming days. 2 – Steel and aluminium tariffs remain at 50%, cars effectively at 27.5% The deal does not include European steel and aluminium, which continue to face a separate 50% import tax. However, von der Leyen said that further negotiations could yield a quota system, wherein such imports within a certain quota could escape the additional duty. Meanwhile, European cars face a 27.5% tariff, with Trump's 25% rate coming atop the pre-existing 2.5% tariffs in place. Germany will likely bear the brunt, given its export-driven economy and large automotive sector. Manufacturers VW, Mercedes and BMW were among the worst-affected by the tariffs, in place since April. While German Chancellor Friedrich Merz welcomed the deal, industrial groups in the country have been critical of it. The Federation of German Industries (BDI) called the deal 'an inadequate compromise' that 'sends a fatal signal to the closely intertwined economies on both sides of the Atlantic.' The US has been the second major market for the European auto industry. Data from Acea (the European Auto Manufacturers Association) showed that the EU exported 757,654 new vehicles to the US last year, worth €38.9 billion ($45.41 billion), and imported 169,152 new vehicles from the US, worth €7.8 billion ($9.1 billion). 3 – European investment commitments in the US The EU has agreed to purchase American energy products worth $750 billion, chiefly oil, gas, including liquified gas, nuclear fuel and semiconductors. It will also $600 billion in the US in addition to its current investments, including purchases of military equipment, Trump said. von der Leyen confirmed the EU would commit to buying $250 billion of US energy products annually for the next three years. 'With this deal, we are securing access to our largest export market,' she said. Trump also said that the EU would purchase a 'vast amount of military equipment' from the US. However, no definite purchase commitment has been made. Since the war between Russia and Ukraine commenced in 2022, the EU has increased its military spending, boosted by Trump's remarks earlier in the year pushing for increased European military spending. Thus far, they have focused on purchasing military equipment from European companies. 4 – Only temporary relief for semiconductors, pharmaceuticals The deal currently retains the 15% tariff rate for pharmaceuticals and semiconductors, which are subject to separate tariff investigations. The Guardian reported that sources said the EU investment commitments helped seal the 15% tariffs on pharmaceuticals and semiconductors. However, both sectors face the threat of additional tariffs in the future. Trump has previously threatened 200% tariffs on pharma imports, while US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said that semiconductor tariffs could also be announced in the coming weeks. Data from the European Commission's data wing, Eurostat, indicate that medicines were the EU's top exports to the US in 2024, amounting to nearly €80 billion. Ireland, which Trump has accused of having 'the entire US pharmaceutical industry in its grasp', has been the largest pharma exporter. 5 – An Ireland-shaped problem The tariff announcement presents a unique conundrum for the island of Ireland, wherein traders in Northern Ireland, a constituent of the UK, can sell goods to the US at 10% tariffs, while Ireland the country faces the 15% tariff rate. A similar situation was last faced during Brexit, when Northern Ireland (as part of the UK) exited the EU in 2020, while Ireland remained a member of the bloc. After tedious negotiations, the two arrived at the Windsor Framework in February 2023, which resolved the issues around customs arrangements. A similar understanding will now become necessary for the two regions to ensure stability across the island and diplomacy continues under the Good Friday agreement, which formally ended 30 years of conflict between Ireland and Northern Ireland. Ireland's deputy prime minister, Simon Harris, said he 'regretted' the 15% tariff rate but said 'certainty' was important. In 2024, the total goods trade between the US and the EU amounted to $975.9 billion, US Trade Representative data showed. The US ran a $235.6 billion trade deficit with the EU, a 12.9% increase over the previous year. European Commission data showed that the US was its largest trading partner in 2024, accounting for 20% of EU goods exports, with Germany, Ireland, France and Italy as the top exporters. The major exports from the EU were over €200 billion (over $227 billion) of machinery and vehicles, €160 billion (over $182 billion) of chemicals and €25 billion (over $28 billion) of food and drink.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store