Could a surge in immigration affect wages in Idaho? Here's what the research says
And many Americans worry about their income and finances.
But could unauthorized immigration hurt salaries in Idaho?
Probably not, according to a February 2024 University of Idaho report examining the state's economy and immigrants who do not have permanent legal status.
There are two important reasons why. The first is that Idaho businesses compete for workers more than people in Idaho compete for jobs, the report said.
For example, in Idaho, one-third of unauthorized workers were employed in agriculture in 2021, with the rest working in construction, manufacturing, professional services, and leisure and hospitality, according to the report.
'The reality is, ag jobs have not been filled by a domestic workforce — outside of family workers — for decades,' said Rick Naerebout, chief executive officer of the Idaho Dairymen's Association, at a City Club of Boise forum.
Idaho businesses and industry professionals in agriculture, construction, hospitality and health care said that actually finding workers is a top concern and challenge, the report said.
Second, wages are not affected unless immigrants in the country without legal status are in competition with other workers for the same jobs, according to the U of I report.
Most U.S. voters believe that immigrants take jobs that others don't want, according to the Pew Research Center. There is no major American industry in which immigrant workers outnumber U.S. workers, the center said. However, immigrant workers outnumber U.S.-born workers in some jobs, such as manicurists, taxi drivers and drywall installers, according to Pew.
The Statesman reached out to Lenney for comment for this story, but he would not directly address questions.
Recently, the Congressional Budget Office said low-skilled workers' wages are expected to grow more slowly from 2024 to 2026 due to a surge in immigration that's occurred in the U.S. since 2021, according to The Wall Street Journal. Farm work is considered low-skilled, according to a document from MIT.
But research has shown that across skill levels, immigrants and U.S.-born workers aren't crowding each other out of the job market, said Samia Islam, a professor of economics at Boise State University. The jobs that immigrant workers take are not jobs that native-born workers typically want or fill, Islam said.
For example, in Idaho, many workers in the dairy industry are foreign-born, according to previous Statesman reporting, and officials with the Idaho Dairymen's Association have said that there aren't enough workers in the state to fill those jobs.
Wages also probably won't go down because a larger share of immigrants are high-skilled workers, and they increase productivity overall, Islam said. Those with a college degree made up the greatest total of immigrants in the United States, according to a working paper.
The Idaho Department of Labor said that it didn't have data on the effects immigration might have on wages, but that of all the people moving to Idaho since 2020, 15% had an international origin. However, that number can also include American citizens and military members abroad returning home, according to spokesperson Samuel Wolkenhauer.
The debate over immigrants taking jobs that Americans supposedly could fill has been ongoing for decades, if not longer. For example, the H-2A visa, for temporary agricultural workers, requires employers to show that there aren't enough U.S. workers for the job and that employing immigrants won't hurt wages and working conditions of 'similarly-employed' Americans.
H-2A workers are also paid adverse effect wage rates, to help protect American incomes. In Idaho, the adverse effect wage rate is $16.83, according to the Idaho Department of Labor.
In fiscal year 2024, Idaho employers were approved to bring in over 7,000 new H2-A workers, according to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services data.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Buzz Feed
30 minutes ago
- Buzz Feed
Who People Want As The New Face Of The Democratic Party
After a resounding defeat last November, it's clear that the Democratic Party needs to figure out how to move forward. So, we asked the BuzzFeed Community who they would like to see as the new face of the party. Here's what they said: "AOC or Jasmine Crockett. We need someone who actually wants the best for the American people and has our best interests at heart." —Anonymous "I hadn't heard of Andy Beshear until that period where we were all wondering who was going to be chosen as Kamala's running mate, but he seems like a great fit to lead the party right now. He's connected with voters enough to keep winning elections in his red state of Kentucky, and we could certainly use some of that in the next presidential election." —Anonymous "I love those videos of Katie Porter breaking things down on her whiteboard to emphasize how corrupt and greedy corporations have gotten. She fearlessly calls out companies that don't pay their workers enough, Big Pharma for exploiting sick people, etc. She is a true supporter of the middle class and exactly who I want to represent me." —Anonymous "I feel like the clear option has to be a governor or early-term senator. Historically, Democratic candidates have often won elections by being outsiders to Washington politics. So, I think the key faces of the Democratic Party should be people like Pete Buttigieg or Wes Moore. What we need the least is for another senator or other person with a long Washington record to come in and march the party to another defeat." —Anonymous "I think Adam Schiff should run as the Democratic nominee for president in 2028. He's really smart, has experience in Congress, and is well-spoken. Most importantly, he has no fear of Trump or Trumpites. Go Adam!" —Anonymous "I recently saw clips of James Talarico speaking on Joe Rogan's podcast, and I was blown away. I hadn't heard of him before, but he was smart, had common sense, and made me hopeful for the future of the Democratic Party. He wants to return the party to really looking out for the working class — something we should all agree on. Even Joe agreed with him and urged him to run for president. I don't think James has the name recognition for a 2028 run, but he's a rising star, and I hope to see much more of him." —Anonymous "Senator Tammy Duckworth of Illinois. She's a veteran who lost both her legs fighting for her country and is committed to members of the Armed Forces, veterans, and their families. She had to use IVF to become a mother and went public about what it took for her to have children. She's not going to sit idly by while the rights of women and reproductive healthcare are being actively suppressed and undermined." —Anonymous "Jasmine Crockett, Maxwell Frost, and AOC. They're young enough to know how to play this game MAGA plays. We should have learned from the first election Trump won. Americans who voted for the economy, without any regard for the morality of the one they voted for, got exactly that — look at all the immoral and chaotic mess! Now, we all have to deal with it." —Anonymous "Given the results of our presidential election and a discombobulated Democratic Party (plus the reluctance to replace career old farts with modern-day thinkers), I don't believe our country is capable of voting in a woman, let alone a woman of color. Hurts me to believe that, as a lifelong Democrat of mixed race and a mother of adult Democrats. But if we make it beyond Trump, we'll need healing and major rebuilding by — sadly and likely — a more centrist white male. One with the integrity and guts to empower the brilliance and partnership of a woman like Jasmine or AOC. Perhaps Walz?" —Anonymous "Melanie Stansbury of New Mexico should also be in the limelight as a true leader. She had the courage to call out Congressmembers who objected to placing the entirety of Project 2025 into the public record." —Anonymous "I've been very impressed with Zohran Mamdani. He's getting people engaged and passionate. His proposals are good for the many, rather than the few. I believe a democratic socialist is precisely what the US needs right now, despite what old, corporate Democrats think. It's so frustrating how other countries can take care of their citizens while the US is too focused on greed. It's time we caught up with the rest of the world." —Anonymous "Andy Kim of New Jersey. He's shown that he's willing to fight. I'm looking three years ahead, and I think he might actually be presidential material." —Anonymous "Pete Buttigieg has such a way with words. Very smart and articulate, with the ability to break complicated issues down in ways that regular people can understand and care about. He also seems to have a calm demeanor, patiently explaining stuff without becoming hot-headed, but still standing his ground. It would be a welcome change after Trump." —Anonymous "Jamie Raskin has demonstrated he is willing and capable of fighting back." —Anonymous And finally, "AOC, because I like that she works with the left wing of the party while the rest of the establishment is courting moderate votes. Jasmine Crockett is also a good candidate to lead the party, but I'd like to know more about her inter-party strategies as well. For now, AOC seems to connect with the people and has the ability to use the system to make the most possible change of the moment. Hey, maybe AOC-Crockett 2028!" —Anonymous Who would you like to see as the new face of the Democratic Party? Why? Share your thoughts in the comments or in the anonymous Google form below.
Business Insider
31 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Finance legend Burt Malkiel is still working at 92. He tells BI why people should retire later.
A 92-year-old Wall Street veteran says young people should be open-minded about their career paths, and workers should retire later. In a wide-ranging interview with Business Insider, Burt Malkiel said he could have never predicted his winding career trajectory. In addition to being Wealthfront's chief investor and the author of the regularly revised "A Random Walk Down Wall Street," Malkiel is a former Princeton economics professor, investment banker, US Army lieutenant, and economic advisor to President Gerald Ford. If someone had told him that he would become an academic when he was growing up poor in Boston, he would have told them they were "absolutely crazy," he said. 'Put a little aside each week' As a young child, Malkiel planned to spend his whole career on Wall Street. "I loved the stock market even though I never had a dollar to invest," he said, adding that he paid as much attention to General Motors' stock price as he did "Ted Williams' batting average." Malkiel eventually landed a job at Smith Barney, a storied wealth manager, but, after a few years, took a leave of absence to complete an economics Ph.D. at Princeton. He abandoned plans to return to banking after he was recruited to teach at the university and to be a director at Prudential Financial. When it comes to their chosen career, young people should "be flexible and realize that you could very well change your mind," Malkiel said. "Don't close off any opportunities," he continued, adding that unexpected detours can make life "richer." Malkiel, an evangelist for passive investing via index funds, also said young people should "put a little aside each week" to invest in a diversified portfolio of "index-type securities." That's "something that you will be very happy that you did later in life," he said. Working later in life Malkiel told BI he's still "spending a fair amount of time each day working" despite being in his 90s, and he believes many older Americans without physically demanding jobs should remain in the workforce for longer. The US is "wasting an enormous amount of talent by encouraging earlier and earlier retirement," he said. Continuing to work "absolutely" contributes to a person's "feeling of worth" and being interested and engaged in "what's going on," he added. "I'm sure that the rest of us probably will feel much better by working longer, and the economy will be stronger," Malkiel said. He said the government should raise the retirement age"very gradually" and predicted that this might be necessary to avoid bankrupting the Social Security system. What keeps him awake at night Asked what kept him up at night, Malkiel chuckled and said his Cavapoo, Lucy, who was barking in the background. He described her as a "hellion" — but an "extremely sweet" one. Answering the question less literally, Malkiel said he's a "card-carrying Republican," but still "quite concerned" about Donald Trump's actions as president. He said that tariffs would make the US and its trade partners worse off, an immigration crackdown could magnify the threat of an ageing population, and Trump's "apparent hatred" for universities and efforts to withhold research funding from them will hurt the country. "I don't see how you make America great by weakening some of our greatest institutions that are the envy of the world," he added. But Malkiel said he was optimistic the US would overcome its challenges in the long run, despite "stumbles along the way."
Business Insider
an hour ago
- Business Insider
Married childfree millennials have a $120,000 net worth advantage
A Business Insider analysis of new data from the Census Bureau's Survey of Income and Program Participation finds that millennials who are married, but don't have children under 18 in the household, are sitting on net worths that exceed those of their parental, single, and divorced peers. It's yet another point in favor of what's fast becoming a new version of the American dream: Living in a high-earning household without kids. Many of those high-net-worth millennials are likely DINKs, meaning that they're in dual-income households with no kids. Others may have arrangements like stay-at-home husbands or wives, where the couple is able to comfortably live off one earner. This data is based on the most recent release of SIPP data; we looked at data from December 2023, which was the last month recipients were surveyed for this wave. We separated out Americans who were married, not a reference parent for any household children under 18, and then sorted by those who were ages 27 to 42 — the age bounds of millennials during the survey period. Childfree and married millennials had a few demographic differences from the larger millennial cohort. They were, for instance, more likely to have a bachelor's degree or a post-graduate degree. Married and childfree millennials were also more likely to be white than the wider millennial cohort, and far less likely to be Black. There were also some key economic differences between married and childfree millennials and the larger millennial group; married and childfree millennials had on average slightly more credit card debt, carrying around $2,456 compared to $2,203 for all millennials. But married and childfree millennials were also more likely to have money socked away for retirement — the average value of their retirement accounts was around $71,886, which far exceeds the $48,408 of the average millennial's retirement accounts. Of course, not all married and childfree millennials are sitting on large net worths. The net worths represent an average across the group, meaning a swath of married and childfree millennials have far less in the bank. Some married and childfree Americans don't want to be in that position — as Business Insider has previously reported, one subset of DINKs would like to have children, but can't afford it, struggle with infertility and uncertainty over family planning, or are turned off by the lack of support for parents in the US. It's also entirely possible that some of those surveyed millennials are biding their time and waiting to have children later in life, a rising trend among some in their generation. There's also another barrier for childfree and married millennials, who are already paying on average around $3,447 in rent or mortgage — the US just doesn't have the housing to accommodate a potentially growing family. Even so, the numbers show it's paying for some millennials to get hitched, but not add to their families. And as Gen Zers think about their futures, financial security is top of mind, while growing their families isn't as high a priority — indicating that the ranks of the financially secure and childfree might only grow.
