logo
Coming together to express horror in Gaza

Coming together to express horror in Gaza

The Age09-07-2025
The risks of AI
Danielle Wood nominates the increased usage of AI as her No.1 discussion point for the upcoming productivity roundtable. She acknowledges there are risks that require increased regulation. While the focus of the roundtable is to reduce redtape and increase productivity, the increasing use of AI is indeed a double-edged sword. Big business will be salivating at the costs to be saved and the fewer employees it needs by AI's greater use. Not all the financial benefits of increased productivity should flow to business profits and executive bonuses. Robust controls-protections will be needed to support workers in their immediate and long-term displacement.
A Labor government should not be encouraging the slashing of redtape and introduction of new work practices that exacerbate the position of those workers and consumers bearing the brunt of any new technologies.
Peter Thomson, Brunswick
Morality and war
Your correspondent (Letters, 9/7) suggests that few now doubt the moral rectitude of those who take part in Melbourne's weekly Gaza demonstrations. But one is certainly entitled to question the righteousness of those, like your correspondent, who have nothing to say either about Hamas' vile war crime of continuing to hold Israeli hostages, or its human shield strategy that inevitably maximises civilian loss of life.
The foremost tragedy of this war is that so many appear to be motivated more by their desire to demonise and delegitimise Israel, than by genuine concern for the welfare of Palestinians.
This is perhaps best demonstrated by the uniqueness of this conflict in which efforts to allow civilians to get out of harm's way have been steadfastly resisted. Israel is accused of ethnic cleansing in wanting to facilitate this, but when it doesn't happen, it's accused of genocide.
Geoff Feren, St Kilda East
What is chant's origin?
The fact that demonstrators chanted ″⁣Death to the IDF″⁣ in Melbourne last Sunday deserves more thought. During the rallies against the Vietnam War, no one chanted, ″⁣Death to the American forces″⁣. I know. I was there. When demonstrators marched against the war in Iraq, this did not happen either. No one has marched and chanted for the deaths of Putin, Bashar al-Assad, the generals of Myanmar, or the leaders in the Sudanese war, all ongoing, or recent conflicts.
Where could this come from? Surely this is more than anger at the IDF?
Pia Brous, Armadale
Living in harmony
Listening to the Rabbi of the East Melbourne Synagogue on ABC Radio on Monday was inspiring, especially when he spoke of a recent admission of one of his children to the Royal Children's Hospital.
At the hospital, he was in a discussion with Muslim and Christian parents. They spoke about what a wonderful country we live in. Australia is made up of many nationalities and cultures, but we must co-exist harmoniously. It is the best country, let's keep it that way.
Peter O'Brien, Newport
Why muted response?
There has been a public outcry about the attacks on two synagogues from our leaders, but hardly a peep out of them, especially the LNP, about the wanton destruction and slaughter going on in Palestine.
John Cain, McCrae
Putin is not worried
I doubt that Vladimir Putin will be too concerned over angering Donald Trump with his intransigence over the Ukraine war he seems uninterested in ending. Putin needs to only wait a few days for Trump to change his mind yet again or if that fails Putin can nominate Trump for a Nobel prize – it seems to be the popular move at the moment.
Ross Hudson, Mount Martha
Trump, meet Kissinger
On the other hand, a Nobel Peace Prize would put Trump in company with the likes of Henry Kissinger – seems about right.
Maurie Keenan, Balaclava
Protecting the oceans
Australia certainly extends beyond Portland, to South Australia and beyond (Letters, 7/7). And the problem of algal bloom around SA is both a major problem itself, and a symptom of the ″⁣marine heatwave″⁣ in the oceans around Australia.
The core problem is global warming, including of the sea. In 2024, then environment minister Tanya Plibersek, extended the area of marine parks, including off the coast of Victoria and South Australia. This brought the total area of protected marine space to 52 per cent of Australia's ocean territory.
That is a start, but not enough. Marine scientists are calling for $40 million to be spent on marine research and damage mitigation.
There is already some focus on worsening bleaching to coral on the Great Barrier Reef. This effort must be extended to cover all of Australia's marine areas.
John Hughes, Mentone
Teaching is a calling
I feel obliged to reply to several letters (8/7) about teacher training.
In 1958, I started a two-year course in a UK residential teacher training college. As well as visiting several different types of schools and attending lectures relevant to our choice of courses, we had six teaching practices in classrooms. I completed the course in 1960 and was qualified to teach in secondary schools.
When I migrated to Australia in 1971 the authorities here accepted my teaching qualification and experience. I retired from a very enjoyable teaching career in 2003.
My own secondary education was in a grammar school where all the staff had to have a university degree. Some of my teachers were very good and some, in spite of their degrees, were not.
Teaching is not a job. It is a calling comparable with, say, nursing.
Chris Rhodes, Gisborne
The erosion of joy
Managerial culture came to universities in the 1990s (Comment, 9/7). The most noticeable change was the growth of university bureaucracies. To support a corporate culture, university bureaucracies became gigantic. Campuses were filled with layer upon layer of administrators.
As a result of these bureaucratic layers, academic activities such as teaching, research and publishing became onerous. The joy of being an academic, and making a contribution to knowledge, was slowly eroded.
Dr Sarah Russell, Mt Martha
A conciliatory gesture
After analysing his own behaviour, Benjamin Netanyahu must see Donald Trump's behaviour as deserving of a peace prize. Dropping only a handful of enormous bombs on another country would seem conciliatory.
John Groom, Bentleigh
A noble endeavour
I'm now soliciting support to nominate myself for the Nobel Prize for Literature for my body of work in Letters to the Age.
Peter Price, Southbank
AFL out on the full
The AFL has lost the plot with its proposed in-season tournament to keep the fans engaged. Instead, how about just progressing all clubs to the finals.
Jenny Bone, Surrey Hills
AND ANOTHER THING
Trump
Benjamin Netanyahu nominating Donald Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize is a very dark and scary sick joke.
Brendan O'Farrell, Brunswick
What an absolute insult to the prize itself.
Carole Ruta, Benalla
Donald Trump nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize – an oxymoron in keeping with the contradictory naming of the prize.
Greg Curtin, Nunawading
I'd like to nominate RFK jnr for the Nobel Prize for Medicine.
Stephen Baldwin, Frankston
″⁣Donald Trump is like an auctioneer in an ill-fitting suit and loud tie, trying to sell a property that no one wants to buy.″⁣ (Stephen Bartholomeuz, 9/7). A perfect image of TACO Donald Trump.
Kay Moulton, Surrey Hills
The Trump administration is like one big game of Deal or No Deal.
Ron Mather, Melbourne
Furthermore
How wonderful to have a system of interest-rate settings based on economic reality, not government whim.
Graeme Rose, Wangaratta
Discussion about the AFL's two-tier competition distracts the football public from bigger issues like the league's dependence on gambling revenue.
David Cayzer, Clifton Hill
Surely the AFL isn't spooked by the State of Origin in the NRL? Three games that pack out the stands and rate highly on TV but the regular attendance at weekly matches is minuscule compared to the crowds that flock to the AFL.
Phil Alexander, Eltham
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The moral test for Labor has shifted on Gaza: Words are not enough
The moral test for Labor has shifted on Gaza: Words are not enough

Sydney Morning Herald

time26 minutes ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

The moral test for Labor has shifted on Gaza: Words are not enough

Just two months ago, the UN warned: 'Every single one of the 2.1 million Palestinians in the Gaza Strip face the risk of famine. One in five faces starvation.' And we know many have been shot by Israeli soldiers while trying to get food. On the weekend, Israel announced it would take steps to restore aid. Sadly, by this stage it is difficult to know with what level of credulity to treat its government's assertions. Israel has long blamed Hamas for looting aid; on Sunday, The New York Times carried a report based on conversations with Israeli military officials: 'the Israeli military never found proof that the Palestinian militant group had systematically stolen aid from the United Nations … In fact, the Israeli military officials said, the UN aid delivery system, which Israel derided and undermined, was largely effective in providing food to Gaza's desperate and hungry population.' This backed reports of a recent American analysis with similar findings. The starvation of the people of Gaza, then, is not an accident; it is not a tragic byproduct of other actions. As de Waal wrote years ago, 'starve' should not be seen as a passive verb. It is something someone does to someone else. And, it follows, something that others permit to be done. Almost a year ago, one Israeli minister, Bezalel Smotrich, said: 'No one will allow us to starve 2 million people, even though that might be just and moral until they return the hostages.' He was wrong. Loading Wong's early call for restraint in Gaza tells us several things. It shows it was possible, at the very beginning, to glimpse some of what was coming. At the same time, Wong's early defensiveness shows how easily participants in public debate – including leading politicians – are able to be knocked off course by efforts to make certain statements unsayable. The conservative press is significant in these efforts; but the rest of the political class, politicians and media, are the ones who allow themselves to be cowed. Israel has achieved as much as it ever will from this war. In the doing, thousands more Palestinians have been killed. Together, these two facts mean that more things are now able to be said. But the moral and practical test for those with influence has shifted. Loading Of course, it's true that Australia can't by itself end the fighting. And it is hard to know what will make Netanyahu listen – or make America behave differently. And it is true, too, that statements can have some effect. The last time famine threatened in Gaza, international pressure led to an increase in aid. Obviously, though, this was only temporary. And that is why it is important to recognise that other options are available to Australia. The UK has now announced it is working with Jordan to deliver aid and will medically evacuate children. France has said it will recognise Palestine as a state, something former Labor ministers Gareth Evans, Bob Carr and Ed Husic are calling for here. On Sunday, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese made clear that Israel has breached international law. This was a welcome injection of clarity. Still, the test at this late stage is no longer whether politicians can issue damning statements. The only meaningful test left is whether our leaders will do everything they can to stop Netanyahu's Israel from killing any more Palestinians.

‘Frosty on Trump': Australians eager for more independence from the US
‘Frosty on Trump': Australians eager for more independence from the US

Sydney Morning Herald

time26 minutes ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

‘Frosty on Trump': Australians eager for more independence from the US

Australians are voicing a strong desire for the country to assert more independence from the United States amid Donald Trump's turbulent presidency, with most voters saying they do not blame Prime Minister Anthony Albanese for failing to secure a meeting with the US President. The latest Resolve Political Monitor survey of more than 2300 people, conducted for this masthead, found that most Australians continue to have strongly negative views of Trump six months after he re-entered the White House. Fewer than one in five Australian voters believe Trump's election was a good outcome for Australia. When asked whether it would be a good or a bad thing for Australia to become more independent from the US on foreign policy and national security, 46 per cent of respondents said they believed it would be a good thing, compared to 22 per cent who said it would be a bad thing. When compared along political lines, 56 per cent of Labor voters said they supported Australia adopting a more independent foreign policy and just 12 per cent opposed the idea. Coalition voters were evenly split, with 34 per cent favouring more distance from its closest security partner while 35 per cent said it would be bad to become more independent of the US. Since returning to the White House, Trump has imposed a 10 per cent tariff on all Australian goods, as well as a 50 per cent tariff on steel and aluminium imports. The Trump administration has also called for Australia to dramatically increase defence spending to 3.5 per cent of gross domestic product, while launching a review into the AUKUS nuclear-powered submarine pact. Since his re-election, Albanese has stressed the importance of Australian sovereignty and said his government would not commit to joining the United States in a hypothetical war with China over Taiwan.

‘Frosty on Trump': Australians eager for more independence from the US
‘Frosty on Trump': Australians eager for more independence from the US

The Age

time26 minutes ago

  • The Age

‘Frosty on Trump': Australians eager for more independence from the US

Australians are voicing a strong desire for the country to assert more independence from the United States amid Donald Trump's turbulent presidency, with most voters saying they do not blame Prime Minister Anthony Albanese for failing to secure a meeting with the US President. The latest Resolve Political Monitor survey of more than 2300 people, conducted for this masthead, found that most Australians continue to have strongly negative views of Trump six months after he re-entered the White House. Fewer than one in five Australian voters believe Trump's election was a good outcome for Australia. When asked whether it would be a good or a bad thing for Australia to become more independent from the US on foreign policy and national security, 46 per cent of respondents said they believed it would be a good thing, compared to 22 per cent who said it would be a bad thing. When compared along political lines, 56 per cent of Labor voters said they supported Australia adopting a more independent foreign policy and just 12 per cent opposed the idea. Coalition voters were evenly split, with 34 per cent favouring more distance from its closest security partner while 35 per cent said it would be bad to become more independent of the US. Since returning to the White House, Trump has imposed a 10 per cent tariff on all Australian goods, as well as a 50 per cent tariff on steel and aluminium imports. The Trump administration has also called for Australia to dramatically increase defence spending to 3.5 per cent of gross domestic product, while launching a review into the AUKUS nuclear-powered submarine pact. Since his re-election, Albanese has stressed the importance of Australian sovereignty and said his government would not commit to joining the United States in a hypothetical war with China over Taiwan.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store