North Yorkshire school transport funding change upheld after vote
Ahead of the meeting councillors were met by a group of about 100 people protesting against the policy outside County Hall in Northallerton, according to the Local Democracy Reporting Service.The council had said it hoped the policy - due to come into effect in September - would deliver savings of up to £4.2m a year.But campaigners argued the new system may actually cost money to implement, and was damaging to pupils, schools and rural communities.
The council said home-to-school transport was one of its three largest areas of expenditure, alongside adult social care and waste management.A spokesperson added that the decision to change the policy was aimed at protecting frontline services.Deputy leader Gareth Dadd said the new policy was "fairer to all families, responsible and affordable"."Unfortunately, a more generous officer is not longer an option," he said."I would like to stress that parents and carers in North Yorkshire still have a choice as to where their send their children."It is important for them to factor in travel costs if they choose a school that is not the nearest to their home."However, one parent speaking after the meeting said she now faced having to pay about £800 a year for her daughter to attend the same school as her son.Another parent, Charlotte Fowler, said: "Shame on all those councillors who have let down North Yorkshire's children today."They had a chance to put things right and they blew it. By choosing to keep a broken system in place the council has left children isolated, parents burdened, and schools uncertain about their future."Families of children due to start secondary school in September will find out if their child is eligible for free school travel by 30 May and those due to start primary school will find out by 30 June, the council has confirmed.
Listen to highlights from North Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
20 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
'Don't let me turn into someone who doesn't recognise the people I love most', says Dame Joanna Lumley as she speaks out in favour of assisted dying
Dame Joanna Lumley has spoken out in support of the controversial assisted dying policy, saying she would not want to carry on if she couldn't recognize her loved ones. The actress, 79, said she supported the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill, which would allow adults with less than six months to live to apply for assisted death. The bill passed a vote in the House of Commons last month, despite objections from Labour ministers and Health Secretary Wes Streeting, and will be discussed in the House of Lords in the autumn. Dame Joanna, known for starring as Patsy in the BBC comedy Absolutely Fabulous. was asked about the bill in an interview with Saga Magazine. She said: 'People are terribly anxious about it and think you may be coerced. 'But I'm saying this now, when nobody's coercing me - don't let me turn into somebody who doesn't recognize the people I love most, where I'm having a miserable time. 'When I get to that stage, when my mind is gone and I have to be fed, that won't be me any more - and I wouldn't mind saying "farewell".' TV presenter Dame Esther Rantzen has been another vocal supporter of the bill and recently urged the Lords not to block the legislation. Dame Esther, 85, has terminal cancer and is being backed by her daughter Rebecca Wilcox. The support from Dame Joanna has been welcomed by campaigner Louise Shackleton. Mrs Shackleton, 58, is currently being investigated for taking her terminally ill husband Anthony, 59, to Switzerland last December to assist his suicide, after he had suffered from motor neurone disease for six years. She told The Mirror that she is set to bury his ashes today on what would have been his 60th birthday She added: 'He would have been overwhelmed that such a huge star has spoken out. 'I would like to thank Joana on behalf of fellow campaigners for having the courage to speak out and to represent the vast majority of people who are in agreement with what she is saying but haven't got her platform. 'Hopefully there will be measured, educated and community focused progress to move this forward.' The bill did have opponents from all parties including Shadow Justice Secretary Robert Jenrick. Writing for the Daily Mail, he revealed how he helped look after his grandmother, Dorothy, as a teenage boy – and how she continued to bring joy to the family as she defied a terminal diagnosis for nearly a decade. He said the prospect of legalising assisted dying 'fills me with dread', adding: 'My Nana felt like she was a burden. I know how much she hated the indignity she felt at having to ask my Mum or us to help her with basic needs. 'People like her – and there are many such people – may consider an assisted death as another act of kindness to us. How wrong they would be. 'Our society pays little regard to end of life care. We need to do much more as a country to help the elderly, like my Nana, in their final years. 'But my experience has taught me that there can be dignity in death, and that even in someone's twilight years, there is joy to be extracted from life. 'So I'll be voting No. And as I do so, I'll be thinking of my great pal – my Nana, Dorothy.' Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch urged her MPs to vote against the legislation, describing it as 'a bad Bill' despite being 'previously supportive of assisted suicide'. Mother of the House Diane Abbott also asked MPs to vote against the bill, saying: 'There is no doubt that if this Bill is passed in its current form, people will lose their lives who do not need to, and they will be amongst the most vulnerable and marginalised in our society.'
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE Votes at 16? We can't even pick Keir Starmer out of a line-up! Teens are wary of voting at next General Election - but they do know who Nigel Farage is
Youngsters set to be given the right to vote in the next General Election have showcased a shocking lack of knowledge about the UK's political leaders. Sir Keir Starmer announced plans on Wednesday to lower the England's voting age from 18 to 16, which could see around 1.5million more teens able to cast their vote when the nation next heads to the polls. The move, a manifesto pledge from the party, has been criticised as a cynical ploy since a large proportion of young voters support Labour. But, opposition parties may be able to blow a sigh of relief after MailOnline went out and quizzed prospective teen voters on their knowledge of the UK political landscape - with some shocking results. While a majority of the teenagers interviewed were able to tell us the Prime Minister's name, some didn't know who he was when shown an image of him. Even worse for Labour, even fewer were able to name the deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner or Chancellor Rachel Reeves when shown pictures of them. But it's not necessarily good news for the Tories - just two were able to identify Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch. Instead, it was Reform UK leader Nigel Farage who came out on top - with an overwhelming number of youngsters able to identify who he was when shown a picture of him. MailOnline visited the streets of Newcastle and Cambridge earlier this week to find out how much prospective teen votes know about the figureheads of UK politics. The youngsters were shown pictures of Keir Starmer, Nigel Farage, Kemi Badenoch, Ed Davey, Rachel Reeves and Angela Rayner. In Newcastle, Nigel Farage was the most recognisable with four out five teens able to name him. Dominic Carlyle, 13, from Jarrow, South Tyneside, knew both Keir Starmer and Nigel Farage from their pictures. He said: 'Keir Starmer is the Prime Minister but I don't know who the leader of the opposition is. 'I thought it was Rishi Sunak. I've seen Ed Davey before but I don't know who he is. 'I would bring in laws to stop smoking. I want to completely get rid of cigarettes. I would tax them more to get rid of them. 'There isn't anything else that I would want to change and I don't have an interest in any specific areas in politics. 'I will be voting when I'm over 16. Some 16-year-olds don't know much about politics so won't be able to use their vote properly. 'Schools should be teaching us more about politics. We never really get taught about it, it's only older children in sixth form who choose to study it.' Olive Irving, 14, from Gateshead, wasn't able to name any of the politicians pictured. She said: 'If I could introduce a policy, I would make school holidays longer. 'I'm not really into politics, but I know that Keir Starmer is the Prime Minister. 'I barely know any politicians. I know their names, but not their faces. I know Farage's name as well as Ed Davey's name. 'I know who the chancellor is because my mam showed me a picture of her crying in the Commons. 'People thought she was going to get fired and she started crying about it. 'A lot of kids will vote for who their friends want to vote for or they won't actually look into politics and vote for who they like the look of. 'I will use my vote but I will look at their policies and do my own research. 'We are taught useless things in school that we won't need in ten years, like algebra, instead of proper things like politics. 'I'm never going to use algebra so I don't know why we're taught that.' Eloise Lincoln, 14, from Newcastle, correctly identified Keir Starmer, Nigel Farage and Ed Davey. She said: 'I would want the government to introduce more policies about the environment such as lowering emissions. 'Lowering the voting age could be a good policy but there are a lot of younger people who are influenced by the internet. 'They may not actually know much about politics but go off what they see online. 'They should teach us more in schools if they are lowering the voting age. I would use my vote at 16 but I would do my research.' Olivia Connon, 15, from Newcastle, correctly identified Keir Starmer, Nigel Farage and Kemi Badenoch. She said: 'I know a bit about politics but not enough. 'I would vote if I was 16 but you have to investigate first about what the policies are. 'I met Rishi Sunak once, we talked about ice cream but he said his favourite flavour was vanilla, which is boring. He didn't get any syrups or flakes in it. 'I know that Keir Starmer is the Prime Minister but I didn't know that Kemi Badenoch was the leader of the Conservatives. 'I don't know much about current policies but if I could bring one law in it would be something to help people have more access to healthcare, as we need more funding in the NHS. 'If the voting age was lowered now it wouldn't be very good because people wouldn't know what they were doing. We need more education on politics.' Megan Wilson, 15, from Gateshead, correctly named Nigel Farage in the picture quiz. She said: 'The voting age should be 18, 16 is too low. People would make stupid decisions or waste their vote. 'There isn't enough education about politics in schools. You only go over it once or twice so you don't learn it properly. 'I turn 16 early into the school year, I'm one of the oldest in my class so I would be voting while doing GCSEs. 'When you're 18, you know a lot more about the world and probably have a job or have been through college. You have more life experience. 'All my friends think it's a stupid decision to lower it because there are already debates about people voting at the age of 18. 'I don't know much about tax or policies. I know we pay tax but that's it. 'My mam votes but I wouldn't, even if the age is being lowered to 16. 'Keir Starmer is the Prime Minister but I don't know who the leader of the opposition is. I don't know much about current policies but if I could bring in legislation I would want to split the six weeks holidays up. 'It's too long, I get bored half way through. I would want four weeks and then another two somewhere else in the year.' Meanwhile in Cambridge, MailOnline spoke to several 16 and 17 year olds, who despite being older than those interviewed in Newcastle, were only marginally more knowledgeable of the UK's political leaders. Only one person was able to identify who the leader of the opposition was (Kemi Badenoch), with two people thinking it was the former Home Secretary Priti Patel. But, much to the Prime Minister's relief, all of the people interviewed were able to identify Keir Starmer. College student Charlotte Templar, 17, is a Green Party campaigner and was for the voting age being lowered. She said: 'The main argument against it is that 16-year-olds aren't informed enough to vote but that can be applied for people aged 18/20/22. 'You are affected by all things at that age and it will make more people want to vote and it will help move away from older people having all the power to make decisions that will affect younger people for longer. 'I feel like I'm old enough to vote and it has been proven in Scotland that it does work. 'Everyone should know what the parties stand for - it should be the school and the parent's responsibility. 'Some might say young people will do 'joke' votes [where they vote for a party unseriously because they think it is funny] but I don't think it would be a large enough amount of people to make a difference. No one says that about university students.' Jack, 17, said he thought his generation was the 'most politically aware'. He said: 'Realistically 16-year-olds are capable for making a choice like any other eighteen or nineteen year olds. 'If a 50-year-old man votes for Nigel Farage because he thinks he's funny then there shouldn't be a discussion as to whether sixteen-year-olds are mature enough or not.' Zosia, 17, said she was worried about 'joke' voting. She said: 'People will make 'joke' votes for parties like Reform. They could be under the influence of adults around them or their friends. 'At 18, you're only just beginning to experience your life like you are at 16.' Mikayla, 17, added: 'I think people are going to be influenced by social media and who their friends are voting for.' Chloe, 17, said she agreed the voting age should be lowered. The A-Level politics student said: 'You can pay tax and get married - the only difference really at 18 is that you can buy alcohol. 'Politics isn't really taught in school in as much depth as it should be. 'Hopefully it would make people more interested in politics and understand why it matters to them.' Friend Hannah, also 17, said: 'The general election affects everyone who is 16. 'I'd like to see them focus more on the environment - it always come second to most things.' Sophie McArthur, 17, said she didn't think lowering the voting age was a good thing. The college student said she was worried about boys in particular being influenced online and how other people's views could affect them. She said: 'Young people are influenced by the media and there are certain sides of TikTok which can not be a very good thing for people who are impressionable or not mature enough. 'I know people who like Charlie Kirk - these are boys who are like "red pill". It makes you worry about the decisions they'll make if they could vote and who for.' Charlie Kirk is an American political activist who rose to prominence as the founder of Turning Point USA - a ring-wing student organisation aligned with Donald Trump - and spoke at the Cambridge Union in May. Gabriella Giussali, also 17, agreed. She said: 'Some people are too young to form that opinion and be able to vote. There are a lot of people who understand politics and lots of people who don't.' Lucia Browne, 17, said she wasn't 'confident' people at her age would make the 'right' decision. She said: 'Social media means a lot of people are influenced and I think there's a different across the country as to how young people will vote. 'You only pay national insurance at 16 so you don't really know a lot about how things work. We're not at the age where we should be dictating government policy.' Julia, 18, visiting from Sweden said: 'I don't think it's a good idea. In Sweden it is 18 and you get more into politics as you get older, meet more people. When you work, you begin to understand people. 'It is too big of a power for a young age. I'd raise it to 20.' Sylwester, 16, also from Sweden added: 'People aren't experienced enough. I'd say 18 is the best age.'
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Pension Commission to look at why four-in-ten fail to save enough
People retiring in 2050 will be worse off than pensioners today, the government has warned, unless action is taken to boost retirement Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) is reviving the Pensions Commission, which first reported nearly 20 years ago, to look at how to tackle the half of working-age adults are not putting any money into a private pension at all, with low earners and the self-employed less likely to be pension saving, the DWP shortfall is also worse among women and some ethnic groups, with only one-in-four people of Pakistani or Bangladeshi background saving in a private pension. People drawing their pension 25 years from now are set to be £800 or 8% worse off per year than their counterparts today, the department said, with four in 10 people currently not saving enough for their than launching a new commission from scratch, the government said it was reviving the "landmark" Turner Pension Commission which reported in 2006, under the last Labour government, and led to the roll-out of automatic enrolment into pension saving. As a result 88% of eligible employees are now saving, up from 55% in 2012, the DWP that progress, the DWP said new analysis revealed "stark" findings including that:more than three million self-employed workers are not saving into a pensiononly one-in-four low earners in the private sector are saving into a pensiononly one-in-four of people of Pakistani or Bangladeshi heritage are savingThe analysis also found a 48% gender gap in private pension wealth among people currently retiring, with a typical woman receiving just over £100 a week and a man receiving £200 from private pension income. The commission is not designed to directly address issues around the cost of the state reports have raised questions over the affordability of the "triple lock", introduced in 2010, which guarantees that state pensions will rise every year by the same amount as average wages, inflation, or 2.5%, whichever is the population ages, and people live longer, the cost of that policy is set to grow cost is forecast to be three times higher by the end of the decade than was original estimated, after successive years of high inflation, followed by strong wage growth. Instead, the relaunched Commission, which will report in 2027, will look at savings in private sector will bring together trades unions, employers and independent experts, some of whom also took part in the original Commission. It will look at what is preventing people from putting more into their retirement pots and will aim to build a national consensus around future Smith, head of pensions at pension firm Aegon, urged the Commission to make "bold, brave and possibly unpalatable recommendations", including "significant increases" to auto-enrolment contributions after Nowak, General Secretary of the Trades Union Congress described it as "a vital step forward"."Everyone deserves dignity and security in retirement, but right now many workers – especially those in the private sector – will find themselves without enough to get by on," he said. Caroline Abrahams, charity director of Age UK said that while the state pension provided the bulk of income for most pensioners, it was "hugely important" to consider the role of private savings, as the current system was leaving many pensioners struggling to make ends meet."Hopefully this can be avoided in future and particularly disadvantaged groups, including low-paid women and self-employed people on low incomes, can be helped to put money aside when appropriate for them to do so," she said. Catherine Foot, director of the think tank Standard Life Centre for the Future of Retirement, said that 17 million people were not saving enough to achieve the retirement they wished to have."The next two decades is when the effects of the savings crisis will really start to bite," she was crucial that the Commission was able to take a step back and view the system in its entirety," she added."There's an opportunity to examine how different elements of the system are working together."
