Elon Musk Forms a New Political Party to Challenge Trump and the Republicans
The announcement was definitive. 'Today, the America Party is formed to give you back your freedom,' the world's richest man posted on X (formerly Twitter) at 3:46 PM ET. He did not immediately provide further details on the party's platform or organizational structure.
By a factor of 2 to 1, you want a new political party and you shall have it!
When it comes to bankrupting our country with waste & graft, we live in a one-party system, not a democracy.
Today, the America Party is formed to give you back your freedom. https://t.co/9K8AD04QQN
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) July 5, 2025This decision directly follows a highly visible poll Musk conducted on X the previous day, July 4, as Trump prepared to enact the bill that had become a centerpiece of his administration. 'Independence Day is the perfect time to ask if you want independence from the two-party (some would say uniparty) system!' Musk wrote, directly posing the question: 'Should we create the America Party?' X users were given only two options: 'Yes' or 'No.'
The results of the poll, also posted on X, showed overwhelming support. Nearly 1.25 million accounts participated, with approximately 65.4% voting 'yes.'
Independence Day is the perfect time to ask if you want independence from the two-party (some would say uniparty) system!
Should we create the America Party?
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) July 4, 2025'By a factor of 2 to 1, you want a new political party and you shall have it!' the SpaceX founder declared on Saturday while announcing the party's creation. He further elaborated on his motivation, stating, 'When it comes to bankrupting our country with waste and graft, we live in a one-party system, not a democracy.'
The formation of this party, while impactful, does not come as an absolute surprise. Musk had previously hinted at such a move last month, amid an escalating feud with Trump, whom he had publicly labeled ungrateful.
This isn't the first time Musk has publicly entertained the idea of a third party. In May 2022, he posted, 'A party more moderate on all issues than either Reps or Dems would be ideal,' adding that, 'This is what most people in America want, but unfortunately it's not realistic.' However, after a tumultuous recent period in Washington where he led the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) within the Trump administration, and a highly publicized rift with the President, he appears more determined than ever to turn rhetoric into political action.
Musk's core belief is that neither the Republican Party, which currently controls the government, nor the Democratic opposition adequately represents a significant segment of the American population. He seems convinced that the political landscape is ripe for a new movement. This conviction is supported by recent polling data: according to a 2024 Gallup study, a substantial 43% of Americans identified as independents, while only 28% identified specifically as Republican and 28% as Democrat.
Despite this apparent opening for a new political force, history suggests that third party candidates face considerable challenges within the U.S. electoral system. Historically, even strong independent bids have struggled to translate popular support into electoral victories. For instance, Ross Perot's notable 1992 presidential run captured 18.9% of the popular vote but secured no electoral college votes. More recent third party candidates, such as Jill Stein, have typically polled below 1% in national presidential elections.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 minutes ago
- Yahoo
NORAD intercepts plane in Trump's Bedminster no-fly zone: 'No excuses'
A fighter jet scrambled by the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) intercepted a civilian aircraft Saturday afternoon after it entered restricted airspace over Bedminster, New Jersey, where President Donald Trump is spending the holiday weekend. The pilot flew into a temporary flight restriction (TFR) zone just before 2:40 p.m. ET, according to a NORAD statement. The aircraft was safely escorted out of the area after a standard "headbutt" maneuver was used to get the pilot's attention. Air Force F-16 Struck By Drone During Training Flight Over Arizona In 2023 This was the fourth restricted airspace violation of the day and not the last. NORAD says another incursion happened later, making for five unauthorized entries in a single day over presidential airspace. Read On The Fox News App NORAD responded swiftly, using its layered defense system of radar, satellites and fighter aircraft designed to protect U.S. and Canadian skies. The airspace over Bedminster is locked down any time Trump is in town. Second Navy Fighter Jet Goes Overboard From Truman Aircraft Carrier, Pilots Ejected Officials are warning private pilots to do their homework before article source: NORAD intercepts plane in Trump's Bedminster no-fly zone: 'No excuses'
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump admin expands efforts to strip naturalized Americans of citizenship
[Source] The Justice Department has issued new guidelines directing attorneys to aggressively pursue stripping citizenship from naturalized Americans who concealed crimes or posed national security threats during their naturalization process, a policy that could affect the nearly 25 million people. What you need to know: A June 11 memo from Assistant Attorney General Brett Shumate establishes multiple priority categories for citizenship revocation and instructs the Civil Division to 'prioritize and maximally pursue denaturalization proceedings in all cases permitted by law and supported by the evidence.' The policy focuses on individuals who 'pose a potential danger to national security, including those with a nexus to terrorism' and those who 'committed felonies that were not disclosed during the naturalization process.' The memo permits attorneys to target those facing 'pending criminal charges' that have not yet secured a conviction. Shumate outlined that the benefits include 'the government's ability to revoke the citizenship of individuals who engaged in the commission of war crimes, extrajudicial killings or other serious human rights abuses.' Pros and cons: Hans von Spakovsky of conservative think tank the Heritage Foundation defended the initiative, telling NPR, 'I do not understand how anyone could possibly be opposed to the Justice Department taking such action to protect the nation from obvious predators, criminals and terrorists.' Others, however, have expressed alarm over constitutional issues. Law professor and former U.S. attorney Joyce Vance cautioned that 'the provision is so vague that it would permit the Division to denaturalize for just about anything,' potentially targeting 'troublesome journalists who are naturalized citizens' or 'students.' The administration's approach has drawn political attention, with President Donald Trump recently saying he will 'take a look' at potentially deporting Elon Musk — who has been critical of his recent 'One Big Beautiful Bill' — remarking that 'we might have to put DOGE on Elon.' Broader implications: The policy marks a substantial escalation from earlier initiatives, including Operation Janus launched under the Obama administration, which identified hundreds of immigrants who had been ordered deported but became U.S. citizens under another identity. The administration has already succeeded in one case against Elliott Duke, a British-born Army veteran convicted of distributing child sexual abuse material, who now lacks citizenship in any country. Trending on NextShark: This story is part of The Rebel Yellow Newsletter — a bold weekly newsletter from the creators of NextShark, reclaiming our stories and celebrating Asian American voices. Subscribe free to join the movement. If you love what we're building, consider becoming a paid member — your support helps us grow our team, investigate impactful stories, and uplift our community. Trending on NextShark: Subscribe here now! Download the NextShark App: Want to keep up to date on Asian American News? Download the NextShark App today!
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Albo slammed for tariff ‘white flag'
Anthony Albanese's admission that he does not expect a US tariff carve out ahead of the upcoming deal deadline is 'waving a white flag' to Washington, according to the opposition. The 90-day freeze on Donald Trump's so-called 'Liberation Day' tariffs is set to expire on Wednesday. Australian goods are subject to universal 10 per cent duties, with steel and aluminium slugged with imposts of up to 50 per cent. The Prime Minister told a News Corp summit this week he did not expect that to change. Opposition trade spokesman Kevin Hogan said on Sunday he did not know why the Prime Minister had been so quick to pre-empt the US decision. 'We have seen carve outs for some countries,' Mr Hogan told Sky News. 'We know the UK have had a bit of a carve out on the steel and aluminium tariffs – remember, steel and aluminium tariffs have gone up to 50 per cent, they're not at 10 per cent. 'Countries have got carve outs to that … Mexico get a few carve outs, Canada have got a few carve outs from what tariffs they initially had as well. 'So there are countries dealing and talking to the US President but not ours.' Only the UK and Vietnam have so far reached trade deals in the 90-day pause, but neither have had tariffs removed altogether. EU officials this week said trade talks had fallen through and that they were shifting their efforts to maintaining the status quo to get more time to negotiate. India has also failed to lock in a deal. Mr Hogan put the lack of an Australian exemption down to Mr Albanese's failure to meet the US President, even though plenty of world leaders had met Mr Trump and still faced far worse tariffs. 'It is embarrassing that our Prime Minister has not been able to secure a physical meeting,' Mr Hogan said. 'I think initially it wasn't a priority of his – now he seems to be struggling to get one. 'Given the importance of that country, not just on the economic relationship we have, but the national security relationship … the fact our two leaders haven't had a chat and Albanese hasn't been able to secure that is absolutely embarrassing.' Mr Albanese has had several phone calls with Mr Trump, including after Labor's landslide win at the federal election. In his comments to the News Corp summit on Friday, Mr Albanese repeated his government's line that the US tariffs were 'an act of economic self-harm' and that he would continue to make the case for an Australian exemption 'We continue to be engaged with our American friends, but they have a different position on tariffs,' he said. 'If you look at what the impact has been so far, our beef exports are up. 'Our exports in a range of other products are up as well. 'Lamb's down a little bit, steel and aluminium have been impacted, but not hugely. 'We are in a position where on 9 July, that won't really have an impact on us because that's about other countries who have higher rates overnight.' Mr Trump included Australia in sweeping tariffs after telling Mr Albanese a Canberra carve out was 'under consideration'. Pressed on that interaction with Mr Trump, Mr Albanese said they 'did have a constructive discussion' but that 'President Trump … made a decision that's consistent with his public comments'. 'He did say that, but he has also said that there's no more beautiful word in the English language than 'tariff',' he said. 'Now we have a different view. That wouldn't even be … in my, to quote top 10 lists … that wouldn't be in my top million of words.'
