logo
Former SNP Westminster deputy leader Mhairi Black quits party

Former SNP Westminster deputy leader Mhairi Black quits party

Rhyl Journal6 days ago
Ms Black said while she still supported Scottish independence there had been 'too many times' when she did not agree with decisions made by the party.
She told The Herald newspaper: 'Basically, for a long time, I've not agreed with quite a few decisions that have been made.
'There have just been too many times when I've thought, 'I don't agree with what you've done there' or the decision or strategy that has been arrived at.'
Ms Black said she was 'still just as pro independence, absolutely' but claimed the party's 'capitulation on LGBT rights, trans rights in particular' had been an issue for her.
She added: 'I thought the party could be doing better about Palestine as well.'
The former MP said: 'If anything, I'm probably a bit more left wing than I have been. I don't think I have changed all that much. I feel like the party needs to change a lot more.'
Ms Black was catapulted into the political limelight when she was elected to Westminster at the age of just 20 and became the youngest MP since 1832.
She was elected as the MP for Paisley and Renfrewshire South, ousting the former Labour cabinet secretary, Douglas Alexander, with her victory there coming as the SNP captured all but three of the seats in Scotland in the 2015 general election – the first since the independence vote in 2014.
She later became her party's deputy leader in the House of Commons when Stephen Flynn took over as group leader, but stepped down at the 2024 general election, blaming the 'toxic' environment at Westminster.
She was also diagnosed with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) during her time at Westminster, saying previously that the condition was picked up after she became unwell with 'burn-out' during her time as an MP.
An SNP spokesperson said: 'The SNP is the largest political party in Scotland, united under John Swinney's vision of creating a better, fairer Scotland for everyone.
'After a year of disappointment and let-downs from the UK Labour Government, it's clear that real change will never come from Westminster and that independence is essential for a better future.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why Labour's £650m electric car grant is doomed to fail
Why Labour's £650m electric car grant is doomed to fail

Telegraph

timean hour ago

  • Telegraph

Why Labour's £650m electric car grant is doomed to fail

Three years ago, the Tory government closed its electric car subsidy and patted itself on the back for 'successfully kickstarting the UK's electric car revolution'. That revolution, however, has failed to materialise. Flagging sales have caused the electric vehicle (EV) market to be propped up by fleet purchases rather than private demand. With net zero targets at risk, Labour has pledged a £650m pot to bring back the subsidy for battery-powered purchases. But with ever-lingering fears over the charging infrastructure, the impact on the second-hand market and the threat of legal action from manufacturers, the return of the EV grant scheme could fall flat on its face. Telegraph Money explores the challenges ahead. How does the new grant work? The Electric Car Grant is backed by £650m of government funding, and is poised to run until 2028-2029. Customers will be able to buy a new EV at a cut price, as long as it is listed for less than £37,000 and meets environmental thresholds. Under the scheme, vehicles put forward by manufacturers will be scored based on how green their production processes are. The greenest vehicles will qualify for the full £3,750 discount, while others deemed less environmentally friendly will receive a smaller discount of up to £1,500. Others could be disqualified from being eligible. The discount will automatically be deducted from the purchase price of eligible EVs, and the manufacturer can reclaim this amount from the Treasury. Carmakers must also prove they are signed up to 'science-based targets' to cut their carbon emissions, in line with net zero targets. The programme will effectively revive a system of cash handouts which were previously available to EV buyers before being axed by the Tories in 2022. Public charging infrastructure is the greater issue Earlier this year, the public accounts committee said 'patchy' numbers of charge points on motorways and in regional areas were putting the switch to EVs at risk. It found that chargers 'have not been evenly spread across the country', with almost half sitting in London and the South East. A review into the previous government grant scheme found that by 2021, the market had 'matured', and the upfront price was no longer the main barrier to vehicle uptake. It stated: 'Consumer concerns have also shifted increasingly towards their ability to charge EVs and away from concerns around the upfront purchase price of vehicles.' Issues over charging had become 'comparatively more important' to the general public. A government survey from 2017 to 2019 found that an average of 40pc of respondents cited vehicle charging locations as the key disadvantage of EVs, while just 8pc identified general cost. But fast forward to today, and the Government has signalled that costs are the greatest barrier stopping the majority of drivers from going electric. Transport secretary, Heidi Alexander, said that with 82,000 public charge points in operation, the UK has 'built the infrastructure families need to make the switch with confidence'. Yet, that confidence still isn't there. According to the AA, one in five drivers say they will 'never' buy an electric car. Sheena McGuinness, of tax firm RSM, said 'more investment is urgently needed in building up the infrastructure' required to make EVs a viable alternative to petrol and diesel cars. She said: 'The Government needs to invest in transforming the grid to genuinely deliver a green industrial revolution. 'Infrastructure of this scale requires a replacement revenue scheme to expand the charging network, upgrade grid capacity and ensure equitable access across urban and rural areas.' This week, the Government said 17,000 public chargers have been added to the UK network in the past year. Roads minister, Leslie Greenwood, said the government is 'helping put range anxiety firmly in the rear-view mirror.' A Department for Transport spokesman said: 'We're delivering on our commitment to make it easier and cheaper than ever to own an EV. Public charge points in the UK increased 27pc in the last year, bringing numbers to over 82,000. That's one added every half an hour. 'We know upfront costs are a barrier for drivers, so our Electric Car Grant will help thousands of people save money whilst providing a substantial boost for the industry.' But cost variations between peak and off-peak charging times, plus the continued VAT cost on top of the public charging price, remain a bugbear for many. According to the AA, an ultra-rapid 150kW+ charge costs an average of 17.6p per mile for an EV, compared with 11.7p per mile for a typical petrol car. With around 40pc of drivers unable to charge at home, there is a great reliance on the more expensive public chargers. In a bid to tackle this, the Government has this month pledged a £63m package to support at-home charging for households without driveways. Uncertainty over how many drivers can benefit With £650m allocated, the grant would subsidise the purchase of 173,000 electric cars if they were granted the full £3,750 discount. That figure is roughly half the number of all EVs purchased in the UK last year, so the cash could run dry very quickly. The Government plans to run the subsidy until the 2028-29 cut-off date, but for this to be the case, either more money needs to be ploughed into the scheme or the size of the grants lowered in price. Uptake, however, will be slowed by the £37,000 cut-off point. While manufacturers on the cusp of being near to the threshold are poised to lower their list prices, dozens of models will remain out of reach. According to Autotrader, the average price of a new battery electric car is £49,790. Steve Walker, of Auto Express said: 'Around 70pc of new EVs cost more than £40,000, yet the new grant is only available for cars priced at or under £37,000, meaning most models won't qualify.' Ginny Buckley, chief executive of an electric car advice service, said: 'The reality is that very few models will qualify for the full £3,750 discount. 'If the Government truly wants to accelerate adoption, they could take a cue from Scotland's interest-free loan scheme to buy a used electric vehicle, a far more inclusive approach.' Manufacturers could take legal action Uncertainty about whether certain cars will qualify for Britain's EV grant scheme has prompted complaints from car industry executives, who say it has made it harder to plan their marketing strategies. There is also confusion as to whether certain car brands will be exempt from the discount scheme because of their country of origin. Ministers have already warned that Chinese-made cars are likely to be blocked, while Stellantis – which owns brands including Peugeot, Citroën and Fiat – is scrambling to demonstrate its eco-credentials. Stellantis manufactures EVs such as the Jeep Avenger, Fiat 600e and Abarth 600e at its plant in Tychy, southern Poland. But as the majority of Poland's electricity is generated by burning fuel, its dependence on the eastern European country could be penalised. Jonathan Smart, of law firm Shoosmiths, said the Government could face legal challenges as a result. He explained: 'Supply chain and dealership agreements often hinge on forecasted EV demand, which in turn depends on grant-backed affordability. If the Government's shifting position undermines those forecasts, the entire supply chain can be impacted. 'The commercial fallout could be significant. If the grant confusion materially disrupts business planning, manufacturers may have grounds to challenge the Government's handling of the scheme, particularly if the applications for the grant cause delays to some and not others.' Mr Smart warned that manufacturers could miss their mandated EV sales targets and subsequently face penalties. BYD, the Chinese firm which has become the world's largest EV manufacturer, branded the subsidy scheme 'stupid'. In an interview with the Financial Times, its executive vice-president called out the Government's plan to keep out Chinese brands. Stella Li said: 'The question is, is there any European government that can afford to fight against Chinese-made cars forever? No. So what's the purpose of doing all this?' A DfT spokesman said: 'Applications from manufacturers are being processed, and eligible models will begin to be confirmed in the coming days and weeks.' It could add to the rampant depreciation of electric cars The knock-on impact for the whole EV market is poised to be wide-reaching. A typical EV now retains only 49pc of its value after 24 months, according to Cox Automotive. The depreciation figure compares with an average of 70pc for diesel and petrol cars. Such rapid depreciation means buyers of EVs have to commit to wiping thousands off the value of their car as soon as it rolls off the forecourt. Experts fear the Government's new grant scheme will exacerbate the issue – driving down used EV prices further. While this could be welcomed by those looking to pick up a cheaper second-hand motor in the years to come, it will do little to whet the appetite for drivers buying brand new EVs, which is Labour's ambition. Toby Poston, chief executive of the British Vehicle Rental and Leasing Association, said: 'This generous grant will boost uptake in the retail market, but could have serious repercussions for the used market where rampant depreciation already has red warning lights flashing. 'Further stimulating new EV registrations without supporting the used market risks creating an even greater supply and demand imbalance, putting even more pressure on fast deflating second-hand values.' He said the exacerbated depreciation 'will erode confidence and result in higher finance costs for new EVs', which will 'eliminate' much of the benefit from the original grant.

John Swinney independence plan branded 'high risk' by former Yes campaign chief
John Swinney independence plan branded 'high risk' by former Yes campaign chief

Daily Record

timean hour ago

  • Daily Record

John Swinney independence plan branded 'high risk' by former Yes campaign chief

EXCLUSIVE: A former senior figure in the 2014 independence campaign said any future referendum could only succeed on a cross-party basis. John Swinney's plan to achieve a second referendum on Scottish independence has been branded "high risk" by a former Yes campaign chief. ‌ The First Minister used his regular Daily Record column this week to announce his party must win an outright majority of MSPs at next year's Holyrood election if they are to force the UK Government to agree to another vote on the constitution. ‌ The SNP would need to return 65 MSPs to meet the target set by Swinney - but current polling suggests the party could end up with fewer than 60. A recent survey by Ipsos also found independence did not make a list of the top 10 issues facing Scotland. ‌ Dennis Canavan, who chaired the Yes campaign advisory board during the 2014 referendum campaign, said the current state of the parties made it "difficult to see any straightforward route map to independence". He insisted that any successful campaign to end the Union "must be on a cross-party basis". The former Labour MP told the Record: "John Swinney's plan is a high risk strategy because the electoral system for the Scottish Parliament makes it very difficult for any party to win an over-all majority. In the six previous elections to the Scottish Parliament, there has been only one which produced an over-all majority and that was in 2011 when the SNP won 69 out of 129 seats. "It is important to remember that support for independence is significantly greater than support for the SNP. Recent opinion polls indicate that support for independence is around 50 per cent - whereas support for the SNP is around 30 per cent. A successful independence campaign must therefore be on a cross-party basis and also reach out to people who are not members of any party." ‌ Canavan continued: "If the SNP were to agree on some form of electoral pact whereby the SNP contested only the 73 constituency seats and left other pro-independence candidates to contest the 56 regional seats, then that would be more likely to produce a pro-independence majority in the Scottish Parliament. However, such an electoral pact seems unlikely because there is too much inter-party rivalry and, in some cases, downright hostility. "It is difficult to see any straightforward route map to independence but, if next year's elections to the Scottish Parliament do produce a pro-independence majority of any kind, then a motion calling for Scottish independence could be passed by the Scottish Parliament. That of itself would not lead to independence but it would strengthen the democratic case and increase pressure to let the people decide." ‌ Green MSP Lorna Slater yesterday accused the SNP of playing an "old tune" when it came to independence. She said: "This is an old tune that the SNP have been playing. There are several pro-independence parties in the Scottish Parliament. "John Swinney, I think, is being a little disingenuous. We had a successful pro-independence majority with the Bute House Agreement that the SNP decided to end." Swinney said in his Record column: "For us to achieve that independence, the first step is to secure a legal referendum recognised by all. In 2011 we secured that reliable and dependable route when the SNP achieved a majority of seats at Holyrood. "That is the only mechanism that has been proven to deliver such a vote - so that is what we need to deliver again. "That is why I have submitted a motion to the SNP conference proposing that we work to deliver a majority of SNP MSPs in the Scottish Parliament to secure that referendum on Independence."

27 civilians killed in Gaza as forced starvation worsens
27 civilians killed in Gaza as forced starvation worsens

The National

timean hour ago

  • The National

27 civilians killed in Gaza as forced starvation worsens

According to Al Jazeera reports, around 10 deaths were caused by strikes near aid distribution centres, following the killing of 71 civilians accessing aid on Wednesday. Overnight, Israeli forces attacked several displacement camps in Gaza. A strike in Deir el-Balah killed a family of four sheltering in a tent, including two children. READ MORE: Scottish Government challenged to explain 'critical friendship' with Israel Bombing near Gaza City and Khan Younis killed a further four displaced Palestinians and injured several others, whilst an attack on an apartment building killed three. The Wafa news agency said a six-month-old baby had suffered tear gas inhalation during an Israeli military raid in the occupied West Bank. Further reports say Gazans are resorting to climbing on top of what little aid trucks are allowed into the enclave and fighting amongst one another for access to food as the man-made famine continues. Speaking to Al-Jazeera, UN truck driver Jihad Shuheiber said that agency workers have no protection at all. 'Drivers have no protection at all. Sometimes, you'll see 1000 people surrounding one truck – you can't even see the front of the vehicle. It's heartbreaking,' Shuheiber said. A further seven people died of malnutrition-related complications on Wednesday, with international pressure to end the genocide and officially recognise Palestinian statehood growing. Canada is the latest nation to announce it will recognise the state of Palestine, though it will only do so if there are elections held before September with no involvement from Hamas. US president and convicted felon Donald Trump said the move will make trade talks between the two 'very hard'. READ MORE: David Pratt: Keir Starmer could do case for Palestinian state more harm than good New polling suggests US support of Israel is at it's lowest since the genocide began, though only 27 Democrats backed a bid to end arms sales. Keir Starmer and the UK Government have been widely criticised for their own 'conditional' path to recognising a Palestinian state, with any potential ceasefire before September blocking official recognition. The SNP announced on Wednesday that they would press ahead with their own Bill to recognise Palestine as a result. The death toll from the genocide has now surpassed more than 60,000, though figures may be higher than official reports.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store