Sustainable dividends from cell-tower providers poised for growth
What are we looking for?
Sustainable dividends from cell-tower providers poised for growth.
The screen
Telus Corp. T-T is exploring a possible sale of 49.5 per cent of its cell-tower network in an effort to pay down debt. That stake could attract as much as $1-billion, while keeping Telus in control of a network with some 3,000 towers spread across key markets.
Like Telus, all tower companies own and operate the physical structures, themselves, but it falls to the mobile network operators that lease space on those structures to install and maintain their broadcast equipment. As our TSI analysts point out, the arrangement makes for a diversity of customers leasing space on any given tower.
Our search started with dividend-paying cell-tower operators. From there, we focused on established players well positioned for cash-flow growth as demand rises and the industry's high barriers to entry keep out new competitors. From there, we applied our TSI Dividend Sustainability Rating System, awarding points to a stock based on key factors:
Companies with 10 to 12 points have the most secure dividends, or the highest sustainability. Those with seven to nine points have above average sustainability; average sustainability, four to six points; and below average sustainability, one to three points.
More about TSI Network
TSI Network is the online home of The Successful Investor Inc. – the group of widely followed Canadian investment newsletters by editor and publisher Pat McKeough. They include our award-winning flagship newsletter, The Successful Investor, and the TSI Dividend Advisor. TSI Network is also affiliated with Successful Investor Wealth Management.
What we found
Our TSI Dividend Sustainability Rating System generated five stocks. American Tower Corp. AMT-N, based in Boston, is the largest independent operator of wireless telecom and broadcast towers, with more than 149,000 sites worldwide. Headquartered in Houston, Tex., Crown Castle Inc. CCI-N owns and operates more than 40,000 cell towers throughout the U.S. Not that the company is planning to sell its fibre business and will cut its dividend by 32.1 per cent later this year to reflect the loss of those assets. SBA Communications Corp., SBAC-Q based in Boca Raton, Fla., owns and operates towers, principally in the U.S., but also South America, Central America, Canada and Africa; all together, that's almost 40,000 towers. DigitalBridge Group Inc., DBRG-N also headquartered in Boca Raton, is a global digital infrastructure investment firm. The company owns, invests in and operates businesses such as cell towers and data centres. These interests include Vertical Bridge, with more than 17,000 towers. And finally, Vancouver's Telus continues to profit from selling telecom services to Canadians. The unlocking of value with the sale of the cell-tower stake, combined with Telus's move to retain controlling interest, will further support its high dividend.
We advise investors to do additional research on investments we identify here.
Scott Clayton, MBA, is senior analyst for TSI Network and associate editor of TSI Dividend Advisor.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
25 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
5 Artificial Intelligence (AI) Stocks Are Worth Over $2 Trillion. Here Are the 2 Most Likely to Join the Club Next.
This section contains press releases and other materials from third parties (including paid content). The Globe and Mail has not reviewed this content. Please see disclaimer. N/A Markets News
CBC
2 hours ago
- CBC
Your SIN is a 'master key.' Here's why you must protect it
Dave has learned the hard way that you don't want the wrong person getting a hold of your social insurance number. In 2024, he became a victim of identity fraud. Someone used his SIN to open a bank account and get their hands on some quick cash. And while he didn't lose any of his own money, his credit score tanked for a period. "The most frustrating part was being told, 'Hey, there isn't much we could do about this. Your information is on the dark web. It will be used again.' And months later, it was used again," Dave, of Laval, Que., told Cost of Living. Dave isn't his real name. CBC has agreed to identify him by a pseudonym, as police have told him that further exposing his identity could lead to more challenges. Dave was one of 4.2 million Desjardins customers that had their data leaked in 2019. And they aren't the only victims. Over the past few years, customers with Sobeys, Ticketmaster, London Drugs, Nova Scotia Power and the Canada Revenue Agency, to name a few, have had their data breached. And since more businesses and organizations have started asking for social insurance numbers, experts are cautioning people to be very selective about who they share their SIN with. "It's the most sensitive, secret and unique identifier. Essentially, it's the master key to our identity in Canada," said Claudiu Popa, co-founder of KnowledgeFlow Cybersafety Foundation, which advocates for online safety for Canadians. SINs The social insurance number was created with the launch of the Canadian Pension Plan in the 1960s and used to track who was eligible, as well as for various employment insurance programs. According to Popa, there aren't many places that actually need to know it. A new employer needs your SIN, as does your bank and some government agencies, like the CRA. But more organizations are asking for people's SINs. Popa says that includes gyms, landlords, insurance companies and schools. He says none of these places need your SIN, but that doesn't stop them from asking. That's because it's an easy way to check someone's credit with a unique number. But some companies are also using it as an identifier for customers. "It has just become a lazy way of uniquely identifying people, and unfortunately it places people at the risk of privacy breaches," said Popa. So what do you do if someone asks for your SIN? Just say no. But as the cliché goes, that's easier written into a CBC article than done in real life. Just ask Greg Pace. When Pace made a major career change from an RCMP officer to a farmer, he figured it was a good idea to take some classes to gain more knowledge about the new field. But midway through the government-sponsored classes, someone from the program pulled him aside and informed him he hadn't put his SIN in his paperwork. "I felt there was a lot of social pressure to comply. And yet I knew it wasn't the right ask — that they were, I felt, overstepping," said Pace. Pace, whose background as an RCMP officer taught him to be wary of sharing personal information, asked why, but wasn't given a reason. So he refused, and when it became obvious he was no longer welcome, he left the course. Compromised What makes the social insurance number so valuable to fraudsters, compared to a credit card number or bank password? Popa says it's because, unlike other pieces of information, it isn't easy to change. Dave knows that all too well. Just in the past year, fraudsters have tried to open two different bank accounts in his name and have bought multiple iPhones online. And the onslaught of fraud came just as Desjardins' offer of free credit monitoring was running out. It's taken Dave a lot of time to talk to banks, credit bureaus and police to get it all straightened out each time. And it's not just a hassle. It can tank his credit score. "To know that somebody could use … your information in a fraudulent manner, something that you worked so hard to build, is extremely frustrating," said Dave. Since the Desjardins breach, some have requested new SINs. But that doesn't happen often. It requires proof that the number has been used in fraud, not just that the information has been leaked. And fraudsters are clever, Popa says. They'll often wait until their victims' credit monitoring has run out, which is usually public information. In an email to CBC, Employment and Social Development Canada (ESDC) says it takes steps to protect people from having their SIN compromised, including awareness campaigns, fraud prevention resources and secure application processes. It says that if your number is compromised, you should file a police report, notify the Canadian Anti-Fraud Centre, contact a credit bureau and report it to any affected government programs. It doesn't, however, recommend applying for a new SIN. "Having multiple SINs can increase fraud risk. Getting a new SIN does not erase the old SIN and does not protect it from future abuse," said ESDC spokesperson Saskia Rodenburg. A different method? There is another potential solution: digital IDs. This system would allow you to share only what you want to share and nothing else. "You might have something like a digital wallet that's in your phone, or in your smart tablet," said Joni Brennan, president of the non-profit Digital ID and Authentication Council of Canada. One piece of information on the ID could be your verified income, for example, which you would be able to share with whichever person or organization that requires it. This way, she says, you could share only the information that's necessary, or that you want to share. Some regions are taking the necessary steps, like B.C., but don't expect a Canada-wide digital ID anytime soon. That's because provinces have a lot of jurisdiction over credentials. And as that progresses, Brennan says finding ways to protect our SIN needs to be an ongoing conversation. "As we see, new technologies come forward that might create new ways for bad folks to do bad things, [so] the space that's focused on security and protection and privacy needs to continue to evolve, as well."
CBC
2 hours ago
- CBC
Canada's stubby beer bottle finds new meaning in an age of American bluster
Forty years after its retirement as the industry standard bottle for beer in Canada, the stubby is being reinterpreted in an age marred by tariffs and American grievance — not as a cultural icon, but as a discreet way of protecting a national industry. In a research paper published this spring, Heather Thompson, a recent graduate of the public history program at Carleton University in Ottawa, argues that the stubby — squat, recyclable and therefore largely unappealing to foreign brewers — functioned as a quiet and distinctly Canadian form of protectionism. "At the time, the Big Three, [Canadian Breweries Limited], Molson and Labatt's, they see the Americans coming and they knew they were very interested in the lucrative Canadian market. They needed something," she told CBC News. "The stubby is not a tariff, it's not government-imposed. It's as much an economic product as it is a cultural product." In today's climate of rising tariffs, "buy Canadian" policies and deepening trade tensions, the story of the stubby might feel less like historic footnote and more like a blueprint — for how Canada can still navigate life beside an economically dominant and often unpredictable neighbour. The stubby was introduced in 1961, at a time when Americans, who favoured non-recyclable aluminum cans, made their products in large centralized facilities and shipped their beer across the U.S. and to the world. The stubby, by contrast, was glass, but it was also cheap, durable and lightweight, making it easy to transport. It was also able to be reused up to 100 times. It was the keystone in a closed-loop Canadian bottling system that kept costs down for domestic brewers while it kept foreign brewers out by raising the cost of market entry. The bottle also fit neatly within Canada's fragmented domestic economy. Thanks to interprovincial trade barriers, brewers looking to sell in a given province often had to produce their beer there or face tariffs and restrictions when crossing provincial lines. By 1962, the year after the stubby was introduced, Canada's Big Three brewers controlled about 95 per cent of the Canadian beer market. They owned nearly all of the country's 61 breweries, which gave them a physical presence in every region of Canada. The Big Three also held a majority stake in Ontario's Beer Store, known then as the Brewing Warehousing Company Limited. When the stubby was made a packaging requirement for all beer sold at its stores in Ontario, Thompson argues, the Big Three effectively locked all foreign brewers out by creating an extra hurdle for entry into the market. "To bottle in the stubby, [American brewers] are going to have to make their own line at their plant to bottle specifically for Ontario," she said, noting any cost savings for American brewers through the reusable stubby would be eaten up in transportation costs by first shipping the beer to Canada then shipping it back the U.S. for a refill. Since almost all of Canada's breweries were owned by only three companies when the stubby was introduced in Ontario, the rest of the country followed suit in adopting the stubby because the bottle could be filled and reused in any bottling plant in any province by any Big Three brewer. On par with bagged milk, says history podcaster That kind of market consolidation meant for a generation of Canadian beer drinkers, from 1961 to 1984, the stubby was just about everywhere: on bar counters, fridges or sweating on the dock from St. John's to Victoria. It was also immortalized as a symbol of Canadian identity by the beer-swilling, tuque-wearing McKenzie brothers, who were a parody of Canadian working class culture in the early 1980s, near the end of the bottle's industry dominance. "When we think of the stubby, at least for me, I think of Bob and Doug McKenzie," said Craig Baird, host of the Canadian History Ehx! podcast, a show that looks back on the country's history. Baird said the only thing that comes close to what the stubby did, in terms of uniquely Canadian design and function, is bagged milk. Like the stubby, it's efficient, cost-effective and largely incomprehensible to outsiders, making it both a practical solution and marker of national identity. "If you look online, people say Canadians use bagged milk even though only Ontario and some other localized areas use bagged milk." Canadian brewers dropped the stubby in 1984, switching to taller, non-recyclable long necks as American brands like Budweiser and Coors entered the market thanks, first, to licensing agreements with American brewers and then free trade with the U.S. The new bottles held the same 341 millilitres but offered more branding appeal. WATCH | Saying goodbye to the stubby: Farewell to the reliable old stubby 41 years ago Duration 4:02 The stubby began to be phased out in 1985 and now largely exists only in antique stores and our collective memory. Reviving the spirit, if not the bottle In a global market shaped by trade battles and foreign ownership, Thompson sees the stubby as more than nostalgia. It's a reminder of what Canadian brewers once did to protect their market — and what they might do again. "We're seeing more interest in buying Canadian," she said. "It's a great opportunity for craft brewers to revive the stubby and its cultural power." While few brewers have returned to the squat bottle, its spirit lives on in projects such as Glorious and Free, a patriotic IPA first brewed by Dominion City Brewing in Ottawa. The recipe is shared with 40 breweries across Canada that have used hometown ingredients to create their own versions. "The idea for the campaign really came from a walk in the snow," Dominion City co-founder Josh McJannett said with an obvious nod to former prime minister Pierre Trudeau, a politician whose retirement followed "a walk in the snow" in 1984, the same year the stubby was put out to pasture. "The thought of stubby beer bottles around again is certainly appealing to the nostalgia in me," McJannett said, noting Glorious and Free is available in tallboy cans only. He said the recipe was crafted as a direct response to some of the frustration he was feeling over U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs and talk of annexation. "This was a way to harness that feeling and take some kind of an action." McJannett said. Firm, but polite. A beer that, like the stubby, refuses to be poured into anyone else's mould.
