
Grandparents are carers out of love – and necessity
This reflects the gradual withdrawal of social responsibility from care, and the assumption that families will absorb the shock. We're seeing the effects of this every day through exhaustion, silence and strain carried behind closed doors. As a systemic psychotherapist, I try to pay attention to patterns; what holds people together, and what pulls them apart. One pattern I see is that the work of care has become more vital, yet less visible. Grandparents, like many others, are holding families together behind the scenes. But we rarely speak about it, and policy almost never accounts for it.
In this era of rapidly evolving climate disruption and growing social fragility, care is the connective tissue that keeps communities alive. If we fail to recognise and support it, we weaken the very systems we'll need to face what's coming.Dr Hugh PalmerPocklington, East Yorkshire
I read your article with great interest as the grandparent of four children, but was sad that you did not take the opportunity to comment on the benefits and burdens for those of us who care full-time for our grandchildren. Over half of the estimated 140,000 children in kinship care are with grandparents full-time, and we are most definitely 'taking on a level of grandparenting that looks a lot more like parenting'.
We do miss out on 'just being Granny' as we perform the parenting role with the grandchildren in our care. One of the losses I feel as we parent our 12-year‑old grandson towards adulthood is that he misses out on grandparents and we miss out on grandparenting.
Unlike part-time grandparent carers, we don't have less anxiety as we deal with loss of work and income, lack of support, and difficult relationships with biological parents. And our chances of pursuing our own retirement plans are not limited – they're gone. We also struggle with the cost, the sense of obligation and the feeling of having no choice, but to a much greater extent. And we most certainly 'plug the gaps of a system not fit for purpose'. In our case, this is the children's social care system. The alternative forms of care for our grandchildren continue to have persistent deficits that lead to very poor life chances.
There are so many benefits to us in terms of the loving relationships we have with our grandchildren, but the deficits are often serious and damaging to our mental health and, sometimes, the stability of our kinship families.Name and address supplied
When I read about grandparents caring for and loving their grandchildren I feel such utter sadness and envy. Not because my children don't have grandparents but because their grandparents aren't interested in being around them. It's a certain kind of heartache, not to mention the practical side of living with the exhaustion of not having help and having a disabled child.
I know they are busy, they have their lives to live, and I understand their desire to protect that. But I will never understand their indifference to their grandchildren and our situation. Everyone who has parents who are involved in their grandchildren's lives are the luckiest people – I hope they know that.Name and address supplied
Surely grandparents being heavily involved in child raising is only new for the middle classes? Nans at the school gate was absolutely the norm when I was growing up in the 80s, and as a mother of 10, my mother's Mam always had a houseful of grandkids.Tracey HoughtonNewport
Have an opinion on anything you've read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
2 minutes ago
- The Independent
Frustration as people may miss out on weight loss jab because of where they live
Thousands of obese patients in England are unable to access the weight loss jab Mounjaro due to a ' postcode lottery ' within the NHS. Despite an agreement for Mounjaro to be available from 23 June, only 8 out of 42 NHS Integrated Care Boards (ICBs) are currently providing the treatment. Doctors have warned that patients are being 'set up for failure' as NHS England has reportedly funded treatment for only a fraction of the 97,500 patients NICE calculated should be treated. NHS England stated it has 'fully supported the rollout' by issuing guidance and providing funding to ICBs in March. NICE has issued new guidance stressing the importance of structured follow-up support for NHS patients after stopping treatment to prevent weight regain, a provision not extended to private users.


Daily Mail
3 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
CHRISTOPHER STEVENS reviews Do You Have ADHD?: 'Do you fidget and get distracted by noise? Maybe you've got ADHD too'
Nobody wants to be schizophrenic these days. Why would they? It's a horrible mental illness, one commonly treated with anti-psychotic drugs. Believe it or not, it was frightfully fashionable in the 1960s. Dinner party guests clamoured to tell each other, 'Well, I don't know, I suppose I must be a little bit schizo!' Quack psychiatrists made their names diagnosing actors and pop stars with the condition. The leading light was Scottish doctor and bestselling writer R.D. Laing, who treated Sean Connery by dosing him with LSD. These days, the most talked about diagnosis is Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder [ADHD]. Not a day passes without a celebrity or online influencer declaring proudly that they have ADHD — with the unspoken implication that this excuses all their failings and confirms what they've always felt... that they are special. Follow the guidelines laid down in Do You Have ADHD?, and we can all be special. It's easy. Before the first ad break, presenter Dr Karan Rajan urged us to download a questionnaire from the World Health Organisation [WHO], designed to identify key traits. The questions have been set by three American professors at Harvard and the New York University medical schools, and given an impressive title: the Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale (ASRS-v1.1) Symptom Checklist. Naturally, I paused the show and filled in the quiz immediately. This, I feel, proves impressively how limited my own attention span is. Do I fidget, asked the WHO? Do I forget appointments? Do I make careless mistakes when engaged on boring tasks? Do I get distracted by noise around me? Yes, all of the above. Now I can apply to join the eight-year NHS waiting list for an ADHD diagnosis, or take a shortcut and go private. Of course I'll go private! If I had the patience to wait eight years, I wouldn't have ADHD, would I? And, fortunately, there are lots of clinics willing to take my money, in exchange for an assessment. Dr Clare Bailey Mosley, the widow of much-loved Daily Mail writer Michael Mosley, took the test, partly because she suspected her late husband had ADHD himself. In her case, the outcome seemed eminently sensible: she exhibited some of the typical traits but could not be said to have ADHD because her daily life wasn't impaired. Clearly, the same applied to Michael. No doubt, he had a butterfly mind and needed a deadline if he was to get a job finished, but that's what made him a successful journalist. The rest of this documentary was mostly shallow and trivial. Asked what indicators he looks for in children with ADHD, Professor Stephen Scott of King's College London said, 'First of all, if you just watch them in the school playground, are they running around more than other kids?' 'Running around' is now a childhood medical condition. Nurse!


The Guardian
3 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Verbally abused children more likely to have poor mental health as adults, study finds
Parents who ridicule, threaten or humiliate their children risk leaving them with a 64% higher chance of having poor mental health as an adult, a study has found. The research also found physical abuse experienced among the research participants reduced over time, while verbal abuse increased. Published in BMJ Open, the study gathered data of 20,687 adults from seven studies published between 2012 and 2024. The studies used all involved questions on childhood physical and verbal abuse using the validated Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) tool and the Warwick-Edinburgh mental wellbeing scale to measure individual and combined components of adult mental wellbeing. Participants were asked over a two-week period about their mental wellbeing, with responses given a score to determine whether the participant had a low or high sense of mental wellbeing. While physical abuse was associated with a 52% increase in the likelihood of a person experiencing low mental wellbeing as an adult, verbal abuse was linked to a slightly higher likelihood at 64%, according to analysis of the results. The analysis also found that, even when physical abuse was part of a person's childhood experiences, participants who also experienced verbal abuse faced additional risks. The prevalence of low mental wellbeing for those who had experienced no abuse stood at 16%, rising to 22.5% for physical abuse, 24% for verbal abuse, and 29% for both physical and verbal abuse. Furthermore, the prevalence of physical abuse halved from about 20% among those born between 1950 and 1979 to 10% among participants born in or after 2000. However, for verbal abuse, the prevalence increased from 12% among those born before 1950 to about 20% among those born in 2000 or later. These findings add to previous research that found experiencing childhood verbal abuse was linked to a higher risk of self-harm, drug use, and ending up in jail. 'Our study reveals that degrading, humiliating and abusive language directed at children can have long-term mental health impacts at least as severe as those associated with physical abuse,' said Prof Mark Bellis of Liverpool John Moores University, the study's lead author. 'Equally concerning is the trend observed over the study period where physical abuse declined but verbal abuse increased … potentially offsetting the mental health gains we might expect from reduced exposure to physical harm.' The authors of the study acknowledged its limitations, namely that they were unable to measure the severity of either type of abuse, or the reasons for these trends in changing prevalence for physical and verbal abuse. 'Although this study does not examine the reasons for these trends, it is vital that we do not simply replace one form of childhood trauma with another,' Bellis added. 'That's why we must go beyond telling parents what not to do, and instead offer clear, practical support and guidance that allows them to raise their children through healthy, nurturing relationships.' The analysis also found that participants born in 2000 or later had a higher likelihood of overall low mental wellbeing, while men were more likely to report never or rarely feeling optimistic, useful, or close to people, while women were more likely to report never or rarely feeling relaxed. Jessica Bondy, founder of Words Matter, a charity with the aim of ending childhood verbal abuse, said the study confirmed that 'words can wound deeply and have a lasting impact on a child's mental health and development'. She added: 'Any gains made in reducing physical abuse risk being undone by rising rates of verbal abuse. We must act now to confront the lasting harm caused by cruel, critical or controlling language. We need to build children up – not knock them down. The mental health of the next generation and our shared future depend on it.'