At least eight people dead as anti-government protests grip Kenya
Another 400 people were injured during the demonstrations, the national rights watchdog said, including protesters, police personnel and journalists. Some had gunshot wounds, it added.
Youth-led protests against police brutality and poor governance have erupted across Kenya again, with thousands making their way to the central business district in the capital, Nairobi.
The protests, which coincided with the first anniversary of demonstrations opposing tax hikes that left 60 people dead and 20 others missing, followed last week's rallies that demanded answers for the unexplained death of a Kenyan blogger while in police custody.
Frustration is growing, especially among Generation Z, over police violence, economic struggles, and government mismanagement.
The Communications Authority of Kenya has directed local media to stop all live broadcasts of the protests halfway through the day as President William Ruto warned that violence wouldn't be tolerated.
Many turned to social media to share updates and remember slain protesters. Others posted anti-government messages and memes. On the streets, some could be seen offering protesters water.
'Too many Kenyans are losing their lives'
Calls for accountability have grown louder in Kenya after a street hawker was killed during last week's protests. A Kenyan court has given detectives 15 days to complete investigations into two police officers suspected of the shooting.
This came as young people flooded social media platforms throughout the week with commemorations of protesters killed last year. At the time, Ruto apologised and vowed to end police brutality as the top police chief resigned.
'Not a single officer has been held to account,' said Hussein Khaled, a human rights activist, adding that people took to the streets 'to demand justice in terms of compensation ... arrest of those officers who were involved ... police reforms because too many Kenyans are losing their lives' to police brutality.
Last year's deadly protests strongly opposed a finance bill that raised taxes significantly to address debt, putting an undue burden on young, educated people struggling with unemployment and a rising cost of living. Ruto later scrapped the bill.
Some tax proposals were reintroduced later, drawing widespread criticism and calls for Ruto's resignation, following the appointment of a new but widely criticised cabinet. A revamped healthcare levy also changed standard premiums to a progressive tax, based on income.
Kenyan court declares Nairobi protest ban illegal
14:25
United Nations' data shows that 70 percent of sub-Saharan Africa is under the age of 30, with 67 percent of Kenya's young people unemployed.
'Both the health and the education sectors, which greatly affect the youth, are seemingly sinking due to misguided policies and failure to provide needed resources. At the same time, there appears to be unlimited funds for 'aristocratic' luxuries,' said Macharia Munene, professor of history and international relations at United States International University Africa in Nairobi, referring to some state people's spending that has been strongly condemned.
Ruto has been accused of misappropriating taxpayer money on lavish trips, most notably the use of a private jet on his trip to the United States right before last year's protests. He apologised and dismissed ministers accused of incompetence, corruption and displays of opulence amid complaints about the high cost of living.
Meanwhile, Kenya's opposition received its share of criticism, with many saying it avoided challenging the status quo after some of its members were appointed in Ruto's new cabinet
'Enough is enough ... We are here for change, it is time for us to get our nation (back),' said protestor Sevelina Mwihaki. 'The blood that we have shed is enough."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
LeMonde
18 minutes ago
- LeMonde
In Gaza, the humanitarian deal between the EU and Israel collapses
Overnight from Sunday, July 20, to Monday, July 21, a World Health Organization (WHO) warehouse in Deir al-Balah, in central Gaza, was targeted by an Israeli airstrike. The facility burned and its roof collapsed. On Monday afternoon, the building housing the medical agency's staff was also struck by an Israeli projectile. The team was forced to evacuate the area. By Tuesday, one of its members was still being detained by Israeli forces. Deir al-Balah, home to teams from numerous NGOs and United Nations agencies, is Gaza's humanitarian hub – the main center for aid operations to the population. Its targeting marks a new red line crossed by Israel. Until now, the area had been spared by Israel's offensive. On Tuesday, UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres condemned "the horror show in Gaza, with a level of death and destruction without parallel in recent times. Malnourishment is soaring. Starvation is knocking on every door." On July 10, Kaja Kallas, the European Union's head of foreign policy, announced that an agreement had been reached with Israel to allow large-scale delivery of humanitarian aid to Gaza. Two weeks later, this arrangement – struck in exchange for the 27 member states refraining from imposing sanctions on Israel – already appears to have been disregarded.
France 24
12 hours ago
- France 24
ICJ to hand down watershed climate opinion
It is the biggest case ever heard at the International Court of Justice and experts say judges' opinion could reshape climate justice forever, with major impacts on laws around the world. The ICJ advisory opinion is "potentially one of the most consequential legal rulings of our times," said Joie Chowdhury, Senior Attorney at the Center for International Environmental Law, an advocacy group that backs the case. It could "define a new era, where climate justice is not a distant aspiration, but a global mandate for the here and now," added Chowdhury. The United Nations has tasked the 15 ICJ judges to answer two fundamental questions that, according to Chowdhury, "strike at the heart of climate justice." First: what must states do under international law to protect the environment from greenhouse gas emissions "for present and future generations"? Second: what are the consequences for states whose emissions have caused environmental harm, especially to vulnerable low-lying island states? To help answer these questions, ICJ judges have pored over tens of thousands of pages of submissions from countries and organisations around the world. Analysts say Wednesday's ruling is the most consequential of a string of recent rulings on climate change in international law. Courts have become a battleground for climate action as frustration has grown over sluggish progress toward curbing planet-warming pollution from fossil fuels. The Paris Agreement struck through the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) has rallied a global response to the crisis, but not at the speed necessary to protect the world from dangerous overheating. 'Disappear beneath the waves' In December, the iconic Peace Palace in the Hague hosted the court's biggest-ever hearings, with more than 100 nations and groups giving oral statements. In what was billed a "David Vs Goliath" battle, the debate pitted major wealthy economies against smaller, less developed states most at the mercy of a warming planet. Major polluters including the US and India warned the ICJ not to deliver a fresh legal blueprint for climate change, arguing the existing UNFCCC sufficed. The US, which has since withdrawn from the Paris accord, said the UNFCCC contained legal provisions on climate change and urged the court to uphold this regime. But smaller states said this framework was inadequate to mitigate climate change's devastating effects and that the ICJ's opinion should be broader. These states also urged the ICJ to impose reparations on historic polluters. "The cardinal principle is crystal clear. Responsible states are required to make full reparation for the injury they have caused," said Margaretha Wewerinke-Singh representing Vanuatu. These states demanded a commitment and timeline to phasing out fossil fuels, monetary compensation when appropriate, and an acknowledgement of past wrongs. Representatives from island states, many wearing traditional dress as they addressed the court for the first time in their country's history, made passionate pleas to the robed judges. "Despite producing less than 0.01 percent of greenhouse gas emissions, on the current trajectory of GHG emissions, Tuvalu will disappear completely beneath the waves that have been lapping our shores for millennia," said Eselealofa Apinelu from Tuvalu. The ICJ's advisory opinions are not binding upon states and critics say that top polluters will simply ignore what comes out of the court. But others note the moral and legal clout enjoyed by the world's highest court and hope the opinion will make a tangible difference to national climate change policies. "The impacts of climate change, absolutely dire right now, will become catastrophic as the years go by, if we do not course-correct," said Vishal Prasad, director of a campaign by Pacific Island students that pushed the issue before the court. "The urgency of the matter, the seriousness of why we're here, and how important this is, is not lost upon all Pacific Islanders, all small island countries. "That's why we're looking to the ICJ."
AFP
2 days ago
- AFP
Italy is still a signatory of the Paris Agreement, as of July 2025
"After the United States, Italy is also withdrawing from the Paris Climate Agreement," says a July 9, 2025 post shared thousands of times on X. The account, "Update News," portrayed itself as media and shared a photo of Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni to accompany its claim. On July 18, the account was suspended. Image A screenshot of a post on X taken July 18, 2025 Similar posts circulated widely across social media platforms and in various languages, including French, Dutch, Turkish and Spanish. On his first day back in the White House in January 2025, Trump announced the United States would leave the Paris Agreement, which is managed by the United Nations climate change body and aims to keep global average temperature rise below a critical threshold (archived here). Under the far-right Brothers of Italy party, Meloni's government has repeatedly criticized multi-lateral climate agreements. She said the European Green Deal should be revised and could lead to deindustrialization, while her administration has sought to transform Italy into a "gas hub" for the Mediterranean. But online claims that the country withdrew in July 2025 from its commitment to reduce its emissions are not supported by governmental sources and have not been reported by credible media outlets, AFP found. Like most European Union member states, Italy was in the first batch of signatories of the accord in April 2016, after the treaty's adoption in December 2015 (archived here). The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change's ratification page and the United Nations treaty collection page are both publicly available and show Italy as a signatory, as of July 21, 2025 (archived here and here). A search for notifications pertaining to withdrawals from the Paris Agreement yielded results for the United States -- which officially withdrew from the accord January 27 -- but not for Italy. Image Screenshot of a United Nations treaty collection page taken July 18, 2025 "We have not heard anything about Italy withdrawing from the Paris Agreement," Leandro Vigna, data partnerships and outreach manager for the nonprofit Climate Watch, told AFP in a July 16 email. The group, which collects data on countries' progress in their climate targets established for the Paris Agreement, still displays the nation on its platform. Keyword searches of the Gazzetta Ufficiale della Repubblica Italiana, a governmental resource that publishes Italian legislation, as well as the Italian government website and the Italian Institute for Environmental Protection and Research did not surface any relevant announcements about a withdrawal of the country from the treaty, either. In 2025, the European Commission -- of which Italy is a member -- reiterated its intent to make the bloc's economy carbon neutral by 2050 and promised to stick with targets set so far, including a 90 percent cut to greenhouse gas emissions by 2040. AFP reached out to an Italian government spokesperson for comment, but no response was forthcoming. Other climate debunks can be found here.
