logo
Exclusive-China flexes military muscle with East Asian naval activity, sources say

Exclusive-China flexes military muscle with East Asian naval activity, sources say

Yahoo28-05-2025
By Yimou Lee and Ben Blanchard
(Reuters) -China has flexed its muscles this month by sending an unusually large number of naval and coast guard vessels through a swathe of East Asian waters, according to security documents and officials, in moves that have unnerved regional capitals.
Since early May, China deployed fleets larger than usual, including navy, coast guard and other ships near Taiwan, the southern Japanese islands and the East and South China Seas, according to three regional security officials and documents of regional military activities reviewed by Reuters.
On May 21 and May 27, for instance, China deployed nearly 60 and more than 70 ships, respectively, around three-quarters of them naval, the documents show. These included guided-missile frigates, destroyers and coast guard boats.
Beijing also dispatched two aircraft carrier groups, with the Shandong now in the busy waterway of the South China Sea and the Liaoning off the southeastern coast of Taiwan, the documents show.
"They are exerting pressure on the whole of the first island chain amid global geopolitical uncertainties," said one security official.
The reference is to waters stretching from Japan through Taiwan, the Philippines and on to Borneo, enclosing the seas around China's coast.
"They are trying to reinforce their dominance," the source said, adding that drills this month by the Liaoning, the oldest of China's three aircraft carriers, simulated attacks on foreign ships and aircraft around the East China Sea and the Yellow Sea.
There was an "obvious" stepped-up Chinese naval presence this month, added a second source, who spoke on condition of anonymity, as did the first, citing the sensitivity of the intelligence assessment.
"China clearly wants to show these are its home waters and it can operate when and where it wants," the source said.
China's defence ministry did not respond to a request for comment.
LIVE FIRE DRILLS
Over the past two weeks China declared several live-fire drill areas off its coast, including last week one directly facing southwestern Taiwan.
Last Wednesday, Chinese state television showed images of amphibious drills in the southern province of Fujian, across the strait from Taiwan, but did not give an exact location.
This week, Japan has been tracking the Liaoning and its accompanying warships through the southern Japanese islands and into the Western Pacific.
China seems to be trying to improve its capacity to operate far from the Chinese coast, Japan's Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshimasa Hayashi said.
"The Japanese government intends to keep a close eye on relevant movement and do its utmost in carrying out monitoring and surveillance activities," he told reporters on Wednesday.
Speaking in Beijing, Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson Mao Ning said the ships' activities were in line with international law and practice and Japan should "look at them objectively and rationally".
China has kept up its stand-off with the Philippines in the South China Sea, where its foreign ministry on Friday urged the Philippines to immediately stop "infringement and provocation".
The Philippine Navy's spokesperson on South China Sea issues, Rear Admiral Roy Vincent Trinidad, told Reuters that China's "illegal presence" in the maritime zones of Southeast Asian states "has been disturbing the peace in the region and is contrary to pronouncements of its 'peaceful rise'."
The spike in Chinese military activity has also come as Taiwan President Lai Ching-te marked the anniversary this month of a year in office.
China has staged three major rounds of war games since the inauguration of Lai, whom it calls a "separatist".
On Wednesday, Taiwan's defence ministry said the Liaoning was off the island's southeast coast, adding that Taiwan would raise its combat preparedness in line with the threat level.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Appeals court finds Trump's effort to end birthright citizenship unconstitutional
Appeals court finds Trump's effort to end birthright citizenship unconstitutional

Politico

time18 minutes ago

  • Politico

Appeals court finds Trump's effort to end birthright citizenship unconstitutional

'The district court correctly concluded that the Executive Order's proposed interpretation, denying citizenship to many persons born in the United States, is unconstitutional. We fully agree,' the majority wrote. The 2-1 ruling keeps in place a decision from U.S. District Judge John C. Coughenour in Seattle, who blocked Trump's effort to end birthright citizenship and decried what he described as the administration's attempt to ignore the Constitution for political gain. The White House and Justice Department did not immediately respond to messages seeking comment. The Supreme Court has since restricted the power of lower court judges to issue orders that affect the whole country, known as nationwide injunctions. But the 9th Circuit majority found that the case fell under one of the exceptions left open by the justices. The case was filed by a group of states who argued that they need a nationwide order to prevent the problems that would be caused by birthright citizenship only being the law in half of the country. 'We conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in issuing a universal injunction in order to give the States complete relief,' Judge Michael Hawkins and Ronald Gould, both appointed by President Bill Clinton, wrote. Judge Patrick Bumatay, who was appointed by Trump, dissented. He found that the states don't have the legal right, or standing, to sue. 'We should approach any request for universal relief with good faith skepticism, mindful that the invocation of 'complete relief' isn't a backdoor to universal injunctions,' he wrote. Bumatay did not weigh in on whether ending birthright citizenship would be constitutional. The Citizenship Clause of the 14th Amendment says that all people born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to U.S. jurisdiction, are citizens. Justice Department attorneys argue that the phrase 'subject to United States jurisdiction' in the amendment means that citizenship isn't automatically conferred to children based on their birth location alone. The states — Washington, Arizona, Illinois and Oregon — argue that ignores the plain language of the Citizenship Clause as well as a landmark birthright citizenship case in 1898 where the Supreme Court found a child born in San Francisco to Chinese parents was a citizen by virtue of his birth on American soil. Trump's order asserts that a child born in the U.S. is not a citizen if the mother does not have legal immigration status or is in the country legally but temporarily, and the father is not a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident. At least nine lawsuits challenging the order have been filed around the U.S.

Appeals court finds Trump's effort to end birthright citizenship unconstitutional, upholds block
Appeals court finds Trump's effort to end birthright citizenship unconstitutional, upholds block

Boston Globe

timean hour ago

  • Boston Globe

Appeals court finds Trump's effort to end birthright citizenship unconstitutional, upholds block

'The district court correctly concluded that the Executive Order's proposed interpretation, denying citizenship to many persons born in the United States, is unconstitutional. We fully agree,' the majority wrote. Advertisement The 2-1 ruling keeps in place a decision from U.S. District Judge John C. Coughenour in Seattle, who blocked Trump's effort to end birthright citizenship and decried what he described as the administration's attempt to ignore the Constitution for political gain. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up The White House and Justice Department did not immediately respond to messages seeking comment. The Supreme Court has since But the 9th Circuit majority found that the case fell under Advertisement 'We conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in issuing a universal injunction in order to give the States complete relief,' Judge Michael Hawkins and Ronald Gould, both appointed by President Bill Clinton, wrote. Judge Patrick Bumatay, who was appointed by Trump, dissented. He found that the states don't have the legal right, or standing, to sue. 'We should approach any request for universal relief with good faith skepticism, mindful that the invocation of 'complete relief' isn't a backdoor to universal injunctions,' he wrote. Bumatay did not weigh in on whether ending birthright citizenship would be constitutional. The Citizenship Clause of the 14th Amendment says that all people born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to U.S. jurisdiction, are citizens. Justice Department attorneys argue that the phrase 'subject to United States jurisdiction' in the amendment means that citizenship isn't automatically conferred to children based on their birth location alone. The states — Washington, Arizona, Illinois and Oregon — argue that ignores the plain language of the Citizenship Clause as well as a landmark birthright citizenship case in 1898 where the Supreme Court found a child born in San Francisco to Chinese parents was a citizen by virtue of his birth on American soil. Trump's order asserts that a child born in the U.S. is not a citizen if the mother does not have legal immigration status or is in the country legally but temporarily, and the father is not a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident. At least nine lawsuits challenging the order have been filed around the U.S. Advertisement Associated Press writer Rebecca Boone contributed to this story.

Trump targets ‘woke AI' in series of executive orders on artificial intelligence
Trump targets ‘woke AI' in series of executive orders on artificial intelligence

New York Post

timean hour ago

  • New York Post

Trump targets ‘woke AI' in series of executive orders on artificial intelligence

President Trump inked three executive orders on artificial intelligence Wednesday, including one targeting so-called 'woke AI' models. 'The American people do not want woke Marxist lunacy in their AI models and neither do other countries. They don't want it. They don't want anything to do with it,' Trump said in remarks from Washington, DC, ahead of the signing ceremony. 3 Trump signed three AI-related executive orders on Wednesday. Getty Images The president's order bars the federal government from procuring generative AI large language models that do not demonstrate 'truthfulness and ideological neutrality.' 'From now on, the US government will deal only with AI that pursues truth, fairness, and strict impartiality,' Trump said. Large language models [LLMs] that are 'truthful and prioritize historical accuracy, scientific inquiry, and objectivity, and acknowledge uncertainty where reliable information is incomplete or contradictory' as well as 'neutral, nonpartisan tools that do not manipulate responses in favor of ideological dogmas like [diversity, equity and inclusion],' would meet the criteria for use by the federal government under Trump's order. The order instructed White House Office of Management and Budget Director Russ Vought, in consultation with other Trump administration officials, to issue guidance for agencies to implement these principles in AI procurement. It also mandated that government contracts for LLMs include language to ensure compliance with Trump's 'Unbiased AI Principles.' 3 Trump argued that Americans and other nations don't want 'woke Marxist lunacy' in AI models. REUTERS Last year, Google's Gemini AI model sparked controversy when it started creating 'diverse' artificially generated images, including ones of black Founding Fathers and multiracial Nazi-era German soldiers. The president also signed executive orders to facilitate the quick buildout of data center infrastructure and to promote the export of American AI technology to US allies and partners across the globe. The data center order directs Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick to launch a program that would provide loans, grants and tax incentives to qualifying infrastructure projects. 3 Trump's order bars the federal government from procuring AI models that are not truthful or ideologically neutral. Getty Images It also revokes Biden-era DEI and climate requirements for data center projects on federal lands, authorizes Cabinet officials to greenlight data center construction on federal lands and expedites permitting for such qualifying projects. Trump's AI-export order directs the Commerce Department to establish a program to support the development and deployment of 'full-stack, end-to-end packages' overseas, including 'hardware, data systems, AI models, cybersecurity measures' that have applications for the healthcare, education, agriculture, and transportation sectors. Trump's latest directives are part of his effort to usher in a 'Golden Age for American technological dominance' and aim to make the US a global leader in artificial intelligence, according to the White House.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store