
Why Anthony Albanese's radical plan for super will hit FIVE MILLION Aussies - not just 80,000 people Labor claims
The re-elected Labor government has the numbers with the Greens to get its Better Targeted Superannuation Concessions bill through the Senate when Parliament resumes next month.
For the past two years, Labor has been arguing its plan to impose a new 15 per cent tax on unrealised gains on super balances above $3million, before assets are sold, would affect the top 0.5 per cent of super savers or just 80,000 people.
This would take the headline tax rate to 30 per cent, as the new 15 per cent tax on unrealised gains was added on to the existing 15 per cent tax on earnings during the accumulation phase for all super accounts.
Controversially, Labor isn't indexing it for inflation, arguing a future government could do so, like they periodically do for income tax rates.
Wilson Asset Management has done new modelling showing this failure to index the new tax would affect 5.4million Australians, aged 18 to 34, by the time they turned 67 and were able to qualify for the age pension.
'All age cohorts under the age of 35 would be captured by the taxation on unrealised gains by retirement,' it said.
The modelling showed Labor's new tax on super balances above $3million, known as tax Division 296, would even affect young Aussies with a zero super balance now.
'Our modelling indicates those aged 27 and under with a zero starting superannuation balance would exceed the unindexed cap before retirement,' it said.
'This has led to some characterising it as a "stealth tax", one that fundamentally alters the long-term investment incentives within superannuation.'
A 19-year-old worker on a $54,088 salary, with zero super, would have $3.491million in retirement savings by 2071.
Someone who is 20 now on a $66,768 salary and just $75,000 in super now would $5.197million in superannuation by 2072.
Australians who studied longer before starting work would also be affected, with a 27-year-old worker with zero super, on a $90,315 salary now, like to have $3.098million in super by 2065.
A typical income earner, now 34, with $180,000 in super would $3.5million in super by 2058.
These Australians would face an annual tax bill in the hundreds of thousands depending how much their fund had growth during the previous financial year.
Wilson Asset Management Management founder Geoff Wilson said young Australians would suffer in decades to come.
'The proposed tax on unrealised gains will not merely be a burden on individual superannuation accounts exceeding $3million, the failure to index means a 25- year-old who today starts with a zero-superannuation balance will be captured by the time they reach retirement,' he said.
Wilson Asset Management warned that forcing those with a self-managed super fund to sell assets, to avoid going above the $3million threshold, would discourage investors from backing technology start-ups.
'The policy will constrict the flow of essential risk capital to the engine room of the Australian economy – our small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and innovative start-ups,' it said.
'It is a policy that threatens to undermine the foundations of Australia's economic dynamism by inhibiting the very companies that drive innovation, competition, and future growth.'
Wilson Asset Management has released a new discussion paper called, 'Critiquing the Proposed Taxation on Unrealised Gains in Superannuation.'
AMP last month warned Labor's plan to tax unrealised gains above the $3million threshold would affect the average 22-year-old worker in four decades' time but Wilson Asset Management's modelling shows the effects would capture workers aged 19 to 34 now.
Compulsory employer super contributions are rising to 12 per cent on July 1.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
19 minutes ago
- Reuters
KKR to acquire Australian chicken grower ProTen from Aware Super
July 2 (Reuters) - Private equity group KKR (KKR.N), opens new tab will acquire ProTen, one of Australia's largest broiler chicken growers, from pension fund Aware Super, the parties said in a joint statement on Wednesday without disclosing financial details. ProTen was established in 2001 and currently manages more than 700 poultry sheds across more than 60 farms. The company has been owned by Aware Super since 2018. "KKR has been actively monitoring the agricultural infrastructure space as a high-conviction thematic," Andrew Jennings, managing director and head of Australia & New Zealand infrastructure at KKR, said in a statement. KKR will make the investment in ProTen from its Asia Pacific Infrastructure Investors II Fund, which has grown its assets under management to about $13 billion since it was established in 2019. The deal is expected to close later this year, subject to regulatory approvals.


Reuters
40 minutes ago
- Reuters
Breakingviews - ADNOC's Santos bid is gift to energy transition
MELBOURNE, July 2 (Reuters Breakingviews) - Abu Dhabi National Oil Company is taking a risk with its $18.7 billion bid for Australian liquefied natural gas producer Santos ( opens new tab. There's a decent chance that Canberra adds the UAE energy giant's offer, unveiled in mid-June, to a list of blocked attempts by overseas players to buy critical infrastructure Down Under. But Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's administration could instead turn the deal into an opportunity to shore up his country's energy transition. Wannabe acquirers of Australian energy assets have a chequered history. Past governments waved through purchases by Hong Kong companies for power producers – CLP Group's ( opens new tab 2011 acquisition of EnergyAustralia and Chow Tai Fook's 2017 deal for Alinta Energy. But they blocked Shell's (SHEL.L), opens new tab 2001 swoop for Santos rival Woodside Energy ( opens new tab and competing foreign bids in 2016 for Ausgrid – including one from China's State Grid Corp. Santos shares are currently trading almost 13% below the price offered by ADNOC subsidiary XRG, suggesting it may soon be added to the list. There's good reason for the discount. XRG wants Santos as part of its goal to become a global LNG provider. Its target is a major player in a country that has become one of the top three exporters of the fossil gas by selling 80% of its production abroad, where drillers can usually get a higher price. Trouble is, there are worries that Australia's overseas success risks domestic shortages, especially as ageing coal-fired power stations close. One regulator, the Australian Energy Market Operator, routinely estimates when those shortfalls may occur, with 2029 its most recent forecast. That timeline may well be wrong. AEMO's past predictions have not come to pass. The southeastern state of Victoria last month unveiled energy efficiency and home electrification rules that could push back AEMO's latest doomsday scenario by three years. And Albanese's administration is adding a home-battery subsidy programme to bolster its goal of generating 82% of electricity from renewables by 2030. No government, though, wants to be blamed for power outages. That gives the upper hand to Treasurer Jim Chalmers, who ultimately decides, with input from the Foreign Investment Review Board, whether to nod through or nix Santos' offer. He could insist that the bidder guarantee a set amount of LNG for the domestic market as a condition of approving the takeover: ADNOC's deeper pockets could help develop domestic gas supplies faster than a constrained, publicly traded Santos. It'd be a smart insurance policy to have while solar, wind and battery projects ramp up. Follow Antony Currie on Bluesky, opens new tab and Linkedin, opens new tab.


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Once known as 'Dirty Myrtle,' Myrtle Beach is now the fastest-growing US metro for seniors
A South Carolina beach town once nicknamed 'Dirty Myrtle' because of its rowdy nightclubs and strip joints has become a magnet for retirees in a nation that continues to age. The number of residents age 65 years and older in the Myrtle Beach metropolitan area grew by 6.3% last year, making it the fastest-growing metro area for senior citizens in the U.S., according to population estimates the U.S. Census Bureau released last week. During the 2020s, Myrtle Beach's senior population has grown by more than 22%, also the fastest rate in the United States this decade. Senior citizens now make up more than a quarter of the around 413,000 residents in metro Myrtle Beach, which once was known for being a budget beach destination. The community with a mile-long boardwalk and 200-foot Ferris wheel used to attract biker rallies which the city tried to end in the late 2000s because of the noise, traffic and rowdiness. But now the noisy streets have had to make room for quiet diners and pickleball courts. The COVID-19 pandemic played a role in the area's senior boom as people in such places as Ohio and New York who had been vacationing for years in Myrtle Beach realized they could retire early or work from home anywhere, said Mark Kruea, a longtime public information officer for Myrtle Beach who is now running to be mayor. 'Many people converted that thought into action,' Kruea said. 'The climate's great, taxes are low, there's a wealth of opportunities for recreation, dining and shopping.' A graying United States The U.S. population age 65 and older rose by 3.1% last year, while the population under age 18 decreased by 0.2%. In the past two decades, seniors have increased from 12.4% to 18% of the U.S. population, while the share of children has dropped from 25% to 21.5%, according to the population estimates. Maine, Vermont, and Florida were the only three states where older adults outnumbered children as recently as 2020. But four years later, those states were joined by Delaware, Hawaii, Montana, New Hampshire, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island and West Virginia. Maine last year had the oldest median age at 44.8, while Utah's was the youngest at 32.4. Groups that saw the most growth The share of the U.S. population that is Hispanic reached 20% last year for the first time, helped by an annual gain of 1.9 million Hispanics mostly through migration. In pure numbers, the Hispanic population grew the most last year in the New York, Houston and Miami metro areas. When it comes to growth rates, the biggest gains were in smaller metros such as Ocala, Florida; Panama City, Florida; and St. Joseph, Missouri. For Black residents whose growth last year was split between migration and natural increase, the biggest gains were in the Houston, New York and Dallas-Fort Worth metro areas in pure numbers. Bozeman, Montana, and Provo, Utah — metro areas with tiny Black populations to start with — were tops in growth rates. In pure numbers, the New York, Dallas-Fort Worth and Seattle metro areas had the biggest Asian population gains, and the growth came primarily from migration. The largest growth rates were in three metro areas with small Asian populations: Farmington, New Mexico; Bismarck, North Dakota; and Burlington, North Carolina. The non-Hispanic white population in the United States declined slightly last year, but it grew the most in the Nashville, Tennessee; New York and Charlotte, North Carolina metro areas in pure numbers. The biggest growth rates for the white population were in the Myrtle Beach; Daphne-Fairhope, Alabama; and Wilmington, North Carolina metro areas. The decline in the white population was driven by deaths outpacing births. ___ Follow Mike Schneider on the social platform Bluesky: @