Burst sewer main close to protected site
Southern Water said the leak was near Passage Lane car park in Warsash, Hampshire, which is near a Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI).
The burst pipe is also close to a designated bathing spot - although the Environment Agency (EA) said there was currently "no indication" bathing water had been affected.
The leak was reported on Saturday, and on Sunday the company said it had been stopped and they were taking "mitigation actions to protect the environment".
One local resident told the BBC the smell was "horrible".
The spokesperson for Southern Water said the leak was also close to shellfish waters linked to the River Hamble, and that they had notified Natural England and the Environment Agency as soon as they became aware of it.
"We are taking a number of mitigation actions to protect the environment," the spokesperson said.
"These include having environmental specialists taking samples and using a fleet of tankers to remove sewage from the system and the use of barriers to stop further overland flows."
An EA spokesperson said they were liaising with Southern Water "to ensure a repair is carried out as soon as possible".
"Our investigation is ongoing," the spokesperson added.
"At present, there is no indication that designated bathing water has been affected."
Hamble Valley MP Paul Holmes said he would be "chasing to see what environmental steps are being taken urgently and what the cause was".
You can follow BBC Hampshire & Isle of Wight on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram.
Southern Water
Environment Agency
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Water firm stops 'illegal spill' into sewage facility
A water firm has said it has identified and stopped an "illegal discharge" into one of its sewage networks. Thames Water said a third party had caused the incident at Wheatley Sewage Treatment Works at the River Thame, Oxfordshire, which caused the treatment process to be "knocked out". An Environment Agency spokesman said about "30 fish in a stream called Wheatley Ditch were killed as a result". The water firm said it would "pursue investigations into the source of the substance and ensure appropriate action is taken". In a statement, Thames Water said it was carrying out "a full clean of the surrounding sewers and pumping station to ensure they are clean, clear, and free flowing". "We have identified the source of the substance as a third-party disposal into the wastewater network, which we have now stopped," the statement reads. "We have deployed tankers, to divert the wastewater flows to an alternative site in order to minimise the impact to the watercourse and we are working closely with the Environment Agency and local stakeholders during this time to ensure full recovery," the statement adds. Earlier, Jake Morley, the firm's government engagement lead for North Thames Valley, said the works were "not designed to take this type of waste and treat it". "We need to allow sites biological process time to recover," he said. "Once the site has recovered, we can slowly remove the tankers and treat as normal at the site." He said there was an indication that wildlife had been impacted. The EA said specialist officers were investigating the pollution incident which happened on Sunday. "Around 30 fish in a stream called Wheatley Ditch were killed as a result," the spokesperson said. "We are working with Thames Water to confirm the source and understand what happened." They appealed for anyone with information on that or any other suspected pollution in the waterways to contact the agency. Lib Dem Henley and Thame MP Freddie van Mierlo said he was "extremely concerned" by the incident reports. "We don't yet know the full extent, but it's clear that something has gone badly wrong," he said. "I've asked for urgent updates from Thames Water, and I'm grateful for the swift response from local councillors and community members. "Once the facts are established, we must ensure that those responsible are held to account and that everything possible is done to restore the health of the river." A Thames Water spokesperson said they would "pursue investigations into the source of the substance and ensure appropriate action is taken". You can follow BBC Oxfordshire on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram. Similar stories Sewage in rivers 'needs a bold solution' 'Shocking' rates of sewage discharged in rivers Thousands of homes face delay over sewage works Related Links Thames Water Environment Agency
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Airport gets £900k fine for plane de-icer pollution
East Midlands Airport has been fined almost £900,000 for polluting a nearby brook with de-icer. The airport, which cannot connect to a mains sewer and so is responsible for the run-off from its runways, pleaded guilty to three discharges of contaminated water into Diseworth Brook in January and February 2022. Airport managing director Steve Griffiths apologised, and said it had taken "decisive action" and invested more than £10m in its drainage. But sentencing the airport at Derby Crown Court on Monday, Judge Martin Hurst said it had failed to properly invest in its systems from 2015 onwards, and said the money being spent "should reasonably have been spent then". He handed the airport - which he said was the second biggest freight airport in the UK and 14th largest in terms of passengers - a fine of £892,500 and costs of £65,687.54, as well as a victim surcharge. The judge said the airport had been "reckless" and caused "risk to livestock and the residents of the village of Diseworth". Sewage fungus The court heard the systems to process water contaminated by de-icer - to be released into both the River Trent and Diseworth Brook - were installed in the year 2000, with a "useful service life" of 20 years. Run-off from the essential de-icing, including of runways and aircraft, is held in a series of winter and summer ponds, which let water out at different times of the year, and hold different levels of contamination. The court was told Environment Agency investigations had found defects throughout their systems, including with monitors, pumps and pond liners. It led, on three occasions, to Diseworth Brook - which runs "straight through the middle of the village" - being polluted. Levels of up to eight times the level allowed were detected on one occasion, the court heard. This pollution causes outbreaks of sewage fungus, damaging water quality and harming plant life. Judge Hurst said the investment of more than £10m in the systems since the breaches showed the airport had been responsible and taken action, albeit "five years too late". Following the hearing, Mr Griffiths said: "I'd like to say sorry for the three breaches that we had in early 2022, where we discharged water beyond our permit into the local watercourses. "We took decisive action at that point in time and we controlled those issues and that was ahead of any prosecution taking place." Follow BBC Leicester on Facebook, on X, or on Instagram. Send your story ideas to eastmidsnews@ or via WhatsApp on 0808 100 2210. Related internet links East Midlands Airport Environment Agency HM Courts & Tribunals Service
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
Jalsa Salana: UK Muslim women ‘concerned' over negative attitudes toward hijab
British Muslim women attending the UK's largest Islamic convention have expressed their concerns after a survey found half of Britons believe Muslim women are pressured into wearing the hijab. Held annually at Oakland Farm in Alton, Hampshire, the Jalsa Salana attracts more than 40,000 participants in the Ahmadiyya Muslim community from across the world. As the event concluded on Sunday, a number of Muslim women in attendance reacted to the findings of a recent YouGov polling commissioned by the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community which found that 49% of respondents believe 'most British Muslim women who wear a hijab do so because they feel pressured by their family or community.' 'I was very disappointed, but maybe not all together surprised,' Munazzah Chou, 40, said. 'I think the scale was quite eye-opening, because it's quite a significant proportion.' Ms Chou, who works as an ophthalmologist in the NHS, added: 'The misconceptions about Muslim women in particular are slightly insulting toward the intellectual capacity of Muslim women. 'People make choices every day that we don't understand: as a doctor, I see patients and we offer them treatments, and they often make choices that we wouldn't recommend, but I never jump to the conclusion that they're being coerced. 'I know that my choice to wear hijab is just based on my religious belief.' Referring to the Jalsa Salana convention, she added: 'There are 20,000 women here who would have a different journey towards wearing their hijab, but I think every single one of them would tell you how this is not a coercive practice. 'They've done it out of personal choice, and all from possibly slightly different, nuanced reasons – but all out of free will.' Syeda Ahmad, 23, said the polling results made her feel as though Muslim women 'keep having to have the same conversations and make the same points over and over again'. 'We do make our own choices, and we are fully thinking human beings who are able to do that ourselves,' she said. 'I feel like the results are maybe a reflection of a certain kind of attitude towards Muslim women that is more concerned with telling us how we feel and what we need, as opposed to asking us.' University student Unaizah Ahmad, 25, said she felt 'concerned' over the polling results. 'When there are calls made for hijab bans, I wonder if this is the mentality that is playing in the background and plays a role in people,' she said. 'And in my experience, it's the complete opposite. 'My hijab is completely my own choice. My religion, the way I practice it, is completely my own choice. 'I've never felt coerced or pressured to do with it. 'To people who hold that belief: I would encourage them to speak to Muslim women who wear a hijab, and hear it from them instead of giving in to preconceived biases.' In June, Reform deputy leader Richard Tice said there should be a 'national debate' on banning the burka. This came as former party chairman Zia Yusuf resigned following an internal row, in which he described a question asked to the Prime Minister by the party's newest MP, Sarah Pochin, about banning the burka as 'dumb'. Syeda Ahmad also further raised concerns over how these renewed calls for a ban on face-covering clothes will impact upon Muslim women and girls. 'If you're actually concerned about Muslim women and how we might be feeling, one of the worst things you can do is project your own prejudices and assumptions onto us,' she said. 'We've seen in other European countries that have introduced things like hijab bans or burka bans – we know from research that only serves to alienate Muslim women. 'It restricts them from places of education. It restricts them from places of work.' Wearing face-covering clothes is currently banned in seven European countries – France, Belgium, the Netherlands, Denmark, Switzerland, Austria and Bulgaria – while other countries have enacted partial bans. 'A great thing about Britain is that there are no bans like that,' Ms Ahmad added. 'That's why you'll find Muslim women in this country working in all manner of professions, as confident people.' She added: 'Religion is personal to people. 'They decide what they want to do, what they want to follow, how far they want to follow it, and there's no punishment for not wearing a hijab in Islam. 'Crucially, Islam allows you to make a personal choice.' A spokesperson for the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community said the survey's results 'highlight a persistent misunderstanding about Islamic teachings on modesty and women's choices'. The YouGov survey of 2,130 adults in Great Britain in mid-July asked people if they felt different groups of immigrants by religion generally have a positive or negative impact on the UK. While 41% said Muslim immigrants have a negative impact, the proportions feeling this way were much lower for other groups. Just under a quarter (24%) of respondents felt Muslim immigrants had a positive impact on the UK, lower than for any of the other religions stated.
