Children's cough syrup recalled over bacteria concerns
Medtech Products Inc. is recalling five lots of Little Remedies Honey Cough Syrup due to the presence of Bacillus cereus, as well as the 'loss of shelf-stability,' the company explained.
The recalled products were distributed nationwide. They were sold 4-ounce bottles, both in stores and online, between Dec. 14, 2022, and June 4, 2025.
Identifying information, including the UPC and lot numbers, as well as the expiration dates, can be found below:
No other Little Remedies products were included in the recall.
While no serious adverse events have been reported in connection to the cough syrup, the FDA warns that Bacillus cereus can cause short-term illness and, in some cases, lead to death.
Bacillus cereus, or B. cereus, is a spore-forming bacterium that commonly exists in our environment, the Cleveland Clinic explains. Exposure to the toxin it creates can result in one of two types of illness — one described as a diarrheal syndrome and another as a vomiting syndrome. The first is characterized by cramps and watery diarrhea, while the second more commonly causes nausea and vomiting.
In severe cases, Bacillus cereus infection can lead to death.
Those who believe they may be suffering from an illness caused by Bacillus cereus are urged to contact a healthcare provider.
Customers who purchased the recalled Little Remedies cough syrup are being told to discard the product. Those with questions or refund requests can reach Medtech at 1-800-754-8853, by email at medicalaffairs@prestigebrands.com, or through the company's website.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
6 hours ago
- Newsweek
The Bulletin June 21, 2025
The rundown: The issue of animal testing is something most Americans agree on: it needs to change and gradually be stopped. Since President Donald Trump began his second term, his administration has been making moves to transform and reduce animal testing in country. Find out what steps are being taken. Why it matters: In April, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) said that its animal testing requirement will be "reduced, refined, or potentially replaced" with a range of approaches, including artificial intelligence-based models, known as New Approach Methodologies or NAMs data. The Trump administration's efforts to tackle the issue of animal testing appear to be a step in the right direction, according to experts who spoke with Newsweek. Read more in-depth coverage: Over 300 Animals Removed From US Safari After Decade of Red Flags TL/DR: Millions of animals each year are killed in U.S. laboratories as part of medical training and chemical, food, drug and cosmetic testing. What happens now? A Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) official told Newsweek: "The agency is paving the way for faster, safer, and more cost-effective treatments for American patients.' Deeper reading How Animal Testing in US Could Be Transformed Under Trump
Axios
7 hours ago
- Axios
Wearables take center stage in RFK Jr.'s personal health push
Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. envisions Americans becoming healthier by using wearable health devices that track heart rates, blood sugar and other vitals — offering real-time feedback on how food affects their bodies. Why it matters: It's a buzzy component of a health care agenda that emphasizes self-empowerment — and self-responsibility — over relying on clinicians. But some doctors and ethicists say the push could backfire if the devices spit out faulty data or jeopardize the safety of sensitive, personal health data. Driving the news: Kennedy said he'd like to see every American using wearables within the next four years, while testifying before the House in late June. He later clarified in a statement to Axios that "they are not for everyone because of concerns like cost and personal privacy." Last month, Health and Human Services solicited applications for contractors to design a multimillion-dollar marketing campaign that will include"populariz[ing] technology like wearables as cool, modern tools for measuring diet impact and taking control of your health." The campaign won't be about wearables specifically, Kennedy later told Axios. Rather, HHS is looking for something focused on "inspiring Americans to stop eating ultra-processed foods and reclaim control of their health," he said. "This campaign will empower Americans to take personal responsibility for their health, including choosing what tools are right for them," he added. Zoom out: "Wearables" refer to a wide range of electronics that people wear on their bodies to monitor health metrics — or even aid in diagnosis. Food and Drug Administration-approved wearable medical devices are becoming increasingly common in patient care and provide valuable clinical data for both individual treatment and public health, says Andrew Brightman, a professor of engineering practice at Purdue University who researches biomedical ethics. The wearables umbrella also includes consumer products, like Oura Rings or Fitbits, that track health metrics but in most uses don't require government approval for safety and effectiveness. Between the lines: "Providing individuals with reliable, accurate, useful medical information is critically important to support health and well-being," Brightman says. "But the contrary is providing people with unreliable, inaccurate and confusing information, no matter how digitized or quantified or how sexy the tech looks to people and is fun to use," he says. "It can lead them to make poor choices about their health." For example, a tracker might conclude someone is in good health because they're getting plenty of sleep and exercising. That could give the user a false sense of security and lead them to delay a visit to the doctor. Supporting wearables is a good strategy to promote health and well-being — if it also comes with more resources and funding to bolster government oversight and regulation of the devices in the market, Brightman says. Expanding the use of wearables also increases health data risks. The main federal health privacy law, HIPAA, protects health data when it's used by a covered entity, like a provider or insurer. But when a consumer enters data into a health app or allows a wearable to track health metrics, their data isn't subject to HIPAA, says Lisa Pierce Reisz, a partner at law firm Epstein Becker Green. Companies have to honor the privacy policies they've created, but terms and conditions aren't standardized and can change — and few people stop to read those policies before allowing their data to be collected anyway. "We lose a lot of control of our data once we input it," Reisz says. "People think, 'Oh, it's just my steps,' or 'It's just my heart rate,' but it potentially is so much more when you look at location information, or if you start to add details about menstrual periods." That's sensitive information that, if leaked or exposed, could endanger people's safety or be used against them. The growing threat of cyberattacks also complicates the picture. Hackers could break into wearable device companies' systems and access troves of people's personal health data. "I am fully aware of the dangers mass data collection poses to personal freedoms, and I do not advise anyone to purchase a wearable that does not provide ironclad privacy protections," Kennedy said in his statement to Axios. What we're watching: Not everyone in Kennedy's core "Make America Healthy Again" base is on board with wearables, and some prominent supporters of his agenda are sounding the alarm about the data risks of the devices, The Bulwark reported.
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
That cucumber recall? You might want to check your fridge
Does it feel like there have been lots of cucumber recalls lately? You are not wrong. The Food and Drug Administration has classified 137 potential salmonella recall reports for food products containing cucumbers in 2025, more than in any other year with available data. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has linked cucumbers to a current salmonella outbreak. Salmonella bacteria are a major cause of foodborne illness, infecting 1.35 million people and killing 420 people each year. Since 2012, the Food and Drug Administration has classified over 3,200 salmonella food reports, according to federal data. On average, a salmonella recall lasts nearly a year, a USA TODAY review of the FDA data found. Currently, there are 217 salmonella recall reports ongoing. You can explore the products here: The FDA has the authority to mandate a recall, but about 99% are voluntarily issued by the companies that make the products. After a recall is initiated, the agency classifies the health hazard presented by the product from Class I (a reasonable probability that the product will cause serious adverse health consequences or death) to Class III (the product is not likely to cause adverse health consequences). About 44% of food recall reports have been classified as Class I. On the other hand, 80% of salmonella food reports are classified as Class I. Most people get infected with salmonella by eating contaminated food like raw or undercooked meat, poultry, eggs, raw or unpasteurized milk and other dairy products, and produce. According to the CDC, 1 in 25 packages of chicken in the grocery store is contaminated with salmonella. Department of Human and Health Services Secretary Robert Kennedy Jr. is among the many promoting raw milk, but experts caution against it. 'We have people whose families have had children and parents and others sickened after drinking raw milk,' said Sandra Eskin, CEO at the nonprofit Stop Foodborne Illness. 'It has salmonella in it, it can have E. coli, and it can have any number of pathogens. That's why they invented pasteurization.' Warmer weather can also create ideal conditions for the bacteria to grow, so it's recommended to refrigerate perishable foods. Other sources of salmonella include contaminated water and the handling of animals. Symptoms start within six hours to six days from the time of exposure and include fever, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting and stomach pain. Most people recover within 4 to 7 days without treatment, but some cases lead to hospitalization and death. Since the start of President Donald Trump's second term, there have been severe cuts and the federal health services workforce is expected to drop from 82,000 to 62,000, USA TODAY previously reported. Trump argued the cuts are a way to save taxpayers' money, but experts say allocating resources towards food safety is critical. An FDA spokesperson told USA TODAY in an email statement that the agency prioritizes food safety and is committed to working with all stakeholders. 'The layoffs relate to administrative staff positions in the FDA. There has been no impact to operational investigators conducting food safety inspections,' the FDA spokesperson said. Over a decade ago, when annual salmonella numbers were estimated to be lower, the U.S. Department of Agriculture estimated that foodborne illness cost the country $3.7 billion per year, most of which was attributed to premature deaths. Eskin, who previously worked at the U.S. Department of Agriculture overseeing food safety and inspections, said recalls are essential for public health. 'A recall is the last line of defense that you and I have to prevent getting sick,' Eskin said, 'if we're going to a restaurant, or more importantly, going to the grocery store.' Dr. Susan Kansagra, chief medical officer at the Association of State and Territorial Health Officials, said in an email statement that federal funds support a wide range of state-level activities related to foodborne illness, like laboratory testing, case reporting, and guiding providers and the public on prevention and treatment. 'Loss of funding and staffing decreases our national capacity to do these activities and therefore quickly detect and respond to foodborne illness,' Kansagra said. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: After flood of cucumber recalls, you should check your fridge
