
With Federal Legalization Stalled, Cannabis Companies Are Finding A New Green Rush In Europe
'We started with putting our toe into the European market, but now we have a swimsuit on and we're walking in up to our belly,' says the 40-year-old Kwon, who cofounded the company in 2018. 'Soon we will be diving in.'
Active, which Forbes estimates to generate more than $100 million in annual revenue, sells vaporizers made for oil to some of the biggest cannabis companies in the U.S., including Trulieve, Green Thumb Industries and Curaleaf. A few years ago, it did not have any business in Europe. Today, more than 5% of the company's revenue is derived from cannabis companies in the UK, which legalized medical marijuana in 2018, and Germany, which legalized medical use in 2017 and opened a limited recreational market in 2024. Kwon is currently negotiating a deal with an EU brand that would expand Active's European business even further. 'Europe could easily grow to 20% of our sales,' he says.
Active's expansion outside America is one Kwon is not taking lightly. The EU, where about 25 countries have some form of cannabis legalization or decriminalization, is poised to become a $50 billion (annual sales) market if reform spreads across the entire continent, according to Whitney Economics. And Kwon wants Active to be on the ground floor of this new burgeoning cannabis industry.
'I think Europe is the battleground where cannabis is going to be won—it's the gateway to the rest of the world,' says Kwon.
The U.S. cannabis market is projected to grow from $32 billion in annual sales to about $46 billion in three years, a 44% growth rate, according to data firm BDSA. But the EU is expected to grow 115% over the same period. And while cannabis companies in the U.S. cannot transport product across state lines, EU business can grow the crop in one country and export products around the continent.
For now, the EU cannabis market is small. Annual sales this year are expected to reach $1.2 billion, according to a forthcoming report by Prohibition Partners. It is projected to reach $2.6 billion in 2028 and $6 billion in annual sales within a decade, or more than a 400% jump from this year. Germany, which is the EU's largest economy and the continent's largest legal marijuana industry with about $500 million in sales last year, is expected to generate just under $1 billion in sales at the end of 2025. The UK, which has not been part of the EU since Brexit in 2020, currently has a medical market with about $255 million in annual sales. The Netherlands and Switzerland both launched pilot programs to test recreational marijuana while Poland, Czech Republic, and other countries have launched medical programs. Malta and Luxembourg currently have adult-use programs and France has proposed medical legalization measures as well.
Compared to the U.S., where 38 states have some form of legalization that generated $32 billion in annual legal cannabis sales last year, Europe's cannabis market is about the size of New Jersey's marijuana economy, but the potential upside and practical regulations that allow cannabis to be grown in Spain and Portugal and exported to other countries legally, has created a solid investment thesis for some U.S. companies to invest hundreds of millions of dollars in the EU.
Beau Whitney, the founder of cannabis data firm Whitney Economics, says that Europe is an emerging market that's too important to ignore. While the U.S. has had a huge head start—California first legalized medical marijuana in 1996—the European market features government collaboration and financial incentives that the United States does not. (The barriers to entry in Europe are high, companies need to have EU GMP-certified facilities, but that's a good thing for investors because it lowers potential competition. Some countries only allow pharmaceutical cannabis products.) In the U.S., only 27% of cannabis companies are profitable, weighed down by federal prohibition, over regulation and punitive taxes on the state and local level. While former President Joe Biden launched a federal review to reclassify marijuana as a less dangerous drug—it is currently in the same category as heroin and LSD—the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration has held up the review. And now with President Donald Trump in the White House, reform has come to a halt, despite the fact that he endorsed changes to the country's marijuana laws while on the campaign trail.
'The U.S. market is state by state and dysfunctional,' says Whitney. 'From an investment perspective, it's high risk, low return, which is upside down.'
In contrast, countries like Germany have taken practical approaches to legalization and folded it into its existing medical establishment. In the UK and Germany, patients go to their regular doctor to get prescriptions for marijuana, which can be filled at traditional pharmacies or through online pharmacies that will deliver cannabis to a patient's house through the mail.
Massachusetts-based Curaleaf is the largest U.S. player in Europe right now. The company expanded to the UK and the EU in 2021 when it acquired Emmac Life Sciences, a vertically integrated medical marijuana business with cultivation sites, manufacturing and distribution facilities across Germany, Italy, Portugal, Spain, and the UK for $286 million—$50 million in cash and 17.5 million shares of Curaleaf.
Boris Jordan, the founder and CEO of Curaleaf, said during an earnings call after the Emmac acquisition that the European market 'will eventually rival the U.S.'
Emmac has since been folded into Curaleaf's overseas strategy, becoming Curaleaf International. And when looking at revenue growth, Curaleaf's international growth dwarfs its U.S. operation. Last year, Curaleaf International generated $105 million in revenue, a 72% jump from 2023 when it made $61 million. In the U.S. meanwhile, Curaleaf generated $1.2 billion in 2024, or 1,000% more than its European division, but last year's stateside revenue is down slightly from $1.3 billion in 2023.
Juan Pablo Martinez, CEO of Curaleaf International, believes that Jordan's prediction is quickly becoming a reality. 'The total addressable market is certainly there, the growth rates are certainly there, and I am confident that the market is going to be larger,' says Martinez.
Meanwhile, Cookies, the cult weed brand cofounded by musician and entrepreneur Berner, sells cannabis in the UK, Germany, Israel, and Thailand and is about to launch sales in Australia. Working off a licensing model, Cookies has deals with three companies that grow its strains in Portugal, Germany and Canada.
Parker Berling, the president of Cookies, says at first, expanding internationally was part of its strategy to be the first American brand in every country where pot is legal. Now, 'the international sector is the fastest growing part of our company,' says Berling. 'We've been selling internationally for years, but in the last few months and through the end of this year we're seeing it become a material part of our business.'
Will Muecke, the cofounder of London-based marijuana-focused private equity firm Artemis Growth Partners, which has nearly $400 million in assets under management, is doubling down on Europe. Muecke says that Artemis, which has invested $200 million into U.S. cannabis companies since 2018, is no longer actively looking to invest in the North American market. Artemis has invested about $25 million in European companies since 2022, including Denmark-based Valcon, a cannabis extraction business, and Muecke says he sees an opportunity to invest up to $50 million more into the EU.
'Our [European strategy] is tail of the dog right now, but it's wagging the dog,' he says. 'It's crushing it.'
Of course, not everyone is bullish on Europe. Kristoffer Inton, an analyst from Morningstar who covers cannabis companies, says the flood of interest from U.S. companies and especially Canadian companies, which are legally allowed to export marijuana to the EU, is not sustainable.
'The prospects of international medical marijuana are promising but it's also where everyone who is struggling sees it as a Godsend,' says Inton. 'If everyone sees it as a Godsend, it's probably going to not be a Godsend for anyone.'
After all, the industry has heard a similar promise before. When Canada federally legalized cannabis in 2019, investors flooded the market with capital on the thesis that Canada could supply its home market, the U.S., and the globe. While reform has ground to a halt in the U.S., Canadian operators were caught with a glut of supply, the price per kilo of cannabis crashed and companies have been struggling to survive ever since. The same thing could happen in Europe, but with 745 million people, it would take a hell of a lot of weed to crash the market.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Ceconomy enters talks with China's JD.com for potential takeover
German electronics retailer Ceconomy, which operates MediaMarkt and Saturn brands, is engaged in advanced talks with Chinese e-commerce company over a possible voluntary public takeover. is contemplating a cash offer of €4.60 per ordinary share, compliant with the German Securities Acquisition and Takeover Act, according to Ceconomy's statement of 24 July 2025. No binding agreements have yet been reached, and it remains uncertain whether a formal takeover offer will proceed. The Chinese company disclosed its interest in a potential deal towards the end of 2023. Reuters reports that a proposed transaction could value the company at approximately €2.2bn ($2.59bn). Ceconomy's largest shareholder is the Kellerhals family, while the Haniel family owns 17%. Meridian, Beisheim and Freenet hold smaller stakes. 36.3% of Ceconomy's shares are freely traded. MediaMarkt and Saturn manage 1,030 stores across multiple European countries and employ 50,000 staff, as of 30 September 2024. The brands also operate a major online electronics retail platform. In the 2023/24 financial year, Ceconomy recorded total sales of €22.4bn, of which €5.1bn were online. According to Bloomberg, logistics division's delivery network could enhance the operations of Ceconomy's physical retail outlets. In the first quarter of 2025, reported net revenues of $41.5bn and net income attributable to the company's ordinary shareholders of $1.5bn. The Chinese company launched an export-to-domestic sales programme in April, 2025, with plans 'to procure no less than 200bn yuan worth of export-oriented goods for domestic sales'. In August 2024, Walmart sold its stake in to raise $3.74bn, a term sheet seen by Reuters has revealed. The decision was part of the US retailer's strategy to focus on its own operations within China. Walmart sold 144.5 million American depositary shares priced between $24.85 and $25.85. "Ceconomy enters talks with China's for potential takeover" was originally created and published by Retail Insight Network, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Tesla Shares Tumble. Is It Time to Buy the Dip or Run for the Hills?
Key Points For a second straight quarter, Tesla posted weak auto deliveries and revenue. The company once again hyped its robotaxi and robot ambitions. The stock is largely valued based on future bets paying off, making it risky to own. These 10 stocks could mint the next wave of millionaires › Tesla (NASDAQ: TSLA) has long been a stock that's traded more on the vision of its founder Elon Musk than on its actual fundamentals. However, with the stock sinking following Tesla's lackluster second-quarter earnings report -- despite more big promises around robotaxis and robots -- reality might finally be catching up to it. Musk has done a lot of brand damage to Tesla over the past six months or so. His funding of President Donald Trump's campaign and overseeing the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) angered many liberal-leaning consumers. He then later got in a very public feud with the President he helped get elected, alienating himself and Tesla from many conservatives, as well. The fallout could be seen in Tesla's Q2 numbers, while tariffs also stung the company. Meanwhile, it will soon see an even potentially bigger headwind due to the expiration of the U.S. electric vehicle (EV) credit by the end of third-quarter 2025. Its core auto business is struggling For the second straight quarter, Tesla saw big declines in its core auto business. After a 13% drop in deliveries in the first quarter, deliveries fell by the same amount in Q2. Model 3 and Model Y deliveries decreased by 12%, while other models plunged by 52%. Tesla's auto revenue plunged 16% to $16.7 billion in the quarter. Within its auto revenue, its regulatory credits, which are pure gross margin, fell by more than half to $429 million. Not surprisingly, this affected Tesla's profitability in the quarter. Even worse for the company is that many of these regulatory credits will soon be going away. Trump's "Big Beautiful Bill" will eliminate the current federal $7,500 EV tax credit at the end of September. As a result, Musk admitted that the company could be in for a "few rough quarters" ahead. Overall, Tesla's revenue fell 12% to $22.5 billion. Its energy generation and storage revenue dropped 7% to $2.8 billion, while its service revenue climbed 17% to nearly $3.1 billion. Adjusted earnings per share sank 23% to $0.40, while its adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) declined by 7% to $3.4 billion. Tesla's cash flow is also starting to take a hit. Its operating cash flow sank 30% to $2.5 billion, while its free cash flow cratered by 89% to $146 million. More big promises Given Tesla's poor operating results, it was not surprising that Musk and the rest of management directed the conversation toward Tesla's big bets on autonomous driving and robotics. Musk claimed that Tesla will expand its autonomous ride-hailing service to cover half of the U.S. population by the end of this year, pending regulatory approval. Now, of course, such a statement makes little sense. The company is currently only testing a small geofenced area in Austin, Texas, with safety drivers, and it has already had a number of safety issues in this small pilot. Its technology appears nowhere close to ready to be adopted in cities countrywide. But let's say, for argument's sake, that the technology and regulatory approvals work out. The company would then need hundreds of thousands of Level 4 autonomous driving vehicles on the road (not its current Level 2 vehicles). Beyond that, it would also need service and cleaning centers, as well as charging infrastructure in place to handle a fleet of that size. It would also need to have a consumer-facing platform that can handle things like pre-trip pricing, dynamic fare calculations, disputes, and refunds. There is no evidence that Tesla has any of this in place. Meanwhile, Musk continued to sing the praises of his Optimus robot, saying it will be Tesla's biggest product ever. He said Optimus 3 has an "exquisite" design with no significant flaws. He's looking to have a prototype of the new robot by the end of this year and then scale production next year. He then wants to be able to produce 1 million Optimus robots a year within five years. Once again, this seems ambitious. Amazon (NASDAQ: AMZN) is currently an AI robotics leader, and companies like Boston Dynamics have showcased robots with advanced mobility, so robots can be hugely useful. However, all Tesla has ever demonstrated is a humanoid robot that could only do carefully choreographed tasks. Today, most factory automation is done by specialized, fixed-purpose robots. The use case for a humanoid robot is still very questionable. Should investors buy the dip? Even after the stock pullback, Tesla's stock trades at a forward price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) of over 170x based on 2025 analyst estimates, while its profitable auto peers -- like Ford, General Motors, and Stellantis -- generally have multiples of 10 or less. With its core auto business struggling, this indicates that the bulk of Tesla's market cap is predicated on ambitions that may or may not pan out. Given the company's track record of overpromising and under-delivering, this is not a bet I'd make. Should you buy stock in Tesla right now? The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $636,628!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,063,471!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,041% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 183% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 21, 2025 Geoffrey Seiler has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Amazon and Tesla. The Motley Fool recommends General Motors and Stellantis. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Tesla Shares Tumble. Is It Time to Buy the Dip or Run for the Hills? was originally published by The Motley Fool Sign in to access your portfolio


Fast Company
26 minutes ago
- Fast Company
This L.A. startup is using AI and robots to help rebuild faster in the fire zone
It's been more than six months since record-breaking wildfires destroyed thousands of homes in the Los Angeles area. So far, few homes have been rebuilt. On one barren block in Altadena filled with vacant lots, no new homes have started construction yet. But one of the first homes that will break ground on the street is using technology to help the rebuilding process move faster. Later this summer, a mobile 'micro factory' will roll up to the lot and begin using robots to build walls, roofs, and flooring panels while a construction crew lays the foundation. Other components, like bathroom 'pods' with all of the fixtures preinstalled, will be built off-site and delivered for assembly. Cosmic, the startup building the house, first launched building sustainable accessory dwelling units (ADUs) with a streamlined process designed to cut time and cost. Last year, the team started designing a larger, fire-resistant single-family home in Northern California. When the disaster hit L.A. in January, the company sped up its work to develop mini factories for the fire zone. Modular construction isn't new. But Cosmic's approach, with compact manufacturing units that travel to the building site, avoids the expense of developing larger factories. (Katerra, one high-profile startup, reportedly spent $150 million on its factory before going out of business.) 'My core belief is that conventional prefab doesn't work,' says Sasha Jokic, Cosmic's founder. 'We saw the billions of dollars invested in the prefab industry . . . you need to keep the lights on, and it's super hard to do it, given the costs of operating the factory.' A typical factory is also constrained to a specific geography, since it isn't economical to deliver more than around 300 miles away. Instead, Cosmic wants to bring modern manufacturing directly to each site. Its first micro-factory is now sitting on a lot in Pacific Palisades, where the company is working on permits for another house in that fire zone. The factory will travel back and forth between the Palisades and Altadena. The construction system is around 10 times faster than traditional construction, Jokic says. It also uses around 60% less labor, which may help it avoid disruptions. The construction industry in Southern California already had a labor shortage; the current threat of immigration raids also means that some people now feel afraid to come to work. The company also uses technology for the design process. For the house in Altadena, for example, it used software to design a house to the clients' specifications in seven days. 'Really, the breakthrough technology is that it's AI -driven,' Jokic says. The company, he says, can instantaneously create a code-compliant plan designed specifically for the site and the client's needs. And because the software will only output designs that the company knows it can build, it's easy to provide accurate timelines and pricing information. For families affected by the fires, the company is offering design services for free. The cost of homes is roughly 30% less than traditional construction, Jokic says. The clarity of the process helped convince the Altadena homeowners to move forward. The family, a couple with a young child, had lived in their previous house—a 1923 craftsman—for a decade. The old house needed repairs, the family had nearly completed a renovation when the fire happened. After the fire, they wanted to rebuild differently. 'We talked to five other architects, and I just felt so overwhelmed by the idea of starting from scratch and going through the rebuilding process again,' says homeowner Justin Lieb. 'The renovation was so overwhelming and exhausting.' They also liked the home's features, which go beyond the fire safety requirements in the building code, from fire-resistant walls and roofs to sprinklers. The all-electric house is also as energy efficient as possible, so it can make the most of the solar panels on the roof. 'Being as self-sufficient and ecologically conscious as possible was a big appeal to us,' Lieb says. A gray water system helps recycle water. They also chose to install an EV charger, though they haven't yet purchased an electric car. Software also helped the permit application process go quickly, and the team had filed everything to the city within around 20 days. 'As we continue improving the system, really the plan is that this is going to be instantaneous—basically 24 hours turnaround for the concept design, and two days for the permitting,' Jokic says. The company handles the permitting process. For the Altadena house, it just got approval from the local planning department. Now, it needs approval from the city's building and safety division, which has committed to a 30-day review timeline. Then construction can begin. The company is now working through the permitting process for four families in the fire zone. Ultimately, they have the capacity to build as many as 150 to 180 homes over the next 12 months, says Jokic. For every 10 homes they build, they have committed to build another for free for an underinsured family in the fire zone, in a project they call the 1:10 Initiative. 'Given that we can build much faster and lower cost and anyone else on the market, we definitely saw an opportunity for us to donate a portion of our revenue to build for people who [can't afford it],' Jokic says. Jokic, who grew up in war-torn Yugoslavia, says that the idea of providing affordable, quality housing has motivated his life's work. 'This is really a deeply personal experience,' he says. 'And just being able to help people who are struggling to get their homes back, that's what really matters at this point.'