Instead of overcomplicating COE system, government has ensured affordable transport for all: SM Lee to Jamus Lim
Instead, the government has ensured that everyone has access to affordable and efficient transport, even if they do not own a car, he added. And those who need more assistance, such as families with young children, are helped directly, such as through grants which can go towards paying for a COE.
SM Lee was responding to a Facebook post by Workers' Party MP Jamus Lim (Sengkang GRC), who said that the COE bidding system does not account for those who may genuinely need to own a car.
Associate Professor Lim added in his Jul 16 post that relying on market forces may not be the best way to adjudicate between the competing needs of different groups.
He was commenting on what SM Lee said at a dialogue on Jul 15 at the Economic Society of Singapore's (ESS) annual dinner.
ESS president Euston Quah, who was moderating the dialogue, had asked SM Lee about calls to let some groups pay less for COEs.
A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU
Friday, 8.30 am Asean Business
Business insights centering on South-east Asia's fast-growing economies.
Sign Up
Sign Up
Responding, SM Lee said there were many 'good arguments' for why certain groups are more deserving of a car.
However, it would be very difficult for the government to design a COE system that takes into account how many children people have, whether they have a disabled family member or old folks at home, and whether their jobs require them to move around, among other things, he added.
'I think if you want to design a scheme that worries about all those things, it will fail,' he said at the dialogue.
There is no fair and easy way to distribute something valuable like road space while making it very cheap, he added.
What the COE system does is to act as a proxy for road space, price this scarce resource at fair market value, then allocate it using economic principles, he explained.
Referring to these comments, Prof Lim, who was also at the ESS dinner, said what is 'sorely missing' in such a system is how those with genuine needs may not be able to afford a car, even if their needs have more merit.
He added that having 'every aspect of their lives determined in a transactional way' is not how humans wish to live.
'Society has values – about compassion, equity, respect and loyalty – that are poorly valued by impersonal markets. It's why we teach our children to share, why we don't charge an hourly rate for time we spend with our kids, why we don't think twice about breaking the bank when our parents fall (ill), and why we devote so much of our energies to causes that we believe in,' he said.
'That's why, for all our economic successes, there are ways that Singapore Inc operates that rub many people the wrong way.'
At the dialogue, SM Lee said that the government can guarantee every Singaporean affordable, convenient transportation, but cannot guarantee that everyone can have an affordable car.
He added that for those who have a special need, it is better for the government to help directly, rather than give them cheaper COEs. For instance, families with young children get bigger baby bonuses, which they can use to defray the cost of a car.
'Directly help the group you need to help in cash, rather than make complicated schemes, which then end up with all kinds of contradictions and wrong incentives,' added SM Lee.
Prof Lim, who teaches economics at Essec Business School, said in his post that the bottom line for him is that people are 'not mindless slaves to the prevailing structures and institutions' and can actively shape the future they want.
'If we want to head in a different direction, towards a more empathetic and just economy and society, then it is on us to seize that vision and make it real,' he added.
In his Facebook comment, SM Lee said: 'Therefore, where we disagree is not over who cares more for our fellow Singaporeans, but what is the best way to meet people's needs and take care of them.' THE STRAITS TIMES
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
AsiaOne
30 minutes ago
- AsiaOne
'We will not tolerate it': Car wash operators serving only Singapore vehicles risk losing business licences, says Johor govt, Singapore News
Local authorities in JB have been instructed to revoke the business licences of car wash operators who refuse to serve locals and cater exclusively to foreign customers, including those driving Singapore-registered cars. Speaking at the closing ceremony of the Johor Property Expo 2025 at Angsana Johor Bahru Mall on Thursday (July 24), State Housing and Local Government Committee Chairman Datuk Mohd Jafni Md Shukor said he viewed such behaviour seriously. "If someone is doing business in Johor but only prioritises foreigners while sidelining locals just for bigger profits, then we will not tolerate it," said Datuk Mohd Jafni, reported The Star. "I will instruct local councils to cancel the licences of any car wash operators who insist on only accepting foreign-registered vehicles, especially those from Singapore." Malaysian allegedly turned away by operator The move comes after a Malaysian claimed on social media that his car was refused service because the operators only catered to Singaporean customers. According to the man, he approached a car wash operator to get his car cleaned but was turned away, with one staff member allegedly telling him, "Singaporean cars only". It was also reported that the car wash operator, staffed by foreign workers, also turned away local customers, claiming all slots had been booked by Singaporean customers. According to the New Straits Times, Datuk Mohd Jafni also issued a warning to all business operators who prioritise large profits without considering the needs of locals. "I wish to remind these business operators not to focus solely on making money by prioritising foreigners. Yes, we understand they want to maximise profits, but they also have to understand their corporate social responsibility," he said. Datuk Mohd Jafni further stated that local authorities would be instructed to investigate such businesses and take firm action if the practice continues. [[nid:720205]]
Business Times
30 minutes ago
- Business Times
Singapore's COE system for cars can borrow ideas from ABSD regime for homes
[SINGAPORE] Living in a country with rising affluence but land scarcity, additional buyer's stamp duty (ABSD) for home purchases and Certificate of Entitlement (COE) for vehicle ownership are personal bugbears. ABSD was first introduced in 2011 and has been increased several times over the years for various buyer profiles. As a local pays 20 per cent ABSD for the purchase of a second home, my dreams of owning another home to earn passive income to fund retirement needs are dashed. To buy a small condo unit for S$1.2 million, I will need to fork out S$240,000 in ABSD, in addition to paying buyer's stamp duty of S$32,600. The COE, first introduced in 1990, confers the right to own and use a vehicle in Singapore for 10 years. In the last bidding exercise, the Category A COE premium was S$101,102. The Category A COE applies to mainstream cars that have engines of up to 1,600 cubic cm in capacity or with up to 97 kilowatts (kW) of power, or for electric vehicles with up to 110 kW of power. Despite the Republic's good public transport system and the COE premium accounting for a hefty chunk of our annual household income, my wife and I continue to own one car, which we share, for greater convenience. However, I worry if my family may have to give up on car ownership should COE premiums keep escalating. For sure, there is sound rationale behind the existence of ABSD and COE. A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU Tuesday, 12 pm Property Insights Get an exclusive analysis of real estate and property news in Singapore and beyond. Sign Up Sign Up The ABSD regime helps to manage housing demand, thus keeping alive condo ownership dreams for many locals. A local buying a first home does not pay any ABSD and enjoys significant priority over other groups of buyers – a local buying a second home pays 20 per cent ABSD, a permanent resident (PR) buying a first home pays 5 per cent ABSD and a non-PR foreigner pays 60 per cent ABSD. An entity or a trustee buying a home pays 65 per cent ABSD. Meanwhile, with roads occupying about 12 per cent of land area, the government manages road space and the number of vehicles using the roads to avoid perennial grid-lock. The COE system is a key lever in controlling the vehicle population's growth. Since February 2018, the vehicle growth rate has been zero for all categories except Category C for goods, vehicles and buses. Nonetheless, even if the ABSD regime and COE system are relevant, should the COE system for cars borrow some ideas from the former? Differentiating among buyer profiles First, unlike the ABSD regime, the COE system for cars does not differentiate among various buyer profiles. Perhaps, like in the ABSD regime, the COE system for cars should differentiate among buyer profiles to give priority to a local buying his first car. For example, levy a small additional premium on PRs and larger additional premiums on other buyer profiles such as non-PR foreigners and companies. Currently, the COE premium paid in a specific category is the same for a buyer of a first car and a buyer of a second or subsequent car. Should Singapore citizens and PRs who buy multiple cars pay a higher COE premium? In short, it may be more equitable if a local buying a first car enjoys priority over other groups of buyers such as companies who purchase cars to generate profit via the leasing out of said vehicles and individuals owning multiple vehicles as part of a car collection. Sure, there may be scope to fine tune the COE system further to favour car ownership based on household needs, but this might introduce unnecessary additional complexity. Removing possible regressivity Second, today, there are three COE categories that can be applicable for cars. Besides Category A, there is Category B for more powerful cars and Category E, which can be used for all vehicles except motorcycles. Typically, Category E COEs are used for more powerful cars. Each COE bidding exercise results in a fixed COE premium for the different categories. In the latest bidding exercise, the premiums for Category B and E were S$119,101 and S$120,000, respectively. What the COE system can possibly adapt from the ABSD regime is to have premiums that are set as a percentage of the Open Market Value (OMV) of a car. The OMV is the cost of a vehicle imported into Singapore. Think about it: the current COE system for cars is possibly regressive. In Category A, the cost of the COE is about 144 per cent of a car costing S$70,000 without COE or 84 per cent of a car costing S$120,000 without COE. Under Category B, the cost of the COE would amount to around 48 per cent of a high-end make that costs S$250,000 without COE, and a much smaller 12 per cent of a super luxury model which costs S$1 million without COE. Of course some other fees and taxes linked to car ownership are progressive with more expensive cars attracting higher costs. For example, higher rates of Additional Registration Fee, which is a tax imposed for registering a vehicle, apply to cars with higher OMV. Still, it may be fair that a billionaire car lover building a collection of luxury marques pays much more for each of his COEs versus what a local pays for a COE for one standard vehicle, which serves day-to-day household needs. Could possibly regressive elements in the COE system for cars be eliminated soon? On reflection, setting aside my personal grievances, owning a car or a second home here are nice-to-haves and not essentials. Many citizens, including young local couples, can buy affordably priced public housing flats for owner occupation. Last week, the Housing and Development Board launched 10,209 flats under the July 2025 Build-To-Order and Sale of Balance Flats exercises, with numerous homes in choice locations. A high homeownership rate among resident households gives people a sense of security and an opportunity to enjoy asset appreciation. Meanwhile, residents are served by an affordable, efficient and comprehensive public transport network. Still, there may be room for tough but needed policies to curb demand for homes and cars to be more equitable. Perhaps the COE system for cars can borrow some ideas from the ABSD regime for homes to prioritise local first car buyers and eliminate possible regressivity.
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Tanjong Katong sinkhole backfilled; road to be repaved after LTA tests
LTA's tests will include drilling probes that are up to 20m deep into the soil to check that there are no air pockets. SINGAPORE - The cavity along Tanjong Katong Road South that resulted in the formation of a sinkhole has been backfilled, and the Land Transport Authority (LTA) will conduct tests before the caved-in road is repaved. Giving this update in a Facebook post on July 28, Mr Goh Pei Ming, an MP for Marine Parade-Braddell Heights GRC, said the LTA's tests will include drilling probes that are up to 20m deep into the soil to check that there are no air pockets. These come on top of radar scans to assess ground conditions. A section of Tanjong Katong Road South collapsed on the evening of July 26, swallowing a car and its driver. The driver was rescued, and sent to Raffles Hospital for observation and had experienced muscular pain. The road has since been closed, with traffic and bus services diverted. The tests and analysis will take some time, said Mr Goh, who is also Minister of State for Home Affairs and Social and Family Development. 'I understand residents are keen to know when the road can be reopened. I think it is best we give the agencies the time to be doubly sure the road is safe before we reopen,' he added. Mr Goh said traffic was smooth when he visited the site on the morning of July 28, noting that LTA had put out messages to motorists, as well as worked with the Ministry of Education to notify parents of road diversions. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Tanjong Katong Road sinkhole did not happen overnight: Experts Singapore Not feasible for S'pore to avoid net‑zero; all options to cut energy emissions on table: Tan See Leng Singapore With regional interest in nuclear energy rising, S'pore must build capabilities too: Tan See Leng Singapore New Mandai North Crematorium, ash-scattering garden to open on Aug 15 Singapore Science Journals: Lessons from weird fish sold in Singapore's wet markets World US and EU clinch deal with broad 15% tariffs on EU goods to avert trade war Asia Displaced villagers at Thai-Cambodian border hope to go home as leaders set to meet for talks
