Texas Starbucks customer outraged by 'illegal' label written on drink lid
'What do you call a sick eagle?' the cup asked, according to a photo of it, as reported by CBS Texas.
'Illegal,' the riddle answered.
Lopez reported the incident to the store manager, who promised a team meeting to prevent recurrence. However, Lopez insisted the unidentified barista should be fired immediately, stating she would take that action if managing the team. The story gained traction, prompting Dallas activist Carlos Quintanilla to organize a June 28th protest at the store to confront the barista.
'It's not just inappropriate, it's disturbing,' Carlos was quoted as telling CBS Texas. 'Especially right now, when the narrative being thrown out in mass media is if you're illegal, you're a criminal, and if you're a criminal, you're illegal.'
However, Quintanilla canceled the gathering an hour after its planned start when no other protesters showed up. He later entered the Target alone, livestreaming, but was asked to leave by an employee for recording inside the store. Quintanilla defended the undocumented community, calling the lid message "not just inappropriate, it's disturbing," especially amid media narratives linking "illegal" status with criminality. He announced the protest's suspension "in forgiveness," urging a "Protest in Silence!" instead.
Quintanilla noted that both Starbucks and Target had responded to demands for clarification about the offensive writing. Lopez had expressed deep personal offense, linking the word to painful experiences with deportations.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
3 days ago
- Indian Express
Ex-bar dancer poses as business analyst on dating app to extort Rs 2 lakh from Bengaluru techie, arrested with 5 men
A Bengaluru software professional was allegedly defrauded out of Rs 2 lakh by an extortionist gang after he visited a woman he had met on a dating app, the police said on Monday while announcing the arrests of six people including the woman, a former bar dancer, in connection with the incident. The Yelahanka police identified the accused as Sangeeta Sahni, 36, Sharanabasappa Baliger, 50, Raju Maane, 34, Abhishek, 19, Beerabal Majjagi, 21, and Shyam Sundar Pande, 20, adding that Baliger, the prime suspect, has prior involvement in a similar case registered by the Puttenahalli police. The victim is a 41-year-old software professional employed by a prominent Mahadevapura firm. Originally from Telangana, he has lived in Bengaluru for 15 years. According to the police, it began when the man downloaded a dating application and matched with someone calling herself 'Rakhi', who claimed to be a business analyst from Bengaluru with Rajasthani roots. After establishing rapport through online conversations, she allegedly invited him to meet at a Starbucks outlet in a Yelahanka mall on July 18. Following their coffee meeting, the woman invited the techie to her residence in Ramagondanahalli village—a property allegedly rented for criminal activities. Once there, she offered him alcohol, which he accepted, according to the police. A police officer said, 'A few minutes later, four men arrived, with the woman claiming that one was her landlord. They accused the victim of drug consumption and produced sachets containing white powder—actually baking soda planted beforehand—from the woman's vanity bag as evidence.' The woman locked herself in the bathroom, crying that her life had been ruined. The four men then began negotiations to extort money from the techie, according to the police. Initially demanding Rs 15 lakh, they eventually settled for Rs 2 lakh, which he immediately transferred, the police said. After discussing the incident with friends, the techie approached the police on July 21, following which they registered a case against the accused. A police officer said the backgrounds of other suspects were being verified.
Hindustan Times
4 days ago
- Hindustan Times
Deerbrook Mall evacuated in Humble, Texas after reports of shooting, active shooter
Deerbrook Mall in Humble, Texas, was evacuated on Sunday following reports of a shooting and a possible active shooter. Deerbrook Mall in Humble, Texas, was evacuated.(UnSplash) Witnesses on social media described a heavy police presence at the mall, with multiple law enforcement vehicles seen near the entrance. One witness wrote on Facebook, 'We were there, there are cops with rifles at every exit. Saw someone get searched looking for a Hispanic male with a white belt. Emergency alarm in the mall said evacuate or seek shelter.' Another wrote, "I was inside Macy's toward the back of the store, a security officer ran up to me and said "you've got to leave the store immediately there is a shooter in the mall" she guided me out the closest exit door, I didn't hear anything or see anything, most everyone had already evacuated the store and hustled to their cars, the traffic is unbelievable!!" A third person reported, 'Stuck in traffic in the parking lot. They told everyone to evacuate immediately. Some of the workers are saying possible bomb and gun. But no definite answer. Alarms are still going off.' Another witness wrote, 'Leaving the mall rn - someone said that there is an active shooter and are evacuating everyone.' Authorities have not yet confirmed any injuries or whether a suspect has been located. Updates are expected as the investigation continues.
The Hindu
24-07-2025
- The Hindu
Indian vs. American morality
I know it's Sunday morning for you but I am sorry to say I am devoting this column to a serious matter — one involving complex questions of morality and jurisprudence. I can't help it — I got so disturbed after watching that video I haven't slept since. Yes, I am talking about that poor Indian woman who was criminally charged for merely walking out of a Target store in the U.S. with some items. I understand she was leaving the shop with items worth $1,300 (₹1,11,994) she hadn't paid for. But does that mean you brand her a thief? There are so many things wrong with the way she was treated, I'm amazed patriotic NRIs still continue to patronise American retail instead of buying all their groceries on visits to India. This tragic miscarriage of justice can be traced to three factors: no clear warning or messaging that the shop was under CCTV surveillance; no option given to the woman to bribe the police officer and settle the matter; and complete mismatch between a state-of-the-art Indian morality and an American system based on a crude assumption of equality before the law, with no allowance made for nuances such as class and caste of the accused. This column is a satirical take on life and society. Privacy lost The first one alone sealed her fate. The entire incident is attributable to a simple cultural difference between India and the U.S. with regard to CCTV cameras. In India, any shop that deploys CCTV cameras warns customers they are under surveillance. You will see a sign saying, 'Smile, you are on camera' or 'Weep, Big Brother is watching you'. So you know the shop expects you to pay for the things you put in your shopping cart. This Target store in Illinois did have cameras, but they were all hidden from view. It also had no signs alerting customers they were under watch. Seriously, is this kind of clandestine surveillance even permitted anymore in civilised society? What about privacy? Anyway, faced with acres of goodies and no cameras, the lady naturally assumed it was okay to leave the shop with some items. If she was indeed required to pay for them, some staffer would surely come and remind her, or at least there would be a security beep at the exit alerting her that the goods were not 'complimentary'. But when she walked out with her cartful of items, there was no beep. So imagine her shock when all of a sudden a guard jumps out of nowhere, calls her a thief, and takes her to the police. Clear case of entrapment One may still condone the guard's over-enthusiasm. But what about the American police? The Indian woman graciously offers to pay for all the merchandise in her cart. But the policewoman would simply not let her pay and close the matter. It was heart-breaking to see the woman repeatedly plead with the police saying, 'The best thing would be for me to pay and finish this.' The cop's stone-hearted reply: 'The best thing would be to not steal in the first place.' Seriously, how can you call it stealing when the so-called thief is literally begging to pay for everything she took? This is where the primitiveness of American morality stands exposed. It sees everything in black and white — as right or wrong, with no shades of grey. Indian morality, evolved over a period of 50,000 years, is a far more sophisticated system. It makes allowances for the complexities and mysteries of human nature. It knows that a person may walk out of a shop with unpaid goods but without any intention to steal — just to see whether they get caught, or purely as a social experiment. This is not accidental. Our sense of right and wrong comes from an ancient truth summed up in a proverb we all learnt as children: 'The crime is not the crime; getting caught is the crime.' This is why withholding information about the presence of CCTV cameras is the real crime in this entire saga, for it duped the poor Indian woman into thinking she wouldn't be caught — a really egregious case of entrapment if you think about it. People often ask me, 'You are bright, talented, and a South Indian. What are you doing in India? Why aren't you settled in the U.S. like Sundar Pichai?' I always tell them, 'America is a backward country. No predictability when it comes to rule of law. Anything can happen to anyone.' People would laugh at my answer. They thought I was joking. Now everyone is realising I was dead serious. The author of this satire, is Social Affairs Editor, The Hindu. sampath.g@
