
Two wounded in Greece after explosion at home of prison guard official
The explosion in the early hours on Saturday morning targeted the home of the president of the Greek association of prison guards in the suburb of Sykies.
The guard, identified as Konstantinos Varsamis on the association's website, was unharmed after about 3kg of explosives were placed near the front door of his building, where he lives on the first floor.
Two other people suffered minor injuries from shards of glass, police sources told Agence France-Presse. The blast was said to have caused a 'deafening noise' heard over a radius of more than 1km.
'I woke up because of the very loud bang of the explosion,' Tzetno Kelo, who lives in an adjacent building, said. 'Shattered glass from a window fell on my bed and I was covered in blood.' He was treated at a hospital before being discharged.
Sofia Hatzigeorgiou, 88, who lives alone, told the Greek media outlet DNews that she had got up and discovered her house had become a 'summer house': a huge hole had opened up in the wall between her mezzanine flat and the building where the bomb had been placed.
The windows of neighbouring buildings were also damaged in the blast. Local media reports suggest the bomb was a 'fairly simple device' triggered by a standard detonator.
Police told Associated Press reporters that a witness saw a man walking in the street shortly before the explosion and they were focusing their efforts on criminal gangs rather than terror groups.
Varsamis has worked for many years at Diavata prison, west of Thessaloniki, known for housing many criminal gang members as well as convicted terrorists.
A spokesperson for the Hellenic police force confirmed that its organised crime unit was leading the preliminary investigation into the incident.
Firefighters, an ambulance and dozens of police officers, including anti-terrorism specialists, attended the scene. Footage of the incident showed crowds of people standing outside the building in the middle of the night, some in their nightwear and slippers. One woman carefully made her way across shards of glass, carrying a cat.
The Thessaloniki MP, Stratos Simopoulos, told DNews he had rushed to the scene of the explosion to support Varsamis, who is a friend of his: 'He has my full support, because a few weeks ago, I too received the same cowardly attack. His was much more violent.
'Public officials, who perform their duty without compromise, may be on the frontlines of the threat from such terrorist and criminal actions. I absolutely believe that they do not flinch,' he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
3 hours ago
- The Independent
‘I have never been an activist': Meet the pensioners risking prison to support Palestine Action
In an interrogation room just after 1am, 68-year-old grandmother-of-seven Marji Mansfield was sat across from counter terrorism officers after being arrested at a pro-Palestine protest in central London. She had suffered days of poor sleep in anticipation of this eventuality. Now, an 'aggressive' man was asking her repeatedly if she sympathised with a terrorist organisation, leading her through an extensive list of questions about her politics and who she knew in Gaza. A few hours earlier, on the afternoon of 5 July, half a dozen officers had handcuffed the pensioner and hauled her off the ground and into a police van, alongside her 73-year-old husband. The couple who once described themselves as small 'c' Conservatives had travelled to the capital up from near Chichester for the protest, declining to tell their children what they were about to do. It was only a day later that their son realised what had happened after he saw her in the news, suspended and flanked by the large group of officers. She had been following the conflict in the Middle East since the Israeli invasion of Gaza in 2014, but only became an active protester after former home secretary Suella Braverman branded peaceful protesters as 'hate marchers' in November 2023. 'I have never been political or an activist. I was just an ordinary, middle-England person,' she says. 'But then I became outraged.' She said she was 'shocked' by the events of 7 October, when Hamas militants broke into Israel and killed around 1,200 people, taking 251 more hostage. 'But the actions that subsequently followed, where entire families are being wiped out, I had to join those urging for a ceasefire now,' she adds. More than 60,000 Palestinians are believed to have been killed since Israel launched its retaliatory aerial and ground offensive in Gaza. Humanitarian organisations have warned that, with not nearly enough aid entering the enclave, the 2.3 million residents of Gaza are now being effectively starved. Sir Keir Starmer this week warned that Britain would recognise the Palestinian state if Israel did not end its 'appalling' war in Gaza. He urged Israel to work towards a ceasefire and a two-state solution. Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu accused Sir Keir of 'rewarding Hamas's monstrous terrorism'. Ms Mansfield dismissed Sir Keir's move as 'performative rather than substantial'. Fighting her own battle for Gaza, the pensioner was arrested under Section 12 and 13 of the Terrorism Act 2000 for holding up a placard that said: 'I oppose genocide, I support Palestine Action'. The charges carry a possible maximum sentence of 14 years in prison. The protest group Palestine Action had just been proscribed as a terrorist organisation, after they claimed responsibility for activists spraying red paint on fighter jets at RAF Brize Norton, making it illegal to support them. It put the group in the same legal ranks as Isis, Al-Qaeda and Hamas, leading critics to accuse the government of heavy-handedness. Ms Mansfield had known it was a possibility she would get arrested, but had no idea how the police would actually react when she and dozens of others held up placards in support of Palestine Action outside the Houses of Parliament. It was the first of what would be weekly protests, all of which resulted in arrests. As the police interview with an exhausted Ms Mansfield drew to a close around 2am, after more than 60 questions had been asked, the counter terrorism officer made one final remark. 'Look, even if you get hundreds of people, thousands of people, we're 30,000 strong,' Ms Mansfield recounts him saying. 'We'll put all our resources, and not just police forces, into arresting and interrogating you.' Then he let the 'traumatised' pensioner go free, hundreds of miles from home. She was not charged with a crime. A total of 385 MPs voted in favour of the unprecedented move to criminalise Palestine Action. Only 26 dissented. Announcing the vote, home secretary Yvette Cooper said that while the right to protest and to free speech form 'the cornerstone of our democracy', Palestine Action was guilty of 'violence and serious criminal damage' that does not constitute 'legitimate protest'. As a result, Palestine Action was proscribed alongside a white supremacist, neo-Nazi organisation called Maniacs Murder Cult and a pro-Kremlin ethno-nationalist organisation which seeks to create a new Russian Imperial State. Critics and human rights activists quickly accused the government of infringing upon people's right to protest after the proscription. In a letter to Ms Cooper, the Network for Police Monitoring said: 'Misusing terrorism legislation in this way against a protest group sets a dangerous precedent, threatens our democratic freedoms, and would be a terrifying blow to our civil liberties.' Several United Nations human rights experts, meanwhile, said criminal damage that does not endanger life was not 'sufficiently serious to qualify as terrorism'. On Wednesday, a judge ruled that Palestine Action would be allowed to challenge the Home Office in court over its proscription, but it could be months until a result. The outrage over the move has increased as more protesters are arrested. Private Eye editor Ian Hislop branded the arrest in Leeds on 19 July of 67-year-old Jon Farley, for holding up a printout of the magazine's front page that questioned the proscription, as 'mind-boggling'. Mr Farley has not been charged. The case was cited by Mr Justice Chamberlain on Wednesday as a reason to allow Palestine Action to fight the proscription. He said it was evidence of the 'chilling effect' the proscription was having 'on those wishing to express legitimate political views'. In total, more than 200 people have been detained since the ban. Not a single person in England and Wales has been charged. The large majority are over 60, according to Tim Crosland, a former government lawyer who now campaigns for Defend Our Juries, an organisation supporting many of the detainees. He says some of the protesters are 'well into their 80s'. The police are aware of these optics. Ms Mansfield claims her male counter terrorism interrogator even asked her at one stage: 'Was this a conspiracy to make the police look bad?' The reality, she says, is simpler: the seriousness of terrorism charges is a significant disincentive to younger protesters at the start of their careers; for pensioners determined to take a stance, it is the perfect opportunity to step up. Robert Lee, 61, another protester arrested on 5 July but not charged, who later went to support demonstrators in Bristol, says he remembers one 83-year-old woman gleefully telling him that police were too afraid to arrest her 'because they are terrified I might die in custody'. But the crowds of pensioner protesters are nonetheless peppered with younger demonstrators, a reality they say nods to the broad spectrum of opposition to the proscription of Palestine Action. For Zara Ali, 18, among the youngest people to have been arrested, her involvement felt especially high stakes. She was already on bail for conspiracy to cause public nuisance after blocking a road in March. She has not been charged. 'I was told to prepare myself for prison,' she says, admitting that she was very 'anxious' when she arrived in Parliament Square for her 19 July protest. 'But at the end of the day, I had it in my mind that this is not about me but about Palestine, and about every single political prisoner who is being held.' The Independent spoke to half a dozen protesters for this piece, all of whom mentioned their 'disgust' with Israel's war on Gaza as the primary motivation for their involvement. Claims that the proscription pointed to a 'dystopian' future in Britain were also commonly cited as key motivation.


Telegraph
5 hours ago
- Telegraph
Terror arrest over Palestine Action RAF attack
Counter-terrorism police have made a further arrest over an attack on two aircraft at an RAF base claimed by Palestine Action. A 22-year-old man, of no fixed abode, was arrested on Friday in Bedford on suspicion of the commission, preparation or instigation of acts of terrorism, contrary to Section 41 of the Terrorism Act 2000. The arrested man is currently in police custody, Counter Terrorism Policing South added Two Voyager planes were damaged at RAF Brize Norton, Oxfordshire, on June 20. The action, which was claimed by the group Palestine Action, caused £7m worth of damage to the aircraft. Four people were charged last month in connection with the incident. The Government subsequently moved to proscribe the group under anti-terror laws after the group claimed responsibility for the action. The ban means that membership of, or support for, the direct action group is a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison. Yvette Cooper, the Home Secretary, announced plans to proscribe Palestine Action on June 23, saying that the vandalism of the two planes was 'disgraceful'. However, Palestine Action's co-founder has since won a bid to bring a High Court challenge over the group's ban as a terror organisation. Lawyers for Huda Ammori asked a judge to allow her to bring the High Court challenge over the ban, describing it as an 'unlawful interference' with freedom of expression. In a decision on Wednesday, judge Mr Justice Chamberlain said two parts of the arguments on Ms Ammori's behalf were 'reasonably arguable' and would be heard at a three-day hearing in November. However, he later refused a bid to temporarily pause the ban on the direct action group until the outcome of the challenge. In his first ruling, he said it was arguable that the proscription 'amounts to a disproportionate interference' of Ms Ammori's rights to freedom of expression and freedom of assembly. He said: 'That being so, the point will have to be determined at a substantive hearing and it would not be appropriate for me to say more now.' The judge continued that a second argument, that Ms Cooper failed to consult Palestine Action 'in breach of natural justice', could also go to a full hearing. Mr Justice Chamberlain said: 'As a matter of principle, I consider that it is reasonably arguable that a duty to consult arose.' He continued: 'Having considered the evidence, I also consider it reasonably arguable that there was no compelling reason why consultation could not have been undertaken here.' The judge refused to allow Ms Ammori to challenge the Government's decision on several other grounds, including a claim that the Home Secretary failed to gather sufficient information on Palestine Action's activities or the impact of the proscription on people associated with it. He also refused the request for a temporary block, finding there was a 'powerful public interest' in the ban continuing and there was not a 'material change of circumstance' since a previous hearing. Following the first ruling, Ms Ammori said: 'This landmark decision to grant a judicial review which could see the Home Secretary's unlawful decision to ban Palestine Action quashed, demonstrates the significance of this case for freedoms of speech, expression and assembly and rights to natural justice in our country and the rule of law itself.' She continued: 'We will not stop defending fundamental rights to free speech and expression in our country and supporting Palestinian people against a genocide being livestreamed before our eyes.' Raza Husain KC, for Ms Ammori, previously told the court at the hearing on July 21 that the ban had made the UK 'an international outlier' and was 'repugnant'. Mr Husain added: 'The decision to proscribe Palestine Action had the hallmarks of an authoritarian and blatant abuse of power.' The Home Office is defending the legal action. Sir James Eadie KC, for the department, said in written submissions that by causing serious damage to property, Palestine Action was 'squarely' within part of the terrorism laws used in proscription. Previously, Ben Watson KC, also for the Home Office, said Palestine Action could challenge the Home Secretary's decision at the Proscribed Organisations Appeal Commission (POAC), a specialist tribunal, rather than at the High Court. Sir James said that an 'exceptional case' would be needed for it to go to the High Court, rather than the POAC. Mr Justice Chamberlain said on Wednesday that a High Court challenge could take place in the autumn of this year, whereas an appeal to the specialist tribunal would take much longer. He said in a summary of his ruling: 'If it were necessary to appeal for deproscription, it is very unlikely that an application before POAC would be listed before the middle of 2026.' In his 18-page written judgment, Mr Justice Chamberlain said: 'If the legality of the proscription order can properly be raised by way of defence to criminal proceedings, that would open up the spectre of different and possibly conflicting decisions on that issue in magistrates' courts across England and Wales or before different judges or juries in the Crown Court. 'That would be a recipe for chaos. 'To avoid it, there is a strong public interest in allowing the legality of the order to be determined authoritatively as soon as possible. The obvious way to do that is in judicial review proceedings.' The judge also said that people protesting in support of Palestine and Gaza, but not expressing support for Palestine Action, had 'attracted various kinds of police attention, from questioning to arrest'. He continued that it was 'important not to draw too much from the fact that police and others appear to have misunderstood the law on some occasions'. But he added: 'Nonetheless, reports of the kind of police conduct referred to… are liable to have a chilling effect on those wishing to express legitimate political views. 'This effect can properly be regarded as an indirect consequence of the proscription order.' Mr Justice Chamberlain later dismissed a bid by the Home Office to bring an appeal over his decision about the POAC. Sir Mark Rowley, the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, said on Wednesday that he understood Ms Cooper's decision, adding: 'As long as that's the law, we'll enforce the law rigorously, because supporting a terrorist organisation is a serious offence.'


The Independent
5 hours ago
- The Independent
Further arrest over damage to planes at RAF Brize Norton
A further arrest has been made in connection with two aircraft being damaged at an RAF base. A 22-year-old man, of no fixed abode, was arrested on Friday in Bedford on suspicion of the commission, preparation or instigation of acts of terrorism, contrary to Section 41 of the Terrorism Act 2000, Counter Terrorism Policing South said. Two Voyager planes were damaged at RAF Brize Norton, Oxfordshire, on June 20. The arrested man is currently in police custody, police added. The action, which was claimed by the group Palestine Action, caused £7 million worth of damage to the aircraft. The Government moved to proscribe the group under anti-terror laws after the group claimed responsibility for the action. Four people were charged last month in connection with the incident.