One of SA's largest mobile operators launches exciting new delivery service
Image: Ayanda Ndamane / Independent Media
One of South Africa's largest mobile operators, MTN, has introduced a new pilot service called Shesh@5G, offering SIM card and home internet package deliveries within two hours.
In recent years, South Africa has seen significant growth in delivery services, with companies such as Checkers Sixty60, Uber Eats, Mr D, and Takealot expanding rapidly.
The motorbike-based delivery service is currently being rolled out in selected areas of Johannesburg and is intended to give customers quicker access to MTN's 5G connectivity services.
This initiative follows MTN's recent 'Smartphone For All' campaign, which plans to provide over 1.2 million customers with 4G smartphones for R99.
Tania Ladopoulou, General Manager for Online and Telesales at MTN South Africa, said that the mobile operator focused on ensuring that "our Home customers enjoy the best possible experience".
'This is another ambition to bring seamless 5G Home connectivity to customers. As South Africa's best and strong 5G network, we are focused on ensuring that our Home customers enjoy the best possible experience with the country's most reliable and fastest 5G coverage.
'No more waiting 24 to 48 hours for delivery. No more standing in queues with this new service, we are putting our customers first by delivering convenience, speed, and connection right to their doorstep.'
According to MTN, customers can place orders through the company's digital platforms. A motorbike courier then delivers the SIM card or home internet package within two hours.
Customers can also complete self-registration using the MTN app, allowing them to activate services quickly after delivery.
'This is not just about faster service, it's about inclusion,' said Ladopoulou.
'We believe that everyone deserves a modern connected life, and they shouldn't have to wait for it. Whether you're connecting for the first time or upgrading to Shesh@5G, MTN is putting the power of instant connectivity in your hands.'
mthobisi.nozulela@iol.co.za
IOL Business Get your news on the go, click here to join the IOL News WhatsApp channel
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
21 hours ago
- IOL News
eThekwini Municipality denies awarding contracts for smart meters amid allegations of wasteful expenditure
eThekwini Municipality denies purchasing smart meters from seven companies, saying the procurement process is still ongoing. Image: Willem Phungula eThekwini Municipality has denied awarding seven companies to supply electricity smart meters. In a written response to the story that the Independent Media published last week, the city's spokesperson, Gugu Sisilana, said the municipality was not aware of differing quantities being placed across suppliers; therefore, dismissing the assertion of wasteful expenditure. Sisilana said the procurement process is still ongoing. 'The allegations of wasteful expenditure, which are not corroborated by any evidence, are not true. This is due to the fact that the procurement process for electricity meters is still ongoing through the Supply Chain Management process. We are not aware of differing quantities being placed across suppliers,' she said. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading Despite the city's denial and information obtained from the city's website, it was revealed that indeed the companies were awarded. Independent Media also saw purchase orders matching the companies on the city's website. Sources within the municipality have described the decision to award all the companies as an attempt to avoid awarding the tender to a qualified supplier with the lowest quote. The source said the only possible reason for this was that the officials wanted kickbacks from the highest bidders. In May 2024, the National Treasury approved the RT29 national transversal for smart metering. The Treasury approved seven companies for the city to choose from when buying these smart meters. In the purchase orders, the city ordered 2,000 smart meters from a particular supplier, which cost R2,591 per unit, whereas the other supplier's unit price was R1,645. One provider charged R2,218 per item, while the other charged R1,811. The city had to pay R5.9 million for 2,000 smart meters from the highest-priced supplier, which likewise had a unit price of R2,600. The source said the city also ordered non-smart meters for R1,996 per unit, which totalled R4.5 million for 2,000 units. It is not clear why the city needed non-smart meters and which customers will be supplied with them, whereas others use smart meters. Among the companies are two giant cellular network companies. In contrast to non-smart meters, which require personnel to physically visit the site and disconnect when consumers have circumvented them or established unauthorised connections, smart meters may be switched off by city officials from the office, the source claimed. 'This is another wasteful expenditure the city has incurred, and there is no valid reason why the officials chose to purchase the same product with the same quality from different suppliers with varying prices. Surely, there is something fishy,' said the source. The municipality has been in the headlines for incurring costs that many view as wasteful, stemming from court cases it has lost. It was recently forced to pay a supplier more than R20 million, which was an interest that had accumulated from the court appeals it had finally lost. The supplier had initially demanded R30 million, which the city disputed but lost the appeal.
IOL News
4 days ago
- IOL News
Fingers pointed at eThekwini Municipality over alleged wasteful expenditure on overpriced smart meters
The eThekwini Municipality's procurement of water meters has come under scrutiny Image: Supplied The eThekwini Municipality finds itself under scrutiny once more, amidst concerning allegations of wasteful expenditure following a recent procurement of electricity smart meters. Officials opted to purchase these devices from the highest bidders rather than the lowest quote suppliers, triggering concern among residents and stakeholders alike regarding potential misconduct and improper financial practices. Sources indicate that this decision suggests an attempt to bypass a qualified supplier that provided the lowest bid — a move that raises various questions. In what many perceive to be an alarming indicator of corruption, it has been alleged that officials may seek kickbacks from these more expensive suppliers. In May 2024, the National Treasury approved the RT29 national transversal contract for smart metering, identifying seven companies for the municipality to choose from for their needs. However, documents acquired by Independent Media reveal a shocking deviation from standard procurement practices. The eThekwini Municipality ordered 2,000 smart meters priced at R2,591 per unit from one supplier, while another supplier quoted a mere R1,645 per unit. The total cost indicated that the city spent R5.9 million for these overpriced devices. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading This instance of poor financial decision-making apparently didn't stop there. The municipality additionally procured non-smart meters at R1,996 per unit, accumulating a further cost of R4.5 million. With the distinction between smart and non-smart meters being that the former can be remotely disconnected by officials, while the latter necessitates physical travel for disconnection, questions loom large over why non-smart versions were even necessary. A source privy to the procurement process has expressed concern, stating, 'This is another instance of wasteful expenditure incurred by the city. There was no valid reason why the officials chose to purchase the same product with the same quality from different suppliers with varying prices. Surely, there is something fishy.' Attempts to obtain clarity from the municipality's communications team went unanswered as of Wednesday, leaving many to speculate on the motivations behind these decisions. This incident comes in the wake of previous controversies linked to the municipality's financial management. Just recently, the city faced a harsh financial penalty, having to pay over R20 million to a supplier, an amount accumulated from interest on a court appeal that the municipality lost. While the initial amount claimed was R30 million, the city disputed the claims but ultimately lost their case. DAILY NEWS
IOL News
4 days ago
- IOL News
From Liberation to Ownership: How Sekunjalo is Powering Nelson Mandela's Vision of Inclusive Economic Transformation
Discover how the Sekunjalo Group embodies Nelson Mandela's vision of economic justice in South Africa, challenging the status quo and striving for true transformation. Image: Independent Media In a country where the soul of transformation often gets buried beneath bureaucracy, profit margins, and political stagnation, the Sekunjalo Group stands not merely as a business entity, but as an ideal. A bold, African ideal born of purpose, shaped by sacrifice, and relentlessly driven by the conviction that freedom is incomplete without economic justice. On the eve of Nelson Mandela Day, South Africa finds itself reflecting on the man who led us out of political bondage. Yet, as we commemorate his legacy, one truth becomes impossible to ignore: the promise of economic liberation remains painfully deferred for millions. The townships still choke on poverty. Ownership of wealth remains skewed. And transformation, once the heartbeat of our new democracy, now whispers in the background. It is against this sobering backdrop that the story of Sekunjalo becomes not only relevant, but urgent. Founded in the post-apartheid spring of the late 1990s, Sekunjalo was not conjured in a boardroom with glossy projections. It was born in rooms filled with veterans of the struggle — men and women whose commitment to freedom had left them impoverished, imprisoned, and overlooked by the emerging elite. Their vision was not just to build a company, but to heal a country. To create an economic engine where political freedom had left a vacuum. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading It was President Nelson Mandela himself who nudged this vision into life. In meetings with Professor Jakes Gerwel and other former activists, he insisted that the coloured community of Cape Town, long marginalised under apartheid, must have a stake in the economic future of the city and the country. The name Sekunjalo, meaning 'Now is the Time,' came from one of these very gatherings. It wasn't just a name; it was a call to action. And action, indeed, followed. In 1999, Sekunjalo Investments became one of the few black empowerment companies listed on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange. But unlike many BEE firms that emerged merely to tick boxes, Sekunjalo anchored itself in principles, not patronage. It was not built to serve elites, but to multiply opportunity. It was not created to enrich the few, but to invest in the many. Its core was empowerment, community, and sustainable value creation. Over the decades, the group expanded across multiple sectors — from healthcare to fishing, from media to technology — creating more than 20,000 direct and indirect jobs. It incubated black CEOs, funded education, and supported local businesses across the continent. It remained fiercely independent, even as competitors and institutions attempted to undermine or erase its impact. And it continued to be one of the very few large African investment groups that had not been swallowed by white capital or global conglomerates. Yet, Sekunjalo has paid dearly for this independence. Its media investments, including the acquisition of Independent Media, marked a turning point. Suddenly, the company was no longer just a player in business but a challenger to narrative control. A black-owned media house that dared to tell African stories with dignity, that questioned the status quo, that exposed what others chose to conceal. It became a target. Banking institutions began closing accounts. Smear campaigns intensified. Accusations — often without trial — became weapons to cripple its growth. But Sekunjalo did not fold. As Chairman Dr. Iqbal Survé once remarked, 'We have never been anti-establishment. We are against injustice, especially when it wears the mask of respectability.' Today, the relevance of Sekunjalo's journey transcends corporate boardrooms. It forces us to ask hard questions about where our country is heading. Why are black-owned companies still treated as suspects? Why are transformation champions punished while the architects of economic apartheid remain celebrated captains of industry? Why is it that, thirty years after democracy, institutions still recoil when real power is transferred into black hands? Nelson Mandela knew that freedom without ownership is a broken promise. He knew that healing a nation required more than reconciliation — it required redistribution, responsibility, and resolve. Sekunjalo's founding was not just endorsed by Mandela; it was aligned with his vision. The group exists not simply to succeed, but to model what ethical African capitalism can look like. It does not separate profit from purpose, nor scale from soul. In many ways, the Sekunjalo Group is the economic echo of Mandela's moral imagination — daring to be principled in a system that rewards corruption, daring to empower when others extract, and daring to be black, bold, and unapologetically African in a marketplace that still fears its own transformation. This Mandela Day, the call is not to light a candle or donate an hour. The call is to recommit to the deeper project he left behind, the building of a just and inclusive economy. Sekunjalo's story reminds us that this project is not theory. It is practice. It is possible. South Africa needs structures of integrity. It doesn't need performative empowerment. It needs brave institutions willing to absorb the cost of real change. Sekunjalo is not perfect, no movement born of struggle is, but it remains a powerful symbol of what is possible when business becomes a tool for nation-building, not just accumulation. 'Now is the time,' they said in 1997. In 2025, the time has not passed. It has only grown more urgent.
