Florida defends "Alligator Alcatraz" as environmentalists seek to halt Everglades detention center
The state filed a 22-page response to a motion filed by Friends of the Everglades and the Center for Biological Diversity seeking a temporary restraining order to halt the facility.
The groups, in a lawsuit filed Friday, contend that the project, which President Donald Trump is expected to visit Tuesday, threatens environmentally sensitive areas and species in the Everglades and Big Cypress National Preserve.
Florida: Temporary facility poses no irreparable harm
But the state's attorneys argued, in part, that the groups' request for a temporary restraining order had not met a test of showing "irreparable harm" from the project, which is being built at the Dade-Collier Training and Transition Airport, a remote site used for flight training. Gov. Ron DeSantis also disputed Monday that the project would harm the Everglades.
"The detention facility will eventually shut down," the state's response said. "Governor DeSantis has been clear that the facility is temporary, is being built on an existing airport, and will not require sewer lines. In these circumstances, there are good reasons to expect a successful return of the status quo."
The state is building the project and has indicated it will seek reimbursement by the federal government. DeSantis has said he expects the site to start operating Tuesday.
Lawsuit contends state agencies violated laws
The environmental groups filed the request for a temporary restraining order and a preliminary injunction Friday along with the lawsuit. They allege that federal and state agencies have violated laws including the National Environmental Policy Act. That law, they say, requires evaluating potential environmental impacts before such a project can move forward.
"In contrast to the significant environmental harms that will result from the construction of a detention center/airport in the middle of a national preserve, and the procedural harm from failing to comply with law requiring an assessment of such harms before proceeding, any harm defendants may shoulder if enjoined would be minimal at best," the motion for a temporary restraining order said. "DHS (the U.S. Department of Homeland Security) already has and contracts with multiple detention centers in Florida and across the United States. To the extent that DHS claims to have insufficient capacity to detain people in response to its own initiative to ramp up apprehensions, that lack of planning does not require or justify bypassing federal laws to develop a new facility within a national preserve and next to a national park."
But the state's attorneys contended that the National Environmental Policy Act places requirements on federal agencies, not states, and that Florida decided to establish the detention center. They also cited an "immigration crisis."
"The risks from delaying the detention facility, which include both imperiling critical immigration enforcement and endangering detainees in current facilities, overwhelm any incidental environmental harm caused by a temporary facility on an existing site," the state response said. "NEPA (the federal law), in short, does not prevent the states from engaging in critical, timely infrastructure projects."
But in seeking the temporary restraining order, the environmental groups pushed back against such arguments.
"Putting aside whether intractable political gridlock over immigration reform constitutes an 'emergency,' it does not give license to the state and federal governments to simply disregard the laws that govern federal projects affecting environmentally sensitive lands, essential waterways, national parks and preserves, and endangered species," wrote attorneys from the Earthjustice legal organization, the Center for Biological Diversity and the Coffey Burlington law firm.
The lawsuit, filed in the federal Southern District of Florida, names as defendants Florida Division of Emergency Management Director Kevin Guthrie; U.S. Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem; U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Acting Director Todd Lyons; and Miami-Dade County. The county owns the site, which is also partly in Collier County.
The county responds
The county on Monday also filed a response objecting to the plaintiffs' request for a temporary restraining order against Miami-Dade. It said the state had used emergency powers and "commandeered" use of the airport. The federal government had not filed a response as of early Monday evening.
The case has been assigned to U.S. District Judge Jose Martinez. The state is represented by Attorney General James Uthmeier's office and attorneys with the Boies Schiller Flexner law firm.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
13 minutes ago
- Fox News
Mamdani is an existential threat to Jewish New Yorkers
A man who has a twisted, revisionist theory about the Holocaust and the history of Jewish suffering has a real chance to become the mayor of the largest populated Jewish city outside of Israel. Let that sink in. A man who was asked to condemn "Globalize the Intifada," a violent, vicious series of uprisings against Jews across Israel, and refused to do so may become mayor of New York City. "To me, ultimately, what I hear in so many is a desperate desire for equality and equal rights in standing up for Palestinian human rights," Zohran Mamdani said, notably with no regrets. He never backed down, and instead of apologizing to the Jewish community, decided to take a moment to speak about Islamophobia. Yes, that is a very real issue, and one I have worked hard to combat myself throughout my own career. But this was a moment for Mamdani to show the Jewish world that he is empathetic and can admit when he made a mistake. He didn't. He just said: "It pains me to be called an antisemite." Well, if Jewish leaders are calling you an antisemite, including the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, maybe you should speak with us to see why we believe this is so. A mayor who openly protested Jewish students on campus and started a Students for Justice in Palestine chapter will certainly not be friendly to Jews who don't fit his tokenized criteria of what makes a good Jew. His support of BDS is another shocking reality that Jewish New Yorkers may face if he wins the November general election. Simply put, anti-Zionism is the latest form of antisemitism. Anti-Zionism denies Jews the right to self-defense. Anti-Zionism denies the historical connection between the Jewish people and the land of Israel. Furthermore, according to Politico, this is a man who refused to co-sponsor a bill condemning the Holocaust. His rhetoric is simply unacceptable and indefensible. Since that article, Mamdani accused Politico of making "baseless accusations" and "falsely claiming that I refused to condemn the Holocaust," the publication reported at the time. In May 2024, Mamdani introduced the antisemitic "Not on Our Dime" bill, seeking to strip Jewish nonprofits supporting Israel of their tax-exempt status. Needless to say, it was rejected as a "nonstarter" by New York lawmakers. Imagine what would have happened in New York City if Iran and Israel's 12-day war took place with Mamdani as mayor. Do you think Jewish New Yorkers would feel safe? Do you think there would be extra protection at synagogues and Jewish events? The answer, emphatically, is no. In April, the NYPD reported 41 antisemitic hate crimes, the highest since 45 incidents in June 2024. I am truly worried to speculate what will happen if Mamdani becomes mayor and the antisemitic gangs he's associated with feel empowered. This is a challenging time for Jewish New Yorkers. In the words often attributed to the Anglo-Irish philosopher and statesman Edmund Burke, "All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing." We call on men and women of goodwill from all faiths and ethnicities to raise their voices in screaming protest and to call out Mamdani's blatant antisemitic and anti-Israel rhetoric and diatribe.
Fox News
13 minutes ago
- Fox News
Trump could arm Israel with US B-2s and bunker busters if Iran tries to go nuclear under new proposal
FIRST ON FOX: A bipartisan pair of lawmakers has proposed authorizing President Donald Trump to transfer B-2 stealth bombers and 30,000-pound "bunker buster" bombs to Israel if Iran is found to still be developing a nuclear weapon after last week's strikes. The legislation, proposed by Reps. Josh Gottheimer, D-N.J., and Mike Lawler, R-N.Y., introduced the Bunker Buster Act, which would allow Trump to "take actions to ensure Israel is prepared for all contingencies if Iran seeks to develop a nuclear weapon." B-2 bomber pilots launched 14 bunker buster bombs on Iran's top three nuclear sites, in a move that Trump claims "totally obliterated" the Iranian regime's nuclear program. Israel, for its part, hit a number of Iranian sites and took out top military brass. However, it doesn't possess the 30,000-pound GBU 57 Massive Ordnance Penetrators, precision-guided munition bombs developed for the U.S. Air Force. The 20-foot-long weapons can travel 200 feet deep inside a target before exploding. As of 2024, the U.S. had 19 B-2s in operation. It does not transfer custody of its B-2 stealth bombers to any of its allies. "Iran, the leading state sponsor of terror, and one of America's top enemies, can never have a nuclear weapon. That's why I strongly supported our military actions earlier this month. Iran has killed scores of Americans, including our service members, and repeatedly attacked our key democratic ally, Israel. Israel must be able to defend herself against Iran, and ensure that Iran cannot rebuild its nuclear capabilities," Gottheimer said in a statement. "This bill gives the President the authority to equip Israel with the tools and training they need to deter Tehran and make the world a safer place," said Lawler. The International Atomic Energy Agency's (IAEA) Chair Rafael Grossi told Radio France Internationale the centrifuges at Iran's underground Fordow nuclear site are "no longer operational," after the U.S. strikes. However, some have questioned whether Iran may have attempted to move its stock of enriched uranium away from the sites that were targeted, but Grossi told CBS over the weekend that Iran may again begin enriching uranium in a "matter of months." "The capacities they have are there. They can have, you know, in a matter of months, I would say, a few cascades of centrifuges spinning and producing enriched uranium, or less than that. But as I said, frankly speaking, one cannot claim that everything has disappeared and there is nothing there," he said. "It is clear that there has been severe damage, but it's not total damage," Grossi added. "Iran has the capacities there; industrial and technological capacities. So if they so wish, they will be able to start doing this again." Meanwhile, after a Houthi strike on Israel, U.S. Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee suggested the U.S. send B-2 bombers to Yemen to strike Houthi targets. "We thought we were done with missiles coming to Israel, but Houthis just lit one up over us in Israel. Fortunately, Israel's incredible interception system means we go to the shelter & wait until all clear. Maybe those B2 bombers need to visit Yemen!" B-2 bomber planes traveled to Yemen to strike Houthi targets in October 2024.
Washington Post
17 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Virginia agrees not to fully enforce state law banning conversion therapy for LGBTQ+ minors
RICHMOND, Va. — Virginia officials have agreed not to fully enforce a 2020 law banning conversion therapy for minors as part of an agreement with a faith-based conservative group that sued over the law, authorities said earlier this week. The Virginia Department of Health Professions, represented by the state's office of the attorney general, entered into a consent decree with the Founding Freedoms Law Center last month, saying officials will not discipline counselors who engage in talk conversion therapy.
