Holy airball! Have the nepo babies found another way to put everyone's backs up?
Name: Wealth bragging.
Age: There's Buddhist scripture warning against it, so let's assume pretty old.
Appearance: Evolving.
Don't worry, I'm very up to date on this. It's all about stealth wealth these days, right? You mean subtle demonstrations of wealth that deliberately make a point of not looking obnoxious?
Yes, that's exactly it. Ha ha ha. No.
What has it changed to? Are you familiar with the 'holy airball' trend?
I'm an adult with real-world responsibilities, so of course I'm not. OK, so the TikTok kids are saying 'Holy airball' whenever someone underestimates them. For example, the professional swimmer Alexia Sotomayor posted a video that said 'told him i'm a swimmer, he said 'i used to swim in the summer, i can probably beat you''. Then there was a clip of her preparing for the world championship, and the word 'Holyfrickenairball'.
Oh, gross. Yes, it's a wildly ostentatious boast. But now the nepo babies are doing it.
Give me an example. Reese Witherspoon and Ryan Phillippe's daughter, Ava, just posted a TikTok that read: 'I told him my mum's a lawyer, and he said, 'Oh what firm does she work at?'' The holy airball moment here was a photo of her mother in Legally Blonde.
Any others? Martin Scorsese's daughter, Francesca, got in on the act ('I told him my dad is a film-maker. He said 'Oh nice, for like commercials or something?'' ) and Akon's daughter, Alianna ('told him my dad was in the music industry … he said 'oh, like a manager?'').
Oh, it's wrong to be proud of your parents now, is it? Well, this is just the tip of the iceberg. Because now the children of CEOs have waded in. The daughter of an Airbnb executive posted a TikTok reading, 'I told him my family owned an Airbnb. Him: 'Oh their little apartment must be cute'', followed by a slideshow of expensive rental properties. The daughter of an Anthropologie designer did one that said: 'I told him my mom designed a famous candle. He said, 'like for a farmer's market?'.'
This is sweet. No it isn't. It's one thing to brag about your own accomplishments, but it's far uglier to brag about accomplishments you had nothing to do with and only benefit from. The subtext of all these TikToks is essentially: 'Look how rich I'm going to be when my parent dies.'
I'm not sure that's the case. And the format of the videos is offputting too. God forbid anyone asks you a follow-up question when you're boasting about your mum.
So I shouldn't show off about my parents online? Not unless you want everyone to think you're incapable of standing on your own two feet without them, no.
Do say: 'TikTokers are bragging about generational wealth.'
Don't say: 'Their parents must be so proud.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
30 minutes ago
- The Sun
Tennis legend Martina Navratilova slams Hollywood star Pedro Pascal over his JK Rowling criticism following trans feud
TENNIS legend Martina Navratilova has slammed Pedro Pascal for criticizing JK Rowling. Pascal is one of Hollywood's biggest stars right now and a stern supporter of trans rights. 3 3 Rowling has conflicting views with Pascal, who has a transgender sibling. The Harry Potter author recently supported the Supreme Court ruling that protected women-only spaces. "I love it when a plan comes together," she posted alongside a picture of her smoking a cigar on a boat. Pascal responded by calling Rowling's reaction "awful" and "disgusting." "I can't think of anything more vile and small and pathetic than terrorizing the smallest, most vulnerable community of people who want nothing from you, except the right to exist," he responded in a separate post. In a recent Vanity Fair interview, he continued his tirade against Rowling while defending his strong response. "The one thing that I would say I agonized over a little bit was just, 'Am I helping? Am I f***ing helping?'" Pascal said. "It's a situation that deserves the utmost elegance so that something can actually happen, and people will actually be protected. "Listen, I want to protect the people I love. "But it goes beyond that. Bullies make me f***ing sick." The Last of Us season 2 trailer hints at long-awaited release date Rowling quickly fired off a response at Pascal. "Can't say I feel very shut down, but keep at it, Pedro," she said. "God loves a trier." Navratilova is outspoken against transgender topics like Rowling. "I hate that the Democrats totally failed women and girls on this very clear issue of women's sports being for females only," she posted in April. Navratilova joined Rowling in posting against Pascal. "Another Johnny come lately telling women to STFU," she posted. Navratilova is a tennis legend, winning 18 major titles in her career.
Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
Your 2p coin could be worth £1,000 if it has two-word error
An expert explained exactly how to spot this valuable coin. Brits are urged to keep an eye out for a highly valuable coin that could fetch up to £1,000. This seemingly ordinary two pence piece is highly sought after by collectors. However, the coin, from 1983, is only valuable if it features a specific error. This mistake has been verified by the Royal Mint as was thought to affect just a 'small number' of coins from that year. In a video uploaded to social media platform TikTok, a coin expert known as the Coin Collecting Wizard explained more. He said: 'Your two pence coin could be worth £1,000. Want to know why?' The error you need to look for means that instead of the standard words 'two pence' on the coin's reverse side (tail side), it will say 'new pence'. This was the standard phrase used on these coins following decimalisation but it was meant to change in 1982. 'Well it is all to do with this right here, the words 'new pence' all because of a simple wording mistake,' he continued. 'In 1982 the Royal Mint officially changed the wording on the coin from 'new pence' to 'two pence' to reflect that decimalisation was now well established. 'However, in 1983 a small number of 2p coins were accidentally struck using the old new pence dies.' Although this coin could be 'hard to find', it's still worth looking for it in your change. He said: 'These rare error coins were never meant for circulation and most were included in special sets making them incredibly hard to find. If you spot a 1983 2p coin with 'new pence' on it rather than 'two pence' you are holding a £1,000 mistake in your hand. 'But you must remember this important information - the only valuable new pence coin is in fact the 2p coin from 1983, none others.' The Royal Mint notes on its website: "In 1983 a small number of 2p coins were mistakenly struck with the wording 'new pence' on the reverse. These coins were produced to brilliant uncirculated quality - a standard higher than ordinary circulating coins - and were included in special sets intended for collectors. "Since there are relatively few coins with the date 1983 and the inscription 'new pence' in circulation, they may well have a value higher than face value to a collector. The Royal Mint is, however, unable to comment on the value of any individual coin and we would recommend that you should consult a coin dealer." At the time of reporting, an example of the new pence two pence coin was listed on eBay for £1,999.95.
Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
The 1% Club stumps viewers with tricky question but some insist it's 'easy'
Viewers of the ITV game show The 1% Club were left baffled by a recent question that it's claimed 99% of people can't answer correctly - but some insisted it was 'too easy' This quiz question shared in a recent episode of the ITV game show The 1% club is said to be so difficult that a whopping 99% of people can't answer it correctly. Do you think you've got what it takes to solve it? Hosted by Lee Mack, The 1% Club sees contestants answer a series of questions which get increasingly harder as the game goes on. They begin with brainteasers that 90% of people are expected to get right, and slowly drop down the percentages until they arrive at the fiendishly difficult 1% question, which must be answered correctly in order to win the jackpot. A clip from a recent episode of the show was shared on TikTok and showed contestants attempting to solve the final question - a tricky puzzle that is aimed at the top 1% of the population. The question was: "If you remove all the underlined letters from the sentence below, what word can be spelt if you rearrange all of the remaining letters? "ONE S ELL I N G FR ES H SAL MO N." Contestants on the show only have 30 seconds to lock in their answer, and they cannot make notes, such as writing down what letters are left after removing the underlined ones. If you want to really consider yourself brainy enough to solve the 1% question, then you'll need to do the working out entirely in your head too - though we wouldn't blame you for using a pen and paper! Are you struggling to work out the answer? Let us give you a hint: the four-word sentence is another clue in itself. Think carefully about what "one selling fresh salmon" might mean, and you'll arrive at the answer. Don't scroll down any further before you've come to a conclusion on what you think the answer might be. We're about to tell you the solution, so check if you were right down below. Answer If you remove all the underlined letters, you're left with: "ONESIGFRHM." That doesn't mean anything as it is, but you should be able to work out the anagram now. If you keep the initial clue, "one selling fresh salmon", in mind as you look at the letters, you should arrive at one solution: Fishmonger. Commenters on the TikTok video were divided on the question. While some admitted it was "impossible" for them to solve, others argued it was "so easy", especially for a question deemed too tough for 99% of people. One person said: "This is impossible." Another added: "Couldn't figure it out, went to the comments for the answer. Didn't even see the four words staring me in the face as a clue." However, someone else stated: "It's easy if you read the clue in the sentence." There were also several people in the comments who didn't quite understand what they were supposed to be doing. Some were slightly incorrect by entering "fisherman" as the answer, while others missed the mark completely, suggesting answers such as "freshing", "aloneness", and "reformings".
