O'Reilly: Trump believes Iran will surrender
'(Trump) doesn't want to use American air power at this point – because that would cause some problems with China and (Russia),' O'Reilly said Monday evening on NewsNation's 'On Balance' with host Leland Vittert. 'He would rather have the Iranians surrender, which he believes they will.'
'What President Trump's strategy is, is to play this out a little longer because Israel is getting stronger while Iran is getting weaker,' he added.
O'Reilly, author of the upcoming book 'Confronting Evil' about vicious historical figures, said he had been texting with Trump on Monday as Israel and Iran traded air strikes for almost five straight days.
'(Trump) believes that the mullahs are through; they will have to sign a deal,' O'Reilly continued. 'The deal will be that the weapons inspectors go into all of the places that are working on the nuke, they identify what they have, and then the Iranians themselves, under supervision of the United Nations, would destroy a lot of their arsenal.'
'The mullahs don't want to do that, obviously, but President Trump believes that will happen,' the former Fox News host added.
Trump departed the Group of Seven (G7) summit of world leaders in Canada late Monday — a day earlier than expected to return to Washington to monitor the ongoing conflict.
O'Reilly's personal conversation with the president echos what Trump told reporters early Tuesday when he described what he was seeking as a 'complete give-up' by Iran.
'I'm not looking for a ceasefire; we're looking at better than a ceasefire,' Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One his return flight. 'Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon — it's very simple.'
The Middle Eastern nations have exchanged attacks since Thursday, when the Israeli military carried out a surprise strike on Iranian nuclear facilities and killed multiple top military leaders and scientists.
Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Trump warned residents of Tehran to evacuate Monday, after the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) had taken out Iran's air defense systems, giving them clear airspace to continue strikes.
Netanyahu has said he wouldn't rule out targeting Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, but Trump reportedly tried to dissuade Israel's leader from moving forward with an assassination plot.
The president has not ruled out the possibility of the U.S. military getting involved.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Israel's Iran strategy heavily banks on US getting good nuclear deal, sources say
Israel also hopes that Trump can successfully place limits on Iran's ballistic missile supply, but this is even more uncertain. Israel is feeling ascendant after its significant achievements against Iran during the June 13-24 war. Still, sources have said that the current strategy going forward is overwhelmingly banking on the US nailing Tehran down to a tough and long new nuclear deal. If the US does not secure such an airtight deal, Israel is unclear on what its strategy or next steps would be. In contrast to the ceasefire deal and end of the war with Hezbollah on November 27, 2024 which in and of itself set clear limits on Hezbollah's right to rearm and clearly outlined how Israel could proactively enforce those limits, the Iran ceasefire simply stopped the fighting between the sides with zero provisions regarding the future. This lack of a clear plan and certainty is true about how much Israel thinks it can hold back the Islamic Republic from rebuilding its heavily damaged nuclear weapons program, and sources have indicated that the plan may even be less clear regarding imposing and enforcing limits on Iran's ballistic missile program. Jerusalem's ideal world would be a US-brokered deal that ends Iran's nuclear program or ends its uranium enrichment and advanced centrifuges for a period of multiple decades, as well as keeps its quantity of ballistic missiles with a range to hit Israel down at the current 500-1,000 total missiles level. But what if Iran only agrees to certain concessions, but not others? For example, Iran could agree not to enrich uranium for the next year or two, during a period of time when it may not in any event be able to do so after the Israeli and American attacks, followed by enriching uranium at "low levels" like it did under the 2015 JCPOA nuclear deal. This would basically be accepting the offer that US President Donald Trump was offering them before the war, except now they would be "losing" nothing because they cannot, at least for some period of time, do very much uranium enrichment right now anyway. Would Trump reject such a deal and potentially allow Iran to rebuild its nuclear program with no limits and no IAEA inspectors? The part about the IAEA inspectors is not theoretical, as since June 13, the UN nuclear inspectors have had no access to any aspects of the Iranian nuclear program. In fact, as of Wednesday, Iran also formally announced that it has indefinitely cut ties with the IAEA. This does not mean that Jerusalem and Washington are blind about what is happening in Iran. On Tuesday, The Jerusalem Post reported that Israeli satellites took tens of millions of photos of Iranian territory leading up to and ruing the 12-day war. But wherever the IAEA had electronic surveillance, it had 24-7 surveillance even indoors, even underground, something which is difficult even for top intelligence agencies to achieve. In short, IAEA inspections have never been sufficient by themselves, but they are crucial and invaluable. If the world was partially blind regarding Iran's nuclear program when Iran rolled back cooperation with the IAEA in 2021 and again in 2022, it is truly blind now. The only good news so far on the nuclear front is that even Iran is starting to admit that its nuclear facilities, including Fordow, were badly damaged. This means that even if the world is blind, there could be several months or more of little new progress by Iran toward reconstituting its nuclear program, no matter how hard it tries. Prior to the war, the Islamic Republic's ballistic missile program was not even on the table. Now, Israel will try to inject it onto the table, arguing that Iran's three massive ballistic missile attacks on the Jewish state in April 2024, October 2024, and this month make it a new existential threat. What if Trump settles for a nuclear deal, but with no limits on ballistic missiles? Israel was worried about Iran building a facility which could jump its missile inventory from 2,500 to 4,000 in around a year or so, and to 8,800 in around two years. Such numbers could overwhelm Israel's missile shield in a far more devastating way than even the 28 Israelis killed and 1,250 wounded from the 12-day war. Presumably, then, Israel would attack before the numbers ballooned that much. But how soon would Israel attack? When will the numbers get back to the pre-war 2,500 level? Earlier, such as when Iran builds and starts to operate a new ballistic missile production facility? Or yet earlier, as soon as it starts to build such a facility? Or maybe Israel can agree to Iran building unlimited ballistic missiles as long as their range falls below the 1,500 kilometer range to hit the Jewish state, given that many Iranian missiles do fall below that range. Will Jerusalem really risk ballistic missile attacks on hospitals, universities, and central Israel just to stop a facility from being built? And if it won't, will it get harder to respond even as the process goes forward because Israeli leaders will need to admit they are afraid of the Iranian response? Jerusalem has some time to let Trump try to resolve these issues. But if Trump cannot resolve them in the coming weeks or months, Israel will likely need to make some clear, hard, and uncompromising decisions about being ready to enforce certain limits, with coordination with the US and a yellow light to strike, even if there is not full-throated approval.
Bloomberg
an hour ago
- Bloomberg
GOP Resistance Softens as Trump Presses House on Tax Package
Conservative hardliners' resistance to Donald Trump's massive tax and spending package began to soften late Wednesday as the president and his allies worked to win them over. Republican congressional leaders delayed a key procedural vote on the measure for hours while ultra-conservatives concerned by the bill's $3.4 trillion cost gathered in a room just off the House floor to refine their demands and then met with Trump's budget director, Russ Vought.
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Hamas still won't do a cease-fire unless it's handed a fundamental victory
President Donald Trump says he's hoping Hamas will accept his team's latest proposal for a 60-day cease-fire with Israel as soon as next week — but the terror group's immediate counter-offer shows why he's in for disappointment. Trump reported that Israel has accepted the deal, which would include a partial withdrawal of Israeli troops from Gaza and a surge in humanitarian aid. A Hamas official says his group, too, is 'ready and serious regarding reaching an agreement' — but only one that 'leads to the complete end of the war.' Same old, same old: That's been the terror group's chief demand from the start. It wants Israel to permanently halt its operations in Gaza with Hamas left free to rebuild — to eventually attack the Jewish state again. Israel can let Hamas' leaders live — but not in Gaza. Before the war ends, 'there will not be a Hamas,' declared Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Wednesday. 'We're not going back to that.' Israel cannot allow any repeat of Hamas' Oct. 7 slaughterfest. And with the group's benefactor, Iran, now severely weakened, there's no reason for Jerusalem not to finish the job: Force these monsters to cry uncle . . . or destroy them. Trump warns that if Hamas rejects the deal, 'IT WILL ONLY GET WORSE' for the group, but that hasn't budged the terrorists before. These bitter-enders may even prefer death. If they refuse to disarm, that's exactly what they deserve. Deal or not.
