
Jane Street Scam Explainer: Why Sebi banned Wall Street giant Jane Street?
By manipulating the prices of the 12-stock Bank Nifty index, the firm earned over one-fifth of its $20.5 billion net income from this single market. Their strategy involved artificially inflating prices to lure unsuspecting retail investors into buying those stocks or their derivatives. Once prices hit their targets, Jane Street would offload its positions, leaving retail investors with the losses.
According to Sebi's initial assessment, JS Group entities have pocketed a whopping Rs 36,502 crore by this pumping and dumping strategy between January 1, 2023 and March 31, 2025 just from manipulating primarily three (HDFC Bank, ICICI Bank and Kotak Bank which constitute as much as 65% of the sectoral index weighting) of the 12 Bank Nifty stocks -– all in just 21 trading days and Rs 735 crore in just one day on January 17, 2024!!!
Unearthing their nakedly illegal practice, the Sebi in an interim order, issued by its whole time member Anantha Narayan G, banned the from the market as well as ordered impounding of Rs 4,843.5 crore of illicit gains they made, which it hopes to recover from their Rs 15,000 crore of Gsecs holding as from July one, the regulator has restricted a traders carry forward derivatives positions to just about Rs 1,500 crore. While the order is interim, the bank on them is in force from the date of the order and will continue till the final order is issued or courts lift/stay the order or until the company returns the alleged unlawful gains of Rs 4,843 crore.
What is Jane Street and How Big is It?
Founded in 2000 by a team of traders and technologists in New York, Jane Street is a global proprietary trading giant with over 2,600 employees across its five offices across the US, Europe, and Asia and trades in 45 countries. It deploys very complex algorithms all developed in-house to execute high frequency algo trades. I entered the domestic market only in 2020 and has three subsidiaries in the country-- JSI Investments, JSI2 Investments, Jane Street Singapore, and Jane Street Asia Trading—along with Nuvama Wealth Management as their local partner for cash trades, given that foreign traders cannot directly trade in the cash segment.
In 2024, it made a whopping $20.5 billion in net income, a fifth of which was made from pumping and dumping Bank Nifty. This is the combined profit of much bigger Wall Street players like Citi and Bank of America have made together in the year. However, the entire gamut of their gaming will be out only when Sebi completes the probe into other indices and exchanges, which Sebi sources say will take at least six months.
On just 21 days of trade between January 1, 2023 and March 31, 2025, it made a whopping Rs 36,502 crore from the country just gaming the Bank Nifty. But Sebi says all of this is not illegal. The Sebi breakdown is: Rs 43,289 crore in index options; Rs 900 crore in stock options, and losses of Rs 7,208 crore in stock futures (which Sebi says is purposefully sold in losses) and Rs 288 crore loss in cash segment which again was as planned.
Of this it made a whopping Rs 735 crore from Bank Nifty on January 17, 2024 alone—which in fact was the beginning of their undoing as well. Because Sebi began to monitor them more closely from that day onwards.
When Did Jane Street Come Under Sebi Radar?
Last year, the JS Group sued its Wall Street rival Millennium Management and its ex-employees Douglass Schadewald and Daniel Spottiswood in a New York court. They were accused of allegedly stealing confidential trading strategy and sharing it with their employer Millennium. Its lawyers claimed that the now stolen strategy was JS' most profitable one having helped it earn $1 billion in net income from one market in 2023 which the lawyers of Millennium and Schadewald and Spottiswood inadvertently identified as India during the court arguments.
JS also admitted that since it lost the tech clout due to stealing by these two men, its profit from this tool alone fell by 50% in March 2024 as Millennium also started benefitting from this. In fact it is this $1 billion figure which JS did not dispute in the court is what alerted Sebi to closely watch its dealings in the country
Sebi's probe into JS also was part of its effort to mitigate the steep losses that retail traders were making in the derivatives space. Its own study has found as much a 93% of retail lost money
Given that the NSE is the world's largest derivatives exchange, controlling as much as 60% of global equity derivative trading volume of 7.3 billion trades in April-- down from over 75% of global trade before Sebi clamped down a lot from November 20, 2024. And the retail investors are the most vulnerable to high-risk derivative trading, with 93% of them making losses according to Sebi's own study released last September which quantified the per trader loss at a whopping Rs 1.25 lakh in FY24.
"The findings of an earlier research report by Sebi, which inter alia states that 93% of retail investors made losses when trading in the options market, now gain additional context. Such losses, when juxtaposed with the abnormally high profits made by the JS Group entities as a result of the prima facie manipulation of the cash, futures and options markets, are reflective of the deep damage that the group has inflicted through their illegal activities," Narayan said in his order.
Following this US case revelations, Sebi in April 2024 began analyzing the proprietary trades by JS. There were also media reports that unauthorised algo trading was rampant in the system. Then on January 17, 2025, Sebi found highly volatility in Bank Nifty (after HDFC Bank result on Jan 16) when the index plunged by 2200 points in the first 7 minutes of the trade from 47000. After this, Sebi asked NSE to warn them first which the exchange asked them to cease and desist from their pumping and dumping strategy on February 6 2025.
And JS assured the exchange and Sebi that they would behave but again they resumed the game in May on all weekly expiries. 'This was the last nail on the Sebi' patience,' a source told TNIE Saturday.
Why the Sebi Ban?
In its 105-page order along with 500-odd pages in the annexures, Sebi, in detail has flagged the 'manipulative' and 'fraudulent' trades by Jane Street that mostly took place on the expiry day of the Nifty Bank index weekly options contracts and in its underlying constituents in the cash market.
Sebi alleges—as it can be challenged in the SAT, High Court and finally in the Supreme Court--that Jane Street has been manipulating the Bank Nifty index by making aggressive trades in the morning to push up the index, only to reverse those trades later while holding option positions that profited from these moves. Over a the two-year period, beginning January 1, 2023 and March 31, 2025 and then on all the weekly expiry days of the Nifty in May 2025, they are said to have made Rs 43,289 crore in gains from options—a significant chunk of which Sebi believes came through unfair means as it controlled almost a quarter of the entire volume.
Main Trigger--Jan 17, 2024 Profit of Rs 735 crore
The first main trigger for the Sebi to keep them under closer watch was the whopping Rs 735 crore profit they made on from Bank Nifty on a single day on January 17, 2024—which in fact was the beginning of their undoing as well. Because Sebi began to monitor them more closely from that day onwards. This profit minting between January 2023 and March 2025 had them pocketing as much as Rs 36,506 crore.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
43 minutes ago
- Time of India
FII flows turn negative in July amid caution over trade talks, earnings outlook
Foreign institutional investors (FIIs), who had been net buyers in May and June, have turned sellers in the first week of July, reflecting a cautious sentiment amid global uncertainty and stretched valuations in the Indian market. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Markets pause after strong run Foreign institutional investors (FIIs), who had been net buyers in May and June, have turned sellers in the first week of July, reflecting a cautious sentiment amid global uncertainty and stretched valuations in the Indian to Dr. V.K. Vijayakumar, Chief Investment Strategist at Geojit Financial Services , the strong FII buying trend that picked up in May has weakened. "FIIs were buyers to the tune of Rs 18,082 crore and Rs 8,466 crore in May and June, respectively. But early July FII activity indicates selling. In the first four days of July, FIIs were sellers every day, with a cumulative sell figure of Rs 5,772 crore," he the latter half of June, FIIs had shown buying interest in financials, autos, auto components, and oil & gas, while booking profits in capital goods and power. "There is a trend of profit booking in segments that have done well recently," Vijayakumar added that the return of FII inflows would depend on two key factors: progress in India–U.S. trade talks and earnings growth in the upcoming Q1FY26 results. 'If a trade deal happens between India and the U.S., that will be positive for markets and FII flows. Similarly, any signs of an earnings recovery in Q1 could provide further support,' he said. However, any setback on either front may weigh on sentiment and dampen FII Read: TCS, HCLTech among 10 stocks that have paid dividends over 40 times since 2011 After rallying over 15% between March and June, Indian equities have taken a breather in July. In the first four trading sessions of the month, the Sensex and Nifty declined marginally by around 0.2%, as stretched valuations and global cues prompted investors to adopt a wait-and-watch focus remains on the outcome of trade discussions, with U.S. President Donald Trump's July 9 deadline for reciprocal tariffs approaching fast. Investors are also awaiting cues from the earnings season, which begins next Friday, benchmark indices edged higher, aided by a rebound in IT and financial stocks. The Nifty 50 rose 0.22% to close at 25,461, while the BSE Sensex added 0.23% to end at 83,432.89. Despite the day's gains, both indices posted weekly sectors, seven of the 13 major indices ended lower for the week. Financials fell 1.75%, pulling back from record highs. However, small-cap and mid-cap indices posted weekly gains of 0.3% and 0.5%, respectively, supported by steady domestic inflows, a stable monsoon outlook, and expectations of stronger Q1 earnings on a low said valuation concerns and broad-based profit-taking kept investors on the sidelines through much of the week. With global developments and corporate earnings set to unfold in the coming days, the near-term trajectory for FII flows and market direction will likely hinge on incoming Read: 10 Nifty smallcap stocks analysts expect to rally up to 72% (Disclaimer: Recommendations, suggestions, views, and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of The Economic Times)


New Indian Express
an hour ago
- New Indian Express
NTR district sets Rs 18.23 lakh crore GDP target under Swarnandhra Vision
VIJAYAWADA: NTR District In-charge Minister Y Satya Kumar Yadav announced that draft plans for the development of Vijayawada and other constituencies were prepared based on available resources, with a target of Rs 18.23 lakh crore Gross Domestic Product (GDP). At a review meeting held in Vijayawada on Saturday, the Minister, along with MP Kesineni Sivanath, MLAs Gadde Rammohan, Bonda Umamaheswara Rao, Sriram Rajgopal, Kolikapudi Srinivasa Rao, and Collector G Lakshmisha, discussed progress under the Swarnandhra P4 ('Public, Private, People Partnership) Foundation. They reviewed key sectors including agriculture, industry, services, tourism, food processing, zero-budget natural farming, Farmer Producer Organisations (FPOs), and mechanisation. During the meeting the NTR District In-charge Minister stated, 'P4 is a key chapter in good governance,' and added that implementation will align with Swarnandhra goals through regular reviews. Saty Kumar Yadav said the district's per capita income in 2023–24 stood at Rs 3,21,651, with targets of Rs 6,38,946 by 2028–29 and Rs 1,10,0000 by 2047–48. Swachh Andhra Corporation Chairman K Pattabhiram, Krishna District Cooperative Central (KDCC) Chairman Nettem Raghuram, Joint Collector S Ilakkiya, and Vijayawada Municipal Corporation (VMC) Commissioner Dhanachandra HM also took part in the review meeting.


Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
ED attaches actor Ranya Rao's assets in gold smuggling case: What to know
The Enforcement Directorate (ED) attached assets worth over Rs 34 crore linked to Kannada actor Ranya Rao in a gold smuggling-related money laundering case. On Friday (July 4), the central agency said that false customs declarations were filed in Dubai — where Rao had a travel history — declaring the destination of gold shipments as Switzerland or the US, but in fact, it was for India. 'The attachments have been made in terms of Section 5(1) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act as property equivalent in value to the untraced proceeds of crime identified during the course of investigation,' the ED said. On March 3, the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) arrested Rao at the Bengaluru airport on her arrival from Dubai and recovered 14.2 kg of gold bars valued at more than Rs 12.56 crore from her possession. On March 9, the DRI arrested Telugu actor Tarun Konduru, Rao's accomplice. The ED said, 'Ranya Rao, in active collusion with Tarun Konduru Raju and others, orchestrated a well-structured operation for smuggling gold into India. Gold was procured from suppliers based in Dubai, Uganda, and other jurisdictions, and payments were made through hawala channels in cash, thereby circumventing legal financial systems.' The probe revealed that the smuggled gold was then sold in India to jewellers and other local entities, and the proceeds were laundered through hawala remittances abroad to finance repeat smuggling consignments. Here is what to know. In early March, DRI officials called it 'one of the biggest seizures of gold at Bengaluru airport in recent times.' The DRI was investigating whether the incident was an isolated incident or a part of a series of gold-smuggling trips, noting that Rao, 33, travelled to Dubai 27 times over the previous six months. The case also raised questions on possible police involvement, as local officers would escort Rao home from the airport after she returned from her frequent trips to Dubai. Rao is also the stepdaughter of the senior Karnataka IPS officer K Ramachandra Rao. She is alleged to have used airport protocol services available to her father to escape customs checks and detection at the Bengaluru airport on arrival from Dubai. Earlier this month, the Income Tax (I-T) department said it would investigate Rao's wealth. Until its repeal in 1990, the Gold (Control) Act, 1968, curbed gold imports and heavily restricted the acquisition, possession, and disposal of gold in India. However, with economic liberalisation in the 1990s, the government modified its approach, imposing an import duty on gold at the rate of Rs 250 for every 10 grams, leading to a boom in gold imports in the following years. Gold imports are largely governed by the Customs Act, 1962, and by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC). The customs duty for gold may differ depending on the amount of gold carried by a passenger and the duration spent abroad before travelling back to India, as per the Baggage Rules, 2016 (issued under the Customs Act). Under these rules, a man residing abroad for over a year may carry up to 20 grams of jewellery duty-free (with a value cap of Rs 50,000), and a woman may similarly carry up to 40 grams (with a cap of Rs 1 lakh). The CBIC also has specific guidelines for Indian passengers returning from Dubai after residing there for over six months, allowing them to carry up to 1 kg of gold as long as the applicable customs duty is paid. The customs duty for gold is: 3% customs duty: for men carrying 20-50 grams of gold and women carrying 40-100 grams; 6% customs duty: for men carrying 50-100 grams and women carrying 100-200 grams; 10% customs duty: For men carrying over 100 grams and women carrying over 200 grams. In 2003, the Supreme Court held that any article imported without complying with the relevant conditions or restrictions must be considered a 'prohibited good'. Such goods are liable to be confiscated under Section 111 and punished under Section 112 of the Customs Act. The punishment may include a fine of up to the value of the goods. Section 135 provides a punishment of up to 7 years imprisonment if the market price of the smuggled goods exceeds Rs. 1 lakh. Smuggling is also punishable under Section 111 (Organised Crime) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, which punishes 'trafficking in…illicit goods' with imprisonment of at least five years, extendable to life imprisonment. The Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) also carries the same punishment for smuggling as a 'terrorist act' under Section 15 if it causes 'damage to the monetary stability of India'. This is an updated version of an explainer published earlier this year.