93% of Bihar voters given enumeration forms, 13.2% have submitted them: EC
NEW DELHI: With enumeration forms distributed to 93.7% of Bihar's 7.9 crore electorate so far and 13.2% electors already submitting the completed and signed forms, EC officials Saturday told TOI that documents can be added or uploaded by electors whose enumeration forms were submitted with incomplete documentation, right until July 25.
July 25 is the last date for submission of the filled-up enumeration forms.
"As of Saturday 6pm, over one crore enumeration forms (13.2% of Bihar's electors) have been received. The percentage of forms distributed has also gone up to 93.6%, with 7.4 crore forms given to the electors," an EC spokesperson said.
Chief election commissioner Gyanesh Kumar, while welcoming the fast-paced work on SIR in Bihar, said the exercise will be completed as scheduled, with the cooperation of all and 100% transparency.
Sources in the poll panel told TOI that where enumeration forms are short on one or more required documents, there shall be a window for the elector concerned to submit them anytime before July 25.
"In order to get one's name in the draft electoral roll, the strict condition is to sign and submit the pre-printed enumeration form before July 25. This step will filter out non-existent voters, either dead or migrated ones who are no longer ordinary residents of that assembly constituency," said an EC officer.
Though BLOs will give their recommendation on "inclusion or exclusion" while submitting/uploading the filled up enumeration form, the electoral registration officer or assistant ERO is expected to scrutinise the forms "not recommended" by BLOs only after draft rolls are published on Aug 1.
As many as 77,895 BLOs are going house-to-house to help the electors fill out their emuneration forms and collect them. In some cases, they are taking live pictures of the electors and uploading them, saving the elector the trouble of getting their pictures clicked.
After the draft rolls are published on Aug 1, claims and objections may be filed by political parties or any member of the public until Sept 1. The final electoral roll will be published on Sept 30. Those still aggrieved can file first appeal with the district magistrate and second one with the chief electoral officer.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
39 minutes ago
- Time of India
Electoral roll revision: Salary of 5 Buxar officials withheld for dereliction of duty
Buxar: District magistrate Vidyanand Singh, who also serves as the district election officer, ordered the withholding of salaries of five Rajpur block officials for dereliction of duty in the ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral roll. The DM also sought written explanations from them for their absence in the meeting and dereliction of duty. The directive was issued during a review meeting held on Sunday. The five officials, against whom action was taken, are Shweta Kumari, child development project officer of Rajpur; Alok Kumar, block coordinator, Lohia Swachh Bihar Abhiyan of Rajpur; Yogita Singh, women supervisor of Rajpur; Jyotis Mati Kumari, women supervisor of Rajpur; and Rinku Kumari, women supervisor of Rajpur. The meeting, chaired by the DM, was convened to assess the progress of the electoral roll revision. Shashi Bhushan, electoral registration officer (ERO) Rajpur-cum-land reforms deputy collector, Buxar; Alok Narayan Vats, senior deputy collector, Buxar; Siddharth Kumar, assistant electoral registration officer-cum-block development officer; along with BLO supervisors and other staff were present in the meeting. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Show Off Your Talent: Enter the Ultimate Creator Contest! Tocsin Media & Marketing LLC Undo The DM instructed all BLO supervisors to ensure 100% verification of enumeration forms and timely data entry through the designated mobile application. He issued strict directions to maintain transparency, accountability, and adherence to deadlines throughout the process. "All officials must perform their responsibilities diligently and within stipulated timelines to ensure the smooth and fair conduct of electoral process," he added.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Congress accuses ECI of conspiring with BJP in Bihar; Poll body denies
The Congress on Sunday accused the Election Commission of India (ECI) of conspiring with the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) to disenfranchise voters in Bihar while criticising the Special Intensive Revision of Electoral Rolls (SIR) being carried out in the poll-bound state. Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge. (File Photo) Party president Mallikarjun Kharge said, 'With the cooperation of the Election Commission, the master plan that BJP had devised to deprive crores of people in Bihar of their voting rights now seems to be ensnaring the BJP itself… Forcibly depriving the poor, weak, deprived, Dalit, oppressed, and backward people of their voting rights is the very conspiracy of BJP-RSS.' The SIR in Bihar is being carried out ahead of the state elections, slated for October-November, 2025. According to ECI, all individuals whose names weren't included in the 2003 electoral rolls need to prove that they are actual citizens of India, by submitting any one out of 11 documents, such as a birth certificate or ID card issued by the government. ECI says this revision is necessary due to rapid urbanisation and migration in Bihar, non-reported deaths, and concerns about illegal foreign immigrants. The list of documents asked for has been criticised on the basis that it doesn't include commonly available documents such as Aadhaar card or a voter card, although ECI has clarified that the list is supposed to be 'indicative, not exhaustive.' Taking to X, Kharge said that public opposition has forced ECI and the BJP to backtrack. Referring to an ad posted by ECI, which asked voters to fill out the necessary form and submit to their Booth Level Officer (BLO) even if they didn't have the required supporting documents, he said – 'This is part of the BJP's tactic to mislead and confuse the public… Bihar is the birthplace of democracy. The people of Bihar will surely respond to this BJP attack on democracy and the Constitution in the upcoming elections.' ECI has denied the claims that there have been any modifications to the procedure of the SIR. 'SIR is being conducted as per instructions dated 24.06.2025 only as there is no change in the instructions', it said. The poll body also warned the public about 'incorrect and misleading statements' being made by unnamed persons to confuse people.
NDTV
2 hours ago
- NDTV
3 Ex Chief Justices Support Simultaneous Polls, But Flag Issues In Bill
New Delhi: Former chief justices of India, who have conveyed their views to a parliamentary committee on the bill proposing simultaneous polls, have endorsed the constitutionality of the 'one nation, one election' concept but have raised concerns over its various aspects, including the power given to the Election Commission, and offered suggestions. Former CJI D Y Chandrachud, in his opinion submitted to the Joint Committee of Parliament, has dismissed the opposition's criticism that the synchronisation of Lok Sabha and state assembly polls violates the Constitution's basic structure, saying the Constitution never mandated holding national and state elections separately. However, he has joined another ex-CJI Ranjan Gogoi in questioning the 'sweeping powers' granted to the Election Commission in the proposed constitutional amendment law 'without laying down any guidelines for the exercise of the discretion', according to the opinion submitted to the parliamentary panel. Chandrachud and another former CJI J S Kehar are scheduled to appear before the committee headed by BJP MP P P Chaudhary on July 11 so that members can interact with them over the bill's provisions and seek their views on their queries. Questioning the vast powers the bill seeks to bestow on the EC, Chandrachud said such 'unbounded authority' could enable the poll body to curtail or extend the tenure of a state assembly beyond the constitutionally mandated five years, under the pretext that simultaneous elections with the Lok Sabha are not feasible. The Constitution must define, delineate and structure the circumstances under which the ECI may invoke this power, he added. Two former CJIs, U U Lalit and Ranjan Gogoi, had appeared before the committee in February and March, respectively. During the interaction, Gogoi agreed with the concerns of some members over the excessive power given to the EC, sources have said. Lalit had suggested that simultaneous polls should be rolled out in a staggered manner and not at one go, as he had said that cutting short the remaining terms of assemblies with substantive tenure left for the purpose of synchronising election cycles could be legally challenged. However, all three ex-CJIs have not questioned the constitutionality of the concept of simultaneous polls. Chandrachud said in his written opinion that simultaneous elections will not infringe upon the voters' right to elect their representatives and that the bill ensures that electors remain continuously represented by their duly elected MPs or MLAs. He said, 'Arguments opposing simultaneous elections are based on the premise that the Indian electorate is naive and can be easily manipulated.' He said, 'The argument that staggered elections are a part of the Constitution's basic structure (or form part of the principles of federalism or democracy) does not hold. Staggered timing of elections cannot be considered as a feature of the original Constitution, let alone an immutable feature.' However, his opinion is not without notes of caution over some of the bill's features or the likely implications if it is to be enacted. Chandrachud has appeared to share the concern that simultaneous elections could marginalise smaller or regional parties due to the dominance of better-resourced national parties, saying it is a significant policy aspect that warrants legislative attention. He said, 'To ensure a level playing field among political parties, the rules governing electoral campaigning, particularly those relating to campaign finance, must be strengthened.' While the Representation of the People Act, 1951 and the Conduct of Election Rules, 1961, impose ceilings on the amount a candidate may spend during the election campaign, there are no corresponding limits on the expenditure incurred by political parties themselves, he noted. This gap in regulation weighs in the electoral process towards parties with greater financial resources, he said. As the bill says that the term of a House elected after a midterm poll will be only for the remainder of the five year term, Chandrachud has said the ability of the government to take any meaningful project will be minimised if its tenure is only of a year or less as the Model Code of Conduct will come into force around six months before the next polls. Several MPs in the panel have also raised this point about the likely priorities and strength of a government elected for a short period.
