logo
Hospitals scoop up physician practices, driving prices up

Hospitals scoop up physician practices, driving prices up

Axios21-07-2025
Hospitals are steadily buying small physician practices and, in the process, driving up the price of care, a new National Bureau of Economic Research study shows.
Why it matters: It's the latest evidence of consolidation in health care that's left more than three-quarters of U.S. doctors employed by health systems or corporations.
The pace has quickened in recent years, driven by factors like declining reimbursements for some specialties and expenses like electronic health record systems that have left small independent practices struggling.
But that's brought a decline in competition that raises antitrust concerns.
"These are thousands and thousands of very small transactions and the question is: What do you do about them?" said Yale economist and study co-author Zack Cooper.
"[The Federal Trade Commission] clearly do not have the resources to block every acquisition of three physicians."
By the numbers: Between 2008 and 2016, the researchers found the the share of private physician practices acquired by a hospital in the U.S. rose by 71.5%.
By 2016, roughly half (47.2%) of physician practices were owned by a hospital.
Within two years of physician groups being acquired, the study found, physician prices increased an average of 15.1%.
Two years after buying an OB-GYN practice, prices for labor and delivery were up by $475, an increase of 3.3%.
Virtually all of the estimated deal valuations of physician-hospital mergers the researchers tracked fell below Hart-Scott-Rodino merger reporting thresholds.
The big picture: Health systems see opportunities to achieve more clinical integration and expand referral networks by snapping up independent physician practices.
The acquisitions aren't limited to hospitals: Private equity and insurers, and businesses like Amazon, are also scooping up medical practices from doctors fed up with declining pay and high overhead costs.
The pandemic and its financial pressures also factored in many physicians' decision to sell: By the start of 2022, 73.9% of physicians were working for someone else, including 52.1% by hospitals and health systems, an Avalere study last year found.
Cooper said his research shows prices go up as the hospital acquirers achieve more market dominance, without a corresponding increase in quality of care.
"When you buy these physicians, it starves other hospitals of physicians and their patients," Cooper said.
The other side: The American Hospital Association said the study relies on data from more than a decade ago gathered from an insurer that itself has become a major acquirer of physician practices.
"Hospital partnerships for physicians and their practices can offer stability and resources, including upfront investments, infrastructure improvements, electronic health records alignment and facility upgrades, allowing for the continuation of access to care, especially in rural communities," said Aaron Wesolowski, vice president of research strategy and policy communications at the AHA.
He said researchers should focus on corporate insurers and other entities that he said have been the main drivers of physician acquisitions.
What to watch: How regulators figure out how to address such a large number of small deals. "We need to start thinking critically about what do you do when an industry composed of three to four people but collectively is 2% to 3% of GDP is getting transformed in the ways that we see them getting transformed," Cooper said.
He suggests site-neutral payments, or paying the same rate for services regardless of setting, would stop incentivizing hospitals to gobble up so many small practices.
But he believes state policies, such as making merging parties demonstrate benefit before a deal is allowed to go through, would also help.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US, China Negotiators to Meet in Stockholm to Extend Trade Truce
US, China Negotiators to Meet in Stockholm to Extend Trade Truce

Bloomberg

time4 hours ago

  • Bloomberg

US, China Negotiators to Meet in Stockholm to Extend Trade Truce

US and Chinese officials are meeting Monday to extend their tariff detente beyond a mid-August deadline, and haggle over other ways to further defuse trade tensions. Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng and US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent will lead the delegations through Tuesday in Stockholm — their third meeting in less than three months. The agenda includes discussions about how long the current tariff truce can be extended, as well as US levies tied to fentanyl trafficking and Chinese purchases of sanctioned Russian and Iranian oil.

US, China Negotiators Meet in Stockholm to Extend Trade Truce
US, China Negotiators Meet in Stockholm to Extend Trade Truce

Bloomberg

time6 hours ago

  • Bloomberg

US, China Negotiators Meet in Stockholm to Extend Trade Truce

US and Chinese officials are meeting Monday to extend their tariff detente beyond a mid-August deadline, and haggle over other ways to further defuse trade tensions. Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng and US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent will lead the delegations through Tuesday in Stockholm — their third meeting in less than three months. The agenda includes discussions about how long the current tariff truce can be extended, as well as US levies tied to fentanyl trafficking and Chinese purchases of sanctioned Russian and Iranian oil.

California's $20 minimum wage hike cost state 18,000 jobs, study shows
California's $20 minimum wage hike cost state 18,000 jobs, study shows

New York Post

time20 hours ago

  • New York Post

California's $20 minimum wage hike cost state 18,000 jobs, study shows

A new study published by the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) this month found that California's 2023 minimum wage hike cost the state thousands of jobs. Researchers found that the state's $20 minimum wage fast food hike has cost the fast-food sector 18,000 jobs since it went into effect in April 2024, representing a 3.2% decline in that sector compared to fast-food sectors in other parts of the country. Advertisement 'Our median estimate translates into a loss of 18,000 jobs in California's fast-food sector relative to the counterfactual,' researchers Jeffrey Clemens, Olivia Edwards, and Jonathan Meer wrote in their paper. The California assembly passed AB 1228 in Sept. 2023, which established the state's 'Fast Food Council' and its ability to set and adjust the sector's minimum wage. Additionally, the bill, signed into law by California Gov. Gavin Newsom the following April, established a new minimum wage for fast food workers, which was previously $16 an hour. 'The hourly minimum wage for fast food restaurant employees shall be twenty dollars ($20) per hour, effective April 1, 2024. Thereafter, the council may establish, pursuant to this subdivision, minimum wages for fast food restaurant employees that take effect on an annual basis, beginning on January 1, 2025,' text of the bill read. Advertisement 4 Workers advocate for a $20 minimum wage during a protest at the Kenneth Hahn Hall of Administration in Los Angeles on Nov. 1, 2022. Los Angeles Times via Getty Imag The research found that in the year since the bill went into law, California's fast food employment contracted while fast food employment around the country expanded. 'Following AB 1228's enactment, employment in the fast food sector in California fell substantially, with estimates ranging from 2.3 to 3.9 percent across specifications, even as employment in other sectors of the California economy tracked national trends,' the researchers stated, noting that employment in the same sector increased by around '0.10 percent' around the country. The paper noted that prior to AB 1228 going into effect, California's fast-food sector 'was on a similar path as the rest of the United States prior to AB 1228's enactment.' Advertisement Critics slammed the wage hike in the wake of the study. 4 California Gov. Gavin Newsom speaks to reporters in Sacramento, Calif. on July 25, 2025. AP In a column for The Daily Signal, The Heritage Foundation economic expert Rachel Greszler wrote, 'When it comes to central planning, history keeps the receipts: Wage controls never work. That's because policymakers can set wage laws, but they can't outlaw the consequences.' Greszler added, 'The consequences of that wage hike on the fast-food industry should be a warning sign' for the city of Los Angeles in particular, after it recently voted to increase the minimum wage for hotel and airport workers to $30 by 2028. Advertisement The Wall Street Journal editorial board said Monday that the notion a substantial minimum wage hike helps the economy is 'magical thinking.' It also criticized New York City mayoral candidates Andrew Cuomo and Zohran Mamdani for proposing similar wage hikes if elected. 'The Democratic Party's socialist nominee for New York mayor, Zohran Mamdani, has called for increasing the city's minimum wage to $30. Andrew Cuomo, his supposedly more moderate competitor, wants a $20 minimum. These guys will never learn because they don't want to see the world as it really is.' 4 McDonald's employees on strike rally for higher minimum wage in Los Angeles, Calif. on Nov. 29, 2016. Getty Images 4 An In-N-Out employee takes a drive-thru order in Los Angeles, Calif. on Sept. 28, 2023. ETIENNE LAURENT/EPA-EFE/Shutterstock Newsom's deputy director of communications Tara Gallegos disputed the findings of the piece, pointing out to Fox News Digital that the research paper was linked to the Hoover Institution, a public policy think tank she claimed has published 'false or misleading information' about California's minimum wage hike 'that later had to be completely retracted.' Gallegos also shared a San Francisco Chronicle article from Oct. 2024, which stated that the results of the wage hike 'defy a lot of the doom-and-gloom predictions made when Gov. Gavin Newsom signed AB1228 back in September 2023. Many of them originated with a survey conducted by the Employment Policies Institute, a think tank founded by a former restaurant industry lobbyist named Richard Berman — once described by TIME Magazine as 'the wage warrior' who 'has been publicly railing against the very idea of a minimum wage since at least the late 1980s.'' Additionally, the Newsom staffer cited a study from a UC Berkeley professor on the $20 wage hike from February, and pointed out several of its findings. Advertisement 'Workers covered by the policy saw wage increases of 8 to 9%, with no negative wage or employment effects on non-covered workers, she said, adding there were 'No negative effects on fast-food employment' and that 'The number of fast-food establishments grew faster in California than in the rest of the US.' She also pointed out, 'Menu prices increased by only an average of 1.5%—equivalent to about $0.06 cents on a $4 hamburger.' The Berkeley study looked at fast-food sector data from when the bill was enacted in April 2024 up until mid-Dec. 2024.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store