
Would you lend the government your savings for a 5.3% return?
But while this offer typically attracts large investors, growing numbers of ordinary investors are now taking advantage.
You get a payout every six months and, if you hold on to the end of the term, you are all but guaranteed to get your money back. But it's not straightforward. Here's what you need to know.
What exactly will ordinary investors be buying into?
The Government issues new debt, called gilts, to help fund the business of government, from borrowing for capital projects to fulfilling spending commitments and rolling over older debt.
It pays lenders a regular income, the 'coupon'. If you hang on until the maturity date you get all your money back, except in the farfetched event the UK defaults.
Or you can sell it earlier on the secondary market and, depending on values of gilts then, may get more than you bought it for.
Money in the bank: Lending your spare cash to the Government could earn you generous returns as high as 5.375 per cent for 30 years
What do you get in return for your investment?
Rates of return are low on gilts that mature quickly (short-dated bonds) but can vie with or beat current savings rates on the longer-dated ones.
A gilt offering 5.375 per cent interest was recently launched, although if you held on to it you wouldn't get your money back until January 2056.
'In the current market, 5.375 per cent equivalent interest could have investors jumping for joy,' says Dan Coatsworth of DIY platform AJ Bell. 'A bank offering that rate on a cash savings account might have a long line of people queuing up to hand over money.'
Holding an investment for 30 years is not for everyone. But a gilt was issued recently paying 4.375 per cent and maturing in 2030. That's only slightly less than the 4.5 per cent you might get on a five-year fixed rate savings account.
When might a gilt be better than a savings account?
In some cases, gilts beat rates on savings accounts. Plus, they offer tax perks to higher earners. If you get out with a profit, you can make a nice saving on capital gains tax which isn't levied on gilts.
You might want to diversify out of shares and cash if you are holding plenty of both, and the coupon on gilts is always paid every six months, unlike some best buy savings accounts which only pay interest at maturity.
How do you pick one to invest your money in?
Investors who need a helping hand may be happier with a bond fund, where they invest in a range of gilts and other types of bonds. The value of a bond is both the capital gain that you could make should you sell it and the coupon that you receive.
The coupon is subject to tax, just like cash savings interest if you exceed your personal savings allowance. But the price gains are exempt from capital gains tax, unlike other types of investment.
It can make sense to pick gilts with a higher proportion of their value coming from capital gains and less from the coupon.
Ordinary investors can do this with further research, but some may prefer a fund manager to do it for them.
What's the catch in lending money to the Government?
The value of your gilt could decrease. This doesn't matter if you plan to hold it to maturity, but will affect you if you decide to sell it sooner.
The value of existing gilts falls when newer ones are issued with a more attractive yield than the old ones. This tends to happen when interest rates rise and the government has to offer a bigger incentive to investors to buy its debt.
When you buy a single gilt, you receive your money back at maturity. Alternatively, you could buy several with different maturity dates to keep the income flowing. Or you may prefer a bond fund that manages this for you.
David Roberts, head of fixed income at Nedgroup Investments, says that investors who buy single gilts are putting their eggs in one basket, whereas those who opt for global bond funds are much more diversified.
He adds: 'The well touted 'Liz Truss' moment saw many gilts fall over 10 per cent in a couple of days. The global bond market is huge by comparison, adding liquidity and bountiful opportunity as well as diversification.'
So how does an ordinary investor buy gilts direct?
Many DIY investing platforms, including Hargreaves Lansdown, Interactive Investor and AJ Bell, offer gilts, and you can buy within a tax-free Isa wrapper.
New gilts are often sold at short notice and for limited periods. You can also buy older gilts on the open (also known as secondary) market.
Another option is to buy and sell direct from the UK Debt Management Office (DMO), which offers a service run by Computershare. You must live in the UK and pass identity and money laundering rules. If you are a customer at a broker it's likely your buyer status is already established, so you can purchase gilts online like any other investment.
DMO charges start at 0.7 per cent or a minimum of £12.50 on gilt purchases worth up to £5,000. AJ Bell charges the same for gilts as for shares – £5 to buy or sell.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Record
4 minutes ago
- Daily Record
Donald Trump says he 'wants to see Scotland thrive' during visit
The US President – whose mother was born in the Outer Hebrides – spoke of his 'love' for the country during a visit to his golf course in Ayrshire. Donald Trump has said he wants to see Scotland 'thrive' during his visit to the country. The US President – whose mother was born in the Outer Hebrides – spoke of his 'love' for the country during a visit to his golf course in Ayrshire. Flanked by Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, the 79-year-old was asked if changes could be made to the UK-US trade deal, which would benefit Scotland. He said: 'I have great love for Scotland.' Speaking of his mother, the President said she would 'religiously' return home every year. He jokingly added: 'When we do our trade deal, a lot of it comes to Scotland, maybe all of it should go to Scotland.' He continued: 'We deal with the UK, but a lot of it comes to Scotland. I was very particular, because this is a part of the world I want to see thrive.' Despite the trade deal agreed between the two countries, a 10% tariff remains on Scotch whisky, one of the country's biggest exports. Asked earlier if that tariff could be dropped or eliminated as a result of the meeting with the Prime Minister, Mr Trump said: 'We'll talk about that, I didn't know whisky was a problem. I'm not a big whisky drinker, but maybe I should be.' Scottish First Minister John Swinney is expected to raise the issue when he meets the President during his visit to his second course in Aberdeenshire before he returns to the US. Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community! Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today. You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland. No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team. All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in! If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. 'Tariffs are very important for the Scottish economy and obviously Scotch whisky is a unique product,' he told BBC Breakfast on Monday. 'It can only be produced in Scotland. It's not a product that can be produced in any other part of the world. So there's a uniqueness about that, which I think means there is a case for it to be taken out of the tariffs arrangement that is now in place. 'Obviously, the trade deal with the United States provides a degree of stability for economic connections with the United States, but the application of tariffs is increasing the costs for the Scotch whisky industry. 'So one of my objectives will be to make the case to President Trump that Scotch whisky should be exempted from those tariffs.


BBC News
4 minutes ago
- BBC News
Worcester curry house's HMO bid rejected over listed fears
Plans to build student housing above an Indian restaurant in Worcester have been owners of the Bombay Palace in The Tything, Worcester, had wanted to build a two-storey extension to create a six-bed house of multiple occupation (HMO).City planners said the development would harm the Grade II listed building and would fail to respect the character of the to plans submitted to Worcester City Council, the two floors above Bombay Palace are currently empty. A statement with the application said the proposal would have provided much needed student accommodation for the city as well as more income for the plan was that the two-storey extension at the back of the building would have allowed the restaurant to extend its kitchen - and increase the living space in the upper would have had their own separate access to the HMO rooms through an external metal news was gathered by the Local Democracy Reporting Service, which covers councils and other public service organisations. Follow BBC Hereford & Worcester on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.


Telegraph
5 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Millions to lose up to £18,000 in savings from pension reforms
Millions of workers in their 50s face losing up to £18,000 if the Government accelerates a rise in the state pension age, a leading wealth manager has warned. Rathbones, which manages the savings of older people, said introducing a state retirement age of 68 earlier than planned threatened to hit people aged 51 the hardest, while people aged 52 and 53 would also lose out. The Government is exploring whether to raise the state pension age to 68 more quickly. It is currently set to be phased in from 2044, but Liz Kendall, the Work and Pensions Secretary, is considering bringing this forward five years to 2039 as part of the Government's pensions review. According to Rathbones, those aged 51 would lose an entire year's worth of state pension payments if the timetable is accelerated. That would be worth £17,774, assuming today's state pension of £12,000 increases by the so-called triple lock each year. Under the triple lock, the state pension rises by the highest of inflation, average wages or 2.5pc per year. Meanwhile, people aged 52 would miss out on £17,340 and those aged 53 would lose £16,918. Each of those age cohorts – 51, 52 and 53-year-olds – comprise some 800,000 people, meaning around 2.4 million risk missing out on significant five-figure sums. Rebecca Williams, from Rathbones, said Britain's ageing population would put a growing strain on the public finances. She said: 'With longevity increasing and population pressures mounting, future generations appear set to face a less generous state pension regime than that enjoyed by many of today's retirees. 'The situation appears particularly precarious for those in their early 50s who face the real prospect of missing out.' The state pension age is currently 66 and will rise to 67 by 2028. Spending increasing Raising the state pension age is likely to prove politically challenging. Previous pension reviews recommended increasing the pension age in the late 2030s, but the move was not put into legislation. However, financial pressure is growing, and Ms Kendall acknowledged when launching her review that she was 'under no illusions' about the scale of the challenge. Estimates from the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) show that state pension payments will amount to 5.1pc of GDP this year, up from 3.6pc two decades ago. That bill will keep on mounting, rising to almost 8pc by the 2070s. Overall spending on pensioners, including the state pension, housing benefit and winter fuel payments but not counting healthcare costs, came to £150.7bn last year and will rise to £181.8bn by the end of the decade, according to the OBR. The Government has sought to limit the increase by restricting the share of pensioners who receive winter fuel payments. However, it was forced into a partial about-turn after a backlash from voters and Labour's own backbench MPs, showing the difficulties of reining in benefits spending. It means there is increasing pressure from the public finances to find ways to save money for the long term, potentially including further increases in the pension age. The Institute for Fiscal Studies estimates that raising the pension age by one year saves the Government around £6bn per year. Nigel Farage, leader of Reform UK, last week said the state of the public purse means the pension age should be increased more rapidly, in line with life expectancy. 'I don't think we can really afford to [wait to the 2040s], to be frank,' Mr Farage said. 'If there is a sudden economic miracle, then it might change that. But it does not look to be happening any time soon.' The International Monetary Fund last week said that if the Government stuck to its promise not to raise taxes on 'working people', then it would have to consider reining in spending, 'to align better the scope of public services with available resources'. 'In particular, the triple lock could be replaced with a policy of indexing the state pension to the cost of living,' the global economic watchdog said.