B.C. solicitor general says Opposition operative took mentally ill man from care home
Garry Begg says in a court filing that the man was found in a state of "psychosis" after being reported missing, and that the vehicle that took him away from Argyll Lodge care home in the riding of Surrey-Guildford in January was located by police outside the law office of the defeated Conservative candidate who is pursuing allegations of irregularities.
Begg's filing, dated Tuesday and signed by his lawyer, says the man was admitted to a hospital emergency room under the Mental Health Act and he remains hospitalized in a secured unit.
The woman accused of acting on behalf of the Conservatives was identified in Begg's filing as Jatinder Sodhi.
'He has lost his home and his independence as a result of the interference of Ms. Sodhi on behalf of the petitioner and the Conservative Party of B.C. in his care,' says Begg's response, released by the NDP on Thursday.
The allegations are among duelling narratives presented by the B.C. government and the Opposition about Argyll Lodge, which is at the heart of Conservative allegations of voter irregularities in the election.
Begg's legal filing is in response to a petition by Conservative candidate Honveer Singh Randhawa, who is asking the B.C. Supreme Court to invalidate Begg's 22-vote election win in Surrey-Guildford that gave the NDP a one-seat majority.
Randhawa and the Conservatives have made a series of allegations of voting irregularities at Argyll Lodge, a community residential facility for adults with mental illness.
The Conservatives, meanwhile, cited an affidavit by the Green candidate in the riding, Manjeet Singh Sahota, which says that when he tried to campaign at the facility, a caregiver told him the residents do not vote.
The BC Green Party confirmed the existence of the affidavit, saying in a statement that the party will refrain from drawing conclusions until all evidence has been examined.
"Because of my conversation with the caregiver, I was left with an impression that no one votes from the lodge, so I believe I did not leave my campaign materials there either," Sahota's affidavit says, according to a news release from the Conservatives.
"A few days later I was canvassing in the same neighbourhood, and I did not revisit the house because earlier I was told that the people living at the lodge do not participate in voting.'
Conservative Leader John Rustad on Thursday renewed calls for a public inquiry about the alleged irregularities at Argyll Lodge as he described Sahota's affidavit.
"We now know from the other affidavits that those members in that lodge voted, that they all voted by mail," Rustad told reporters.
In January, Elections BC suspended its review of the Conservative complaint over potential violations after the party said it had evidence of 45 suspicious votes in Surrey-Guildford. Elections BC said the review was suspended until the courts had ruled on Randhawa's petition.
Begg's filing cites affidavits from lodge staff and a resident's relative.
It says Sodhi was warned by RCMP to stay away from Argyll Lodge after she began visiting residents starting in November last year, giving them cash and accusing relatives of not caring for them.
The filing says the facility's director and family members were concerned Sodhi was "a scam artist" trying to exploit two residents, unaware that she "was in fact assisting the Conservative Party of B.C. in gathering information for the petition," the response says.
Begg's response says in spite of the police warning Sodhi took two residents to open bank accounts and also took them to a lawyer to sign statements about the election that "they could neither read nor understand."
The response says one resident was allegedly moved out of the facility by Sodhi despite his son's request for a restraining order or peace bond against her.
It says the black truck that took the resident away was later located by police outside the Randhawa's law office.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Feb. 27, 2025.
Marcy Nicholson, The Canadian Press
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
26 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Britain is lowering the voting age to 16. It's getting a mixed reaction
LONDON — There has been a mixed reaction in Britain to the government's announcement that it will lower the voting age from 18 to 16 before the next national election. The Labor Party administration says it's part of a package of changes to strengthen British democracy and help restore trust in politics. The opposition says it's a power-grab by the left. Experts say it's complicated, with mixed evidence about how lowering the voting age affects democracy and election outcomes. Britain's voting age last fell in 1969, when the U.K. became one of the first major democracies to lower it from 21 to 18. Many other countries, including the United States, followed suit within a few years. Now the government says it will lower the threshold to 16 by the time the next general election is held, likely in 2029. That will bring the whole country into line with Scotland and Wales, which have semiautonomous governments and already let 16- and 17-year-olds vote in local and regional elections. A handful of other countries currently have a voting age of 16, including Austria, Brazil and Ecuador. A few European Union countries, including Belgium, Germany and Malta, allow 16-year-olds to vote in elections to the European Parliament. Supporters argue that 16-year-olds in Britain can work and pay taxes, so should be allowed to vote. 'If you pay in, you should have the opportunity to say what you want your money spent on,' Prime Minister Keir Starmer said. Pro-democracy organizations welcomed the lower age, and a move toward automatic voter registration, saying it would help increase voting rates. Turnout in the 2024 election was 59.7%, the lowest level in more than two decades. The age change is part of a package of electoral reforms that includes tightening campaign financing rules and broadening the range of documents that can be used as identification at polling stations. Supporters argue it will increase democratic participation by getting teenagers into the habit of voting at a time when most are still in school. 'Younger people who are in full-time education and often still live at home can make for better, more engaged first-time voters compared with 18- to 20-year-olds, who often experience their first election in a highly transitory phase of their lives,' Christine Huebner, a social scientist at the University of Sheffield who has studied youth voting, wrote in The Guardian. Opponents argue that 16- and 17-year-olds should not be given the vote because in most ways they are not considered adults. 'Why does this government think a 16-year-old can vote but not be allowed to buy a lottery ticket, an alcoholic drink, marry, or go to war, or even stand in the elections they're voting in?' Conservative lawmaker Paul Holmes asked Thursday in the House of Commons. Mark Goodwin, a senior lecturer in politics at Coventry University, agreed the move could seem paradoxical, because 'socially, if anything, we're moving in the opposite direction.' 'Increasingly the age of majority, the age at which you become a fully capable and responsible adult, is moving more towards 18,' he said. The government's political opponents on the right argue that Labor hopes to benefit from 1.5 million new potential young voters who generally lean to the left. Nigel Farage, leader of the hard-right party Reform UK, said Labor was trying to 'rig the system.' Conservative former foreign secretary James Cleverly said the government had cynically announced the change because it is 'tanking in the polls.' Experts say enfranchising 16- and 17-year-olds is unlikely to dramatically change election results, because they are a relatively small group with diverse views. And it's far from clear that Labor will reap most of the benefits of a bigger youth vote. U.K. politics, long dominated by Labor and the Conservatives, is becoming increasingly fragmented. Polling suggests younger voters lean left, but they are split among several parties including Labor, the Greens and the Liberal Democrats. Farage's embrace of TikTok has built his brand with youth, and Reform has some support among young men. Goodwin said that in many parts of the world, 'young people are abandoning the center-left in droves. 'And in many cases, they're lending their support to parties of the populist right, or challenger parties, outsider parties, independents, more alternative parties,' he said. 'If it is a cynical ploy to get more Labor votes, there's certainly an element of risk about where those votes would ultimately be cast.' Lawless writes for the Associated Press.
Hamilton Spectator
30 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Britain is lowering the voting age to 16. It's getting a mixed reaction
LONDON (AP) — There has been a mixed reaction in Britain to the government's announcement that it will lower the voting age from 18 to 16 before the next national election. The Labour Party administration says it's part of a package of changes to strengthen British democracy and help restore trust in politics. The opposition says it's a power-grab by the left. Experts say it's complicated, with mixed evidence about how lowering the voting age affects democracy and election outcomes. The biggest change since the 1960s Britain's voting age last fell in 1969, when the U.K. became one of the first major democracies to lower it from 21 to 18. Many other countries, including the United States, followed suit within a few years. Now the government says it will lower the threshold to 16 by the time the next general election is held, likely in 2029. That will bring the whole country into line with Scotland and Wales, which have semiautonomous governments and already let 16- and 17-year-olds vote in local and regional elections. A handful of other countries currently have a voting age of 16, including Austria, Brazil and Ecuador. A few European Union countries , including Belgium, Germany and Malta, allow 16-year-olds to vote in elections to the European Parliament. The case for votes at 16 Supporters argue that 16-year-olds in Britain can work and pay taxes, so should be allowed to vote. 'If you pay in, you should have the opportunity to say what you want your money spent on,' Prime Minister Keir Starmer said. Pro-democracy organizations welcomed the lower age, and a move toward automatic voter registration, saying it would help increase voting rates. Turnout in the 2024 election was 59.7%, the lowest level in more than two decades. The age change is part of a package of electoral reforms that includes tightening campaign financing rules and broadening the range of documents that can be used as identification at polling stations . Supporters argue it will increase democratic participation by getting teenagers into the habit of voting at a time when most are still in school. 'Younger people who are in full-time education and often still live at home can make for better, more engaged first-time voters compared with 18- to 20-year-olds, who often experience their first election in a highly transitory phase of their lives,' Christine Huebner, a social scientist at the University of Sheffield who has studied youth voting, wrote in The Guardian. Critics call it a cynical move Opponents argue that 16- and 17-year-olds should not be given the vote because in most ways they are not considered adults. 'Why does this government think a 16-year-old can vote but not be allowed to buy a lottery ticket, an alcoholic drink, marry, or go to war, or even stand in the elections they're voting in?' Conservative lawmaker Paul Holmes asked Thursday in the House of Commons. Mark Goodwin, a senior lecturer in politics at Coventry University, agreed the move could seem paradoxical, because 'socially, if anything, we're moving in the opposite direction.' 'Increasingly the age of majority, the age at which you become a fully capable and responsible adult, is moving more towards 18,' he said. The government's political opponents on the right argue that Labour hopes to benefit from 1.5 million new potential young voters who generally lean to the left. Nigel Farage, leader of the hard-right party Reform UK, said Labour was trying to 'rig the system.' Conservative former foreign secretary James Cleverly said the government had cynically announced the change because it is 'tanking in the polls.' Labour can't take youth votes for granted Experts say enfranchising 16- and 17-year-olds is unlikely to dramatically change election results, because they are a relatively small group with diverse views. And it's far from clear that Labour will reap most of the benefits of a bigger youth vote. U.K. politics, long dominated by Labour and the Conservatives, is becoming increasingly fragmented. Polling suggests younger voters lean left, but they are split among several parties including Labour, the Greens and the Liberal Democrats. Farage's embrace of TikTok has built his brand with youth, and Reform has some support among young men. Goodwin said that in many parts of the world, 'young people are abandoning the center-left in droves. 'And in many cases, they're lending their support to parties of the populist right, or challenger parties, outsider parties, independents, more alternative parties,' he said. 'If it is a cynical ploy to get more Labour votes, there's certainly an element of risk about where those votes would ultimately be cast.' Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
Britain is lowering the voting age to 16. It's getting a mixed reaction.
The biggest change since the 1960s Britain's voting age last fell in 1969, when the U.K. became one of the first major democracies to lower it from 21 to 18. Many other countries, including the United States, followed suit within a few years. Now the government says it will lower the threshold to 16 by the time the next general election is held, likely in 2029. That will bring the whole country into line with Scotland and Wales, which have semiautonomous governments and already let 16- and 17-year-olds vote in local and regional elections. A handful of other countries currently have a voting age of 16, including Austria, Brazil and Ecuador. A few European Union countries, including Belgium, Germany and Malta, allow 16-year-olds to vote in elections to the European Parliament. Advertisement The case for votes at 16 Supporters argue that 16-year-olds in Britain can work and pay taxes, so should be allowed to vote. 'If you pay in, you should have the opportunity to say what you want your money spent on,' Prime Minister Keir Starmer said. Pro-democracy organizations welcomed the lower age, and a move toward automatic voter registration, saying it would help increase voting rates. Turnout in the 2024 election was 59.7 percent, the lowest level in more than two decades. Advertisement The age change is part of a package of electoral reforms that includes tightening campaign financing rules and broadening the range of documents that can be used as identification at polling stations. Supporters argue it will increase democratic participation by getting teenagers into the habit of voting at a time when most are still in school. 'Younger people who are in full-time education and often still live at home can make for better, more engaged first-time voters compared with 18- to 20-year-olds, who often experience their first election in a highly transitory phase of their lives,' Christine Huebner, a social scientist at the University of Sheffield who has studied youth voting, wrote in The Guardian. Critics call it a cynical move Opponents argue that 16- and 17-year-olds should not be given the vote because in most ways they are not considered adults. 'Why does this government think a 16-year-old can vote but not be allowed to buy a lottery ticket, an alcoholic drink, marry, or go to war, or even stand in the elections they're voting in?' Conservative lawmaker Paul Holmes asked Thursday in the House of Commons. Mark Goodwin, a senior lecturer in politics at Coventry University, agreed the move could seem paradoxical, because 'socially, if anything, we're moving in the opposite direction.' 'Increasingly the age of majority, the age at which you become a fully capable and responsible adult, is moving more towards 18,' he said. The government's political opponents on the right argue that Labour hopes to benefit from 1.5 million new potential young voters who generally lean to the left. Nigel Farage, leader of the hard-right party Reform UK, said Labour was trying to 'rig the system.' Conservative former foreign secretary James Cleverly said the government had cynically announced the change because it is 'tanking in the polls.' Advertisement Labour can't take youth votes for granted Experts say enfranchising 16- and 17-year-olds is unlikely to dramatically change election results, because they are a relatively small group with diverse views. And it's far from clear that Labour will reap most of the benefits of a bigger youth vote. U.K. politics, long dominated by Labour and the Conservatives, is becoming increasingly fragmented. Polling suggests younger voters lean left, but they are split among several parties including Labour, the Greens and the Liberal Democrats. Farage's embrace of TikTok has built his brand with youth, and Reform has some support among young men. Goodwin said that in many parts of the world, 'young people are abandoning the center-left in droves. 'And in many cases, they're lending their support to parties of the populist right, or challenger parties, outsider parties, independents, more alternative parties,' he said. 'If it is a cynical ploy to get more Labour votes, there's certainly an element of risk about where those votes would ultimately be cast.'
